Ono's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ono's Profile › Ono's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 132 pages)
gambojimeta:The write up is confusing. Did you take some time to digest the story? What's with De Santis and Trump? How's Ann impacted by this? Not sure i get it. |
benalvino3:benalvi, I won't be too fast to conclude on this. Romney just said that Biden failed in that aspect because he didn't engage "centrist" Republicans. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jan/16/romney-biden-botched-election-reform-not-talking-c/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS RINOs like Romney and the likes will be the downfall of the US and the Republican party. |
Kokobilo87:yeah?? LOL |
Didn't finish that: Buttigieg (Maltese: Buttiġieġ [bʊtːɪd͡ʒɪːt͡ʃ]) is a Maltese surname, derived from Sicilian Arabic أبو الدجاج Abu-d-dajāj(i), meaning 'chicken owner, poulterer' (literally 'father of chickens'). I like that there's something chicken to it. And father of chickens is a good fit for the current transportation secretary. |
basilico:Sounds like MadCow....LOL. And Buttgieg - butt-leaked or butt-fried! |
feedthenation:Ok . And your point is ? |
Enugurangers:Erm, this is clear now. Sooo, what if PB and OK went to the rally? Did they go about burning malls and destroying properties like Antifa and BLM people did in the summer of 2020? Since when did it become a crime for a group to attend rallies - peacefully? And if not for people like Epps, do you think that event would have gone violent and rowdy? |
Enugurangers:Haba bros, no one is contesting the fact that people came from all over the country to "march peacefully and protest the stolen election". By all accounts, the crowd that went to DC that day was huge - backs Trump's claim 100%. What we have now seen, however, is that we have infiltrators - most likely sponsored by the Government and with the tacit support of Pelosi, and other power drunk democraps. Hence Epps coming to fore. Thinking about what these people have in mind brings the shill to my bones. It is tantamount to a coup on the Trump presidency. A very well organised, well oiled, multi-party coalition of haters of Trump (democraps and RINOs) who just want the man out of office - by any means, so long as they don't kill him. Two different things bro. |
Enugurangers:If the below is true, then anything is possible. Notice that the writer of that piece gave links to evidence to support his claim.
|
Whew! two pages of clean, respectful conversations in here. No foul images of dogs and guys in undies. No foul words, just courteous response to probing questions and with opinions presented with no recourse to insults. And Ibime and PrideofLincoln gone too. Hehe! Where is gentle basilico? We can do it guys - neat, respectful and exciting debates. |
Good read. https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/
|
wirinet:And how did you know that (in bold). America runs a democratic form of government. Trump, born and raised in the US - he's been in the country all his life (more than 70 years), will not be president (his first political office - and I consider that stellar performance, a feat) if he's not conversant with the laws of that country! And this is not the first time a president in the US will refuse to concede defeat. Not new. Check the records. So, what's the problem with democraps all wanting to make sure the guy doesn't get to come near government again? |
wirinet:My point is that people can manipulate "anything numbers" these days. Gone are the days of trusting in the "process" - especially in the US of A of today. Have you seen the polls lately, about the confidence levels of Americans generally in their institutions? Agencies like the FBI and CIA that used to be darling organisations that Americans love to work for and really look up to in times of national confusion or stuff like that have their ratings plummeting to all-time low - like never seen before. And this thing started largely from the days of Obama. In Newsom's case, his policies are unpopular in California, especially his shoddy handling of COVID-19, with his partying-while-the-state-burns attitude. But democraps rallied round him when the referendum was up. Ciattrelli had to make sure and conceded (key point). Times have changed and it's a "shine your eyes" thing now, otherwise, democraps will impose their will on the people. What's wrong with Trump wanting to make sure before conceding? And if he's got evidence (like we are seeing now in Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Philadelphia, Texas and elsewhere) what's wrong with that? |
But they want Trump to concede. Hypocrites. |
wirinet:Like when Gavin Newsom recall fell short of the needed vote for an election in California and nobody in the GOP made any qualms about that. Same in New Jersey, the GOP candidate conceded defeat - even when the margin of victory was little, for a deep blue state like NJ. Spin me something different. |
Praise ye the Lord! Doer of great and marvelous deeds. Ye men of the world, look unto Jesus and be ye saved from all your travails and sins. He will save you! Praise ye the Lord! |
Konkoja:The one thing that has distinguished Trump - from other presidents (like Obama de o dumber), is that he doesn't like to chicken out, especially when he's got hard evidence that a crime has been committed. Take for example, the Russian Hoax saga, the Ukrainian president's phone call saga, the stolen election of 2016 (Russian puppet) etc etc. Trump said all those were fabricated lies against him and his office. Over time, and with a little effort on his part (Special Counsel Durham), he's been proven right - all the time. Why will his claim that the presidential election of 2020 was rigged be different? What are the odds that he's lying and cannot be trusted? What has he got to lose? He's a wealthy man already - a septuagenarian who should be resting and enjoying his wealth. There is an audit trail convincing enough for me to believe him. The election was rigged. |
benalvino3:That was made quite clear in Schumer's video last time - on "mass voting" in the US. |
Kokobilo87:No one is irredeemable. I will give it my best shot. He will see the light. Don't lose hope. |
Kokobilo87:Hahaha.. I will succeed. I know he loves the truth. This thing is really not about Trump guys. We need to learn to accept what's good and true. Evil, lies, and deceit, twisting narratives to sway innocent people do no good. We all must rise and condemn evil in all its ramifications. |
gambo, I know you have it in you to do good. You're a bright chap. Stop following people who will lead you straight to hell with their myopic, biased and crazy opinion. Do well to love the truth, and boy, you'd be glad you did! |
gambojimeta:The average human should be able to think for himself/herself. Right ? Remember I told you I don’t dwell on one news source to make an uninformed opinion. I have searched far and wide before selecting the Federalist. Honest truth tellers. Learn to “love” the truth - unbiased. |
gambojimeta:How is that relevant to the questions posed to the FBI guy? Right or left, Center or offsite, the truth is sacrosanct and can be seen by all. Why live in self denial ? |
obixcel:Unbelievable! What has changed is Donald Trump Wow! |
gambojimeta:Did you even try to read the content of the link shared? |
Read no further. This shed all the light you need on January 6th “insurrection” https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/11/fbi-refuses-to-say-how-many-informants-were-involved-in-jan-6-violence/
|
Gosh! What with all these stewpid/crazy and foul images! Can the mods ban gambo and his gang please?? Can't one read comments/posts in peace again?? |
feedthenation:Pay attention to the words in bold. There is no doubt that the innocent, patriotic crowd that went to the Capitol to "protest" the rigged 03/11/2020 presidential election were at some point infiltrated by arsonists and violent groups (most likely sponsored by democraps and their ilk in government circles). It was a trap and the crowd fell for it. Initially, it wasn't crystal clear to all, but as the day goes by and more information about what transpired that day came to fore, Republicans got a handle of things and started walking back their previous positions/convictions based on the lie that the Fake News media peddled - I will do same if I were in their shoes. My take on it based on all that I have seen, read and heard. |
OK. I'll make it a simple question, again. What's Jesus about in this passage of the scripture? I'll accept if you say you don't know. It's fine. We are not expected to know everything. We have UFOs out there that many are still trying to solve their mysterious sightings. Abi? "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world." John 6: 47-51 |
budaatum:LOL. The things of the Spirit are not discernible with physical eyes. The reason why when all these started, I told you, you will not understand. You can't read a book, a spiritual book like the Bible and expect to fully understand the content using your mortal eyes (spiritually blind, by the way). If we go by your approach of just reading the Bible and interpreting it literally, how do you interpret this passage from the Bible as stated by Jesus himself? After all, Jesus is no longer in the world. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world." John 6: 47-51 Physical flesh (your eyes) goes contrary to the law of God. It cannot see far into the spirit realm. Galatians 5:17 (KJV) For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. Galatians 5:16 (KJV) This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. Are you ready to walk in the spirit - so you can see far? So you can see what I am about in proper perspective? |
budaatum:Adam died a spiritual death, a precursor to the physical death that happened to him after 960 years. The original plan God had for him (and us) was to live forever. Compare living forever with living for 960 years. For the wages of sin (in the case of Adam, the sin of disobedience) is death (physical and spiritual); but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Roman 6:23. When you die spiritually, you're cut off from the source of everlasting life. You can be breathing and moving around and procreating. But the true power you should wield as God wants for you has been taken away from you. The Devil deceived them and thus cut off that link between man and God. God cannot stand sin. This deception is still being played today by the Devil and his minions. In my personal opinion (and this is just me), I have a feeling that the Devil has found a comfort nest in the Democrap party of America. The lawlessness that's pervasive in that party can only be attributed to demonic and devilish influence. What can one say about homosexuals, gays and lesbians running the affairs of a country. Pedophiles on the loose. Lawlessness in mostly democrap controlled states. Vote rigging. Rampant thuggery, death and violence on the rise and shamelessly urged on. Sexual immorality, drug addiction, abusers, etc. It's not that these things aren't done in other climes and elsewhere, but the democraps, to me, are the agents of the Devil in this one. I hope this is clear to you. |
budaatum:You still won't understand! Hmnnn... |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 132 pages)

Wow!