₦airaland Forum

Available

Available

MrBrownJay1:
you see the problem with you people is that you ask ONE particular question and then give follow ups (to that particular question) that has absolutely nothing to do with the question at hand. you are confused to say the least... see yourself, cant you understand simple ENGLISH?!?!?

so, your initial question was: if i thought there was a "purpose" to humans APPEARING on earth.... to which i replied that: "NO. there is no purpose whatsoever to human APPEARING on earth, its the work of evolution" (aka evolution is the reason why we appeared on earth AND there isnt any purpose to it)

but now, you want to twist what i wrote by claiming something COMPETELY IRRELEVANT TO WHAT I JUST WROTE

AGAIN: living life to the fullest should be the purpose of any human being living on earth, BUT there is no purpose whatsoever to how human beings appeared on earth, because thats the work of EVOLUTION. duh!

Why should a human with no purpose to life, live a righteous life?
How do we define a righteous life?

FxMasterz:
Not all doctrinal matters were resolved in Acts 15. They only tackled the one that surfaced at the time. The epistles that were written were written to address other matters. And matters continued to arise even after the apostles were gone. The JW organization for example created a cult out of doctrinal matters.

Oga mention the ones that were not settled na. And why are pastors today not settling biblical doctrinal contradictions like the apostles?

MightySparrow:
...


In the first instance what concerns you about the person that asked for advice and you could not give your own, you are questioning me.
Is anything wrong with you you?

Are you saying that you are too big for one to ask questions from?

Car inspection

I'm available

Available

Car inspection in Lagos

Available

I'm available

FxMasterz:
Would you list them please?

You should list them oga. You were the one that said that not all doctrinal matters were resolved. So you can list them.

MrBrownJay1:
not at all, just like Animals on earth its just all about EVOLUTION.

Since we are like animals without a purpose, why do you think that humans have to live a righteous life. Because you mentioned righteousness as one of the standard of living life to the fullest. How do we define what is righteous and what is not?

FxMasterz:
The doctrinal disagreement was resolved but that does not mean that all doctrinal disagreements were resolved. Most of the epistles of the new testament were written to address doctrinal disagreements. Acts 15 shows that we're still brothers even in the midst of disagreements.

Can you list some of the doctrinal disagreements that was not resolved?

Car inspection

I'm available

I'm available

MrBrownJay1:
the above is MY universal answer to the question you asked me... do you want me to also have a lawyer to certify it?

I guess you meant your personal opinion actually. Which is fine. Now do you think there is a purpose why humans appeared on the surface of the earth today?

MrBrownJay1:
i have already replied that yeye question of yours...here it is again:



THE ABOVE IS MY REPLY TO YOUR QUESTION... and you can take it or TAKE IT!

Again, is the answer above your opinion or it's a universally accepted way of living life to the full?

Car inspection in Lagos

Available

Available

MrBrownJay1:
this has nothing to do with paranoia and all to do with you asking the same question on and on, even though i have already answered you... just because you dont like my answer doesnt mean that if you ask it again and again, it will miraculously change. everything you are asking now, i have already answered. just go back and read it if in doubt.

Please show me where you mentioned the source of the standard you gave me for enjoying life to the fullest? You never even admitted if those standards were your personal opinion or they were a universal opinion.

FxMasterz:
The disagreement Paul and Barnabas had was not doctrinal but they had a disagreement. That's the point. There could be disagreements. That doesn't dissolve the oneness of Christ's body.

The disagreement recorded in Acts 15 was doctrinal. Why did you avoid talking about this?

Was the doctrinal disagreement in Acts 15 later resolved? Or was it left to everyone to decide what they will believe independently?

MightySparrow:
Okay.

You that you are sure, tell us what you know about these pastors and their teachings.

Be honest please.

I am hammering on honesty.

I have nothing to tell you.....you recommended the pastors. You are supposed to answer the questions that followed your recommendation.

Car inspection

I'm available

Available

FxMasterz:
Michael547, Stop disturbing Mightysparrow. He already knows you force falsehood on your congratulations, that's why he's asking you who made you a judge of pastors' doctrines?

Pastors are humans. They're not God. They can disagree on matters of interpretation. It happened in Acts 15. Paul and Barnabas had disagreements too. One agreement we all have as Christians is that Christ is the Son of God (not an angel) who came to die for man's sins, and resurrected to give us eternal life. He's coming again for His saints to live together with Him for all eternity. That's our common ground.

No pastor forces his doctrines on church members. You can feed on the Word of God from a pastor, you're free to disagree with some things. Ask questions and debate doctrines during Bible studies. Get home and study for yourself. Hold to whatever you know to be the truth. Follow Jesus. Not any man. That's it.

Doctrines don't separate us. We are one in Christ Jesus. It's not doctrines that make us one but Christ.

The Roman Catholics deviate completely from the very foundations of Christian doctrine. That's why the OP sees that they're not Christians. That's a church that worships the queen of heaven - Semiramis (Astaroth) disguised as Mary the mother of Jesus. They worship images.

All those pastors mentioned by Mightysparrow are still brothers in Christ. They fellowship together and have respect for one another even though there might be slight differences in doctrines.

Jesus is the basis for our oneness. Not doctrines.

Was the disagreement that Paul and Barnabas had a biblical doctrinal disagreements?
If yes, what was the doctrinal matter about?

MrBrownJay1:
you asked and i gave you all the answers you needed... trying to go round and round asking the same questions on and on, just because you didnt like my answer, is your problem, not mine.

you can push your religious ideas all you want, but that certainly aint gonna change MY ANSWERS. is it?

I never said I did not like your answer. I only asked for the source and if it was your personal opinion or a universal standard. You are just been paranoid for no reason.

Car inspection in Lagos

Available