₦airaland Forum

airmark:
I copied it as you were trying to be economical with the truth as usual. Your statement was definite, why would anyone be interested in inconsequential reasons?.



Accept that you goofed by supporting an ignorant stance, that got guillotined within 4 months of Maresca in Epl. No need of waiting billion light years.

This is the problem. You say too many things in one answer. It never allows you get to the point.

You are quoting a post over and over again that begins by stating that you confuse me with someone else, and that I never got into the attack v defence debate..... You think that's not relevant but you think the latter part is.

For me, I never departed from the latter part of that statement. I owned it then, I own it now. I believed it then and I believe it now. Can we agree that I am not departing from that statement?

Good. So moving on, now, tell me, why do you think I said the second part of that statement?

airmark:


Coherent kwa?

Everyone knows Timbros stance in the Attack vs Defence debate by doing our transfer 50/50 for both the defence and attack. All these your semantics won't alienate you from it.

We didn't balance any sh1t in attack and defence during the window and we have seen the improvement. You can't dudge the L by dissociation now, egbon.



Airmark's stand that you claimed Timbros trumped.

You talk too much. So you copied what I said about Timbros. But what was the exact reason I said so?

airmark:
The only liar here is you and it's on record that you backed Timbros ignorant view on the attack vs Defence debate. In fact you declared him the winner before the first kick of the season. He opined that without balance no improvement. Now you are avoiding a reunion with him like he is HIV patient.

As regards Alvarez, ask your foot soldier, Lordfalcao, he will tell you those that joined him to place Jackson over Alvarez.

What was the exact reason I mentioned Timbros' point as the more coherent point?

airmark:
I no be you wey lie say you no support Timbros view on Attack vs Defence debate, after we spent more on attack and see improvement.

Don't drag us back. We established your lack of understanding on the matter.

For this Alvarez one, name names abeg. Let's find this person together, so we don't confuse you for a liar.

Unbelievable. 5 goals. The only good thing about this is that they will make Arsenal they are back.

Arsenal could have conceded 5 goals themselves.

Good lord. How many chances do they need to make a goal?

If na Chelsea, dem go get power.

airmark:
The same Alvarez that they claimed Jackson is better than, is who they are now saying Fraudiola shouldn't have sold. Clowns aplenty.

Name names. Abi you don dey lie again?

raumdeuter:
Bad decisions like signing Grealish Doku Nunez, Kovacic and resigning Gundogan

I never wan write off Savinho yet

Selling Palmer and Alvarez
Plus not selling Walker Bernardo after last season

Selling Palmer and Alvarez. Top of that list.

Rogers!

Goal.

Beauty!!!!

Wow!!!! Youngest Chelsea player to score a hattrick in the first team.

BlueMann:
Josh I dey see ur movement

You saw that right?

Goalll!

This boy! I love him.
Hustle personified!

One all

E be like say Cucurella don collect red card o

3ptsssss

Master Cucurella!!! Well done.

Caicedo and Cucu .....I have no words.

Goallllll

Oh lord! Guys why you playing south my heart like this?

popizaino:
Are you at SB?

No no. I am not.

I am so nervous.

Jackson? Haba!

See referee

Cucuuuuuu

This guy is a nervous wreck.

We sef suppose collect from this points sharing from City.

Wow! City died.

Ah!!!!!!!!

Pep in shock!