₦airaland Forum

Good lineup but why the heck is Havertz starting.

LordReed:
Which part is unprovable, the radioactive decay?

First, you don't usually use carbon dating for samples older than 50,000 years. For such samples you use MULTIPLE methods (such as Potassium-Argon (K-Ar) dating and Uranium-Lead (U-Pb) dating) to get a more accurate time fix.

The elements used in dating are not stuff that has undergone chemical bonding reactions, if it has then it wouldn't be the same element would it? What chemical reactions retard or speed up radioactivity?

I find it interesting you're backing up a standard of scrutiny which they don't hold themselves to. For all of the extra ordinary claims, all you get is "the bible says" and when they try to imitate the standard with pseudo-science, you get nonsenses like "aquatic live fossils". The hypocrisy is way too glaring.

FlipModeSquade:
Why don't you go right ahead and explain to us like we babies what sin means?

A Christian telling someone he's dvmb for holding an opinion is comedy central stuffs.😂

They seem to love irony. Saw this same person make another comment on a diff thread that - carbon dating, they called it "dating" - makes no sense. This is someone that thinks bronze age illiterate men, in one of the most primitive parts of the world - that barely understood how the world works and make claims like the "sun stood still" - are the ones with truth about objective reality. Apparently taking myths as facts is what people that aren't dumb do.

Ebenezer2021:
Rabies is real.
When dogs bite you and it's left untreated you'll bark like a dog and die instantly.
But we dey use dog take do suya here in Uyo

Jesus wept. Where have you seen anyone infected with rabies bark like a dog? Or do you think only dogs get rabid. So if a rabid monkey bites and infects a person, he/she'd bark like a dog or screech like a monkey? Educate us.

We will do all of them, if your wife or god crosses our path, we will sleep with them too

CharlotteFlair:
Oh no! You just cared so much about what triggers me moments ago 🤣

You care mahn! You really do! 🤡

This one has his wires crossed, only you quoted me out of the blue, now forcing me to care. Ok I care, I care that you choose a first century apocalyptic prophet crucified as a common criminal. Told you I'd do better 😌 So what prize does my caring get me?

CharlotteFlair:
I choose Jesus Christ over Lucifer any day any time. Can't you see?

Oh my bad, didn't realise I was meant to care about the choices of some random nobody on the internet, I'd do better next time 👊🏽

CharlotteFlair:
Just like your existence? 🤡🤡

This one is already triggered fighting for Jesus. 😄

CharlotteFlair:
Jesus Christ himself was mocked by your kind, so it's nothing new and nobody cares what you think.

Baseless stories.

Nastrademus:
Watch as data boys will insult Christianity now

Like christianity needs any extra help making a mockery of itself lol.

You only need common sense to see the shroud is a joke taken too far. A 3d object transfers perfectly detailed imprints and outlines to a 2d object wrapped around it. Its not smudged or distorted around the contours and where it presses against the body, nothing just perfect transfer of a person that was supposedly tortured, forgetting even the injuries and blood flow would be inconsistent, not to talk of the hair.

Then it just happens to show the silhouette of a european man even though its meant to be some guy from the middle east? This is not even considering that the linen cloths used to wrap the bodies then were multiple and seperate as stated in John_ that there's even a seperate relic claiming to be the head covering. The shroud is as nonsensical as it gets.

Breaker001:
You will see that every word I have spoken on you will stand, and you shall be saved 😎

Famous last words of a blind man. Don't forget olanzapine. At least we would add the useless "prophesy" to the pile of failed prophecies from the failed apocalyptic prophet you worship.

Breaker001:
Do yourself a huge favor and save my words on you in your email. Because truly I say to you, you will need it in the nearest future as your reference point 😎

Do yourself a favour and locate the nearest pysche ward to help with your delulu instead of looking for who will save your meaningless ramblings. I recommend you start with Olanzapine.

Breaker001:
And you will be tied down by the same "mental slavery" whether you believe it or not. This is as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. Screenshot this and save it, for it shall come to pass that you will despice the same moniker you know yourself for; and you will regret you ever named yourself by that moniker. The LORD see you through 😎

This is what they call Delulu+. I'd suggest you seek a psychiatrist quickly, your rope is short. 🤡

It's 2026, if you still believe in any of all these myopic superstitions, a clear mental evaluation is needed.

Breaker001:
Looking at your moniker, I can only say I pity you. But your time for redemption will soon come. VERY SOON. 😎

Coming from the person tied down in mental slavery. Ironic.

Breaker001:
Chickens don't feel pain as they lay their eggs. Thats how God designed it to be 😎

You and your god designed their nervous system but magically disconnected it, while still leaving the nervous system in place, so by magic they somehow don't feel pain? Wonderful! The guts with which some of you parrot nonsense confidently needs to be studied.

spiceadole:
My husband did not spend on me while we were dating.
It's possible to date without spending.
It depends on the type of lady you are dating.

The problem is men want to use relationship to have sex hence the women bill them and they use money /gifts to impress them.
No spending.. No sex..
Best relationship

What was your perspective on it at the time, especially compared to prev relationships. Did you guys discuss it to come to that point or was it just an unspoken rule? Don't mind my many questions, just curious.

orisa37:
ONLY JESUSES ARE SAVE IN NIGERIA.

Jesus that could not save himself so they had to develop cope around his death. Why do you think Nigerians have been calling on him forever and he's continually silent? Cause he's dead and gone just like Nigeria

54 lalallallalalllalalla

WriteerNg:
I have a theory. It might sound stupid but still.

I think he has a parasitic organism inside him that cannot survive in a live host.

So for the parasite to live, it has to control its hosts brain and thinking, maybe make him feel like he's been choked to influence his decisions of cutting himself. To relief the pressure around his neck.

You can see how relaxed he was after cutting his neck, when the blood was pumping out, like a noose was just removed from his neck.

Before he realizes what he has done, it is already too late and then his body dies. The parasite then gets to feed on his body, maybe for months until there's nothing left.

Then it starts searching for its next host.

I've seen several such cases. If we had good scientific research centres, his case would be thoroughly studied.

This is a reach but more plausible than the other ignorant comments about demons, possesion and what not. At least with yours we've seen it in occur in nature just not humans. Dude might just be schizophrenic or even have BPD and has gone of his meds. People with those 2 illnesses tend to really go off the handle when not controlled by their medication as their reality gets distorted.

Certainly not from a book and god that commands barbaric acts like genocide, incest, infanticide and discrimination. We get our morality from the same place people that existed before your bible got theirs, same place animals get theirs that theyre able to show cooperation, empathy, altruism, guilt, fairness and enforcement of rules. Same place the followers of other religions old and extinct got their moralities from - not the bible or Yhwh.

Ray07:
We still have logo that cost more to create. Can ai run it

This makes no sense.

iukpe:
I don't think they bleeped up anyone's lives, just the lives of less creative. The designers will only turn more to Chat GPT graphics option.

Who will hire the designers when everyone can just use the same thing the designers are turning to? Graphics design has been dying with the introduction of Canva, Postermywall and the likes - and that was better - with this... Well, only a matter of time.

osazsky:
ur computer fit roof house...or do plumbing he nor go fall from roof..can it climb a ladder

You've not seen 3d printed houses? Dey there.

triplechoice:
You're confusing objectivity with verifiability. When I said "It is objectively true that I had that dream", I was making a claim about an event in the world, that a specific mental experience occurred in my brain at a specific time, and that is an objective fact like ",It rained yesterday"

The content of my dream is subjective (I never denied that) and not verifiable by others. But the occurrence of the dream, the fact that I experienced it, is as objective as any biological process. I never claimed the flying was physically real. I said the experience was real. That is the subtle but crucial distinction you missed

But who is to say dream content has no connection with objective reality, making them "real" What you dismiss as "subjective" may not be so . A wet dream, for instance, has a biological cause, buildup of sexual tension, and the brain creates a movie which triggers physiological processes to dissipate that energy .

You created confusion at the beginning by not clearly articulating your thought, and now shifting the goalpost after you logic was faulted . You started by saying "any claim or proposition"", without specifying, must be objectively proven to pass truth. That was the reason I brought up dreams, love and consciousness, which are regarded as truth even though not testable according to your strict standard. By your reasoning, one should doubt their own dreams, even their own thoughts since they cannot be measured or falsified. In other words, my thoughts, your thoughts, would not be true by your standard

Abraham Lincoln dreamt of his assassination, and it happened the way he dreamt it. When he shared the dream, it was dismissed as mere fantasy, until it became reality. But to you the dream content is not truth despite the fact the dream has become reality.

What you're insisting on is scientism: the claim that all truth can only be known through the scientific method. Thiat is incorrect because there are alternative methods for knowing truth. Scientists hardly use the word "truth" because they know science deals with provisional models that survive testing, not capital -T Truth. Falsifiability is a tool for weeding out bad theories, not a definition of what is real

So no, your narrow standard does not get to dismiss love, dreams consciousness, or my inner experience as untrue. You are the one who confused a useful method with the nature of reality itself. Please update your epistemology.

Like I said you clearly don't know what objectivity means. Id help you out.

Merriam Webster : expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations

Cambridge : based on real facts and not influenced by personal beliefs or feelings:

Existing independent of or external to the mind; actual or real.

If you were confused that's a you problem, the title of the thread was literally a claim about objective reality. I don't know why you're foaming at the mouth. Writing wouldn't change fact no matter how upset you are beacuse it seems you can't smuggle what are empty claims about objective reality as truth. Id also suggest you educate urself on the definition of truth, it has facts in there somewhere, then educate urself on what a "fact" is.

It is not my standard, it is "the standard" virtually everywhere no matter how upset it makes you feel, unfortunately feelings and opinions have nothing to do with truth. It's a good thing I never once mentioned science and it's a good thing even outside of a lab the same properties are used to demonstrate what is factual and what is factual = truth.

sonmvayina:
The Torah is a book of the law. It is the constitution of the Jews. The stories are not supposed to be understood literally. It is not a history textbook.....
When I take my annual leave I will populate my "The letter killeth" thread.

This is the typical retreat into “imetaphor” once the archaic nature of the texts is exposed. Suddenly everything becomes symbolic. I’m sure metaphorical stories come with structured genealogies, the commands are just metaphor, even with actual penalties attached to them. The time indicators, actual geographical references, named rulers, census details, lengths of their reigns?

Even the Sabbath sef is metaphor, even though it is practiced literally, some how its sourced from a "metaphorical" event. The people in the text who were described as taking and acting on it literally - all metaphor. It’s not like there are actual narrative markers that are literally grounding events in actual time and place.

It’s not like we can distinguish the poetic sections from legal codes and historical narrative based on the genre already present in the text. Spin another yarn, this one is weak.

triplechoice:
No. I disagree. Your standard is not "the standard for truth about objective reality". It is the standard for empirical science . Objective reality doesn't work the way you assume. . Most of what we consider true in life, dreams, consciousness, the past, love, doesn't meet it. That doesn't make those things "random claims". It just means your bar is set for the wrong job.

You fear that without your high bar every "random claim" would be asserted as truth. Apart from this being a false dilemma, it's strange you think you must accept every claim made be others, hence your worry. You can simply ignore claims you find unconvincing.

There's a middle ground. We can evaluate claims by different standard depending on the domain. Science's falsifiability standard is for repeatable, measurable phenomena, not for singular past events, inner experiences or metaphysical claims

You can only demand scientific demonstration if the person making the claim declares it scientifically proven truth. But when they have not said so, it is wrong to to demand scientific evidence. The only thing you can do is to ignore them or take them at their word if you trust the person


For instance, if I tell you, "I dreamed last night that I was flying", you cannot falsify it, demonstrate it or repeat it. Yet it is objectively true that I had that dream. Science confirms humans dream, but the specific content is not verifiable by your standard. By your rule , my claim would be ""not true " which is absurd.

That alone proves your standard is too narrow. You need to widen it so you don't miss out on certain things in life which are true but don't meet those criteria

You know what objective means right?! Cause I doubt you do.

For instance, if I tell you, "I dreamed last night that I was flying", you cannot falsify it, demonstrate it or repeat it. Yet it is objectively true that I had that dream. Science confirms humans dream, but the specific content is not verifiable by your standard. By your rule , my claim would be ""not true " which is absurd.


If you did you'd know the above is a clear subjective experience. You dreamt you were flying, did everybody else also experience your dream - that you were indeed flying? Clearly no. An example of an "objective" experience that reflects "objective reality" would be the claim "humans dream" or "humans eat", the kind of food they like to eat or whatever kind of dreams they have are subjective experiences. And the properties of objective truth are as stated - no less. Again pls check the meaning of objective as it differentiates from subjective. Absolutely no claim can be "objectively true" without those properties.

sonmvayina:
Christianity is the fakest religion ever. It is built of absurdities. It is founded on pagan ideology and human sacrifice. Something the creator detest. He even said "Thou shall NOT kill" That does not sound like somebody who wants or likes human sacrifice??

You mean the god that accepted Jephtah's sacrifice of his daughter, supposedly tested Abram with slaughtering his son is against human sacrifice and killing. Same god who outrightly commanded different genocides and supposedly wuped out the whole earth. Pot meet kettle.

triplechoice:
Your definition for truth is so narrow that only physics and chemistry survive. Apart from these two, nothing else can be true for you since it simply cannot meet the standard.

Well, that’s the standard for truth when we’re talking about claims concerning objective reality. There’s a reason the bar is high — otherwise every random claim could just be asserted as truth. Virtually all areas that deal with objective reality operate with that same standard. If we lower it here, then any claim can simply declare itself true without meeting any real criteria rendering the wors truth meaningless.