₦airaland Forum

rooftops:
So suddenly all our players now have limitations that hinders automatism? Wawu

Oya tell me, when did you last see it? Tell me under which manager your saw this in full flow?

rooftops:
He will always support anything the man puts out. I know he will definitely reach his breaking point also

I no go reach breaking point.

Next season, we will upgrade many positions, out crap players, stop over reliance on Palmer and play better football.

BlueMann:
If you're moving the ball from one side to the other, take advantage of the sideways motion of the opposition defense and play a vertical pass in behind, that's probably the best way you can catch them off guard. Why don't we have automatisms like this in place?

It's a player limitation, not system limitation. If anything, this is how Maresca wants to play; with heavy emphasis on the third-man pass.

But you have the likes of Fofana, Badiashile, Cucu, Enzo many times seeing that lateral run of forward players but just decide to cycle the ball back sideways.

rooftops:
All your confirmation is nothing, james in midfield is useless

Who would you have played? You guys stop wasting words. Who would you have played?

So Lavia coming on for 10 mins confirms everything I have been saying. Lavia is not match fit yet.

Look at our options. Na wa.

FBS:
Another mega save by Sanchez

Another mega save.

How's the linesman not seeing that blatant dive from 1 yard ?

diggz:
I’ve come to realise that you’ll say anything to defend your bald-headed Pep Lite and his questionable decisions. You did the same when your pepLite chose the chronic gambler repeatedly, even when he was costing us games. Now that your Pep Lite has started playing an unfit, stiff James in midfield, your new justification is that it’s good squad management? Kontinu!

At least me I am consistent in my defence of Maresca. Why don't you tell us why you think he shouldn't play James and who should play instead?

I have listed my reasons.

Ibime:
He doesn't help with no dynamism

Lavia or KDH are better midfielders than him at this stage

Is it Fofana that has the fitness for RB?

Lavia is glass. We don't even know what his fitness levels are. He's not played in game in about 12 or so. No way he's starting this high-profile game.

KDH is almost not a real footballer. We've seen this guy play. There are no real options.

To add to this, on the defensive side, we are playing Enzo in midfield against an Arsenal that will pass through us like hot knife through butter. With Lavia out and KDH not able to help with fortifying the midfield either, I will take James in midfield twice on Saturday and Sunday.

There are no options.

Ibime:
Then play him centre-back cos you need as much fitness to play midfield

Not a bad shout but there is no dynamism in midfield with Enzo and Caceido. We could play 9 hours with Caicedo and Enzo and have no shots or through passes from midfield.

James helps with some dynamism.

Very good phase of play.

Almost Cucu.

diggz:
You tell me

I already told you how it is, across several posts. You think it's not......But you want me to tell you how it's not

diggz:
How is playing James in midfield good squad management?

How is it not?

lordfalcao:
then he should be on the bench.

Of what use is him starting this game? When he doesn’t have the leg for mildfield work

If he's on the bench, then you have only Lavia to play; Lavia who only needs 30 mins of football to be out for another 10 games.

I say it again and again, James does not have the fitness to play RB, unless you just want him breaking down and out of the team time and again.

It is good squad management.

This guy always nervous.

Since they are tying up deals early, they should enter quickly and complete Jobe Bellingham.

I can see that someone within the team is taking midfield matters very seriously.

Chelsea sign Geovany Quenda.

raumdeuter:
Actually savvy investors when they see the dip they buy more which increase their profit when the market rebounds like its doing now

Only rookie investor will run away from the market because of a dip when he can buy more

What have you said about tariff beside side step and dodge from presenting the facts.

Investor Alawiye. Investor buy the dip.

Dayo stop. Go have a lie down. I hope this is not what you advise your folk..... BUY THE DIP!

raumdeuter:
You posted a picture of crashing market but not able to follow up with the picture of the same market rebounding. So what is your intention?

Since you want to side step the issue of tariff because you probably know its a losing argument for you Its okay then

So when are you posting the market rebound with the same excitement you posted the crash

I already treated the topic of rebound vs recovery. Your inability to catch up is not my problem. Savvy investors don't cheer rebounds, they follow trends. And the trends is downwards. So there is nothing to post. When there's something to post about a recovery, I will be in the markets before I post.

On tariffs, I have been more than an educator to you. If you have any continued nothingness to share on tariffs, the board is yours. Why are you waiting on me to lead the topic?

Are you worried about something?

raumdeuter:
Do you know what you are arguing against first which is why I am asking you what was the tariff on US goods before Trump and the tariff on Canadian goods

When we establish that basis you can now make an argument on the fairness of the tariffs which Trump made his election argument based on and which many people voted for him as Americans do not want to be the taken advantage of anymore

Me I posted a picture of crashing markets. You are the one that's been arguing since.

You are not smarter than the millions of investors who are selling off and waiting it out. You are also not nearly as knowledgeable than the millions of analysts that collectively understand where all this is leading to - recession.

So any perceived "fairness" of Trump's tariff is beer-parlour, cult-following understanding of nothingness.

raumdeuter:
I will ask you again to see how much you know

Before this Trump regime, Was Canada putting a tariff on US goods if yes how much in percent
Before this Trump regime, Was US putting a tariff on Canada goods if Yes how much in percent

To know if you understand what you are arguing about

Sir you think there is a need to ask these questions because you don't understand what I am typing. The only reason you keep asking these inconsequential questions is because you are prepping to start a false-premise/equivalence argument that will go on for weeks.

Your need to do this .....again, is evidence of the lack of understanding of what you voted for; and lack of understanding of the consequence of Trump's chaotic governance.

raumdeuter:
Where do you see recession? Where is your mockery when the market is rebounding? . He lacks understanding but the inflation is cooling prices are dropping


It shows that you have zero understanding of what put your mouth into

I am asking you about tariff to be sure you know what you are fighting against and not just being lemmings of the media as usual

I will ask you again to see how much you know

Before this Trump regime, Was Canada putting a tariff on US goods if yes how much in percent
Before this Trump regime, Was US putting a tariff on Canada goods if Yes how much in percent

Who told you there is a recession already? I told you what the market is reacting to, but you are asking me which recession? You think the markets are mad and only you know? Or you think the markets are going to wait until a recession is here before reacting?

Tariffs have always existed. But tariffs are usually reached after carefully thought-out economic and fiscal policies, sometimes after carefully analysed bi-lateral trade agreements.

Arbitrary tariffs and use of tariffs to create trade wars are what the problem is here. Today 50% tarriffs, tomorrow walk it back...... but not walking it back completely, I am still coming back. That's economic uncertainty, that affects commerce and trade, CPI, and consequently the stock market.

That's why I am telling you that you don't understand what you voted for.

raumdeuter:
The glee with which you posted the dip, I was expecting you to post the rebound as well

But that is not enough to make you smile, Wait for the next dip and we will likely see your smile

It's not glee. It's mockery. Mockery at your guy's lack of understanding that markets don't like chaos.....and by extension, mockery of the evidence that all you who support him lack same understanding.


Only a moment ago, you were spelling prosperity to me in CAPS! Prosperity in the face of a recession?

A few days ago, you were asking what the difference is between tariffs now and tariffs then. If you really have to ask this question, it means you never really understood what you voted for.

So you see why the mockery?

raumdeuter:
You didn't care about the bad news, yet you jumped here to give us the update on a down market day, if you care then when are you going to give us the update like today ? Oh no that's not your problem

You don't have any stake in the market but was delirious that the market dropped only to hide when the market is back up. You are not happy about the bad news but you havent posted the latest green update on NASDAQ with your smileys like you did less than 48hrs ago

Take off the mask we see you for what you are

Obviously this is not your forte.

What you see is a rebound, after massive sell off. It is not a recovery... so I am not sure what you are expecting me to say. There's always people buying a dip. There's always people trying to catch a falling knife during a bear market. So you will see momentary rebounds.

The Dow rebounded 500pts last week Friday, and then went on a massive dip from the opening of Asian and Australian markets since Sunday night. Tesla has dropped 15% from its high. Biggest periodic drop in over five years.

What you think because there's "another" rebound today, it's good news to share? The market only rebounded off the news of your stupid guy backing off his promised 50% tariff on Canada. That's not a recovery, and that's no good news to share. The overall trend is still downwards, because of Bloomberg's prediction of now a 50% chance of a recession.

Your guy is tanking the markets. And he's tanking the markets out of no particular well-thought out fiscal or economic policies. But you are attacking me for predicting that it was going to be like this?

Seriously?

bemeruca:
Idiots don't understand market goes up and down. At the same time the Chinese stock market was volatile as well.

Price of eggs and energy is coming down but I don't expect the haters of this country to flash it here.

Hehehe. Markets go up and down .

raumdeuter:
Any update on what the NASDAQ and DowJones are saying today?

Or you dont care about the good news its only the bad ones that make you happy?

What is that thing that you said is coming to a bus stop near me again? Does is spell like P-R-O-S-P-E-R-I-T-Y?

Hehe. You are a clown. You are talking to someone who's been actively trading Indices and Commodities since 2017. You think I only care about the bad news?

I liquidated my entire portfolio just before inauguration, because I didn't want to trade in a market I was 100%..... again 100% sure would be nothing but absolutely freaking chaotic.

And I am saddened by the reality of my prediction. You think I am happy about the sad news!

You are reading what you want to read sir.

raumdeuter:
So strange to see a US president drumming up support for a US company that employs American workers and pay taxes to the US govt

This is what we say about you sheeples who let the media deceive you, One would think its a crime for a US president to promote US vehicles or this is the first time this is happen when its very common

Below is Biden acting as a sales man for American made vehicles
https://s.abcnews.com/images/General/president-joe-biden-emissions-01-gty-llr-210805_1628192283153_hpMain.jpg

https://www.carscoops.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2022-Ford-F-150-Lightning-Joe-Biden--1024x555.jpg

You must be dim. Go and look at the video. It goes beyond a President promoting "American- made Cars" to him praising a specific brand and calling that specific brand the best.

If you defend this, then you have lost all manner of self-respect Dayo.

A President may use their platform to promote American goods and services, but he CANNOT and SHOULD NOT, use his platform to provide free advertising for a specific brand, especially when the owner of said brand gave him money towards his election campaign, and said individual now works in the government.

And I don't fvcking care if this is Biden, or Bush, or Obama, or Reagan.... it is flat out wrong. You should be livid and alarmed by this stuff.

Jesus Christ! Are there no longer any norms you will not destroy over this cultist support?

Donald Trump as a sales man for Tesla. You cannot make these things up.

raumdeuter:
Can you help with a screenshot of FTSE lets see how ita going for you across the pond without tarrif threats

What's the point you are trying to make with that? For decades, America's stock market stability has always created ripple effect across all world exchanges. Chaotic and incoherent governance is turning the markets into free fall, but you are asking me what the FTSE is doing.

You think I am happy the NSDQ is crumbling?