₦airaland Forum

Kemetian:
Thanks for educating them.

Nairaland is the ONLY black forum that you see people supporting white supremacy and white racists.

It’s an absolute embarrassment.

Thank goodness the world doesn’t know about this forum.

When christian is added to the racist biography, they think he supports them when in reality he only cares about white people

They are looking for who can make the biggest pot ever

they are all the same pretendious occultic political religion just to deceive the masses

stop labelling yourself right or left

post=136793594:
My problem with you is that you argue like a woman, this one this that.. just zig zag. You contradict yourself without knowing.

I never said any race is superior than the other, go back and read my first post. There is no perfect race anywhere but there are things easier for some race than the others. It doesn't mean being superior.

Even Lee Kuan Yew believed this, below is his quote:

The Bell curve is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85 per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score on average 100. Asians score more … the Bell curve authors put it at least 10 points higher. These are realities that, if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow.

-Lee Kuan Yew, The Man & His Ideas, 1997

Read this article on more of Lee Kuan Yew views on racial abilities https://elewa.substack.com/p/never-ask-a-nigerian-what-lee-kuan

using IQ averages as a baseline for what’s easier for one group than another is still misleading. IQ is influenced by environment, education, nutrition and opportunity, so population averages don’t tell the full story.

Even Lee Kuan Yew’s quote was made in the context of policy planning for Singapore, not as a statement on racial potential. Countries rise or fall based on institutions, governance, and investment in human capital, not inherent IQ. So while some tasks may statistically favor certain traits, it doesn’t determine overall ability, achievement, or the potential of any group.”

okpouman:
The problem is indiscipline of Nigerian blacks.

Discipline and a good heart can change civilisations for the better.

Most black males have evil hearts and are grossly indisciplined

saying most black males have evil hearts is statistically baseless and logically flawed. Human behavior varies individually, not by race. There are disciplined and kind people of every background. Societies succeed or fail largely due to institutions, governancemand culture, not inherent traits of people. for example, Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Rwanda all demonstrate disciplined societies because of policy and social structures not racial genetics

No nation or racial group is free from corruption, misbehavior or societal issues. Instead of accepting racial blame, focus on solutions, education, governance, accountability and community values.

post=136790654:
Don't quote me if you can't comprehend my speculation. My point is majorly based on natural human/racial abilities.

Don't bring in colonialism here, our middle class citizens immigrating to the west en mass is still a form of self-voluntary colonization.

North Korea with all sanctions and isolation were still able to become a strong country no African country can match.

If you sample 100 West Africans and 100 Indians and train them in strength sport which group do you think will come out on top?

It’s definitely the West African team.

The Gulf countries in Asia understood their strength (oil money) and weakness (science and tech), they were able to hire the best structural Engineers from all parts of the world to build a futuristic and modern city.

Accepting reality is not being in bondage or racist. It is the first stage of growth, because you will work with what you have and hire the best for what you dont have.

Take a look at families, some kids perform better than their siblings in certain areas. In school class some students more brilliant than the others. This is not something to be emotional or angry about. It is Mother Nature.

Success of a nation is far more linked to institutions, governance, education and resources not biology. for example: Japan and South Korea were very poor 70 years ago. Today they are among the richest not because of racial superiority but because of policy, education and investment.

North Korea’s strength is almost entirely military deterrence because of hostile neigbours, Economically they are weaker than many African states. they have a gdp of $25b and wide spread poverty.

some populations may have genetic advantages in specific sports, West Africans in sprinting, East Africans in long distance, Europeans in swimming, etc. But those differences are narrow. Nations don’t rise because of sprinting ability. India’s global strength comes from tech and science; West Africa shines in sports. It’s not about inherent superiority, but about what societies choose to invest in.

on the GULF countries success, it is also about governance and and economic strategy not race,

individuals differ in ability, but when you look at groups or nations, the determining factor is education, institutions and opportunity. for example, Singapore was once poor with no natural resources but with good governance and planning, it became one of the richest nations in the world.

History and data show nations rise or fall based on institutions, leadership and strategic use of resources. North Korea is not strong, it’s isolated and poor. The Gulf’s success is governance and oil money not biology. African nations’ challenge is corruption and governance not nature.

MadamExcellency:
Western civilisation is under threat. The provocateurs are people who ran away from their country because those countries aren't working or favouring them but they came to the USA and never want to integrate but to turn it into the hell they came from

are you white?

if you are black why the self sabotage?

hegelian:
I don't think it's mostly IQ, I think it's mostly EQ.. We let our emotion control us too much and this affect our planning to a short term view.. A typical black man will throw reason away even in the face of obvious evidence just so his emotion wins.. An average black don't plan for long, we mostly plan for short term Like a year or two, so I won't say it's only IQ but EQ mostly.. You will see us voting for worst candidates for silly reasons and defend silly things for sentiments, it was also why we were converted to Christianity and islam en masse and took away our own myth for evil

This isn’t a race issue, it’s a human issue. Every human being is biased, emotional, and capable of throwing away reason when sentiment takes over, you’ll find this behavior across all races and cultures.

The difference between short-term and long-term planning is not about “Black EQ” vs “White EQ.” It’s mainly a class and scarcity issue. When people live in scarcity, they naturally focus on short-term survival, food, rent, school fees, safety rather than 20-year strategies. This is seen everywhere, not just in Africa. Poor communities in the U.S., Asia, and Latin America show the same short-term thinking patterns.

Wealthy people, regardless of race, have the luxury of long-term planning because their immediate needs are secured. That’s why you see elites building dynasties and institutions while the average man, anywhere in the world, is focused on next week’s bills.

So, the problem is not that “Blacks are emotional.” The real issue is scarcity and weak systems, once those improve, long-term planning naturally follows.

DMerciful:
You're giving so much exvuses which tells me you're not ready.

You keep throwing the racist world as if tribalism is not worse than racism.

South Korea is an example i used when i said east Asian countries. China is a communist country but has superceded the west in development in the shortest possible time without giving excuses. Remember the century of humiliation of China?

Finally, all countries were colonized at some point including the British! America got their independence in 1776 and became a world powee in a short time. This is the best time for any serious country to develop in leaps and bounds because the tendency of invasions has reduced drastically

Yes, tribalism is a problem in Africa but racism is not somehow less. Racism was institutionalized into global systems, slavery, colonisation and global trade rules and Africa is still dealing with those effects today. Tribalism is internal and can be overcome with stronger institutions but it didn’t build global wealth structures like racism and colonialism did. Comparing the two as if they’re the same ignores scale and impact.

You mentioned South Korea and China. But let’s be accurate, only a handful of East Asian countries (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong) The rest of east Asia is still developing. It’s misleading to say east Asia did it, why not Africa? as if all east Asian countries are suddenly superpowers.

You say China developed “without excuses,” but do you even read history? The Chinese themselves gave plenty of excuses during their underdevelopment. They spoke for decades about the “Century of Humiliation” as a justification for their struggles.

One of the reasons China is rich today is because their government and banks took bold unconventional steps. They printed money and directed it into massive infrastructure projects, railways, highways, power plants, entire cities. This state led investment created jobs, connected markets, and fueled industrial growth.

Their rise wasn’t magic and it wasn’t excuse free. It was built on historical grievances, disciplined state planning, authoritarian control, and using tools (like aggressive monetary expansion) that many other countries are too afraid to use. That’s not “no excuses,” that’s learning from history and bending the system to their advantage.

You also said America became a power quickly after 1776. Wrong. America didn’t become a world power until after World War II (1945) almost 170 years after independence. Before then, it was industrializing, expanding internally, and even went through a brutal civil war. The US had its own struggles, and its wealth was fueled by slavery, land grabs from Native Americans, and global exploitation.

DMerciful:
You're speaking emotionally and biased. Its on record that the first humans were blacks so we got a good head start.

Secondly, at independence, we were at par with or doing better than the east Asian countries. Where are they today and where are we today?

Thirdly, the things you mentioned about literacy, democratic institutions, technological adoptions were already invented and brought by missionaries and through our journeys to other countries, all we had to do was copy but still failing shamelessly.

Finally, show me one black country that we can confidently say will be a developed country in the next 50yrs?

When we tell ourselves the truth, then maybe we can take deliberate steps to remove that label of our inability to govern ourselves. When i say black, i mean the average black ofcourse there would be exceptions but they're in the extreme minority

i am not emotional here and biased but telling you the long term effect of what might happen when you continue listening to racist ideas and judging yourself based on racist ideas...

Yes, the earliest humans came from Africa, that’s basic anthropology but that doesn’t mean Africa had a head start in civilization. Evolution doesn’t equal economic development. Civilisations rise and fall based on geography, resources, trade routes and historical events. The fact that Africans were first humans doesnt automatically mean they should be first in modern GDP rankings. That’s a faulty comparison.

Countries like South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan received huge injections of aid, military support and favorable trade terms from the US and allies during the Cold War because they were seen as strategic buffers against communism. African countries didn’t get that kind of support; instead, many got IMF and World Bank policies and neo-colonial interference that crippled growth. Context matters.

you are ignoring the fact that Africa already had systems of governance, trade and education before colonisation. Missionaries and colonial schools weren’t about empowering Africans, they were designed to produce clerks and interpreters to serve the colonial system. Copying Western models without sovereignty or resources doesn’t equal success, it often meant dependency.

Predicting the future is tricky but dismissing all African nations ignores progress that’s happening. Look at Rwanda’s governance reforms, Botswana’s stable growth, Nigeria’s tech sector, Kenya’s fintech and infrastructure, Ghana’s democratic resilience. No one thought South Korea in the 1960s, poor, war-torn, illiterate would become a global powerhouse in 50 years. Yet it did. Why assume no Black nation could do the same?

That’s the same rhetoric racists use pointing at averages while ignoring structural barriers and opportunities. People everywhere are average. It’s systems, institutions, and leadership that lift entire populations. Saying “Blacks can’t govern themselves” is lazy; the reality is Africa has been systematically undermined but still shows resilience and growth in many areas.

post=136783729:
Your first paragraph (Our society is functioning) made me to stop reading. I can see you yet to wake up from your delusion. Bye

You stopped at my first sentence because the rest of my reply dismantles the propaganda you’re repeating. That’s not debate, that’s avoidance. If you really believed your position, you would have engaged my points on history, progress and stereotypes instead of dismissing them as delusion.

Calling facts delusion doesn’t make them disappear, it just shows you’re not ready to face them. I’m open to a real discussion, but if you’d rather shut it down, it only proves that my argument challenged the narrative you’re holding onto.

DMerciful:
Blacks have not shown capacity to lead themselves to high standards of living and good governance

When you write that “Blacks have not shown capacity to lead themselves to high standards of living and good governance” I honestly find that very troubling.

That exact line has been used by white racists and colonizers for centuries to justify slavery and colonization, the claim that Black people can’t govern themselves. To hear a Black person repeat it is basically copying their rhetoric word for word.

what you type dismisses the real progress we’ve made since independence. In just a few decades we’ve improved literacy, life expectancy, democratic institutions, technology adoption and entrepreneurship. Europe and America took centuries (and exploited colonies) to reach their current state.

How does a person with your mindset instill confidence in their own child? If you believe your people have “no capacity,” then you are saying your child, and even yourself, have no capability to achieve greatness. That’s not only untrue, it’s dangerous to believe. It plants self-doubt where there should be ambition.

The statement also collapses on itself. If you include yourself, you’re admitting you too have no capacity. If you see yourself or your child as an exception, then you’ve already disproven your own claim because progress always starts with individuals who scale their efforts into community change.

Instead of repeating colonial propaganda, we should acknowledge the challenges African countries still face, corruption, weak institutions, external pressures but also recognize the resilience and creativity we’ve shown. The honest framing should be we have problems to solve, but we are capable of solving them ourselves.

So yes, your statement doesn’t inspire confidence, it dismisses progress and it echoes racist ideas that were designed to keep us down.

government can not just come and take your land except for public good nut also have it in mind that you are buying the land not as a very long term investment you can pass to your great grand children.

it is also important, you check document properly so that you wont buy your property in the wrong place.

post=136783573:
Great mind you have which i like but we can share opinions respectfully. You summarized your points by saying the issue is society and not genetics. The question now is why cant we build a functioning society?
Also why do blacks do well in running races, boxing, etc and not so well in swimming. The earlier you realize that genetics factor a lot in human ability the better. Like I said before, no race can have it all. Whites are not good in some areas of life also. It is what it is, we all need each other in one way or the other.

Our society is functioning but because you compare it to Western culture, you assume it isn’t. From colonization until now, Africa has made real progress and will continue to progress. Development is never stagnant; it evolves over time.

The Western world itself wasn’t built by whites as a whole, but by a small group of elites. They designed systems, built special schools to reproduce leadership, and used cheap labor often from colonies and enslaved people to create their wealth. Ordinary whites didn’t build society; they simply benefited from structures created by elites. Measuring progress only by Western standards ignores that every culture develops differently, and Africa’s growth is still ongoing.

On sports, you are repeating racist tropes. Out of millions of Black people in Nigeria, we only have 1 world class runner. Football is the most popular sport here, yet only very few ever reach global success. Boxing and running are international sports, you’ll find white fighters, Mexican fighters, Black fighters, and others. They are diverse fields.

Saying “Blacks are boxers” or “Blacks are runners” is not factual. Seeing a few Black runners and concluding “all Blacks run because of genetics” is lazy stereotyping. You don’t see many Black swimmers or tennis players not because they don’t exist, but because of lack of access, training, and opportunity. Talent is everywhere opportunity is not.

Sports like running and boxing are also relatively cheap and accessible, which is why they are more common in poorer neighborhoods. Many people use them as a path out of poverty. That’s not genetics, it’s access, economics, and opportunity.

Every race has diversity. Within a single race you will find intelligent, creative, strong, and energetic people. Claiming one race is “good” in one area while another race is “bad” in another is pseudo-science with no real data. There are brilliant Black writers, scientists, and innovators just as there are among Mexicans, Asians, and every other group.

Fuckyoumod:
comprehension is the real issue here.
You did not comprehend what I wrote.

You are the one that have comprehension issue.

I love the audacity and confidence of those tribes, I am impressed

post=136782139:
I don't know what kirk said but let me throw in my own observation and life experience. Sub human and inferior may not be the correct term to use. When it comes to IQ that is creativity and brain power, the whites are way above compared to blacks. We have blacks with high IQ but they are always minute in a high population of very low IQ. Then when it comes to strength, strong immunity and body esthetics, blacks are on top way above the whites. God never created species/animals to be equal, take a look at dogs, birds, plants and animal. Different breeds have different strength and power. The USA understood this fact first and it enabled them to become no 1 in the world. They use blacks for sports and entertainment industry, use Asians for management and innovation. They the whites are very good in management and growth maintenance.
So in summary we are not subhumans or inferior but there are things very hard for blacks especially growth maintenance, innovation and management.
The blacks with high IQ won't be able to function properly in a dysfunctional society that is why most highly achieved blacks did so in Western countries.
We have to accept this and not feel bad about it. It is natural and nobody can have it all. Blacks use to be on top when the world was operating on sheer human strength and power but unfortunately now it is operating on brain power. In order for us to grow our government system must be changed which is all about who has the highest money to share. This unfortunately won't happen soon. So African countries will keep on being the last

My guy, you are just being brainwashed.

1-IQ is not equal to Intelligence or Creativity, IQ tests mostly measure pattern recognition and test-taking ability, not creativity or brain power. Many psychologists agree that intelligence is multidimensional, emotional intelligence, problem-solving, social skills, and adaptability often matter more than raw IQ numbers. So saying one race is above another in IQ is not only misleading but also based on outdated science.

2.Environment Shapes Achievement, If you put any group of people in a broken system with corruption, poverty, weak institutions, and lack of infrastructure, they will underperform. That’s not genetics, that’s environment. Nigerians and other Africans who move abroad thrive in tech, medicine, law, academia, and politics. That proves the potential is there, it just needs the right environment to flourish.

3. It’s false to say Blacks are mainly in sports and entertainment. In fact, there are more white athletes and entertainers overall because the US. is majority white. The visibility of a few Black superstars creates the illusion that this is all Blacks are good at. But in reality, whites dominate numerically in sports like baseball, swimming, hockey, golf, country music, Hollywood, etc. What you’re describing is a selection bias,people only notice the famous Black athletes and entertainers.

The reason African societies are struggling is not "low IQ" but centuries of slavery, colonialism, and ongoing economic exploitation. Imagine if Europe had been stripped of resources and enslaved for years would they be leading in innovation today? Likely not.

What we see is not about biology, but about historical advantage.

You said: "Blacks with high IQ can only succeed abroad." But that itself proves the issue is society, not genetics. The same Black person who “can’t function” in a corrupt system thrives in a functioning system. That kills the argument that the issue is innate intelligence.

cr7lomo:
We are talking about crime.. u selectively selected murder...is murder the only crime in USA??

even if it is crime, whites commit more crimes than blacks. whites make up about 60%+ of the US. population and Black people about 12–13%, in raw numbers, whites commit more crimes overall. That’s simply because there are more white people.

you are just being brain washed so that you can see yourself as inferior.

Fuckyoumod:
Kirk said that over 150 years Africans are yet to get anything right but kept blaming the whiteman. There is sense in what he said.

RIP to him.

That is the type of defeatism he is preaching to you as a black. Telling you that your home country can never be good, that is because you are looking at the west as the standard.

Think about the effects it can have on you..you will start looking at yourself as inferior.

Smartcitizen:
Not Igbo people please and that's why other ethnic groups always claim they want to dominate them in Nigeria.

Igbos have this superiority complex that they just feel like everyone is just under them and it use to create problems for them.


🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

pls continue to believe you are superior because that is the only way to achieve things in this world and have confidence

voortrekker966:
Show me one lie there.

I know your reply to me will be 'inferiority complex'. Call me what you wish but he didn't lie there.

you are free to believe anything you like without questioning the narrative.

if someone is pushing a certain narrative about you, dont you think it will affect you and your children? or how the world view you, dont you think it will affect you and your children self esteem.

maybe you are short sighted, but narrative sticks and they destroy livelyhood, confidence and future generation because they are already being labelled what they are not.

i

SamuraiXXX:
The fact that he got shot by a white guy does not necessarily mean that what he said about blacks is not true.

I have a sister who is doing well in the United States and she told me that she consciously avoids living in black-dominated areas because of violence and intense envy from black neighbours

so white people do not envy their neigbours right?

so area where poor white lives, there are no violence there??

as a rule of thumb, if you are successful, you do not live where poor people are regardless of race.

ClassicEvilSpir:
everyone has their own outlook on life.
bro, out of every black dominated nation on earth, Barbados is the only one relatively successful.
I am just being realistic.
Kirk was being realistic. same people crying for him are same people who are going to attack me for my views.
if you have experienced the ills of this country, how your passport can't access you pleasant travel experience, poor standard of living despite resources that rivals many first world countries, you should know better.
lol, even black lives matter advocates don't want to live with their own race.

also to add, David hundeyin blocked me because I opposed his outlook on the whites keeping Africa poor. isn't this evidence the whites are superior?

if you continue to believe you are inferior, you will never achieve anything in life even if you travel out, you will always be happy with servitude.

cr7lomo:
Charlie kirk was absolutely right....blacks commit most crimes in America than whites ...u can Google it... whites mostly commit heinous crimes...but by statistics...blacks commit most crimes

that is a big lie

you are being taught to hate yourself by these white racists.

the data says that white commite more crimes than black.

ClassicEvilSpir:
I once had a colleague who would defend Nigeria, and rationalise the corruption and unnecessary bureaucracy in the country.
he attended private institutions, and would say other Nigerians complaining were overreacting about the state of the system.
until of course, Nigeria finally happened to him in the worst way possible.
it is a different outlook when one has not been a victim.

but how does this correlate with the topic of discussion?

look at them defending this.

This is just weird, never seen this

Many Nigerians believe they are sub human and inferior

erad:
I really fail to understand the essence of your argument. White women benefit more, great. Are there blacks and Hispanics that have been employed courtesy affirmative action? Yes! So that validates whatever it is he said in the context of DEI.

I don't even know what brought someone benefitting more than the other into the discussion.

What Charlie said was in context and the mischievous OP is quoting him out of context, that's all I'm trying to clarify.

can you put into context what he meant by this

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified. OR this

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

according charlie kirk...black commits all the violent crime in america even though they are 13% of the populations

what an irony...He got shot by his fellow white man

All his quotes about black people

Blacks are violent

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.

Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more...

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

tyler robinson, a 22 year old white male from UTAH

Myrepublic:
The killer was a professional, judging by the video. Looks like an ex military guy

the killer is tyler robinson a 21 years old boy with no history of serving in the military