₦airaland Forum

Arda1000:
prove that it happened, How do u believe it happened ?

Damn! 🤦🏾 Have you heard of the word "sacarsm" before. Now re-read my comments. You wouldn't ask this question.

thomas2024:
Thank you. I wonder why people are so gullible.

People don't like to read. The more you read - the more you know, the more you know - the more you question, the more you question - the more you think critically. They prefer to outsource that thinking to those who they perceive as authority figures, to do it for them. Ergo swallow every bs hook, line and sinker.

Arda1000:
where did such water come from? Just a simple question

Already told you Magic: An invisible being who uses the earth as part of his couch - a footstool really - left the tap in his kitchen sink running.

Arda1000:
ure joking right

Quite obvious I'm being facetious—because how else do you explain the claim that three times the volume of water on Earth suddenly appeared from nowhere and then drained out to nowhere? Where did the extra volume come from, and where did it drain to? How did rain fall at over 9 meters per hour for 40 days straight when that's well beyond the physical limits of cloud capacity? And then, all evidence of this extraordinary, catastrophic event just conveniently disappeared? Is that not magic?! Now you see me, Now you don't.

Arda1000:
called down water from where?
You guys just talk without thinking,where did the water come from simply question.

One word, Magic 😄

Magnificenttop:
Enjoy. You earned it.
People invalidate dvmb, then validate common sense but you've successfully achieved the reverse. Through "extraordinary/indisputable" proofs, you've been able to invalidate logic and common sense, then validate dvmb and dvmber. Really smells like irony. You're such a genius.
Right now, my dog barks by itself, refrigerator freezes things by itself and everything else works by itself, no maker, no designer.
Like I said, you've shrunken the god of the gaps. You finally won this. Big W.

🥱🥱🥱 🤡

Magnificenttop:
Highly impressed. I always knew it, for anyone out of the blues, to strongly reject established convention, norm and sound logic, then firmly hold onto an opposing stand, he must have really got extraordinary proofs and indisputable grounds.
Since we know how cars work, they injure and also kill people, then they definitely made themselves. Hmmm, indisputable facts, very rare intelligence and extraordinary logic. 💯 You're such a genius.

I don't know about the rest of the world but here in Zalawullha county, my spring-loaded door now closes all by itself. Seems we finally shrunk the god of the gaps. 🤦🤡

See what i ate for breakfast 🤣 Tastes great but smells like irony.

Magnificenttop:
Long, boring, circular epistle from Prof. Hawking. Baseless, no substance.
🤡 Initially: We know how something works, means no maker.
🤡 Now: 99.9999% gadgets and all others get faulty, spoilt and unusable, we always have to repair and dispose them. Automobiles also injure and kill people. Therefore no designers or makers.

Oh wait! Holy sheeeit! My breakfast just made itself and emerged right on the dining table. I can't seem to comprehend what the flying fafo is going on right here! 🤡🤦

Man, I was half hoping Nairaland’s resident savant would shock me with something not pulled straight from Mythology for Cavemen. But hey, expecting 2 to become an odd number was probably more realistic. 😄

You’re right though—trees, stars, and tectonic plates clearly came out of the same kitchen as your breakfast.
Truly enlightening. Got any more CERN-level revelations for me, Savant Sir?!😁

Magnificenttop:
🤡: Boring circular epistles and baseless assumption af. The paper is simply going to exist all by itself and publish itself then it'll collect the nobel prize, the waffle maker prize and any other, all by itself. It's that simple and straightforward bla blu bla blah.

Have we run out of waffles so quick. Aww! That's sad or nairaland's bot keeps eating ur waffles. Even the bot's tired of nairaland's resident genius. Kindly say hi to your imaginary creators friends for me. 😉 Tell them I’m a huge fan of their so-called intelligent design especially the part where: 99.9% of all species that ever lived were wiped out, 99.999999% of the intelligently designed universe is completely uninhabitable.

And the one tiny habitable speck they did create?! Packed with volcanoes, hurricanes, tsunamis, parasites, viruses, disease, predators, famine, multiple natural disasters, and just enough oxygen to slowly kill us over a few decades. Brilliant just brilliant. But my favorite touch? The one where most animals don’t even survive to adulthood with over 60% dilying young. So practical. So merciful. So... intelligent.

Also particularly love the self destruct feature of the only habitable planet to be swallowed by it's star. Tell em I said thank you for sending their best - the savant himself - forward to defend their work, he did well. Truly outstanding all round. It's been a fun experience.

There's a serious mental health epidemic in this country no one seems to be paying attention to.

Magnificenttop:
Anonymous secretly drops gift basket at doorstep.
🤡: No trace of any owner, infinite regression, the hamper made itself bla bla bla
Me: Even a toddler would know someone dropped it there
🤡: Since it's that easy and straightforward, publish the paper to backup your claim.
🤦💀 wtaf

🤣 Never have i seen a genius run away from an easy nobel prize. All's not lost though you still get the waffle maker prize, for waffling baseless & boring circular epistles 🧇. When I said your genius is way beyond me... 😁🤡. Enjoy your prize, you deserve it savant sir.

Magnificenttop:
Not so Sir Hawking. You lot often forget that you're at the receiving end here, you chose to be. You're the one challenging logic, convention, sanity and common-sense. So, go ahead and do everything you said in your reply. World is waiting. You're all some good source of comic relief, we're not tired of your lame bs.

🤣🤣 You can't publish the paper, I though it was pretty straightforward with the numerous epistles. Baseless af. 🤡

Magnificenttop:
That actually applies way more to your side. In addition to being illogical, counterintuitive among others. Not also forgetting how ridiculous and lame it is.
A common nail-clipper needed designer/design/intelligence/mind and more but the whole universe existed by itself. The idea is so dvmb, even without further probe, it immediately crumbles at the very start of it.

🥱🥱 Yes yes, publish the paper with the plethora of evidence backing up the claims to collect that Nobel prize you so rightly deserve. Should be quite straightforward and easy seeing as it's absolutely valid 😄

Magnificenttop:
Thankfully, objective reality and sound logic support the imaginary friend.
While nothing supports the no-God jargon, convention doesn't support it, not even science. It's baseless, illogical and counterintuitive.
It's faith only in religious context, doesn't apply to the material universe.
No matter how we twist it, the imaginary friend always win.

Baseless assertions backed by baseless assertions.

Magnificenttop:
Substance? What other substance again can anyone give to someone who cannot see this whole universe. Only replying epistles back to your epistles.
An imaginary creator who could create a tangible universe as this, deserves to live rent free in everyone's head, still noble and truthful choice, than threading a ridiculous path of self-deception and denial, employing unending, counterintuitive jargons to validate the impossible.
What followers choose to do or not do is personal preferences and lifestyles, still doesn't change anything about the truth of the universe. It is what it is and nothing can change anything about it.

Baseless assertions backed by baseless assertions. Thankfully objective reality doesn't work that way. Empty claims would remain empty claims until substantiated which your favourite imaginary friends would never be. There's a fine reason it's belief, faith nd not fact. Says it all. 😌

Magnificenttop:

Well, if I created this kind of universe, i'd also do the same. The universe speaks for itself, there's nothing left to say or see again here.
Call it engineering marvel, you discover it's way more. More than sculptural feat, more than structural excellence, more than a masterpiece, more than aesthetics, more than arts, more than extreme functionality, more than peak intelligence, more than design, more than complex, more than vast. It's everything and way more than everything. It's pure miracle. Zoom in or zoom out the universe, you continue to see endless wonders, marvels and it only keeps getting more puzzling and crazzier each passing moment.
Anyone who claims no creator really deserves the hide and seek game because that's the height of insincerity, self-deception, denial, falsehood and unfairness.

🥱 Epistle upon epistle, yet still no substance, savant sir. But I must say, it's a brilliant strategy. Imaginary creators and beings that exist solely in the minds of those convinced they're real… and somehow, that belief becomes so intense they argue, despise, and even kill each other over whose invisible friend wins the cosmic hide and seek game.

Even more impressive, followers of the same imaginary being manage to split into warring camps over who’s interpreting the fiction correctly. A true circus act. You definitely deserve that Nobel Prize. When’s the peer-reviewed study coming out, sir? We should title "I don't know or understand ergo my favourite imaginary friend did it". What do you think 😄.

SIRTeee15:
Pele...
I can see Seun's spam bot is giving u hard time.
Maybe U should be more coherent and learn to argue without insult.
Then U will be fine.

Like you weren't ban by the spam bot too 🤣. Anyways empty noise would always be empty noise over whose imaginary friend is real.

Magnificenttop:
Circular logic, says one of those who avoid straightforward, crystal clear discussions but hide under endless, meaningless terminologies to validate their counterintuitive arguments. More like making illogical babbling look appealing and great.
A carved, monolithic stone tool is not the same as the original, raw stone.
Owner/owners, creator/creators, cosmic fistfight or not, that's not the issue here. The issue rn is that there is or there are.

A creator simply creating a universe is endless regression but no-creator gives a perfect fix? Uninformed atheists don't realize the side that stand pose way more challenges. They keep invoking science like it's a magic wand. Genuine science is just neutral knowledge that belongs to every and anyone, it never contradicts a creator in anyway nor has any opinion of such.
The universe is too vast and too complex while our knowledge is too limited. Even, the little science we brag about face more questions than answers and again sometimes become invalid with new findings. Yet if we get any little success, what it points at is the necessary intervention of intelligent mind, design and intention behind everything. No way out, it's impossible mission.

All these to say I learned well and the creators are the best hide n seek players ever. Got it 👊🏽

Magnificenttop:
Great logic Stephen Hawking.
Next time we see any object in the street with no known, traceable owner, no documentation, it simply means it existed there all by itself just because it wanted to. Hmmm, deep.
We see isolated, depreciated artifact in the wild and instantly concluded it definitely once had an owner, though unknown and untraceable, then further use it to construct the possible owner and all other details from this tiny artifact but it's so impossible to do the same for this vast, active universe. The joke here is obvious and a deliberate act of playing dvmb.
@bolded, this is so appropriate. That's the ridiculous routes taken when some jokers try hard to explain how the universe exits without a creator.

Oh savant sir, I’ve already said I don’t speak Christianese, nor do I have the required experience in ironic circular logic to operate at your genius level. But still, I managed to learn a few things.

For example: a man-made artifact carved from stone is exactly the same as a naturally occurring stone — no difference at all, no way to tell at all. That’s how science works now, apparently. Also, the universe has owners(not owner), they play hide n seek and those owners have owners, and so on forever, but not to worry, it’s not infinite regress when you finally reach the one you like or were indoctrinated with.

And thirdly, the alleged creators are all in a cosmic fistfight over who gets the blue checkmark as the true originator, which somehow validates the claim instead of discrediting it. Brilliant. Also learnt are that you can disprove a negative(here I come bigfoot and aliens). Difficult lessons but I learned. Thank you for breaking down such complex, ironic circular logic into bite-sized fallacies for us laypeople. I’ll be nominating you for a Nobel prize, you deserve it.

SIRTee15:
I responded to your waffling, go and check; but the problem is I'm allergic to claims lacking in evidence and that's what your posts are all about. I may or may not answer.

Demanding that I show U the name of Jesus in the old testament is a desperate attempt at clutching at straws.

Anyway Louis Pasteur greets U.

🤣🤣🤣
Thought as much, typical chicken with empty noise. What further seals this is the incredible irony that Pasteur never said such when fact checked. Truly laughable, at least like the others on here ud think twice before quoting me next time. 🤡

SIRTee15:
Luciferi how are U
Isaiah 53 greets U......

😄 So wait let me get this straight, you chicken out from a convo cause you couldn't answer simple straightforward questions. Just to come bk to it after a long time, only cause you were called out for been a chicken. Quoted me everywhere and still didn't give any sembalnce of an answer despite the numerous quotes. Time passes again and you quote me yet again, still no semblance of an answer but vague pics from nameless sources.

Anyways humor me one more time let's see if the same scenario plays out. It should be easy to answer the questions from my comment you quoted. So I'll paste it here for you to answer. 😁 4 simple questions, 4 simple answers.

(...why not show us in Isaiah 53:

Where Jesus is mentioned by name as the messiah or even anywhere,

Or Jesus’ children, according to Isaiah 53:10,

Or where he repents of sin,

Or where he dies multiple times, all according to Isaiah 53?

Or is he scared of dying multiple times to fulfill his other failed prophecy about his return? 😂

Surely, you'd be able to point out these things easily from Isaiah 53 if it’s not the typical Christian selective renegotiating retcon. Typical circus act, Tick tock.)

Magnificenttop:
Hmmm, this is deep.
True, my posts have never been demonstrated to have someone behind them, just random texts appearing under your mention. Now, that's some next level discovery.
Perhaps, noone even designed the web, no one behind anything. Everything just happening all by itself because they needed to.
You're really hitting on some fundamental truths here Stephen Hawking. I feel you.

Lol! This is the kind of amazing false equivalence only a true genius could come up with. "My social media post has an author, so the universe must have a cosmic content creator." Truly bulletproof logic, savant sir.

Because obviously, a human-built, documented, and publicly maintained system like the internet, created by people we literally know by name and have interviewed, is abs totally the same as the universe, which has… none of that. No observable creators, no manual, no GitHub repo in the sky, and sadly, no LinkedIn profile. Wow!

But wait o it must be true because a contradictory and inconsistent book written by illiterate desert peasants with no clue to how the world works, from the most primitive part of the world tells me so. Ergo, it is. AMazing! 😁

Next you’ll tell me gravity was invented by Apple because your iPhone falls when you drop it. Your genius is beyond me, kind sir. I'm taking notes. Actually… now that I think about it, like the web, shouldn’t we have creators instead of a creator? I want to learn.

Magnificenttop:
Well, I don't think so.
In the first place, if you ever had the ability to learn or be taught, you wouldn't have thought our better understanding of how the universe works shrinks it's maker.

Ah yes! Our better understanding wouldn't shrink the universe's "maker" - when the universe has never been demonstrated to have one - nor shrink the maker's maker nor the maker's maker's maker... ad infinitum. Quite a valauble lesson.

Magnificenttop:
You just gave a perfect reply to yourself, or aren't you the same person shrinking the god of the gaps? And still the same who thinks understanding how something works means it has no maker?

Like I said, I guess nairlands resident genius taught me something impossible today. lol!

LordReed:
I want to see his reaction when he learns that infraRED light is not actually red. LMAO.

Or that an airplane's BLACKbox is not black. 😄

Magnificenttop:
No be only god of the gaps, na god of the gafes.
A ngga once said, while younger, he thought someone made the piano but now grown up, he could explain how the piano works, so this shows that piano made itself, not by anyone. It's same way low-budget, atheist wannabes sound lame.
Superstition initially explained everything due to ignorance but now science explains things, fine. That only has everything to do with humans' flawed, slow understanding, it has nothing to do with the universe or it's maker.
From ignorance to superstition to slow understanding and now thinking that knowing how something works disproves its maker. From dvmb to dvmber. That's a lame, big L.

Typical cristianese speak, whole lot of empty words just to say nothing. 😅 Didn't know you could disprove what has never been proven or demonstrated - that the universe has a "maker". Guess nairaland's resident genius taught me something today.

PulsingPurple:
Mek una leave my thread 😂😂

Una no well at all 😅

I'm out 😅, my aim here's done.