₦airaland Forum

afrodoc2:
Those are hackneyed lines that have been used HERE before and probably more than once sef. I am sure Nihilist the show promoter will remember who first used them here.

usbcable:
There you have it

A40:
All of Messi's goals came against Bosnia, Iran and Nigeria. Only 1 assist in the knockout stage! Even if Maradona didn't win in 86 its bleeding obvious he did a lot more when it mattered compared to Messi in 2014

Abimloaded:
Argentina isn't the same team with Messi. Check the stats for the team with and without Messi.
Why are you sounding like this, man ??!

Chanchit:
And how many of them have won the balon d'or for scoring against Buffon?

diggz:
Nihilist welcome back.... pictures of our akpola pls

Saintsammurai:
I dont argue for the sake of arguing...I talk with profound fact....how dare you idiots!!! rate veratti over rakitic...idiots that watch only 90minutes football, idiots that rate players based on the money clubs wanted to buy him...What credibility does veratti has,,,what has he done? how many best player award has he won? how many captain armband has he won at club level, is he even a fan's favourite in club level? People that dont know football will start spewing trash...Ivan rakitic won swiss league best young player when he was about 18years old, he feature in a uefa cup at just 17years old, he was a fan's favourite and leader in schackle04, where he won the german cup, he was given the captain role in sevilla where he won uefa cup,,,compare that including what he acheive in barca, to that of overrated verratti.....NONSENSE AND UNGRATEFUL IDIOTS....

Chelseafan1:
Omo, me sef will be great one day.

Shoe wey cost pass wey I don buy for my life na 10k

Bimffo:
Nihilist, Go on soun!!!!

Snap that thing for your leg if them don deliver am to you.

No forget mention me o.

Ibime:
I still cannot see what Nateevs is paying up for. Because more people agreed with Nihilist POV? How is that the basis for a bet? A bet must be watertight legally, and tied to numbers or historical facts. I can see neither in Nateevs bet with Nihilist.

diggz:
Burrr burrr Nihilist.....u can't invest all into shoes without settling the board man na ;

Bimffo:
Nihilist shey I never late.

Take Griffon out of that list. He will waste the 20£.

nateevs:
There is now consensus. Oya send me ya akant!

Greatihex:
nihilist, remember thy brother o.

Griffon:
Hehehe. What's the guarantee?

Tochex101:
Nigga making you sweat for this cash......

Griffon:
As we don drive enter Uyo town, come dey chill for G-Park, na en Bimffo dey preach about AIDS so?

Work has eaten up all the time I've got in the world, I have lost touch with my social life, why can't I just make this count?

The best ride I have ever received was dished out by an efik woman, I want to relive those memories. If I give up the ghost in the process, please Diggz, make sure Cobham Express keeps delivering.

nateevs:
Hollup! This was the prerequisite for £100.





And we are discussing Jamie Vardy in the same team, even though there is doubt on Mahrez.

Trust me it's not about being dishonourable. You haven't won. If you have, I pay you right away.

nateevs:
If however, there's overwhelming consensus with your POV, then I will give you the money. Until then......

nateevs:
To start with, Vardy being prolific renders payment a no no. Unless you want to argue that too.
To Mahrez, he scored 10 goals in all competitions last season. In a season that Leicester almost went down.
You will have to judge Mahrez by this season, to confirm that he is indeed not prolific.

diggz:
Please pay me my canvass money bro..... bwuahahahaha

Greatihex:
ok. Let me say this.
The issue of 11 hazards and 11 willian is an issue of set up and formation.
If 11 hazards are set up to play on the counter attack with a 352 formation, the team wl hv a higher probability of beating both a possession based and a counter attack based 11 willians. This is because, 11 willians wt possession wl do little or ntin to breakdown a a 352 hazard with more bodies in defence that cn transform into an organized counterattack force. This wl also b d same result wt an 11 counterattacking willian that doesn't have the intelligence to do something in a counter.


Btw, cn someone please help us with the defensive stat of hazard vs willian in frm our two title winning season, cus i am nt sure if willian has a beta stat than hazard in that aspect.
Cc. Airmark, ibime, nateevs

@Nihilist, cn you pls play a 352 counter attack hazards against that of willian let us see the result.

nateevs:
This is actually figures without the context therein. Mahrez is only 26. 2 seasons ago when he was deemed a "one hit wonder" he was only 24. How many 24-year olds were leading their teams to glory?

Before the season in question, he was the age Chalobah is now and some of us still like to call Chalobah a youngster. So I don't see the point in the clause "all of his career" as though he's been around for eons.

I strongly believe that last season, he could have consolidated. But it's no news that Leicester barely escaped relegation with open rebellion against the Manager. All of them downed tools for reasons we cannot explain. Verry reminiscent of the Hazard we saw in the season right after the league title.

It is enough to conclude that Mahrez is not prolific.

nateevs:
This is open to debate. Having one good season is proof that you are prolific, or at the very least, capable of it.
Plus you specifically mentioned 2 years ago. That specific year Mahrez was prolific.

One thing is for sure. You CANNOT say categorically, that Mahrez IS NOT prolific.

That's the difference.


If however, there's overwhelming consensus with your POV, then I will give you the money. Until then......

nateevs:
Hehehe....That was carefully worded mate. You omitted the key sentence.




Riyad Mahrez!

diggz:
Bwuahahahaha...... Nihilist u no go ki person with laff for here


But mahrez was in Leicester na....

nateevs:
3. You cannot use isolated instances of a team of runners to show that they can consistently out-performance a team of skillful players. Pick one team, a team of all consistent runners and no prolific players. Then show me where they have consistently performed and consistently outperformed a team of prolific players with less runners and you get £100. There's none. Instead, what you will find, are isolated cases and I don't consider that as ample empirical evidence to support this point.

Mcleo007:
Its so easy to be a Ronaldo and do the things he does. .

diggz:
I guess everyone chooses to see whatever they want to see in that statement.

FBS is simply trying to say he will pick 11 players who will give everything for the team like willian ahead of 11 flashy players(I am deliberately not using hazard as an example here) who are not ready to do the dirty work when needed.