Rilwayne001:


Salam bro, I missed your highly profound input sire. How your side?

haffaze777:


brother where have you been since all dis day? How is ibadah?u re welcome back

Demmzy15:
I'm loving this wallahi, lexiconkabir, Rilwayne001, haffaze777, carinmom, yazach, mubarakopeyemi, et al. Come and see fresh meat!

Demmzy15:
We don't deal with barca

Demmzy15:
Aminat508 Lexiconkabir Rilwayne001, haffaze777 etc this calls for celebration

ladelade11:
Please house! Anyone familiar with Frankline Uni in Columbus Ohio

truthman2012:


Liar, slave of allahh.

What did you say in that your thread you claim the issue was dealt with?

But lieman seriously u didn't see me and u didn't ask of me. Why na

haffaze777:



My chief nah your "oju" be dis

baami otojor metta
how you dey cope with those guys na

Empiree:
Really dont have their time. If you type the verse raised by Op in search bar, you will notice many christians have been asking the same question endlessly. I remembered answering them in detail last year. So there isnt no point engaging them on this subject again. Here is a link to Sura 10:94. Full of threads opening by Christians smh https://www.nairaland.com/search?q=Quran+10%3A94&search=Search

jcross19:
you people have nothing to offer or say, they tabled a simple question to you people, you find it hard comprehend and answer but trying derail the thread. Is now getting interesting since no any islamic scholar has come to explain what op is trying to say then let us admit that allah is a fool.

Pained!
the point raised by lieman is no big deal as it has been dealth with serveral times. Lieman is a mischievous cat as you and every other Christians are. He still cite Every intentionally misinterpreted Quranic verse that has been dealth with by Muslims in previous threads in every new thread he wants to open. so it would match his legacy of mischief. You want me to take you repulsive goats serious? Raining insults on Allah doesn't surprise me, but the makes me laugh is the son of god whom you worship who once came out of kitty kat and cried just like this

How holy is such a god
Don't cry me river, cry me an ocean

Rilwayne001:


London for what?

Rilwayne001:


lool.. My Chief, where have you been? Truthman and his reprobate heathens are not ready to change, but we are trying our best

lexiconkabir:
boss, leave that guy sorry oldman jare, how that side na?

malvisguy212:
what is the purpose of you slaves of allah roaming this thread without defending your false doctrine ?

darkenedrebel:


who's that chick?

slimmy05:
go to the new school and email your old school that you want to transfer your sevis that your parents decided you stay close to your family members

slimmy05:
you need to enrol in the school of your choice and get their I-20

slimmy05:
Have you secured admission from the new school? Do you have the I-20 with you?

plappville:


Gormless...

plappville:


My dear, what's she the bull shit she's. .. This your sentence shows you are very very intelligent. ..

Answer: In Matthew’s record of what is commonly called the Sermon on the Mount, these words of Jesus are recorded: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18).

It is frequently argued that if Jesus did not “abolish” the law, then it must still be binding. Accordingly, such components as the Sabbath-day requirement must be operative still, along with perhaps numerous other elements of the Mosaic Law. This assumption is grounded in a misunderstanding of the words and intent of this passage. Christ did not suggest here that the binding nature of the law of Moses would remain forever in effect. Such a view would contradict everything we learn from the balance of the New Testament (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15).

Of special significance in this study is the word rendered “abolish.” It translates the Greek term kataluo, literally meaning “to loosen down.” The word is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It is used, for example, of the destruction of the Jewish temple by the Romans (Matthew 26:61; 27:40; Acts 6:14), and of the dissolving of the human body at death (2 Corinthians 5:1). The term can carry the extended meaning of “to overthrow,” i.e., “to render vain, deprive of success.” In classical Greek, it was used in connection with institutions, laws, etc., to convey the idea of “to invalidate.”

It is especially important to note how the word is used in Matthew 5:17. In this context, “abolish” is set in opposition to “fulfill.” Christ came “...not to abolish, but to fulfill.” Jesus did not come to this earth for the purpose of acting as an opponent of the law. His goal was not to prevent its fulfillment. Rather, He revered it, loved it, obeyed it, and brought it to fruition. He fulfilled the law’s prophetic utterances regarding Himself (Luke 24:44). Christ fulfilled the demands of the Mosaic law, which called for perfect obedience under threat of a “curse” (see Galatians 3:10, 13). In this sense, the law’s divine design will ever have an abiding effect. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was given.

If, however, the law of Moses bears the same relationship to men today, in terms of its binding status, then it was not fulfilled, and Jesus failed at what He came to do. On the other hand, if the Lord did accomplish His goal, then the law was fulfilled, and it is not a binding legal institution today. Further, if the law of Moses was not fulfilled by Christ—and thus remains as a binding legal system for today—then it is not just partially binding. Rather, it is a totally compelling system. Jesus plainly said that not one “jot or tittle” (representative of the smallest markings of the Hebrew script) would pass away until all was fulfilled. Consequently, nothing of the law was to fail until it had completely accomplished its purpose. Jesus fulfilled the law. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it. What Jesus' death means for the sacrificial system, it also means for the other aspects of the law.

plappville:


Why are you Pained

hahahaha mentality of a myopic megalomania

plappville:
[s][/s]

Valid here....

truthman2012:
Since all souls MUST die, why did Jesus escape death in islam?

Quran 21:35 : Every soul must taste
of death, and We try you with
evil and with good, for ordeal.
And unto Us ye will be returned.

The quran says every soul MUST die. All prophets including allahh's greatest prophet, Muhammad died also. Many of them died disgracefully.

In islam only Jesus was not allowed to die but taken to heaven alive, why?

Muslims also believe Jesus will come back again to marry, bear children and die. Since he was destined to do all these, why was he deprived of them and taken to heaven abruptly only to come back for them much later?

Who was allahh afraid of by taking Jesus straight to heaven to escape death instead of dealing with his enemies?

The quran says every soul MUST die. [s]All prophets including allahh's greatest prophet, Muhammad died also. Many of them died disgracefully.[/s]

In islam only Jesus was not allowed to die but taken to heaven alive, why?

foolish question he saved him from his enemies

Muslims also believe Jesus will come back again to marry, bear children and die. Since he was destined to do all these, why was he deprived of them and taken to heaven abruptly only to come back for them much later?

That's why he was "destined" to do so and the time he shall do so is part of the "destiny". do you even know what destiny and time is? Time is a part of destiny which is when it is being fulfilled phase by phase olodo! He was saved from his enemies who wanted to kill him and that's pretty cool. Not the helpless Jesus in the Bible which Yahweh forsook and made him chop koboko like an erring slave. And was ultimately nailed like a wood on wood. That's the God of Christians dealt with by a group of men with muscles
stop being foolish by hate lieman

Who was allahh afraid of by taking Jesus straight to heaven to escape death instead of dealing with his enemies?

Trust me when I say you people are just jobless lots without sense you will say I'm abusive.
So saving someone from his enemy means the saviour is afraid of someone? how foolish Iesa was saved an Glory be to Allah.
Jesus wasn't saved in the Bible! Yahweh couldn't do anything but watch himself or his son or whatever suffer. That's your God beaten blue black by a grouped of armed men in muscles he couldn't save himself either. Jesus himself was regretting and asked the bigger God why he has forsksen him..
Yahweh couldn't save Jesus and he couldn't deal with his enemies