₦airaland Forum

kashmo:
this has to be one of the quickest straight red Arsenal forced on its opponent

What do you mean Arsenal "forced" on their opponents?

Red card. . . 5 mins.

Any decent team will beat ManU.

Ooops!

StarBoard:
Nateevs,
I think it was a business ploy that worked to a T.He got the pay-rise,but the aftermath is what we're waiting to see.
What guarantee was there that wherever he would have ended up would give him the "ambition" he was talking about?
And what was the "ambition" he was talking about?
Winning the league every year and the Champions League every two years?Notice he never specified those ambitions,and coming from a player who's won just about every title that matters at the same club he's throwing that allegation of "ambition ",it  really sounds absurd to say the very least.
And if the "ambition"was tied to buying players,we all know it doesn't necessarily translate to winning.I guess you'd know that with the Shevchenko buy a few years ago.Sorry to use your club,but if it had anything to do with purchases,Chelsea woulda been Champions League winners by now.

I still maintain that the "ambition" thing held no water with United under Fergie and still doesn't.As long as he is around,United will find a way to compete with the rest of the field.In United's case,not every high-profile signing has been successful.He's been at the club 5 years now and shoulda known the club's transfer methods.Using that excuse is just pitiful.

The ambition he was talking was that of the future not of the past.
He saw the crop of players that won those trophies and he compares them with what they have now.
He must have grown up knowing and reading that Fergie has broken the British transfer record five times.
He can't see the will to do that any more.

He didn't need to go that far to negotiate for more money. . Also Fergie said earlier in the week that he was offered money to become the highest Utd player ever and he declined. Why did he when he could have jumped at the chance? He should have put pen to paper there and then if it all about money. Why did he refuse still?

Those questions remain unanswered. Some things have happened in the background that's not clear to all. We don't know if one of the conditions under which he signed was that there will be investments on the squad.

If you look deep, you will find out it wasn't all about money.

asha 80:
Six persons lost their lives in Ahoada Local Government of Rivers in 2009 when Barcelona won the UEFA Champions League.

A bus driver and a supporter of the opposing club, Manchester United, rammed his vehicle into a group of Barcelona fans celebrating the 2-0 win, killing the six.

What part of the above did y'all miss? I guess it was a Chelsea fan also, driving a Utd coloured bus.

tkb417:
@nateevs
The pay is worth 250k per week including image rights and bonuses

Be that as it may, I don't know of anybody that earns a complete package as high as 250k.

You don't know that. You are filled with distaste for Rooney now, you will believe anything negative written about him.

3pts. Very important points. Still on top. Hopefully City and Arsenal will draw and Stoke come back from 2 goals down against Utd. . . . again.

But how awful was Drogba?

Kalou's been a real impact. . and Josh is established as a sub.

Nice one Kalou.

Na wa Drogba ooo

Now we are all over the place. Drogba, Anelka and Malouda. . I don't know.

Drogba's just ruining things.

Nice counter attack.

How did we not score that with 4 men?

HNIC:
U guys put Juju for that particular end of your pitch
na so Koscielny also head over bar from 2 yards

Juju from Europe.
It works.

Bosingwa is on fire.

We have to be careful oooo.

What was that from Drogba?

How did Anelka not even hit the target ?

Now that's what I am talking about.

HNIC:
Chelski looking a bit unco-ordinated
Midweek trip to Russia

More like first 15mins of football.

Bosingwa through on goal.

Here we go. .

Attack on the right and left will be deadly.

Which £250k? Only City and Real will pay footballers that type of money. Utd will never pay anyone that money, not even Ronaldo.

lalaboi:
Bros. . . Its just having fun. . .
Not every fan wants to type possible tactics and prediction. Some fans just wanna see their team win, they dont care how dey go about it, what formation they played in or What tactics led to the win. U could have just joined the fun, and then share your "intelligent" analysis (start the trend). Lead by example.  

Bros trust me. I know the difference between fun and unintelligent talk.

Sagamite:
I disagree with this.

I have seen some women it is not even worth discussing what they have done wrong with.

They are completely pig-headed, argumentative and defiant. They will turn the discussion to all about themselves instead of understanding what they have done wrong. They will be looking for anything from the past, no matter how trivial or small in comparison to their current error, to use as weapon of them be "wronged". Or they will justify all their thrash behaviours with "that is the way women are".

They have a foul attitude and are disgusting to be around.

This is why I have only condemned his violence towards her, that is inexcusable. I will not condemn his leaving of the house until I know her own character and attitude. He is free to not want to be around someone and that does not make him less of, or not fit to be, a man.

No one owns him.

Exactly what I meant. Men always have a reason not to forgive women.
If this man was not beating her, every post will be asking her to wait it out but a man is not supposed to.

You can only but agree sometimes when opposition fans say Chelsea fans are the least intelligent. I rush to this page thinking fellow Chelsea fans are holding it down and discussing possible tactical views of the game - I mean with 2 pages already - only to see 2 pages of absolute drab.

My blood is blue, my this is blue, my that is blue. Sometimes, you can only wonder if some peops are paid to type crap.


I want to be a mod and I want to create a thread. . "The Intelligent Chelsea forum" . . . That way we have the powers to weed out unintelligent talk.
Ha!

If it's "all" about the money. . Then he could have walked. After all, he could have earned even much more.
Why did he stay to earn less than he could earn if he left?

monkeyleg:
@myhome10,

Really sorry to hear that less than 1 yr into marriage you guys are having troubles like this, but take it easy, all might not be lost.

Some of the things you need to know are

1: Marriage is not something you can walk away from that easyly. I always advise people to see that as the the last resort. Infact if you are a christian, the bible cautions against it, except were there has been maritial unfaithfulness (Proven)

2: Marriage is not easy. It requires a lot of investment in time and effort. I often argue that if one leaves, you are not sure you will get a better deal at the other end, so stick it out. there are always benefits for fighting hard for your marriage.

3: Be careful what advise you listen to. find a trusted family member or friend, probably one wih a long standing marriage as seek constructive advice.
Now if you ask me, I would say, stop probing for now. Just him come back home first. Don’t trouble him, make sure his food is ready and the home is in a good state, you carry on as usual (I know it would be difficult). Give it some time, when the dust has settled, probably a month or 2 down the line, you can then open up to him.

There is no point in second guessing what the problem is. It could be a multitude of things. But one thing is certain, Please pray and keep your part of your marriage commitment. God is faithful and will reveal all when the time is right, especially when you have not done wrong. I know he will restore your marriage especially if he thinks it is the best for you.

Remember, there are challenges is every marriage, the best marriages are those which have stood the test of time.

This is the best advice only if he doesn't beat her. Will you ask your daughter to wait out a union that's barely a year old and already has her running for her life. The fact that she "may" not find something better is no reason for her to "stick with this". .

People will scare you into thinking there is nothing good out there. . but you already know this is bad. Yes it may turn out good but you may never live through it to know.

If you are not man enough to tell your wife she's done something bad, then you are not fit to be a man. Stop preaching for women to wait in marriages. Preach for men to love, respect, tolerate and forgive their wives if they've done something wrong.

After all "for better for worse" does not apply to women only.

So dude decided to stay. I don't believe this just happened though.
There is an underlying story and we shall hear the truth very soon.
This is all a smoke screen. Fergie is part of some under g conspiracy . .

Mark my words, you all will hear it soon.

I do not care what grounds a man has got . . There's nothing sufficient to lay your hands on a woman.
A man who lays his hands on a woman immediately surrenders his justification in any marital issue whatsoever.

People may ask you to stay and endure. . for they know this person and that person that did and are now enoying their marriages.
What they don't tell you is perhaps an equal number of helpless women who have listened to archaic advises of "stay and endure" and then have ended up maimed or killed. How can you tell how it is going to turn out for you?

If a man beats you once, he will never stop. We've heard of women beaters in 5 years of marriage. . but in the first year? Lady, check out before it's late.

Whether she nags, shouts, steals, cheats, name it. . . There is no reason to beat a woman. I don't care if the story is one-sided. Worse case, you tell her it's over. If you love a woman, there's nothing she does you can't forgive . . . when you beat her, you surrender your justification.


Simple.