Lucifyre's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lucifyre's Profile › Lucifyre's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 43 pages)
MaxInDHouse:Damn this is what happens when religion puts one's brain in a box. You can't think outside said box. I also said the earth is 4.5billion yrs old, do you want to know when it was born too? 😄 |
MaxInDHouse:Who said Yhwh was born, I didn't know he was born, who's his mother?? |
MaxInDHouse:Lol! so you even know you lie 🤣 27363yu3u2u9383837 |
MaxInDHouse:At least only you used your hand to type and assert it, not me😅. Maybe holy/unholy spirit confused you cause you lie too much or maybe it's even Yhwh's wife.😄 |
MaxInDHouse:Wow i didn't know honestly, at least until you educated me now. Didn't know millions of your own brothers and sisters care about stopping faithful people from living up to their faith. You learn everyday. Thanks. |
MaxInDHouse:No one cares man, no one cares. There are better things to do than shadow boxing, don't you think so bro max 😁 |
MaxInDHouse:😅 Im trying to be a good christain nau, isn't that what it's all about, making baseless undemonstrable assertions and taking it all on "faith". I'm quite sure I'm doing it right, so ask Yhwh for the " day he was born", he'll reveal it in the spirit. Peace be unto you. 😄 |
MaxInDHouse:Didn't know the only way to know is to be present. Certainly explains all the confusion in xtianity and the bible as non of you even the writers were there. lol! |
MaxInDHouse:You mean the god you've been worshipping all this while didn't tell you his birthday? Ain't nice nau. |
There is no heaven or hell, that's just undemonstratable superstitious nonsense. How could Yhwh who's barely 3500 years old have created a universe 13.8 billion years old. Only in mythology. |
Lucifer is the Grinch to Christainity's Santa Claus. |
CJStarz:And unfortunately not enough imagination here which is why blacks are several decades behind. |
GlobalWay:We're talking evidence based facts, this one's bringing baseless ancient mythology and conspiracy theories. 🤡 |
22jumpstreet:"Those so called scholars were all paid to keep the lying" 🤣 Typical conspiracy nutjob, what did they pay them with? Milk and honey?! Who paid em? A talking snake i guess. What a joke. Funniest part is you citing those same scholars when you thought they agreed with your agenda, like how closeminded can one be(I don't forget that hilarious and embarrassing thread). Like I said empty noise backed by empty claims that would never change facts. You should check your dictionary to know the meaning of "debunk". Empty baseless noise is never debunking, anyways goodluck " debunking"😁 |
logicalhumour:Hallelujah amen brother. I can feel the spirit that is holy flowing through you. |
22jumpstreet:And I couldn't care less for your theological gish gallop, they're all nonsense and baseless mythology as far as I'm concerned, Jewish and Christain alike. Non of that speaks to the FACT he existed, believing or denying it wouldn't change a general and academic consensus older than 80yrs. You might want to get to writing your paper backed by evidence to change it, so we adopt yours as the new consensus and fact. No?! Till then you're just another noisy person on the Internet spouting baseless claims. |
22jumpstreet:Deny all you want, don't think anyone cares, it literally wouldn't change the fact and luckily facts & truths don't care about belief or denial. |
Steep:No one is arguing Jesus didn't exist, it's basically a fact and consensus about 80yrs old, what is also a fact is my previous statement, there's zero evidence for any of the supernatural claims about him and like other historical figures - see Alexander who was claimed to be the son of Zeus - all of the supernatural claims are basically mythlogical which is a fact. If they're not provide evidence they happened which obviously you can't. As for your gospel claim that the writers are known, if they're known it wouldn't be difficult to identify the names of the authors within the texts as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John right. So pls show us where within the texts the authors Matthew, Mark, Luke & John, identify themselves or any evidence they wrote it. Again, obviously you can't. End of story. And to properly kill off that baseless assertion of known writers, how did poor stark illiterate peasants who spoke Aramaic in a time period where the literacy rate was less than 2% somehow manage to write in sophisticated greek and chose not to write in Aramaic or say Hebrew, more than 50 years after. Empty claims lol! |
Steep:"and the books of the gospel are reliable historical narrativ of the life and death of Jesus." This is an outright lie, this is 2025 please let's ease off on peddling outright disingenuous claims as facts. How can the narrative be historical when it was written decades after by anonymous non - eyewitnesses with inconsistent narratives that contradicts not just itself but what we know from the available historical data. Yes the gospel are historical sources but when they're analyzed they fall apart. The only events considered plausible from the gospels about Jesus' life was that he was baptized and he was crucified nothing more. Everything else especially the supernatural claims have zero evidence or data to support them and on analysis some are even influenced by older existing motifs from nearby cultures and religions. |
"Why did god create us" One would first have to ask which of the gods, for they're quite many laying claim to been the one(s) who 'created' everything. Then one would then have to assertain as factual, one of these gods out of the many is indeed the one who created everything. As it stands, there's zero evidence or data for any of these so called gods nor any evidence or data that suggests the universe and it's contents were 'created'. So asking that question would not give any objective factual answer, just the typical subjective and baseless fluff disguised and asserted as facts. |
bewildered:Christainity is just a different side of the same coin as Islam. One's just hypocritical to pretend it's violence free when it's obviously not. They've both left so much violence and destruction in their wake. |
Obviously there's none, zero, nada, zilch. Even the bible that makes the claim can't harmonize said claim and is contradictory af. It is factual to say he never resurrected, crucified like a common criminal, and remained dead as one. |
Timblogga:Now you know. Seems comprehension is an issue, cause i already addressed that and ur other comment. How did those doing the indoctrinating know?. |
Timblogga:Because morality is subjective and grows with reason and thought and exists without religion or superstition. Same "rules" don't apply everywhere. It's rooted in empathy, social co-operation, thought and reason. Even in societies without formal religion, people still knew stealing or murder was wrong, not because of fear of divine punishment, but because it destroyed trust and harmed others, harm which they didn't like to happen to themselves. Even in animals that don't have a rule book to follow, empathy is usually observed even across species. That's why those practices are abandoned just like the practices in the so called morality rule book whose recommendations for almost everything amoral is to stone to death and burn alive. Why don't you stone people to death and burn them alive if your rule book is valid and objective. It's quite simple common sense really. |
Lol! I would never not find it funny when delusional people who believe in a different brand of delusion, scoff at others for having a brand of delusion different from theirs like it's not all delusion. Quite ironic. |
triplechoice:Yes absolutely. The right thing is still the right thing at the end of the day regardless of intentions. |
"...because i do not want to bring curses upon them..." This is the problem with religious and superstitious people, you would not do it beacuse it's the right thing to do but for the fear of punishment or the promise of a reward. Half baked morality. |


Nooo. How will someone prefer their traditional ways over Christianity and the way of our lord Jesus?