ParisLove2's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ParisLove2's Profile › ParisLove2's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 12 pages)
You can't quote me cus i didn't do anything neither did i make any comparison. It's either i broke NL rules or i didn't. Continue waiting for apology. Mtswwwwwwww |
[quote author=deols][/quote]Hello ? ? ? I've gone through the hijab in the USA thread and i didn't see anywhere i described hijab as bin bag. As far as i know the posts weren't hidden so why am i still serving an undeserved ban? |
deols: Your post dated march 10(yesterday) on the hijab in d USA thread.What do you mean? Did i describe 'u know what' as a bin bag? ![]() |
deols: I assumed you'd be smart enough to realise that wanting to be banned simply summarises all your actions.nope, i don't remember using bin bag to describe hijab, could you point out where i did that? I'll apologize and accept my ban in good faith. If i remember correctly i even cautioned people not to refer 'u know what' as bin bag. |
hi deols, could you please give me a more sensible reason why 'Paris_love' account was banned other than 'banned for wanting to be banned'? The reason really sounds stupíd to me. |
maclatunji: Typical. Paris! Paris!! Paris!!! Your obsession with Islam will draw you into it God-willing.Lol, we'll see |
maclatunji: Hahahahaha, this story really got to you- didn't it?This story? Not a chance. OP mentioned the number never told us how he managed that. Even if the story is true look how well it turned out for Pakistan,muslims blowing each other up on daily basis, kidnapping hindu girls and forcefully converting them compared to their Indian neighbors which is predominantly Hindu by the way |
"At first he had to study the Holy Quran in secret. There was the risk of being misunderstood if a Muslim caught him with the holy book. He started fasting and in fact he would begin a day before Ramazan started.. Lol just see how peaceful the religion of peace is. Any non muslim reading the quran is putting him/herself in a 'risky' position of being caught by a peace loving muslim. The muslim will just "explode" with joy on seeing a non muslim reading the Quran. MashAllah |
.Weekly Jihad Report Jan. 26 - Feb. 01 Jihad Attacks: 39 Allahu Akbars*: 6 Dead Bodies: 265 Critically Injured: 336 *Suicide Attacks Monthly Jihad Report January, 2013 Jihad Attacks: 193 Countries: 22 Religions: 5 Dead Bodies: 931 Critically Injured: 1480 |
. Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace "Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are harsh to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29 2013.02.04 (Taji, Iraq) - A Holy Warrior self-detonates in a thick crowd of Iraqis, leaving about two dozen dead. 2013.02.03 (Khakriz, Afghanistan) - Women are among the casualties of a Taliban roadside attack. 2013.02.03 (Kirkuk, Iraq) - Three dozen innocents are slaughtered by a suicide bombing followed by a grenade and shooting assault along a city street. 2013.02.02 (Miyanishin, Afghanistan) - Two young children are among a family of five exterminated by a roadside bomb. 2013.02.02 (Sarai Nawrang, Pakistan) - Women and children are among the casualties of a brutal Fedayeen attack that included a suicide bombing in a family home. 2013.02.01 (Pattani, Thailand) - Three are killed when Islamic 'separatists' spray a group of farmers with machine-gun fire. |
OP you know this is all lies. |
^ Thanks |
From a Muslim website. Do Muslims watch Pornography?http://www.muslimsandtheworld.com/do-muslims-watch-pornography/ Edits: Nairaland word filter ^^censored that link |
Can you please untag my last post on https://www.nairaland.com/1183494/muslim-countries-lead-online-indecency ? I don't Know what i did to that spambot. Thanks |
seanet01: Yeah the easy way out like the Weapons of Mass destruction in Iraq which turns out to be false?Yea everything critical of islam is western propaganda right? Culled from islamic website. Do Muslims watch Pornography?http://www.muslimsandtheworld.com/do-muslims-watch-pornography/ Edits: Nairaland word filter ^^censored that link |
tbaba1234: Chei!! Usisky can write nonsense....You really chickened out of really?Like seriously? |
[s] fellis: You have no point whatsoever, stop writing.Trash. Why will you wish me merry christmas when I don't celebrate christmas? How would it appear to you if i wished you happy kwanzaa or happy Yom kippur even when I know that you don't celebrate these things?I'll simply reply in kind like i did to my muslim friends that wished me happy eid. I even called some up to wish them happy celebration. ![]() |
fellis: Abeg all this your plenty colour dey make eye pain me, why can't you use only black like other people?Cause am unique The fact that the verses were not arranged according to how they were revealed does not mean that it was corrupted. I don't even understand how you would see such a thing as corruption. The revealed verses are exactly the same way they were when revealed, in the original Arablc form (even if interpretations exist, the original form and message is still there).The verses clearly states that God doesn't want his words changed. Am sure the warning or condemnation given to israelites also applies to muslims and he had a purpose for revealing it in stages. But pretty surprised you didn't find the the perfect book of God not perfectly organized as corruption. Doesn’t it indicate that the collection of Quran was not divinely ordained? Even you leave the above arguments aside, how perfect would you call a God that declares today that  ”today I have perfected your religion for you”(Quran 5:3) but still continues with his revelations tommorow ? Can you forgive the imperfection of such a God that has more to say after he has perfected his religion? Even after declaring in Quran 5:3 that He has perfected his religion, Allah found out that his religion was not so perfect. So he kept revealing more verses .Even if you leave that aside, do you know that the prophet never ordered the compilation of the Quran ? that the collection of Quran was ordered by Caliphs and not the prophet? that the collector of Quran found this task to be more difficult than moving mountains? that the Quran was compiled from bones,leaves, hides and the hearts of believers!! ? ..still you believe that with all this hodge podge ..the Quran surely remained uncorrupted and complete!!!? I don't celebrate christmas.I don't care Why do you celebrate it? Did Jesus Christ ask christians to celebrate christmas?Jesus loves to be celebrated, ask Judas, yea and even his birth was celebrated by Angels and of course the three wise men Florena: wat u dnt knw is dat d Qur'an was arranged accordin 2 d size of d chapters, i mean 4rm highest 2 lowestWhy wasn't arranged as it was given to Muhammad? The Quran we see today was compiled not by Muhammad but by his followers who were fighting each other like bloody hounds. Despite all that you believe your little book wasn't corrupted? Think about it. ![]() See you all next year. Have a merry Christmas and a fruitful new year ![]() |
Lemme just ask this simple question; ![]() "The quran is not in chronological order, all real scholar agree to this! But there was such order obviously. The first "revelation" came to muhammad in the cave. But it has number 96 in the quran. There are medina-surahs (came first). And mecca-surahs (came later). Now the order is completely mixed up !! So, this is my question; WHO HAS CORRUPTED THE QURAN BY PLACING SURAHS IN THE WRONG ORDER ? AND WHEN ?? AND MOST IF ALL ...WHY !!! REMEMBER: YOUR ALLAH DOES NOT LIKE HIS WORDS BEING CHANGED FROM THEIR RIGHT PLACES (SURAH5:13). AND THIS TIME NO SILLY EXCUSES AND LOGICAL FALLACIES, BUT A DIRECT HONEST ANSWER WITH REFERENCES, ETC...PLEASE" Lest i forget, that bible has been translated so many times or have many versions doesn't change anything. The original manuscripts are still there. And just like she claimed Paul never met Jesus, Muhammad too never Allah and likewise Constantine a former idol worshiper was among those that compiled the bible so was uthman a former idol worshiper before his conversion to islam was an idol worshiper. Thank God she mentioned nothing about originality as Quran was copied from many sources. Merry Christmas ♥ |
Great, atleast he's not quoting pagans, atheists, satanists and what have you to discredit Christians. bigots
|
Am voting Goshen ![]() |
Some do, so don't. Merry Christmas https://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/c0.0.474.315/71605_356200771145882_2091914974_n.jpg |
tintingz: @paris lover you are very sick quoting this to your crap post...Lol, dealing with Muslims living in self denial is not something i signed up for today. Wow 3 and counting... Lord have mercy ![]() |
tbaba1234: ^Every natural disaster serves as a reminder for humans (our weakness) and a warning for the last day.You can shout lies from now till thy kingdom come i don't care, the topic of your thread even gives you out. Also there you mentioned how Allah destroyed city of Ad like with something similar like hurricane Sandy. What then are you trying to say? If you feel like denying what you said, that it means another thing well i apologize for that. It was very naïve of me to think that Sandy itself was the main punishment not knowing it was just a warning. Wow, hope am forgiven? Great, now with all this doom looming, America is the last place where you or any Muslim would want to be. My instincts tells me Saudi would be the safest place so when you relocating? Am sure you don't wanna be caught in the crossfire when the annihilation begins and be termed...what's it called again...erm..collateral damage? |
tbaba1234: Again I never said that;Why on earth would i lie when just quoted yourself saying it's a warning? I guess the H.sandy was the appetizer, real desert is still coming. God well...bless America |
ATMC: logicboy is plus 2 ahead of goshen for now and plus 5 ahead of mr anonyAh, alright thanks. I'll come back later to cast my vote. ![]() |
tbaba1234: I never ever said the hurricane sandy was a punishment... You do not have to lie to promote your point. I was in New york when the hurricane hit. I am very disgusted by this claim. Even Lagosshia did not make any comment of this kind.You said it's a warning. What da heck is that supposed to mean? A warning to do what? Stop making anti islam films? So Americans don't heed that warning then what? Whether you were disgusted or not i don't care, that as well is irrelevant to me. |
maclatunji: You see that your long epistle is just a waste of time. Someone asked a question, I gave a categorical answer based on my knowledge and you want to cry? Please cry on. Your thoughts are your thoughts and my words are my words.Lol so what's this thread all about? Shouldn't the same thing be applied to all those atheists and pagans OP quoted to discredit Christians? Any way your thoughts are irrelevant, just quoted it to show betathings ignorance or hypocrisy. ![]() |
Schadenfreude is the act or emotion of takingpleasure in the misfortunes of others. The word is from the German meaning "harm joy" , as a noun, it is capitalised in German, but not usually in English . [2] While in its simplest form,it is a feeling of relief or gratitude at not havingmisfortune befall oneself and does not represent an active desire for harm to befall others, it can be malicious. Schadenfreude is usually considered mean-spirited, notably by those whom the joke is on the misfortune befalls, and is a form of sadism . Who does it? Well, everyone. No, seriously; everyone to greater or lesser extent. Yes, you too. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Schadenfreude Am out |
This thread is very fallacious and biased and the OP being a Muslim, it's no surprise at all. At first he admitted that muslims do celebrate the misfortunes of others but when they do it they're committing sins, he also pointed out that christians do the same but somehow wants us to believe when they're doing it, they're not committing any sins. Then he pointed there are those who call them to order still that's not enough for him. Then he went ahead to quote anonymous posters that somehow feels hard done by muslims. Like this one ZUBY77:But then again this is an anonymous site, how are we sure you're not the one using multiple ids to make such comments so that you'll use it later on to prove that Christians are bad? Also what makes you think that anyone that's not a muslims automatically becomes a Christian? In his desperate attempt to make useless points he also quoted a pagan. Is a pagan now a Christian? PAGAN 9JA(m):this is desperately ridiculous! Then he went ahead to claim that Muslims don't insult religious leaders, that they don't have such double standard. Is either the OP is ignorant to make such claims or intellectually dishonest. Just few days ago the mod of this section declared they're no more genuine pastors MeGaStReEt: maclatunji: I say so unequivocally.https://www.nairaland.com/1137947/how-feel-when-stranger-pastor/1 Doesn't that mean that are the religious leaders that non muslims have are fake? Imagine if a non muslim come here and declare that muhammad is a fake Prophet, the number of years he would ban him. Then he went ahead to quote 41:34, the same verse that his own Prophet threw under the train when he attacked other tribes that were allegedly going to attack him, the same man that had adulterers stoned to death and cut off the hands and feet of those who had stolen his camels and he had their eyes put out by fire (heated nails). What's the cause of this incosistencies? Whatever happened to repel evil with good ![]() Everyday muslims quote Quran and hadiths to justify the murder of non muslims worldwide, one would think that's the highest for of blasphemy but we don't see any outrage like we usually see when a movie or cartoon pops up. In front of this persecution what does Jesus teach? "Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous" (Matthew 5:44-45, NIV). Talk the talk and walk the talk, even on the cross, Jesus prayed for those that persecute him. "Father, forgive them, for theydo not know what they do." Gospel of Luke 23:34 What about Muslims? Shortly after hurricane sandy struck, Muslims leaders and those on this forum like Tbaba and Lagoshia declared that's it's a punishment and warning from Allah. https://www.nairaland.com/1087306/hurricane-sandy-reflecting-winds And https://www.nairaland.com/1093172/hurricane-sandy-divine-punishment-america tintingz: It is both punishment and natural disaster......them never see anything this just the begining hurricane brandy is still coming the twin sister to hurricane sandy.....let them prepare for this tho i never pray for this to happen...And so many others like it, even Muslims celebrate when evil before their fellows. Take for example how muslims celebrated after Gadaffi died. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/imagegallery/gallery/phpyYoThb.jpg And after the death of crown prince, "2012, June 27th. Saudi Shite Cleric Nimr Al-Nimr: “Where is [Crown Prince] Nayef’s army now? Will it protect him from the Angel of Death? Where are his intelligence agencies? Where are his officers? Can they protect him from the Angel of Death? He will be eaten by worms and suffer the torments of Hell in his grave. Why doesn’t a king retire when the time comes? Must the Angel of Death come to take his soul? Nayef did not retire, so the Angel of Death had to take his soul to rid us of him. …Allah be praised! May He take their lives, one after the other – the Saud, Khalifa, and Al-Assad dynasties.” Ah, the heart-warming expressions of brotherly love between Sunni and Shia. It’s obviously a match made in (the Islamic) heaven." Surah9:113 It is not fitting for the prophet and those who believe that they should pray for forgiveness for unbelievers even though they be of kin Since you're not allowed to pray for unbelievers including their dead ones not even say RIP what should a muslim do if not celebrate? ![]() |
Even in Quran Jesus is the son of Allah: 21:91 (Arabic transliteration and translation word by word): Wa-allati [and who] ahsanat [guarded] farjaha [vágina] fanafakhnā [so we breathed] feeha [therein] min [of] ruhina [our spirit] waja [and we] alnāhā [made her] wa-ibnahā [and her son] ayatan [a sign/verse] lil’ʿālamīna [for the world]. 21.91 (Yousaf Ali): And (remember) her [Mary] who guarded her chastity: We breathed into her of Our spirit, and We made her and her son a sign for all peoples. Comment: None of the Koran translators correctly translates “farjaha” in this verse, nor indeed “feeha” which, except in this verse is invariably translated as “therein”. Mind you I’m not sure how much difference “…guarded her vàagina. We breathed therein…” compared to “…guarded her vagina, we breathed into her...” really makes, though I suppose the former is more pointed (as the Arabic often is) 66:12 (Arabic transliteration and translation word by word): Wa maryama [And Mary] ibnata [daughter] Aaimrana [of Imran] allati [who] ahsanat [guarded] farjaha [vàgina] fanafakhnā [so we breathed] feehi [therein] min [of] roohina [our spirit]… 66:12 (Malik): Mary, the daughter of `ImrAn, who guarded her chastity, and into whose womb We breathed of Our spirit, who testified to the words of her Lord, and His scriptures, and was one of the obedient. Comment: Malik says it straight in 66:12, except he substitutes “womb” for the more correct “vàgina”. Therefore this verse can be rendered “so we breathed into her vagina” (as does al-Nasafi: Madarik al-Tanzil, vol. 4, p. 272). General Comment on these two verses: the word “farjaha” is a derivative of “farj” which, according to Arab-English dictionaries is “any hole, opening, fissure, rent, slit, tear or gap”. Muslim sources also acknowledge that “farj” can refer to female (or male) séx organs in a “metaphorical” manner. According to Arabic dictionaries “farjaha” is a female ‘private part’ – ie a vàgina. Other sources say: “Farjaha refers to [the] pudendum”. Taking the tri-literal root “frj”, we find this root-word contained in K23:5, 24:30-31, 33:25 and 70:29-30, in each case the literal meaning is “private parts” (both male and female). The word used in each case is “furoojihim” “furooj” is the plural of “farj and the “ihim” ending denotes both genders. The Tafseer of Ibn Kathir on K.70:29-30 says: “Meaning: they [men] keep their private parts away from that which is forbidden and they prevent their private parts from being put into other than what Allah has allowed them to be in, except from their wives or their right hand possessions (meaning: their female slaves.) What this Tafsir is saying is that guarding one’s “privates”, or “modesty” or “chastity” (if we wish to be coy about it) means not putting your penis in an ‘unlawful’ vàgina. Thus it seems clear that a woman’s “frj” and its derivatives mean “vagina”, just as a man’s “frj” means his penis. On the other hand: In the two other instances in the Koran with “frj” words, K50:6 and 77:9 the reference is to the heavens, not humans and here the word means hole/split/ rent etc. I should state that all Muslim exegetes and writers of Tafseer comment that the “farj” referred to in verses 21:91 and 66:12 were “openings” in Mary’s clothes, despite the fact that there is no mention of any garments or clothes in the Arabic text of the Koran (see above) and in no other case in the Koran does a “frj” word mean anything other than vàgina when applied to women and further this is in contradiction to the normal Arabic usage of “farjaha” meaning “woman’s private part” – ie vàgina. Side note: Some commentators have suggested that this usage is vulgar (on the basis of a “farj” being a hole) and that the commands to women are on the level of “guard yer hole!” Whether this is accurate or not, I am not in a position to say. —- I can only assume that this exegesis is used because taken literally, these two verses have dire consequences for “normal” Islamic Theology and this “interpretation” of the verses referring to Mary’s “farjaha” as being “openings in her clothes” (despite the normal Arabic meaning and every other usage in the Koran applied to women, a woman’s “frj” is her vagina), is done to get out of the problems these verses raise. Firstly: if Allah “penetrates” Mary’s vagina with his spirit (as implicit in 66:12) in order to make her pregnant, doesn’t that make Jesus Allah’s Son in a very direct way and in direct contradiction to other verses (also hence the exegetical gymnastics). This is supported (probably accidentally) by the Tafseer of ibn Kathir which says “…that breath went into her womb through her private part; this is how ‘Isa was conceived…”.(Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Abridged, Volume 6, Surat Al-Isra’, p. 244) Second: Given that to “Nikah” a women means primarily to have séx with her and only secondarily to marry her, do these verses imply Allah “Nikah”d Mary? Which is again in direct contradiction to other Koran verses: 21:91 (Hilali-Khan): “And (remember) she who guarded her chastity (Virgin Maryam (Mary)), We breathed into (the sleeves of) her (shirt or garment) through Our Rooh (Jibrael (Gabriel)), and We made her and her son (Iesa (Jesus)) a sign for Al-Alamin (the mankind and jinns)” where nearly 50% of the verse is the interpretors interpolations (!) based on (partial) use of tafseer. Source |



MashAllah
really?
