The United States should get its facts straight before casting a shadow over a sovereign nation like Nigeria. Allegations of oil theft and transnational crime demand evidence, not inference. A vessel flying an illegal flag, with opaque ownership layers and a history of name changes, does not automatically translate to Nigerian culpability, especially when NIMASA confirms the ship is not Nigerian-flagged, not on Nigeria’s registry, and the alleged owner is not registered as a Nigerian shipping company.
Hearsay is not proof. Maritime cases rise or fall on documents, registries, bills of lading, AIS data, sanctions filings, and named beneficiaries. If there are Nigerians involved, name them. If there is bunkering, trace the barrels. Until then, restraint is not weakness—it is rule of law. Nigeria’s Senate should formally invite the U.S. Ambassador to explain, on the record, how the conclusion “Nigerian-owned” was reached when the facts point to flag hopping and shell structures, the classic smoke screen of illicit shipping.
Accountability is welcome. Careless attribution is not.
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has dismissed reports linking Nigeria to the supertanker seized by U.S. forces over allegations of crude oil theft and other transnational crimes.
NIMASA refutes claims linking Nigeria to the seized VLCC MV Skipper. The MV Skipper, seized by U.S. forces, has no registration under the Nigerian flag. Checks revealed the vessel's owners are not registered with NIMASA as a shipping company. The vessel was intercepted in international waters, carrying the Guyanese flag illegally.
The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) has dismissed reports linking Nigeria to the MV Skipper, a Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) seized by U.S. forces over allegations of crude oil theft and other transnational crimes.
In a statement issued on Friday, the agency said the 20-year-old tanker, with IMO Number 9304667, is not registered under the Nigerian flag and has no authorisation to operate as a Nigerian vessel.
NIMASA added that preliminary checks show the vessel does not appear in Nigeria’s official ship registry and that its purported owners, Lagos-based Thomarose Global Ventures Ltd., are not registered with the agency as a shipping company.
The clarification follows the announcement by the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Navy that the supertanker was intercepted earlier in the week off the coast of Venezuela. American authorities allege the vessel was involved in crude oil theft, piracy, and the illicit transport of oil from Iran and Venezuela in violation of U.S. sanctions. The Skipper has been under U.S. OFAC sanctions since 2022.
NIMASA pledges cooperation with international partners NIMASA stated that tracking data from its C4i Center indicated the vessel was last sighted in Nigerian waters on 1 July 2024, after which it sailed on its regular international routes, operating in the Arabian Sea and subsequently in the Caribbean, where the U.S. interdiction occurred.
The agency also noted that the tanker, previously owned by Triton Navigation Corp. of the Marshall Islands, has undergone multiple name and ownership changes.
At the time of its interception, the vessel was found flying the Guyanese flag without authorization. Guyana’s Maritime Administration Department (MARAD) confirmed that Skipper is not listed in its national registry, describing the flag use as illegal, a tactic often associated with vessels attempting to evade sanctions or obscure their identities. The Director General of NIMASA, Dr Dayo Mobereola, emphasized the agency’s commitment to cooperate fully with all relevant authorities, including U.S. investigators. Mobereola noted that no form of criminal activity will be tolerated within Nigeria’s maritime domain.
jiggyman: It was never called nigerian ship! It was referred to as nigeria registered ship!
The article clearly referenced a Russian oligarch who is connected to putin
Are you denying on behalf of the government do we not have a government agency in charge of all ship registered in Nigeria ? If a car is registered in Lagos and its involved in an armed robbery incidence in Abuja. Should we not dig up the registration from Lagos. Even if the owner of the car is from maiduguri ?
DaddyJapan: Stop it! Your hyperbole is an emotional response and not grounded in facts!
Repeated reflagging or flag-hopping is a tactic used to evade sanctions.
Why don't you read up a bit more on this vessel to understand the geo-political events that have shaped its maritime history. Enough of the Mamaput analysis!
Nigeria is not under sanctions or embargo, on crude sales So Nigerian government should make an official statement, if they have nothing to hide. Come out officially and tell us the crude oil was not stolen from Nigeria Tell us you don't know anything about the ship ? Tell us the Ship is not known to us.
professorPABX: What concerned Nigeria Government? Is it a Government Agency Shipping Company? The Shipping Company mentioned was Registered in 2012 during Jonathan Government and the company based in Warri, Delta State.
The crew said they are from Guyana. If Guyana said they are not Guyanese company, then NIMASA and other Maritime Agency should find out if the Ship is registered in Nigeria.
The Nigerian Company associated with the Ship is one of those companies registered in Delta during Jonathan regime for Oil Deals. The company status is presently inactive. What concerns Government with it?
Stop protecting oil thieves. Did they send you to protect them The crude oil inside was Nigerian crude oil. We don't care when the ship was registered, the Oil was stolen under this government. It cannot be Guyanese oil, because chevron manages Guyanese oil 100%
Dogalmighty17: I disagree with you here. Flag hopping is very common in the maritime industry worldwide. Nigeria is not an exception. There's very little most governments can do about it.
We are aware of the flag hopping, you are leaving out the elephant in the room $120 million dollars of crude on that ship was stolen. Its a Nigerian registered Ship. Carrying a false Guyanese flag. ALL THE CRUDE OIL IN GUYANA IS CONTROLLED BY THE AMERICANS, so you cannot steal from the Guyanese The crude oil was stolen from Nigeria and the actors are big time criminals and possibly government officials.
jiggyman: Its not nigerian owned! Its registered in nigeria for tax evasion purposes.
Its used to ferry illegal oil across north America, south America, Asia and Russia.
Its been to Nigeria only once at bonny port.
Let the Nigerian government officially deny it. Then the USA government, will mention all the names of those who own it. When they bought it How they bought it. Which accounts have been receiving payments for the crude sales. You think the USA has not done its homework before calling it Nigerian Ship.
Nigeria spent ₦17.5 trillion last year, outsourcing pipeline protection and energy security to private contractors, allegedly led by Tompolo. Yet a VLCC carrying $120 million of crude was stolen and intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard. Think about that: a single day’s haul, gone right under the noses of those being paid billions to “secure” it.
Who is really fooling who here? The government wants the populace glued to headlines about insecurity and kidnappings, while actual billion-dollar thefts happen quietly in the shadows. The theater of “bandits” on land may just be a distraction from the true looters at sea and in the boardrooms, quietly moving the country’s wealth abroad.
And why did it take the United States, not Nigerian authorities, to catch the crime? Because the systems we pay trillions for are either impotent, compromised, or selectively blind.
Make no mistake: those raking in illicit crude and laundering it through phantom companies are the real bandits, and they are not dodging gunmen in the creeks—they are dressing their crime in legalese and shipping papers. Meanwhile, the ordinary citizen watches the smoke and mirrors of “insecurity.”
The Tinubu administration must stop subsidizing incompetence and shadow-economy elites. Clamp down on these multi-million-dollar offshore heists, expose the networks, and stop letting foreign nations show us what we should already have seen. Nigeria cannot afford this hypocrisy.
What happened with the Skipper is not just a maritime embarrassment, it is a national disgrace that exposes a chronic Nigerian problem: the government is brilliant at fighting loud insecurity headlines while utterly blind to the shadow-economy criminals who quietly bleed the country dry and tarnish its name abroad. A VLCC linked to a Nigerian CAC-registered entity being seized by the U.S. Coast Guard under suspicion of crude theft, false-flag operations, and transnational criminal activity should ring every alarm bell in Abuja. Instead, we get the usual silence, as though these things simply “happen” without systemic rot at home enabling them.
Nigeria’s greatest security failure is not only banditry or terrorism; it is the unchecked underworld economy that has turned fraud, smuggling, illegal oil lifting, and opaque wealth into a fashion culture. People parade unexplained riches, shouting “Money na water!” while everyone with sense knows these lifestyles are lubricated by criminal proceeds washed through dodgy front companies and weakly regulated sectors.
The Tinubu administration cannot keep ignoring this parallel economy. Every time a foreign government intercepts a vessel, exposes a syndicate, or uncovers a laundering network tied back to Nigeria, it chips away at the country’s credibility, investment appeal, and diplomatic leverage. A serious government would treat this as a national-security priority, not an afterthought. If Nigeria wants respect on the global stage, it must stop exporting scandals. And that means cracking down, seriously, aggressively, and consistently, on the shadow-wealth ecosystem, not just the headline-making insecurity on home soil.
The United States Coast Guard, in a joint operation with the U.S. Navy, has intercepted a Nigerian-owned supertanker, Skipper, following intelligence reports linking the vessel to crude oil theft and piracy.
The United States Coast Guard and U.S. Navy intercepted the Nigerian-owned supertanker Skipper owing to allegations of transnational criminal activities. The Skipper allegedly operated under a false flag registration, raising suspicions and highlighting its deceptive practices. The investigation addresses crude oil theft, potential drug trafficking, and its alignment with illicit financial and operational networks. Authorities are scrutinising Thomarose Global Ventures Ltd., the inactive Nigerian company managing the Skipper.
The United States Coast Guard, in a joint operation with the U.S. Navy, has intercepted a Nigerian-owned supertanker, Skipper, following intelligence reports linking the vessel to crude oil theft, piracy, and a series of transnational criminal activities spanning multiple jurisdictions.
The Skipper, a 20-year-old Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) with IMO Number 9304667, has long operated in West African and South American waters, according to a report by Vanguard. Though the tanker is reportedly owned and managed by Lagos-based Thomarose Global Ventures Ltd., its official registration lists Triton Navigation Corp., headquartered in the Marshall Islands, as the owner.
Illegal flag use confirmed by Guyana At the time of the interception, the tanker was allegedly flying the Guyanese flag without authorisation. Officials from Guyana’s Maritime Administration Department (MARAD) confirmed that Skipper does not appear in the country’s ship registry, describing the vessel’s use of the flag as both illegal and deceptive. Flag-switching, often called “flag hopping,” is a common tactic used by ships attempting to evade regulations, trade sanctions, or detection by maritime authorities.
U.S. security officials said the seizure was conducted under American law enforcement authority after a multi-agency investigation raised alarms about the tanker’s movements and cargo records.
President Donald Trump publicly announced the operation on 10 December 2025, describing it as part of a broader crackdown on illicit maritime activities targeting U.S. national security interests and the global energy supply chain.
In addition to suspected crude oil theft, a persistent problem in the Gulf of Guinea, investigators are examining whether the vessel was being used to transport a significant consignment of hard drugs.
Authorities are also exploring potential links between the tanker’s operations and an international network involving Iranian and other Islamist-aligned financiers implicated in money laundering, weapons trafficking, and the illicit oil trade.
The Skipper’s arrest has heightened scrutiny of its Nigerian manager. A Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) search shows that Thomarose Global Ventures Ltd., the company associated with the vessel, is currently inactive.
The inactive status, coupled with the opaque ownership arrangement and unauthorised flag use, has intensified questions about the company’s role and the tanker’s activities before interception.
An explosion occurred earlier this week at a key onshore natural gas pipeline in Nigeria, disrupting operations at the link shipping gas to industrial users and power plants, Nigeria’s state oil company NNPC confirmed late on Thursday.
The explosion occurred on the evening of December 10 on the Escravos–Lagos pipeline near the Tebijor, Okpele, and Ikpopo communities in the Delta State. Initial observations indicate a pressure drop consistent with a loss of containment at the gas pipeline, NNPC said in a statement.
“The cause of the explosion is still unknown but would be confirmed after a detailed investigation has been concluded. Our priority at this time is the safety of nearby communities and the protection of the environment,” the state company said, adding that it has activated emergency response procedures and teams.
The Escravos–Lagos gas pipeline is a major conduit of gas to industrial users and power plants in southwestern Nigeria.
The incident of still unknown cause took place days after NNPC and local producer Heirs Energies signed a deal to capture and use the gas flared at their onshore OML 17 joint venture near Port Harcourt in a bid to monetize the resource and reduce flaring.
Under the deal, the companies will capture the gas flared across OML 17 and deploy it for use in power generation, industrial applications, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and compressed natural gas (CNG). The move is aligned with Nigeria’s gas development priorities and energy transition goals.
Gas flaring has been a major issue at Nigeria’s oilfields—it is wasted instead of used for many industrial purposes, and holds back the country’s targets to reduce emissions.
Nigeria saw flaring volumes jump by 12% in 2024, which was the second largest increase globally behind Iran, the World Bank said in a report earlier this year.
CodeTemplarr: 11disproportionate entitlement i see in your comment. Whatabout those who actually owe us but do not care?
Not entitled. I don't need a dime from his money but we are not going to pretend there is nothing like corporate social responsibility Gani Fawehinmi was a private lawyer,a lot of people i know benefited from his scholarships I went to school on Mobil and shell double scholarship. The government needs to do more as well But that doesn't absolve other sectors from contributing There is nothing Dangote can give me that will change me. I am also financially blessed......lol
The government’s failure to secure highways has forced citizens into the skies, and now even that escape has become a luxury. When leaders who swore to protect lives can’t guarantee safe roads, the cost of their inefficiency gets dumped on ordinary Nigerians, turning basic travel into a N500k-N800k punishment.
The Senate has summoned the Minister of Aviation, Festus Keyamo, alongside key industry stakeholders, for an urgent meeting following widespread public concern over the sharp rise in domestic airfares.
The resolution followed a motion raised by Senator Buhari Abdulfatai, who, as reported by Channels TV, warned that the escalating prices threaten national mobility and could disrupt travel ahead of the festive season.
Checks by The PUNCH showed that one-way airfare on some domestic routes, particularly on the South-South and South-East routes, has jumped by about 150 per cent, crossing N300,000.
Before the festive period, air tickets on domestic routes hovered around N120,000. But an analysis of domestic airfares on the websites of airlines last Tuesday showed that ticket costs, particularly to the South-South and South-East regions, have increased by about 150 per cent compared to what the prices were before the Yuletide.
During the debate, Senator Buhari highlighted complaints from Nigerians over soaring domestic flight costs, noting that a one-way ticket from Abuja to Lagos now ranges between N400,000 and N600,000, a price he says many citizens can no longer afford.
He added that the situation is particularly troubling given the growing insecurity and challenges on major highways.
“We need to invite stakeholders of our airline agencies to interact and interrogate these issues. Immediate steps must be taken before the festive period,” he said.
Other senators voiced similar concerns. Senator Adamu Aliero described the fare hike as unacceptable, while Senator Onyekachi Nwebonyi condemned what he called a “400 per cent increase” and criticised delays in establishing a national carrier.
He urged Minister Keyamo to take decisive action.
Senator Solomon Olamilekan noted that airline operators have already received multiple concessions, especially on spare parts, and should therefore be held accountable for the current price surge.
However, Senator Orji Kalu attempted to justify the increases, citing rising operational costs and expensive spare parts, a defence that drew strong objections from several lawmakers.
The Senate ultimately directed Minister Keyamo, airline operators, regulators, and other stakeholders to appear before the relevant committees this week to explain the fare hikes and propose measures to stabilise prices ahead of the holiday travel season.
KaLuCh: Guy. These people dey Western countries dey murder too. In fact, these people get entire countries devoted to killing others. These people are jihadists. Poverty did not turn them into murderers and bandits. Their religion did.
If you dont understand world politics, you will belive everything you see on TV. London has a muslim mayor, New york just elected a muslim Mayor as well. If "these people" as you call them are that bad.....why are they winning majority votes in the largest democracies in the world ? ? ?
Stay away from bigotry and prejudice, learn the real politics going on in each environment. Dont be manipulated by media. Use your intelligence.
Jakarta: That's childish, those farming in the north, rolling wheelbarrows morning to night, riding keke and motorcycles don't know how to steal or kidnap? A man caught red handed on top of someone else's wife, will always have a reason why he did what he did. Stop using poverty to justify insecurity, that's childish and lazy thinking.
The government is not doing enough to bring people out of poverty. They are not even ready to face the problem head on. Poverty is a bigger problem in Nigeria than insecurity.
Jakarta: So based on your analogy it is poverty that made people go into worship centers and started shooting, and bombing them? You need serious beating.
No comfortable person wants to die. Trust me.These people are easily hired because poverty in the north is very high. Can you hire Dangote's child to go and do banditry and kidnapping ? Some people in the north dont have access to 20k naira from January to December. These people will commit crimes for 10k naira, they dont care about what the optics look like,
Ttalk: I know you will definitely type nonsense.How is terrorism, kidnapping and genocide and indigenous displacement amount to neglect?Are southerners killing the indigene and talking their land?
All the insecurity in Naija is as a result of poverty. If Musa Obinna and Bayo had 3 square meals, a comfortable accommodation and a business which is thriving. No one will entice them with funds to come and do banditry,kidnapping or other vices.
We are running away from the real cause of the problems and chasing shadows.
Nigeria’s rising external debt reflects a government leaning heavily on credit without achieving proportional gains in jobs, productivity, or fiscal resilience.
As poverty deepens, the nation diverts vast resources toward combating banditry and kidnapping, issues rooted in exclusion rather than ideology.
When daily survival becomes uncertain for millions, social order breaks down regardless of how many policemen/army are hired to cure banditry and kidnapping. Sustainable security begins with economic dignity, not escalating debt.
A lot of state governors have had at least 2 Trillion naira in FAAC allocations since inauguration. Go to their states, some have not commissioned one commensurate project, or stimulated mass employment in any sector. Now the strategy is to hire policemen to prevent hungry citizens from committing crimes........LOL
Nigeria, which has been substantially dependent on loans from foreign lenders, including the World Bank, has seen its debt stock rise significantly under its current administration.
Nigeria's debt to foreign lenders has substantially increased under its current administration. Debt to the World Bank is projected to reach $9.65 billion by year-end, with notable contributions from IDA and IBRD loans. Nigeria has become Africa's largest International Development Association borrower, holding a $18.5 billion stock in IDA loans. Total external debt for the country was reported at $46.98 billion as of mid-2025.
Current projections show that the country’s debt to the World Bank is on track to hit $9.65 billion before the year runs out.
Drawing figures from the lender’s website, The Punch reports that the debts cover International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and International Development Association loans (IDA).
While the International Development Association offers thoroughly concessional loans and grants to the world's poorest countries, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development offers credits on commercial or near-commercial terms to middle-income and financially sound low-income countries. Loan procurements under Nigeria's current president, Bola Tinubu, began shortly after his inauguration in 2023, with $2.7 billion in loans for four key projects.
In the same year, financing was focused on power sector recovery, renewable energy access, girls' education, and women's economic development.
The Nigeria Distributed Access through Renewable Energy Scale-up project secured $750 million in IDA assistance to strengthen private sector-led clean energy access.
Another $700 million IDA credit was recently allocated to girls' secondary education in participating states.
The Nigeria for Women Programme Scale Up received $500 million in IDA funding to support women's economic empowerment.
Currently, the country is looking to borrow an additional $500m from the World Bank on December 19.
These and many other loan programs have driven the country’s debt to the World Bank close to $10 billion.
The current year's loan pipeline is roughly comparable with the $2.7 billion obtained in 2023; however, it represents a fall of roughly 36.6% when compared to 2024.
IDA loans total nearly $7.30 billion over the course of the three years, while IBRD loans provide about $2.35 billion.
Grants increase by an additional $122.19 million, from $0 in 2023 to $70.01 million in 2024, then to $52.18 million in 2025.
As per the Punch, Nigeria is currently Africa’s largest IDA borrower, and the third-biggest in the world, as the West African country’s stock of World Bank International Development Association loans has climbed to $18.5 billion.
Nigeria's exposure surged by $1.4 billion, or 8.2%, from $17.1 billion in September 2024 to $18.5 billion in September 2025.
Nigeria’s total external debt was reported to be at $46.98 billion as of June 30, 2025.
dgitrader: Theres is corruption all over the world But its type in arewaland, is institutionalised by religious, tribal, class, and political bigotry. Deep and firmly rooted, it can not be uprooted. All this talk about lack of development, insecurity, radicalism, diseases, crisis, etc are just the fruits, the root is deep and not talked about.
There is no topic too sacred to confront. If Nigerians challenge their so-called leaders with real questions, and back those questions with cameras, evidence, and persistence, the silence will break. Show the world the public schools where children still sit on bare floors, and the primary health centers where people are turned away because there are no supplies. The spotlight shouldn’t be on billion-naira jets or gold-trimmed motorcades. It should follow reporters who enter these leaders’ villages, film the crumbling classrooms, speak to the children wandering the streets without guidance, and ask: Has your governor ever set foot here? Do the VIPs benefiting from government contracts even remember this place?
Change won’t come politely. It will come through relentless, unconventional pressure, the kind that makes neglect impossible to hide and shame impossible to ignore.
Many archaic systems remain in place, systems that no longer work in today’s world. The Almajiri system, for example, could be reformed to include Western education, trade, and artisanship, giving children practical skills alongside religious instruction.
Agricultural and farming schools, with commercial-scale animal husbandry, could be established, similar to successful models in Brazil and China. Food-processing facilities could also be set up to prevent the waste of harvests every season.
Yet the leaders remain silent on development. Their voices are loud only when competing for power, and they often use that power to oppress their own people.
Consider this: the primary healthcare center in Buhari’s village is likely under-resourced, and students in local schools sit on the ground. Katsina natives have held power for over a decade, including Yaradua and Buhari.
Meanwhile, Dangote is worth $30 billion. Yet the public facilities in his hometown,schools, clinics,remain woefully inadequate. The contrast is stark and undeniable.
He slapped you in Manchester ? Report the assault to Manchester police. Send them the video evidence Also send the video to the British high commission in Nigeria He will be banned from ever traveling to the UK His Visa will be cancelled If he is a British citizen he will be arrested on his next trip.
You have to start making these people accountable. Sue him for 1 million pounds for assault.