₦airaland Forum

u see your statement is you never know. But they didn't did they.

@ debosky

even if they were not ready to surrender i still dont think WMD should have bee used. And like i said if it were some other country US would have been pushing for prosecution.

seedish

debosky:
maybe 200,000 lives is more valuable than 7-8million lives to you i don't know but the war would have raged on for years and countless millions would still have been killed. i don't like any death, but if the death of some will prevent the death of countless others it is a bitter but better alternative to take

what makes you so sure Japan was not ready to surrender already.
Just to remind you if another country did this, i am sure US would have pushed for them to be tried for war crimes.

you got that right (i better find sth to eat)



tpbm is cool

promiscioius girl in bed last night

Give it up to me - Sean paul feat Keyisha Cole

rubbish

rubber

debosky:
4.because the UN is a faulty organization giving undue powers to 5 veto wielding nations, open to manipulation and with a weak structure and no means of enforcing its mandate. reform the UN and maybe we'll have less of that

since one or more out of the 5 would never let it function well, thats why people in other countries (excluding the 5 permanent members) should learn to think for themselves. If they all decide they will leave the UN unless the # of permanent members are increased (inlcuding an african one preferable Nigeria {South africa has whites} and an Arab one), trust me the 5 members will have to do sth about it. unless they want a UN with just 5 members.

debosky:
@ nilla 2million japanese soldiers were killed in WW2 lets not even count civillians, 7million chinese and 4million indonesians were killed by the japanese in a period of 2-3 years

if 200,000 deaths (all death is regrettable to me) will prevent the death of 2million people it is a sacrifice well worth it in my opinion.

For me thats not a well worth sacrifice. Do you Know people are still dying from the after effects. And generations and generations of those people have to be watched to see the effect on the genetics of these people.
But my point is you use what you have right. thats why people shouldn't have it (WMD). If some have it all should have it. then everybody will think well before doing or talking trash.

senseless

yes


tpbm is excited

tone

The way the Isreali supporters hear are passionately supporting is as if they are being paid or they are also citizens of Israel.

i once said that.


its nice to see someone else saying this

kabiyesi:
I just hope that this present generation of Naija is not a wasted one. If one could be more Israeli than an Israeli, it means one could be more Christian than a Pope.

Belarus




h

blue

@ Afam,

Now I have the time. When I don't i wont argue so much

welcome pal

lol

mhmmmm,

i would eve be scared for aliens

yes girl.

i hear some people say he is frozen somewhere

and hitler right?

i agree with you on animals.

nnama

@ debosky

Hiroshima and Nagasaki -total death of roughly 200,000 (japanese) to stop other killings.

what sarcrifice?

now your confusing me . I thought you guys said Hezbollah wanted to wipe out Israel. and the last time i checked you guys were claiming Hezbollah is not a country (and as such should not have military personnel or weapons).
I never said an organization or people have a right to WMDs but rather countries.

and also there is a difference between MUST and right to.

That some have nukes does not mean EVERYONE must have and can handle having one! Since some people can take 2 beers without getting drunk and then drive, then EVERYONE is allowed to drink and drive? Still think! It is not about posting!!!!

Dearie, i did not say must have, but rather have a right to.
Handling one, by that you completely have faith in the ones that have, but will not have faith in some of the ones that dont have (but are thinking of having)

its totally between the two of you

@ zebudaya

u pick what you want. see my quote

Personally i don't want any country to have WMD. But if some have, then everybody else has a right to (for the love of me i would never understand why humans love to create things that destroy their fellow humans. i hear you all, defense)
Syria and Iran can have WMDs if other countries have (nobody should say some people are more responsible, b/c its not the country that determines how responsible people are)

zebudaya:
Iran and Syria having nukes doesnt have negative impact on others right? Why should i read your previous quotes when the one you are posting now are driving me nuts because of your are always contradicting yourself, No nation should have nukes, oh Iran and syria can have WMD's bla bla bla,

When you find quotes of me contradicting myself let me know.
Like i said read my earlier posts, thats if your interested.

zebudaya:
You don't like terrorists, but you believe every country has a right to own WMD's eg Nuke's. You are driving me to drink with your logic. So terrorist supporting and financing states like Syria and Iran should own nukes right? why stop there everybody has the right to smoke cocaine, rape, and steal and so on and so forth

Debosky i get your point

If you read my earlier posts, you would notice when i said. Personally i dont want any country to have WMD. But if some have, then everybody else has a right to (for the love of me i would never understand why humans love to create things that destroy their fellow humans.  i hear you all, defense)
Syria and Iran can have WMDs if other countries have (nobody should say some people are more responsible, b/c its not the country that determines how responsible people are)
Everybody has the right to smoke.
Nobody has the right to rape or steal (cos it has negative impact on others)

Make I no even talk.

why won't you talk.

the US is protecting its interests in those countries, it doesn't want the mistakes of the past (Germany almost taking over the whole of europr, saddam invading a peaceful country) to repeat themselves

Mistakes of the past. can Iraq have millitary stationed in the US?