₦airaland Forum

Eleribu ! Go and search the internet, she never danced for Fela. It was her dad that was Fela's manager.

1) Click here for confirmation>>> https://dnbstories.com/2020/12/burna-boys-mother-bose-ogulu-never-danced-for-fela-kuti.html
2) Click here for additional confirmation>>>https://koko.ng/burna-boys-mother-bose-ogulu-did-not-dance-for-fela-seun-kuti/

Uncle B is Benson Idonije, the broadcaster, writer and music critic who was Fela’s first band manager. Mr Idonije is the father of Burna Boy’s mum. Many social media users erroneously believe that Mrs Ogulu danced for Fela after her father managed the Afrobeat icon’s band.

ShugaSneh:
This old woman that refused to act her age.

When she use to dance for one local yeroóba musician and showcasing her black as*s to the world..... she's behaving like the south wast.e ewedu munchers.

[b]OBI is a boy when it comes to politicking ! Donating to an institution for political mileage in your backyard is akin to preaching to the choir. In the last election, he recorded an average of 92% in the South Eastern States, in the next election, even if he records 100% votes there, it will still not be good enough to crown him as President. The framers of our constitution designed it such that for any Presidential Candidate to emerge victorious he needs to build bridges across at least one other major tribe that is different from his own. When Tinubu the master of the game was doing this, he went to the far North and endeared himself to them by donating a minimum of N50M in each instance, he campaigned the most in the North before finally coming to address his people in the SW who are already firmly in his corner and the rest is now history. Unlike OBI, who focused his energy in talking to his own people outside of the SE by visiting Alaba and Computer Village in Lagos.

Anyway, the fool is separated from his money already and 2027 is still far.[/b]

[quote author=bobobenz post=126941505][/quote]

[b][b]OBI is a boy when it comes to politicking ! Donating to an institution for political mileage in your backyard is akin to preaching to the choir. In the last election, he recorded an average of 92% in the South Eastern States, in the next election, even if he records 100% votes there, it will still not be good enough to crown him as President. The framers of our constitution designed it such that for any Presidential Candidate to emerge victorious he needs to build bridges across at least one other major tribe that is different from his own. When Tinubu the master of the game was doing this, he went to the far North and endeared himself to them by donating a minimum of N50M in each instance, he campaigned the most in the North before finally coming to address his people in the SW who are already firmly in his corner and the rest is now history. Unlike OBI, who focused his energy in talking to his own people outside of the SE by visiting Alaba and Computer Village in Lagos.

Anyway, the fool is separated from his money already and 2027 is still far.[/b][/b]

[quote author=bobobenz post=126941505][/quote]

Can someone please explain to these fools and the deranged Obi supporters that it was long ago explained that the original copy of Tinubu's certificate was lost during the raid on his house when he went on exile during the Abacha's regime and the new copy of the certificate is a reissue signed by the designated authority in charge in the late 90s after the regime of Abacha came to an end. The dates and the justification for the observed inconsistencies adds up to be credible !

If you do not know, Tinubu is simply d!cking you around to make a fool out of you at the end of the day. I have access to folks that retired from Mobil Oil Nigeria's (MON) HR department and they have confirmed that this is just a storm in a tea cup because his credentials were verified long ago and found to be authentic.

iSense247:
Elnora Daniel, Niva Lubin joined CSU decades after Tinubu ‘graduated’ in 1979, couldn’t have signed his certificate, Atiku tells court

Mr Abubakar wants to use the document to prove Mr Tinubu committed perjury and, therefore, is unqualified to be Nigeria’s president.

ADEFEMOLA AKINTADE • SEPTEMBER 28, 2023

https://gazettengr.com/elnora-daniel-niva-lubin-joined-csu-decades-after-tinubu-graduated-in-1979-couldnt-have-signed-his-certificate-atiku-tells-court/?utm_source=operamini&utm_medium=feednews&utm_campaign=operamini_feednews

Two can play rough !

nairalandkachy1:
Explain Why CTC Of Judgment Is On Tinubu’s Counsel Letterhead - Atiku's aide to PEPC

There Would Have Been A Second Civil War If Peter Obi Had Won At The Tribunal – Reno Omokri Writes

https://l.kphx.net/s?d=1815154773700068255&extra=Q1RSWT1ORyZMTkc9ZW4tVVM=&g=40d3378cb89763fcf280dec68fadfeb2 (From Phoenix APP)


If Peter Obi had won the #NigerianElections2023 , or at the Presidential Election Petition Court, there would have been a civil war in Nigeria.
Not may. Would. Why? Because he and his Obidients were just too arrogant and were already recreating, and would have further recreated the events that led up to the Nigerian Civil War.

Let me explain: During the elections, there was nothing they did not do, including cyberbullying, threatening, abusing, insulting, name-calling, accusing, hounding, targeting, ganging up, mocking, caricaturing, and harassing anyone who refused to support them.

I did not say anyone who was fighting them. No. Anyone who refused to support them. They made minimal attempts to be persuasive. It was just nogbu nzogbu, enyimba enyi! They had a warped sense of entitlement that you must support Peter Obi, and if you did not, then you are supporting a “wrong candidate” (the exact words they used).

They were more fascistic than Mussolini. In terms of education, Peter Obi is at the bottom of the barrel, with his second-class degree in Philosophy. You can’t compare him to a PhD in Water Engineering (Kwankwaso), a Master’s with Distinction in International Relations (Atiku) and a BSc in Accounting (Tinubu).

Joseph, have the fear of God and answer this question-am: Am I lying? But he was the right candidate, and anyone who did not support him must be pilloried. What led to the Nigerian Civil War? It began with the January 15, 1966 coup at which Majors Emmanuel Ifeajuna, Chukwuma Nzeogwu, Chris Anuforo, and Don Okafor killed political and military leaders from every region of Nigeria except theirs.

Major Adewale Ademoyeg was involved with the plotting but not the killing, unlike the others who participated in the massacre. And in 2023, after Peter Obi lost, prominent Obidients with direct ties to Peter Obi were openly calling for a military coup to restore Obi’s mandate. These guys have learned nothing! And that was only one reason for the civil war.

The other reason was the arrogance and caricaturing of other Nigerians by supporters of Majors Nzeogwu and Ifeajuna (the coup leaders) after the coup. Soon after the coup, some of their supporters printed almanacs with caricatures insulting prominent Northern, Western and Mid-Western leaders. In one of the almanacs, Chukwuma Nzeogwu was shown with his leg on top of Sir Ahmadu Bello’s head. Interestingly, in that almanac, Ahmadu Bello’s head was put on the body of a goat.

Those almanacs outraged Northerners and made them turn against the Aguiyi Ironsi-led government. In February of 1966, a famous Igbo highlife maestro named Celestine Ukwu released a song titled Ewu Ne Ba Akwa, meaning ‘the goat is crying’. Rightly or wrongly, other Nigerians believed that that song was mocking the killing of the late Sardauna by Nzeogwu. That song and the almanac mocking the Sardauna ignited a p0grom against Igbos in the North. And things eventually descended to civil war. Is that not what happened in 2023? Were Obidients not caricaturing those who refused to support Peter Obi? I personally was caricatured.

Waziri Atiku, Bola Tinubu and their supporters were also caricatured. New Celestine Ukwu songs of 2023 were composed to insult those who supported other candidates instead of their right candidate. And just as their leaders did not caution them in 1966, so did Peter Obi not caution them in 2022/23.

There was no low or dirty thing they did not do, including publishing the photos of Justice Tsamani’s children along with threats to kill them (as they did with my then one-year-old daughter) and recruiting Rufai Oseni to lie against me and others.

And then there was the Yes Daddy leaked audio, which revealed their true intention for the Muslim Ummah. History does not repeat itself. Irresponsible people repeat it and blame history for repeating itself.

Here is the opinion of the Lagos Blue Line in the eyes of a Ghanian....click to watch



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4WYP3zYy0A&t=17s&ab_channel=DJPAKORICH

Biodun556:
The Red line train is set for completion.




https://www.facebook.com/seyilawcomedian?mibextid=RRjQPWiRlrgxWQyH

Did you say you don't have your original result ? You try and run for a political office and watch the headless mob use it to score cheap political points. Even your mother will begin to doubt your sincerity.

nedekid:
Story de sanwo olu own too?
What is with these politicians and "dagbo"?
Ask me for my waec or gce certificates from donkey years ago, I do not have them but I know the records are there in waec, secondary school or last last UI.
Why all this drama?

https://podiumreporters.com/index.php/2023/06/25/revisiting-the-peter-obi-judicial-entertainment/
By Michael Chibuzo

Less than 3 months ago, I authored a four-part series where I dissected the petition filed by the Labour Party Presidential Candidate in the last general elections, Mr. Peter Obi challenging the victory of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in February 25th Presidential Election. In that series, I opined that Obi’s petition is the most watery Presidential Election Petition ever in our democratic history and went on to dissect the entire petition to prove it.

From the ongoing proceedings at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT), it is glaring that my submissions are proving to be correct. Mr. Peter Obi and the Labour Party hinged their petition on three grounds namely:

1. That the 2nd Respondent (Bola Tinubu) was at the time of election not qualified to contest.

2. That the election of the 2nd Respondent (Bola Tinubu) was invalid by reason of corrupt practices or non-compliance with the provisions of the6 Electoral Act 2022

3. That the 2nd Respondent (Bola Tinubu) was not duly elected by majority of the lawful votes cast in the election.

For ground 1, the petitioners contended that President Bola Tinubu was not qualified to contest because his running mate, Sen. Kashim Shettima had double nomination – one as Senatorial Candidate for Borno Central and the other as Vice Presidential Candidate. The petitioners also further contended that President Bola Tinubu was not qualified to contest for president due to a fine of $460,000 handed by a US District Court of Illinois on October 4, 1993.

As the hearing of Obi’s petition was underway, the Supreme Court delivered judgment in a suit instituted by the PDP seeking the disqualification of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on the ground of double nomination of his running mate, Sen. Kashim Shettima. In the unanimous judgment of a 5-man panel of the Supreme Justices, the apex court held that apart from the suit being statue barred, the PDP lacked the locus standi to challenge the nomination process of another political party.

Part of the judgment read:

“the position of the law has always been that no political party can challenge the nomination of a candidate of another political party. The position did not change in section 285(14)(c) of the constitution. No matter how pained or disgruntled a political party is with the way and manner another political party is conducting or has conducted its affairs concerning its nomination of candidates for any position, it must keep mum and remain an onlooker for he lacks locus standi to challenge such nomination in court.

Section 285(14)(c) of the constitution only allows a political party to challenge the decisions and activities of INEC disqualifying its own candidate from participating in an election.”

In addition to the above judgment, Amina Augie JSC affirmed that Shettima did not participate in any Vice Presidential primary and was merely appointed by the Presidential Candidate of the APC pursuant to his powers in Section 142 of the 1999 Constitution as his associate.

The Supreme Court, by that judgement simply rendered one leg of the ground 1 of Peter Obi’s petition useless even before the tribunal had commenced hearing fully.

It was therefore funny that during the hearing, in trying to prove their double nomination case, all Mr. Peter Obi’s legal team could do was to bring two new TVs to the court room to play the video of when the then APC Presidential Candidate, Bola Ahmed Tinubu visited President Muhammadu Buhari in Daura to inform him of his choice of Sen. Kashim Shettima as his running mate. The LP legal team simply wanted to prove that as at that day when Tinubu made the announcement, Shettima was still Borno Central Senatorial Candidate of the APC and therefore according to them amounted to double nomination even if it was for a brief moment! What a logic!

The other leg of the ground 1 is the issue of $460,000 fine allegedly handed by the US District Court of Illinois on October 4, 1993 to President Bola Tinubu. On this, I still maintain my stand that President Bola Tinubu cannot be disqualified by virtue of Section 137 (1) paragraphs (d) and (e) because whatever fine the US Court handed to President Bola Tinubu, it was not a conviction or fine by a Nigerian Court neither was it registered in Nigeria.

Even if we assume without conceding to the fact that the court was in Nigeria or that President Bola Tinubu was indeed guilty of any crime and convicted, Section 137 (1e) barred him from running for office for 10 years only. The said court case Obi is relying on happened 29 years ago. So, in essence, ground 1 of Obi’s petition is simply dead and waiting to be buried by the Tribunal in its judgment.

For ground 2 of Peter Obi’s petition, the way his legal team has been going about trying to prove that the election of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was invalid by reason of corrupt practices and non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act has been hilarious and entertaining, to say the least

Like I pointed out in part 2 and 3 of my earlier series on the Obi petition, of all the allegations of rigging and reallocation of votes in his petition, they could only present specific figures for two states (Rivers and Benue) as what they believe were the real scores.

During the pre-hearing, Obi said he will call 50 witnesses to testify and prove his case including some star witnesses and ‘experts’. However, Obi’s legal team ended up calling only 13 witnesses before closing their case. The witnesses include:

1. Barr. Lawrence Ukechukwu
2. Anthony Chinwo (JP Morgan Chase Software Engineer).
3. Lucky Ukpewo (Channels TV Senior Reporter).
4. Lummie Edevbie (Arise TV Director of Operations).
5. Ijeoma Osamor (AIT Broadcaster).
6. Prof. Eric M. Ofoedu (Professor of Mathematics).
7. Ms Clarita Ogar (a Cloud Engineer).
8. Mr. Chibuike Ugwuoke (a cyber security expert).
9. Onoja Sunday (an election observer).
10. Kefas Iya (an ad-hoc staff of INEC).
11. Emmanuel Edet (Head of Legal Services, NITDA)
12. Yunusa Tanko (LP Presidential Campaign Spokesperson).
13. Peter Emmanuel Yari (an INEC adhoc staff from Kaduna).

The testimony of almost all the 13 witnesses called by Obi’s legal team revolves around electronic transmission of results and the IREV portal. They are trying hard to prove that the Presidential Election was not credible as a result of the inability of INEC, due to technical glitches, to carry out ‘live transmission’ of the results from the polling units to the IREV portal. They started by issuing subpoenas on TV channel personnel from Channels, AIT and Arise TV to come and testify that they reported where INEC Chairman promised electronic transmission of election results.

They also brought a cloud Engineer allegedly working with Amazon Web Services who was also a Labour Party House of Reps Aspirant to testify that Amazon Web Services that hosted INEC servers did not suffer any glitches on the day of the Presidential election. Only two INEC adhoc workers were subpoenaed by Obi’s legal team and they didn’t come to testify that the results they declared at the polling unit were changed but to testify that they couldn’t transmit the picture of result sheet to the IREV portal in real time.

The star witness called by Obi’s legal team, Professor of Mathematics, Eric M. Ofoedu to analyse the results declared by INEC and eventually uploaded in the IREV portal presented calculations in only TWO states (Rivers and Benue), to prove that Obi won the election. During cross examination, he was asked why present only the two states to which he responded that he simply picked the two states randomly and would have analysed more states if he had more time. The professor further stated that 18,088 polling unit results uploaded into the IREV portal were blurred.

The LP House of Rep Aspirant, Ms Clarita Ogar that claims to be a Cloud Engineer with Amazon Web Services in her testimony made a mess of Obi’s case as she effectively admitted during cross-examination that she was not sent by Amazon Web Services to represent it and therefore not speaking for them. She was also presented with facts publicly available showing that Amazon Web Services have experienced multiple worldwide glitches in the past including in December 2022 to which she admitted.

She was also reminded by Wole Olanipekun SAN that she sued INEC for omitting her name from the register after complaining that she made several efforts to upload her particulars on INEC portal but it failed due to a network glitch and stated in her affidavit then that the INEC site crashed. She agreed. So in essence she believes INEC site crashed during her own upload last year but did not experience any glitch on the day of the Presidential election without any proof outside the publicly available health status of Amazon Web Services which according to her did not indicate AWS experienced any network glitch on February 25th.

Perhaps the most entertaining witness of the Labour Party Presidential Candidate in the petition is Yunusa Tanko who was their Campaign Spokesperson. LP built their case around electronic transmission of results and Yunusa while being led in evidence stated that LP filed a suit against INEC seeking the court to compel INEC to transmit results electronically and that the court in a judgement delivered on January 23rd, 2023 refused all the reliefs that were sought by the party as the court held that nothing in the Electoral Act stipulated how INEC should transmit election results and that the high court, while dismissing the suit, further held that INEC was at liberty to prescribe the manner the election results should be transmitted.

During cross-examination, Mr. Yunusa was reminded that he did not state any figure to indicate the number of unlawful votes that were credited to President Tinubu and the APC as he alleged in the affidavit he deposed in his statement on oath. He insisted that votes were simply allocated to all Presidential Candidates by INEC and that If the results were uploaded as required by the law, his party would have gotten more votes than what was allocated to it. He went further to tell the court that his wish was for the entire result of the election to be voided, including the votes “allocated” to the presidential candidate of his party, Mr. Peter Obi!

When asked to confirm that Obi scored about 95.07 percent of votes in Anambra state, Mr. Yunusa Tanko said: “I have not seen it.” He went further to say: “We are not satisfied with the outcome of election, that is why we are here in court. How do we know the actual votes we got when the results are yet to be uploaded on the IReV portal, four months after the election held?” He was further asked to tell the court the total figure of votes that were unlawfully allocated to President Tinubu, to which he replied: “Our expert witness has already presented the figures in his evidence before this court. I am not a mathematician and I am not good in calculations.” Mind you, the expert witness he was referring to was Prof. Ofoedu who had earlier said he did calculations for only Rivers and Benue states due to lack of time.

Finally, when Yunusa was asked what he wanted the court to do with results that were scored by Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of the PDP, who came second in the election, he said: “We are challenging the entire results of the election and if they are cancelled, it affects results that were allocated to all the candidates, including votes scored by Atiku. What an entertaining witness! If what you want is for the entire election to be cancelled (due to an unsubstantiated allocation of votes), why then the noise about recovering a ‘stolen mandate’?

Unfortunately for the petitioners, this their obsession with ‘live transmission’ of election results and their relentless attempt to make transmission of results the sole determining factor that confers legitimacy on the results declared has met a solid brick wall even before the conclusion of the hearing of their petition. The Supreme Court while delivering in the Oyetola vs Adeleke case declared in page 14 of the judgment that ”the evidence required to prove non-accreditation, improper accreditation and over voting under under the Electoral Act 2022 are the BVAS, the Register of Voters and the Polling Unit result in INEC Form EC8A by virtue of S.47(1)(2) and 51(2) of the Electoral Act 2022, Regulations 14, 18, 19(b)(i-iv), (e)(i-iii) and 48(a) of the INEC Regulations and Guidelines for the conduct of Elections 2022.”

In fact, the Supreme Court in that judgment further stated that the result viewing portal IREV is just to the public at large the opportunity to view the polling unit results on the election day. It even alluded to the fact that INEC electronic database and by extension the IREV portal CANNOT be a COMPLETE and ACCURATE of the number of voters accredited and of the number of votes cast on an election day because it is not the direct record of these numbers and contains only the numbers transmitted to it from the BVAS. So that if the BVAS malfunctions and is unable to INSTANTLY TRANSMIT as it was recording because of lack of internet connectivity, failure of INEC officials to press the submit button properly and loss of power in the battery, what is recorded in the BVAS will not be in the database and consequently the IREV (for the scanned form EC8A).

So, Mr. Peter Obi and LP should understand that the physical form EC8A from the 176,846 polling units in Nigeria and the accompanying 176,846 BVAS machines OUGHT TO BE their primary evidence for proving any corrupt practices and non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act. Obi’s legal team did not tender the form EC8A they got from their agents from 176,846 polling units in the country neither did they tender the BVAS accreditation certificate for each of the 176,846 polling units in the country to prove their allegations of over voting in some places and wrong allocation of votes to President Tinubu. What they brought before the Tribunal was 18,088 blurred results they downloaded from the IREV portal, which is simply useless in determining any electoral fraud without the corresponding physical form EC8As and BVAS record of each of the polling units.

The funny thing is that at each juncture when they tendered these useless exhibits (boxes of blurred IREV printout, videos of Tinubu’s visit to Buhari and INEC Chairman’s press conference assuring of electronic transmission of results) before the tribunal, and the tribunal naturally admits them in evidence as is the standard practice in litigations, their supporters will erupt in jubilation with a Renewed Hope that they’re closer to ‘retrieving their stolen mandate’. You will see many ignorant supporters boasting that Obi was more prepared for the Tribunal case than the elections and that APC did not see Obi coming. Hilarious.

Finally, in their Ground 3 as outlined in paragraph 81 of their petition, Peter Obi and the LP were contending that the interpretation of Section 134(2)b of the constitution is such that a candidate with the highest number of votes MUST score at least 25% of the votes in the FCT in addition to 24 other states of the federation to be declared winner. They therefore stated that since the 2nd Respondent, President Bola Tinubu did not score up to 25% of the votes cast in the FCT, he is not duly elected. On this same subject matter, five individuals that described themselves as residents of the FCT instituted a suit at the Federal High Court Abuja seeking to stop the inauguration of the President, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu on May 29th, 2023 since he did not score up to 25% of the votes cast in the FCT. The Presiding judge, Inyang Ekwo rightly dismissed the suit and fined the lawyer representing the plaintiffs the sum of N10 million.

Even though Justice Inyang Ekwo did not rule on the issue of 25% in the FCT itself, it is very clear that it is a non-issue to start with as I extensively dissected in part 3 of my earlier series on the Obi petition. However let me reiterate here that the essence of Section 134(2)b of the Constitution is simply to ensure national spread and prevent one section of the country being dominant. It will therefore negate the essence of the provision if getting at least 25% of the votes cast in the FCT is a compulsory criteria to be declared winner. This in effect means FCT voters will now be more important than voters from the entire 36 states since a candidate can secure 25% of the votes in the 36 states but may fail to reach that threshold in the FCT and going by that flawed logic, such candidate will not be declared a winner because FCT voters are holding him hostage. This is definitely not the intention of the Constitution.

Section 299 of the 1999 Constitution on its own conferred the status of a state to the FCT and provided that it be treated as if it were a state wherever it is mentioned in the Constitution. Therefore the judicial voyage of Obi on the 25% in the FCT question will definitely end up fruitless. The other judicial fishing expeditions of Obi’s legal team especially as it relates to alleged dual citizenship of the President and their obsession with his certificates equally shows how shallow the Obi petition is. It is simply a clever way to remain in the news and keep his Obidients engaged ahead of the next time he will contest for president. Well, the circus will soon come to an end.

Can anyone observe that this was re-staged for the glam because the package was already opened ?

[quote author=EBMedia post=123901276]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFw3cXRa62w

Nigerian chef and Guinness World Record holder for marathon cooking, Hilda Effiong Bassey, (aka Hilda Baci), has announced the arrival of her award plaque, IGBERETV reports.

Baci revealed this in a video she posted on her Twitter page on Monday.

She was certified as the new record holder for the longest cooking by an individual with 93 hours and 11 minutes.

In the video, she received the award plaque packaged in a box and delivered by a dispatch rider. She captioned the video;

Our Plaque is here 😆😆 @GWR pic.twitter.com/1ZCaGHSjFd

— Hilda Baci (@hildabacicooks) June 19, 2023

]

Are you talking about the same SIMI that has just released a new song ? Take a listen....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07OVSaj_VrI&ab_channel=SimiVEVO

Ebus12:
Where Is the Simi of 2014-2019?



When I asked a similar question about a year ago, a certain lady did not only stop at countering, insulting, and calling me all sorts of unprintable names; she also badgered into my DM and called me a "male witch", for airing an observation. Well, I’m sure her conscience should have given her a hint as to who the real witch is now. Me, who observed and didn’t hide my fears about an artist’s decline, or her, a fake fan, who is more interested in giveaways than helping Simi redress her falling career.

Oh yes, even if we are all afraid to spit this raw truth out, we all know that the Simi of Simisola and Omo Charlie Champagne are probably chilling off somewhere around a hotel in Zonkwa, Kaduna State.

If we will be honest, we will confess that the Simi that gave us hits on a back-to-back basis is probably in national exile and, hopefully, might only return together with DJ Switch when the federal government grants Switch amnesty. If we are true music fans, we must have missed that charming Simi-Falz combo, whose only comparison is a scrumptious rice and gbegiri combo prepared by a 49-year-old Urhobo woman.

That Simi was always anticipated.

That Simi that these new generational Tems and Ayrra Starr can’t match.

That Simi gave Tiwa Savage and Yemi Alade a run for their money.

That Simi, whose songs were relatable and whose videos were educative,

That extra-ordinary, super-talented, and extremely creative Simi

WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT SIMI AFTER HER MARRIAGE TO ADEKUNLE?

WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT SIMI AFTER THE BIRTH OF DEJA?

WHAT HAPPENED TO THAT SIMI AFTER DUDUKE?



The present Simi is a complete shadow of herself. This present Simi, who used to be a hitmaker, is now more of a noisemaker and troublemaker, fighting innocent male fans on Twitter over women's rights and whatnot.

The present Simi, who was an exceptional songstress, has now been reduced—or rather, she has now reduced herself—to an in-house songwriter for her husband, Adekunle Gold.

Her songs, which were topping charts and getting over all airplay, are now hardly played in Calabar beer parlors.

The Simi that many once rated equal to or sometimes above Tiwa Savage is now scarily present in any music conversation.

The Simi that could effortlessly bag seven mega hits in a year is struggling for one average hit since "Duduke."

The energetic Simi we all knew and loved now sings as if she is entertaining only demotivated refugees seeking asylum in Guinea-Bissau.

What has happened to the Simi of Simisola and Omo Charlie Champagne?

All these evidence and Electoral Law that you are quoting are all hogwash. Please google the meaning of the word TRANSMISSION and you will realise that it is not limited to electronic transfer. Any document that you move either physically or otherwise could be deemed as being transmitted. The medium is therefore immaterial Anything obtained and presented from IREV is not sacrosanct and cannot be superior to the hardcopies signed by all the party agents. Screaming that the results were not uploaded on the IREV Portal does not hold water because the term REAL TIME is a subjective one that means AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. As we all know, the results were uploaded eventually. All computer literate individuals would know that you may send an email at a particular time and it may not be delivered to the targeted recipient several hours or even days later. Therefore, physical uploading of election results on IREV portal could therefore be deemed to have occurred at the time intended but delayed due to PLAUSIBLE network congestion, which is beyond the liability of INEC.

You will have better luck if you could point out that SUBSTANTIAL number of results available on the IREV Portal are totally different from the hard copy issued to your party agents. Note that there were over 170,000 Polling Units and corresponding results generated. Statistically, there are bound to be some errors. If such errors are not sufficient to change the final outcome of the election, therefore the already declared winner stands.

IfnobeGod20:
I am tempted to just reply you. I hope you have with you the 2022 Electoral Act and have read the content very well and abreast yourself what the law says. Pls let me take you on a journey as I quote verbatim from the Electoral Act and also check the few footnotes embedded.

Section 64 Nigeria Electoral Act 2022

(4) A collation officer or returning officer at an election shall collate and announce the result of an election, subject to his or her verification and confirmation that the –
(a) number of accredited voters stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act;

'footnote'
Note the word recorded and transmitted. The word is not submitted but transmitted. These are two different words, meaning different thing.

(b) the votes stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60 (4) of this Act.

'footnote'
Transmitted directly from the polling units. The collated result must be correct and consistent with the votes or results recorded and transmitted, point of emphasis. If what INEC collated recorded is not in congruence with the transmitted result, then, there is a foul play.

(5) Subject to subsection (1), a collation officer or returning officer shall use the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act and the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60 (4) of this Act to collate and announce the result of an election if a collated result at his or a lower level of collation is not correct.

'footnote'
It is even mandatory for a collation officer or returning officer to compare the recorded results with transmitted results as seen from the above section.

(6) Where during collation of results, there is a dispute regarding a collated result or the result of an election from any polling unit, the collation officer or returning officer shall use the following to determine the correctness of the disputed result –
(a) the original of the disputed collated result for each polling unit where the
election is disputed;
(b) the smart card reader or other technology device used for accreditation of voters in each polling unit where the election is disputed for the purpose of
obtaining accreditation data directly from the smart card reader or technology device;
(c) data of accreditation recorded and transmitted directly from each polling unit where the election is disputed as prescribed under section 47 (2) of this Act; and
'footnote'
In this section, it was made explicit that in case there is a dispute in the collation of results, it is expected for the collation officer or returning officer to rely on data of accreditation recorded and transmitted directly from each polling unit so disputed.

(d) the votes and result of the election recorded and transmitted directly from
each polling unit where the election is disputed, as prescribed under section 60 (4) of this Act.

(7) If the disputed result under subsection (6) were otherwise found not to be correct, the collation officer or returning officer shall re-collate and announce a new result
using the information in subsection (6) (a)-(d).

Meanwhile, so funny that many of you want to play smart, knowing fully well that many of these results were uploaded weeks after the presidential election when the so called adhoc staff of INEC, that is PO had forgotten that the presided over election. Remember their work ends as soon as they get to LG collation center and handed over to the LG returning officer. Then, who now posted the results after weeks that the election has been conducted and announcement made? Again, why was the legislative election uploaded successfully but the presidential election was not in an election conducted same day, same time and by the same commission? It was on record that they could not upload that of presidential election results and the commission chairman claimed it was due to glitches experienced, which only affect that of president and not others conducted same day. Think!

Who will explain in simple English to these emotionally charged kids that the results from the IREV portals are SECONDARY/IMMATERIAL and the PRIMARY and only credible source through which INEC declared the winner is from the HARD COPY result sheets, which was also issued to all Party Agents ?
Therefore, going to the IREV portal to download results is a complete waste of time and what they should be doing is to present their own hard copy results issued and point out the differences with certified true copy of what INEC has. You guys will be flatly disappointed when it dawns on you that claiming that the results were not uploaded on IREV is also hogwash because either it was done instantly in supposed real time or very much later is totally immaterial.
Most of the INEC Polling Agents are Youth Corpers and others below the age of 30. They are supposed to be technologically savvy but they could not take legible pictures with the BVAS device despite the huge amount spent in training them. Please who is to be blamed for this failure but yourselves ?

Prior to the election day, every intelligent person knew it was either a 3 way deadlock, which could end up in a rerun of the election between the top two candidates OR a slim victory for BAT because he had a SLIGHT edge over the others.
As predicted, BAT won with the lowest margin ever recorded in our modern politics. The reason being that the 3 top candidates represent the 3 major tribes and all their ethnic compatriots are predicted to line up behind one of their own. The North has the highest population, followed by the SW and the SE being the last. As observed, the SE voted 90% for Peter Obi but that is not sufficient to meet the requirements to emerge victorious, while roughly 65% from SW voted BAT and 60% in the North voted for Atiku. Of course, candidate BAT with a fairer spread across the nation won. BAT lost in Lagos as expected due to the large Igbo population and that is the true result as expected.
Please point out where your glory was taken and the likely victory path for Peter Obi in this calculus ? How on earth would you expect the SW and the core North to vote massively for Peter Obi and abandon their own compatriots, when you tightly hugged yours ? Can you point to any political bigwig in the nation, South or North that campaigned for Obi ?

You guys are simply zealots and you think because you want victory so badly and if you scream the loudest, bully everyone that does not agree with you, it should then rightly be presented to you on a platter of gold. Unfortunately, it does not work like that.
Peter Obi never won and he has no clear chances of winning now or in future. You guys need to learn how to build bridges Northerly and Westernly across the River Niger, if you want to play politics successfully.

I await your insults and from others of your kind because when you cannot hold an intellectual discourse that is your fall back option.

iSense247:
https://dailypost.ng/2023/06/16/tinubus-victory-ait-broadcaster-ijeoma-osamor-testifies-for-peter-obi/?amp=1

You children are educated but not smart to figure simple thing out and that is why you are being beaten black and blue when you unnecessary get emotional, be it #EndSars or when you manifest as Obidients when you don't think out of the box. Those BLURRED documents that you are disparaging were uploaded by a lazy and incompetent youths like you, despite the huge sums of moneyspent to train them and they could still not operate the BVAS machine correctly. For your information and emotional stability, note that the RAW result sheets, signed by Party Agents were the documents used at the WARD LEVEL to collate the results and the image posted on IREV is for public viewing and not for INEC to use.

COMPREHENDE?

keymatt:
See how mods mischievously made the headline looks as if Peter Obi presented blurred evidence.

Correct Headline: Peter Obi presented 18,000 blurred INEC certified Documents Uploaded on IREV.

The question intelligent minds will ask is, how was INEC able to read the blurred INEC results and declare Tinubu as the alleged winner of 2023 presidential elections?

Labour Party, Obi and the Dis_OBI_dient mob should stop LABOURing in vain ! All these evidence that you are presenting are all hogwash. Anything obtained and presented from IREV is not sacrosanct and cannot be superior to the hardcopies signed by all the party agents. Screaming that the results were not uploaded on the IREV Portal does not hold water because the term REAL TIME is a subjective one that means AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. As we all know, the results were uploaded eventually. All computer literate individuals would know that you may send an email at a particular time and it may not be delivered to the targeted recipient several hours or even days later. Therefore, physical uploading of election results on IREV portal could therefore be deemed to have occurred at the time intended but delayed due to PLAUSIBLE network congestion, which is beyond the liability of INEC.

You will have better luck if you could point out that SUBSTANTIAL number of results available on the IREV Portal are totally different from the hard copy issued to your party agents. Note that there were over 170,000 Polling Units and corresponding results generated. Statistically, there are bound to be some errors. If such errors are not sufficient to change the final outcome of the election, therefore the already declared winner stands.

chisomkachy:
https://thenationonlineng.net/just-in-obi-lp-tender-18088-blurred-result-sheets-other-documents/

[/font][color=#000099][/color]

Do you know the meaning of COMMISSIONING ? If you don't, commissioning of a technical facility like this is not just the ceremonial cutting of ribbons. What is going on now is the real commissioning, whereby the plant would be subjected to compartmentalized testing and then integrated testing of all the components together to ensure they would all function as one unit as designed. During this phase, a lot of things (bad) are likely to happen but they would be rectified or fine-tuned.

COMPREHENDE ?

Believeintruth:
So why then commission something that is not ready yet?

The startup and commissioning has commenced and it will take about that time frame before the right quality of product starts coming out. Petroleum Refining is not a single throughput process, the feed and the product would be recycled/refluxed several times before success is achieved.

abhosts:
So why not launch with incoming President when it is ready?

The startup and commission has commenced and it will take about that time frame before the right quality of product starts coming out. Petroleum Refining is not a single throughput process, the feed and the product would be recycled/refluxed several times before success is achieved.

abhosts:
So why not launch with incoming President when it is ready?

She and #Him_Tu_Lie are simply LABOURing in vain !

Penguin2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1KCChKL1SM

Cheering moment when the indefatigable and beautiful Mrs Margaret Obi showed up to support Hilda Baci, the Nigerian girl trying to break the Guinness World Record for longest cooking hours by an individual.

You just can’t help but love everything about Peter Obi.

My late grandma in her rich Ijebu accent would have said: "K'ombo ne, s'hom lucki"

Noerection:
https://punchng.com/breaking-supreme-court-adjourns-nnamdi-kanus-case-to-sept-14/

https://podiumreporters.com/index.php/2023/03/08/mit-disowns-gbadebo-rhodes-vivour-exposes-lies-lp-candidate-attended-the-institution/

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology has debunked claims made by Labour Party governorship candidate in Lagos state, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour that he attended the institution and graduated with a Masters Degree.

According to the institution, it has no record of Gbadebo ever attending the institution.

In a verification message sent to the institution and shared online, the institution distanced itself from the Labour Party flagbearer, exposing the lies in his educational claims.



Gbadebo had in his Wikipedia profile listed MIT as one of the institutions he attended and got awarded a masters degree in Architecture.

The Labour Party gubernatorial candidate is up against All Progressives Congress incumbent Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu who continues to enjoy endorsements from Lagosians and stakeholders in the metropolitan city on the basis of his wide-range of achievements in his first term in office.