I have taken my 2nd dose of AZ.

Ok sir.

Don't say you were not warned.

Information searched on duckduckgo compared to Google.

And you wonder why you think I am a conspiracy theorist while I know you are a fool.

I left her name so you can search and watch the video yourself.

Lifted directly from the FDA.

If fact-checkers scribbled some mumbo-jumbo on it, it must be true because they are called fact-checkers.

Fact-checkers said "they don't alter your DNA"

Very very very rare

"Instagram links" lol

Even when I am showing you exactly where to go to read it yourself?

Must be ment.

Of course, what I heard or read is not what I heard or read.

Same way "fact-checkers" said Bill Gates did not mean the jabs were not effective even though he said it and I heard it.



PS: Fact-checkers confessed they are just opinion merchants but the people who think they are on my frequency are quoting them to disprove me.

LOL

Pfizer's own data that was forced out of them. This was 90 days after they had rolled out the jabs.

Trust me, I have no reason to lie. It is safe and effective.

Everything in this world can cause heart attacks except the jabs of course.

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604656/


"Pandemic of the unvaccinated"

Rare. Rare.

People who don't know how to read or research should stop quoting me please.

Why are they showing me the interview she did right after fainting? Did I say that video was taken down?

Some people should learn how to read or not get engaged in a topic that is too high for them.

For e.g, they can read the reuters link and then click the ones reuters inserted to claim the lady was seen 4 days later.

If they are bored, they can search for said lady today and show us she is alive.

They won't. Instead they will be providing stupid links by people writing easily disprovable nonsense with no evidence just talks and vibes.

Imagine "politifact" "reuters" all run and owned by the conspirators will provide proof against their own plan.

Some people need a brain reset desperately.

"Can you show me one person that died after vaccination" yenyenyen

The deadly COVID-19

Very rare.

This is from December 2021.

Mrs Walensky said there has been no safety concerns at all.

She even endorsed it for children.

Safe and effective + extremely rare.

Despite the censorship and even under reporting.

Extremely rare.

The jabs change your DNA...oh no they don't.

Jabbed or unjabbed. No significant difference according to The Lancet.

More.

COVID19 manufactured in a lab - not by mistake. Source - DARPA

Extremely rare.

Pfizer always said their jab was designed to prevent COVID-19

The advisory board of the CDC told her don't vaccinate children. She over ruled. The board of the FDA said don't vaccinate children. They ignored. WHO said don't, and like clock work they did what they had already planned to do.

Somebody say safe and effective.

Maestro21:


I enjoy engaging you because you are civil and I can see that you have your thinking cap on. Which is why I want to address the highlighted portion. This "vaccine" was not produced in 1 year neither do normal vaccines take 5 years to produce. A vaccine can be produced in a day - that is not the issue. The issue is, after designing one, you need clinical trials to test and understand its kinetics, dynamics and efficacy. Those clinical trials are in 3 phases and each phase is subjected to time. This particular vaccines skipped most of those trials, so anything they seem to be learning on the fly, is what they would have learned in time - as per how they were supposed to do things. Don't you think it bizzare that such hurriedly rolled out vaccines should then be mandated when it is not even fully understood?



Of course, I am fully aware and your exposition is correct however, how vaccines work with immunocompromised patients i.e side effects etc are discovered and tabulated during the clinical trials. As such, such immunocompromised individuals are exempted from receiving the jabs. Further, even when breakthrough deaths may occur despite taking such measures, they are usually rare, few and far between. That is certainly not the case with this jab. In fact, these vaccines (so called) were not designed to generate an immune response as the measles vaccines that you referred to. The producers have said it ad nauseam: their investigational drug only aims at reducing the severity of symptoms. That is not how vaccines work which is why we have seen too many breakthrough cases and even they have announced a need for booster shots.



I read the reuters article and then clicked the links that they cited to the supposed video of her standing in line with other nurses 4 days after. Interestingly, the video was taken down. I did a little digging and the video was a fake - the lady in question was clearly not her which is why they took it down. Her husband changed his married status online to single, Tiffany has since deleted all her social media profiles and accounts and since December of 2020, nobody has seen or heard from her - reuters in their article said they wrote to her but she was yet to reply - and still concluded all was well. You would think it will be easy to just put out a video proving you are alive and well so the "theories" will end, right?

Well, Tiffany is dead. Which should make you wonder why anyone will go through the length to deny it if it was coincidental. Remember this is August 2021, and since December 2020, not one person has heard from Tiffany.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/as1rvnNFNaQQ/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/FTFIwIEozZ1i/

I have more links than these, I just wanted to present the ones that are effective summaries.

My reply to someone else in August 2021. Hahahaha

.

Extremely rare.

Vaccines are safe and effective. Oh no, we never said so.