₦airaland Forum

enemyofprogress:
Rubbish. I ate people showing off

lexy2014:
U don't need 2 impress me& u really haven't said anything worth agreeing with. All u need 2do is state d facts but that seems 2b causing u some difficulty

lexy2014:
If u had done ur homework, then it wouldn't have been difficult 4u to tell us d land& d specific laws which Paul was using to persecute Christians. Y should that b difficult 4u since u have "biblical knowledge"?

lexy2014:
Oga, its a simple question. U said "laws of d land". U should b able to tell us which land & give us d specific laws which Saul was using as a basis to carry out d killings which he did. So far, u haven't done that

lexy2014:
Which land and what are thopse laws?

lexy2014:
Which law was Saul using to persecute d early Christians?

madridsta007:
Fair enough point.

But still missing my point. Which I felt was simple. That anyone, backed by law or not, who replicated what Saul did in today’s world will be rightly regarded as a terrorist. Keyword, if you read your Bible well, “he was persecuting Christians”

“Who are you, Lord?" Saul asked. "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting," he replied.

Anyone who does such murderous persecution today will be regarded as an extremist. Not sure how this is hard to understand.

madridsta007:
Saul was persecuting Christians and claimed he had the Jewish law backing him.

The suicide bombers who killed hundreds of Christians on Easter Sunday in Sri Lanka, were persecuting Christians. They will also claim that they had the (Sunni Islamist creed) law backing them.

If Saul was alive today, doing what he did, we will refer to him, quite rightly, as a terrorist or an extremist.
Yes, these words may sound "troubling" to you but, by definition, he would be referred to as a terrorist or an extremist. Saul if he were alive today, would have happily blown up a plane filled with Christians, by virtue of what he did then. What will he be called when he does that? A terrorist.

You see, there is nothing happening today that hasn't happened in history. Different characters, different nomenclature, but essentially the same.
Saul was a lawyer and not a terrorist!

madridsta007:
Saul was persecuting Christians and claimed he had the Jewish law backing him.

The suicide bombers who killed hundreds of Christians on Easter Sunday in Sri Lanka, were persecuting Christians. They will also claim that they had the (Sunni Islamist creed) law backing them.

If Saul was alive today, doing what he did, we will refer to him, quite rightly, as a terrorist or an extremist.
Yes, these words may sound "troubling" to you but, by definition, he would be referred to as a terrorist or an extremist. Saul if he were alive today, would have happily blown up a plane filled with Christians, by virtue of what he did then. What will he be called when he does that? A terrorist.

You see, there is nothing happening today that hasn't happened in history. Different characters, different nomenclature, but essentially the same.
Saul was a lawyer and not a terrorist!

madridsta007:
I would have ignored those people expressing surprise that a "chief priest of a cultist" group is now a Pastor, if they were not so-called Christians.
But many are. It exposes the ineptitude of their understanding or knowledge of the Bible.

Saul who later became Paul was a persecutor of Christians- what we refer to as terrorists. He was the Chief Terrorist in the days of the early Christians. In fact while he was converted, he was on his way with names and records of Christians to terminate their lives, normally through stoning. He later became more important as an Apostle, infact more important than all the disciples of Christ put together, writing more than half of the books in the New Testament.

Is being an ex-cultist worse than a terrorist? Yet Christ changed him. You so-called Christians are the foxes that spoil the vine.

OkaNaUbe:
Sakamaje Sulabania
You are right.

I know who got married to an older and mature Lady but the woman gave him hell and they divorced.

I also have seen someone who married an older and mature Lady above 36 and they are happy. You won't know the age difference because the wife is down to earth.

Conversely, I have seen who married a younger wife (under 25) and she was hellish, playing tantrums and even bully the older husband.

I have also seen "under 25" woman who gives her hubby peace

No clear cut formula for marital Bliss.

Just pray to marry "your wife ".

Nsonaso:
Lol so Bob Risky is now PA to Satan... Some people has no chill

Martinez39:
No thanks. If you want to believe in ridiculous garbages and falsehoods, suit yourself.

Martinez39:
@bolds
Trash and nonsense. They are all hear, "dem say dem say, I hear I hear." When I ask people who believe in our traditional voodoo and silly tales if they have seen these things in action, they say "no." It's only hearsay and make believe. You that is alking, have you seen it your own eyes

lilmax:
, I got to realise most of the male friends she has and told me about, the ones she still would call her close friends have had one sexual thing with her or the other. To be precise, 9 of them and 7 have had a thing with her, sexually. In her defence, there was no emotional attachments... Which to me is even more annoying. Plusshe still wants to hang out with them.

she still wants to hang out with them LMAO

guy I know if you tell her to stay away she will tell you you're INSECURE

maturity is far from her and it seems the HOE phase didn't teach her anything

people here will tell you she told you because she trusts you,but I'm here to tell you she's ready to MANIPULATE the hell out of you

she hasn't learnt anything yet, hence she still wants to hang out with them

the ball is in your court,do you want to continue? or stay out? or use her as knacking machine?

I'd say be the mature one and walk away without knacking, its not worth it,knacks dey everywhere

my advice: stay out and get you a girl with SENSE, she's obviously not ready to change

lilmax:
, I got to realise most of the male friends she has and told me about, the ones she still would call her close friends have had one sexual thing with her or the other. To be precise, 9 of them and 7 have had a thing with her, sexually. In her defence, there was no emotional attachments... Which to me is even more annoying. Plusshe still wants to hang out with them.

she still wants to hang out with them LMAO

guy I know if you tell her to stay away she will tell you you're INSECURE

maturity is far from her and it seems the HOE phase didn't teach her anything

people here will tell you she told you because she trusts you,but I'm here to tell you she's ready to MANIPULATE the hell out of you

she hasn't learnt anything yet, hence she still wants to hang out with them

the ball is in your court,do you want to continue? or stay out? or use her as knacking machine?

I'd say be the mature one and walk away without knacking, its not worth it,knacks dey everywhere

my advice: stay out and get you a girl with SENSE, she's obviously not ready to change