NafeesaAA's Posts
Nairaland Forum › NafeesaAA's Profile › NafeesaAA's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (of 41 pages)
Typical Hausa Turban
|
Typical Fulani Turban
|
Do you know the Hausa turbans are different from Fulani ones. Hausa ones are generally bulb-shaped without the two tail-like pieces of cloth sticking out from the top. The Fulani ones, apart from the tail-like elements, are also more closely similar to the Touareag ones in structure and design. Though these days they are both worn interchangeably.
|
Do they use quota system in UK?/
|
Good one from Arewa
|
Panal beat them before deporting the idiotss
|
The Civil War was fought with less lethal weapons compared to what will happen if a all out war is fought. Ojuwku had the support of 100% of Igbos, Kanu cannot get 50% of his supporters to agree on fighting a war as an option. The SS wouldn't want to get involved, because getting involved means all oil installation can become legitimate targets. The SS will rather be neutrals in this war, compared to the civil war where they were conquered. Boko haram have ISIS in Syria, AQIB in the Magbrib, Alqeada in Somalia as allies. These terrorist groups support them with training and equipment. IPOB would not get any international support, because America see Nigeria as an important partner, a major UN contributor to peacekeeping. France on the other hand wouldn't want a war so that the fight against Boko haram wouldn't be disrupted. The Odds are against IPOB, the SE is 7 times less than Niger state in land mass. Encircling it wouldn't take much. Nigeria air superiority is a factor to considered, IPOB will loose control over its airspace and sea embargo will be imposed. Remember, this war will be limited to the SE alone. The South West will surely steam up their borders against flow of refugees. Turkish connection ?? am not yet convince, Turkey is a major defender of Muslims, I don't see them fighting on the side of IPOB that threatened to kill Muslims.The Civilian JTF in Borno and Yobe can effectively keep boko haram in check while NA concentrate on IPOB But then, I agree with you, War is the last thing we need. |
The Civil War was fought with less lethal weapons compared to what will happen if a all out war is fought. Ojuwku had the support of 100% of Igbos, Kanu cannot get 50% of his supporters to agree on fighting a war as an option. The SS wouldn't want to get involved, because getting involved means all oil installation can become legitimate targets. The SS will rather be neutrals in this war, compared to the civil war where they were conquered. Boko haram have ISIS in Syria, AQIB in the Magbrib, Alqeada in Somalia as allies. These terrorist groups support them with training and equipment. IPOB would not get any international support, because America see Nigeria as an important partner, a major UN contributor to peacekeeping. France on the other hand wouldn't want a war so that the fight against Boko haram wouldn't be disrupted. The Odds are against IPOB, the SE is 7 times less than Niger state in land mass. Encircling it wouldn't take much. Nigeria air superiority is a factor to considered, IPOB will loose control over its airspace and sea embargo will be imposed. Remember, this war will be limited to the SE alone. The South West will surely steam up their borders against flow of refugees. Turkish connection ?? am not yet convince, Turkey is a major defender of Muslims, I don't see them fighting on the side of IPOB that threatened to kill Muslims.The Civilian JTF in Borno and Yobe can effectively keep boko haram in check while NA concentrate on IPOB But then, I agree with you, War is the last thing we need. |
THE IPOB FRAUD AND THE BURDEN OF RESPONSIBILITY BY Ahmed Musa Husaini EXCERPT: "... Only when Kanu threatened the elections in Anambra that the region's political leaders remember that they have a responsibility to rein Kanu in. By feeding their people on a steady diet of ethnic propaganda in order to distract attention from their own failures, the South-east leadership must take disproportionate blame for the present situation. The irony is, the Igbos cannot be the most persecuted ethnic group and at the same the most geographically spread nationally, with Igbo men and women eking out a living in all obscure corners of the Nigerian space. By choosing hate and incitement, Kanu and his Ipob cheerleaders have proven that they are intellectually and temperamentally incapable of leading a nonviolent self-determination. Their struggle is borne out of political blackmail and therefore devoid of any moral legitimacy. They do not represent the Igbos and do not know how to do any of those things that are of benefits to the average Igboman. Ipob thrives on hate and incitement. But human beings and nations cannot live on hate and incitement alone, yet hate and incitement are all that Ipob has to offer. But this can neither fix their present level of social and developmental malaise nor bring the South-east any political gain. It can only lead them to self-destruction with its utter, unspeakable consequences. Since its resurgence on the back of Jonathan's 2015 election defeat, the Nigerian state has tolerated Ipob more than it did any other rogue group. Ipob cannot be more-Jonathan than the ND militants who have moved on from 2015 elections and embraced the initiatives pursued by the FG through Vice President Osinbajo. Given the choice between order and anarchy, the Nigerian state has no option than to put Nnamdi Kanu where he belongs no matter the price. The only victims, as in every conflict situation, are those who are unfairly targeted on both sides. That is why we need to draw a line between the average law-abiding Nigerian Igbo wherever he is, and Ipob thugs bent on stoking an all out ethnic war. There is no moral equivalence between the Nigerian security forces and Ipob thugs. The Nigerian security must do everything to protect civilians from Ipob terrorism in the South-east and possible reprisals elsewhere. They must avoid any act of collective persecution that will feed into Ipob's narrative of collective Igbo victimhood. .... But those who support evil out of primordial allegiances have their consciences to live with, and if they don't have any, they cannot escape its consequences..." |
MISSCONGENIALITY:Did IPOB distinguished between Yoruba's and Hausa?
|
A few Igbos have always denounced the tactics of Nnamdi Kanu and his IPOB supporters. But a large majority were conspicuously silent even when Kanu incited IPOB to kill securitymen in search of his illegal radio station. Ohanaeze Ndigbo said nothing. SE politicians and traditional rulers said nothing, save for a handful. And Igbos living abroad hail Kanu as a freedom-fighter. When Kanu was arrested, they condemned the government and fought for his release, only to keep silent again when he threatened war on Nigeria, threatened to kill her president and threatened to scuttle an election. But they now find their voices to condemn the army crackdown on IPOB. To them, killing a policeman and burning vehicles and police stations are democratic freedoms, but the army using corporal punishment on anarchists is injustice. Well, the world does not work that way. In the US and UK where Kanu's admirers live, dare threaten to kill Donald Trump or Theressa May and you will be jailed for terrorism. The world also sees through Kanu's cry of marginalization in a country where Igbos have been senate presidents, petroleum ministers, finance ministers, CBN governors, and SGFs. Igbos have not been presidents or VPs of late, but those are elective offices which they deprived themselves willingly. Twice, Buhari's running mates were Igbos who as VPs could have succeeded his presidency. But the entire Southeast was a hotbed for PDP fanaticsm - which backfired in 2015. So, political miscalculation deprived the SE of the presidency and vice presidency, not marginalization by non-Igbos. In this internet age, the world is well aware of that. In short, Kanu and supporters are on a fool's errand to the laughter of the world. In today's world, you attain power through political sagacity, not by blackmailing a president you love to hate. And you don't threaten a war and expect the army to turn the other cheek. All the world's newest countries - South Sudan, Bosnia, Croatia, etc - have emerged from war. So, for Kanu to have Biafra, he must defeat the Nigerian Army. Will Biafra survive as a country? It won't, but I don't care. Let Kanu and his supporters worry about that. |
A few Igbos have always denounced the tactics of Nnamdi Kanu and his IPOB supporters. But a large majority were conspicuously silent even when Kanu incited IPOB to kill securitymen in search of his illegal radio station. Ohanaeze Ndigbo said nothing. SE politicians and traditional rulers said nothing, save for a handful. And Igbos living abroad hail Kanu as a freedom-fighter. When Kanu was arrested, they condemned the government and fought for his release, only to keep silent again when he threatened war on Nigeria, threatened to kill her president and threatened to scuttle an election. But they now find their voices to condemn the army crackdown on IPOB. To them, killing a policeman and burning vehicles and police stations are democratic freedoms, but the army using corporal punishment on anarchists is injustice. Well, the world does not work that way. In the US and UK where Kanu's admirers live, dare threaten to kill Donald Trump or Theressa May and you will be jailed for terrorism. The world also sees through Kanu's cry of marginalization in a country where Igbos have been senate presidents, petroleum ministers, finance ministers, CBN governors, and SGFs. Igbos have not been presidents or VPs of late, but those are elective offices which they deprived themselves willingly. Twice, Buhari's running mates were Igbos who as VPs could have succeeded his presidency. But the entire Southeast was a hotbed for PDP fanaticsm - which backfired in 2015. So, political miscalculation deprived the SE of the presidency and vice presidency, not marginalization by non-Igbos. In this internet age, the world is well aware of that. In short, Kanu and supporters are on a fool's errand to the laughter of the world. In today's world, you attain power through political sagacity, not by blackmailing a president you love to hate. And you don't threaten a war and expect the army to turn the other cheek. All the world's newest countries - South Sudan, Bosnia, Croatia, etc - have emerged from war. So, for Kanu to have Biafra, he must defeat the Nigerian Army. Will Biafra survive as a country? It won't, but I don't care. Let Kanu and his supporters worry about that. |
A few Igbos have always denounced the tactics of Nnamdi Kanu and his IPOB supporters. But a large majority were conspicuously silent even when Kanu incited IPOB to kill securitymen in search of his illegal radio station. Ohanaeze Ndigbo said nothing. SE politicians and traditional rulers said nothing, save for a handful. And Igbos living abroad hail Kanu as a freedom-fighter. When Kanu was arrested, they condemned the government and fought for his release, only to keep silent again when he threatened war on Nigeria, threatened to kill her president and threatened to scuttle an election. But they now find their voices to condemn the army crackdown on IPOB. To them, killing a policeman and burning vehicles and police stations are democratic freedoms, but the army using corporal punishment on anarchists is injustice. Well, the world does not work that way. In the US and UK where Kanu's admirers live, dare threaten to kill Donald Trump or Theressa May and you will be jailed for terrorism. The world also sees through Kanu's cry of marginalization in a country where Igbos have been senate presidents, petroleum ministers, finance ministers, CBN governors, and SGFs. Igbos have not been presidents or VPs of late, but those are elective offices which they deprived themselves willingly. Twice, Buhari's running mates were Igbos who as VPs could have succeeded his presidency. But the entire Southeast was a hotbed for PDP fanaticsm - which backfired in 2015. So, political miscalculation deprived the SE of the presidency and vice presidency, not marginalization by non-Igbos. In this internet age, the world is well aware of that. In short, Kanu and supporters are on a fool's errand to the laughter of the world. In today's world, you attain power through political sagacity, not by blackmailing a president you love to hate. And you don't threaten a war and expect the army to turn the other cheek. All the world's newest countries - South Sudan, Bosnia, Croatia, etc - have emerged from war. So, for Kanu to have Biafra, he must defeat the Nigerian Army. Will Biafra survive as a country? It won't, but I don't care. Let Kanu and his supporters worry about that. |
Davik01:So the ritualists no see Igbo's to use |
So when are Hausa people going to revenge their own killings, like the burying alive of 3 Hausa keke riders in Enugu.
|
They will find trouble first and start claiming victim later |
Very true. I am grossly irritated by this charlatan and fraud called KANU. I wonder why others can't see the games on his chess board. He is a nonentity that desires fame and fortune so bad that he is riding on the perceived grievances of the Igbo youth who feel left out and forgotten. This is the same man that was soliciting for arms in the USA when nothing had even gone wrong. From the very beginning the crook had an agenda. No one should play in to his hands. Igbo's should sit back and evaluate the cost of the war. They can build a better Igbo land without confrontation and war. May peace reign in our land. Amen! |
A hunted Hausa man dragged
|
attackgat:Go Sidon with your lies, I guess the video of IPOB members hunting Hausa people in Aba was also shot in Malawi?
|
This provocation is getting out of hand, see as a butchered this Hausa guy
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (of 41 pages)
?? am not yet convince, Turkey is a major defender of Muslims, I don't see them fighting on the side of IPOB that threatened to kill Muslims.