₦airaland Forum

Im sick of the women pretending to be men on this website ( and vice versa). Its so fuckin disgusting, you people are mentally ill... live in the body God gave you

Despite the fact that it is from David Duke, just about every claim made in this video is verifiable & proven. This video is water-tight


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IheJ2Rohz1c

ah ty

Kandiiikane: pleeps right

But yes, as for the public opinion blow that Israel will suffer.... it will be huge. But will it change anything? I highly doubt it... the media controls the truth and Jews control the media

just think about all the insane stuff israel has gotten away with

PhysicsQED: Is this actually true?

Can you post a source for this or provide facts to support this statement?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4c1p_DMkIw This documentary talks about Debeers in general without going into the ethnic aspect of it. As you will see in this film they only license raw diamonds to select dealers, you have to read behind the lines or do outside research to find out they are all jewish.

It just goes to show the aura of political correctness that surrounds this ethnic group.

Yeah, Jewish influence in politics, economics, business and the media is definitely disproportionately high in the U.S., but that's not exactly evidence of something malevolent or sinister or even any evidence of any kind of "control" - it might suggest something about the abilities and/or tendencies of some Jews.

Well i always try to be unbaised in everything i write here, and in all honesty it is possible the Jews actually are an intellectually superior group of people. The raw data this guy puts out is staggering, even though his explanation for it is very weak
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a_Ju8WCeHk

However one thing I agree with is the idea that the prospect of some politically active or politically involved people of Jewish descent possibly guiding the U.S. into another war (this time with Iran) out of dual loyalties, the way Jewish neoconservatives guided the Bush administration into war in Iraq (and even some Jewish American journalists criticized the roles of Jewish neoconservatives in guiding the U.S. into war in Iraq, so it's not an inherently "anti-semitic" (anti-Jewish) idea or anything, as some people might assume), is a scary prospect. Launching a war against Iran would be disastrous for world peace, as it could reach a WW3 level if things go really badly and if the Iranians manage to convince some other powerful nations to ally with them. The Iranians are a tougher nation mentally and militarily than any group the U.S. has fought - they would be a lot tougher to crack than anything the U.S. has ever faced before, including the Vietnamese, who U.S. forces did not defeat. And the military and civilian losses and casualties that would be inflicted on the U.S. and their allies in trying to conquer Iran (and even then, that would only be a temporary conquest if it were to happen, as the Iranians would only grow angrier, more indignant and more ready to fight their conquerors/oppressors after the occupation) would dwarf those incurred in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined if such a war were to happen.

If in the near future, a small group of politically influential Jews, as was the case with Iraq, is able to convince the head of the American government to prosecute an undeclared war (something the president can do without asking Congress) against Iran, which could eventually escalate into a full scale war, in order to serve the interests of Israel, this would be disastrous not just for all the nations directly involved (the U.S. and its military allies vs. Iran and its military allies), but even for the Jews themselves (or at least the ones outside of Israel), as they would lose an enormous amount of sympathy, goodwill and support, and be viewed much more suspiciously after that event to the point where few would want to deal with them or view them as trustworthy. If politically active Jews are somehow able to convince the U.S. president to initiate a military conflict with Iran, that would be the worst thing Jews could do for themselves, but I wonder if hardcore right wing Netanyahu types of Israeli politicians would even understand why that would be so bad. Anyway, with Hagel as the Defense Secretary of the U.S., we're basically guaranteed that the U.S. will not have any kind of military conflict with Iran at least until Obama leaves office. When Barack leaves the oval office and Hagel is replaced, anything could happen.

Honestly I fail to see the apocaliptic threat in attacking Iran. It would be a horribly unjust war, but i don't think it would be as bad as you are predicting.

First off, Irans military is good but the military gap between the U.S and the rest of the world is so big that it hardly makes a difference. The United states Abosolutly mowed down the Iraqi army in the Iraq war...the coalition was able to litterally bomb w/e target they wanted for days on end with no resistance. With stealth bombers they can do the same to Iran...
What the Israeli government wants to do is to weaken Iran to the point where they are no longer a threat. This can be done without ever putting boots on the ground.

Secondly, i see no reason why China would enter the war... they little vested interest seeing as their economy is so interwined with America's that war would probably damage them more than us.

Thirdly, i see no reason why Russia would join the war. People need to remember that the soviet union is gone, Russia is not such an important player on the world stage anymore, they are a paper tiger. The only thing that makes them relevant is their nukes and why would they use them over Iran?

If Israel and the U.S decide to attack Iran, the only thing the brick nations be able to do is Veto it in the U.N. aka nothing

its sad and depressing as hell... but ya thats what it is

It will be an even sadder day for the ladies when men learn to start playing the game they way woman have to the last 50 yrs, the male ppopulation is slowly waking up to the rude reality

The most innapropriate thing about all this is that the jews are allowed to function as a monolithic racist group on the world stage.

Take for example, the diamond cartel Debeers... they control the majority of the worlds diamonds yet are allowed to contract their products only to fellow jews. This is the 21th century, no other race could get away with something like that. I personally think own group preference is a good thing, and i don't fault them for doing this. The problem is that we are brainwashed into thinking racism is only ok for jewish ppl... there is litterally no backlash in mainstream media against jewish racism

I just learned that Gabrielle Giffords is jewish... lol

I watched it.

-The quotes from those rabbis are crazy and offensive, but after looking them up it seems that those statements were criticized by some other Jews. I don't take the statements of a few religious nutjobs too seriously in assessing what the worldview of an entire group of people is.

You cant dismiss him as religious nutjos when he is the cheif Serphardic rabbi of Isreal. The opinions he expressed in those comments are standard orthodox Jewish beliefs. Orthodox Judaism is the official religion of Isreal and so is is perfectly acceptable to use this world view to paint the country in general.

According to the vid 95% of jews around the world are orthodox ( i do not belief that figure) but i do know that many of the most influencial jews are. If any other ethnic group had beliefs that extreme would the world tolerate it? no

don't see what the big deal is about the shiksa thing - the intended meaning of a word as it is used, not its original etymology is what is important. The etymology of "Ethiopian" is some Greek words that mean "burnt face." Does that mean that someone who calls himself an Ethiopian is trying to say that he is a burnt faced person? However, if it is used not just to designate a non-Jewish woman, but to denigrate that woman because of her non-Jewishness, and if the Jews that started using the word viewed non-Jewish women as promiscuous or whor1sh in the places that they stayed in in Europe, then that means that they too developed ugly stereotypes about other peoples just as those peoples did about Jews. I guess you could call it "anti-gentilism" of some sort. This is basically evidence that Jews can be just as bigoted as other groups, but I can't see how it indicates that they are uniquely hateful or "the most" hateful.

I cant fault your logic here, u make some good points.

On Iraq, I agree that the Iraq war was basically about Israel (and a possible future war against Iran would also be about Israel), not about Saddam or imaginary WMD's. Certain strongly pro-Israel Jewish "neoconservatives" in the Bush administration basically convinced Bush (not exactly the brightest guy to hold the U.S. presidency), Rumsfeld, etc. of the need for a war in Iraq to eliminate the threat that Saddam Hussein's regime posed to freedom, liberty, his own Iraqi people, etc., when the underlying motivation probably had more to do with removing the threat that Saddam posed to Israel (consider Israel's 1981 strike against Iraq's nuclear weapons program) through conquest and occupation and possibly partitioning Iraq along ethnic or religious (Shia vs. Sunni) lines to weaken the strength of the country as a threat to Israel. On Afghanistan, I agree with the idea that that war is basically about Israel, although there was not really any pro-Israel high level political plot involved there. That war, unlike the Iraq war, is really the U.S's war, and not Israel's even if the root cause of the conflict has a lot to do with Israel. It's very unlikely that Al-Qaeda would have attacked the U.S. and U.S. forces multiple times (not just on Sept. 11) if not for the U.S.'s continued unwavering support for Israel, but nobody wanted that war to happen and it only happened because those terrorists carried out such a large attack on the U.S. and insisted on using Afghanistan (an area where they could operate unchecked by a real government) as their base.

The U.S. and most of Europe will continue to support Israel and the right of the Jewish people to have that homeland in the middle east because many influential or politically powerful non-Jewish people in the U.S. and Europe are basically Christian Zionists who support Israel for religion-related reasons, because many of them are scared that Jews will be subjected to genocide if they let the Arab states take over that area, because many of them feel guilt about previous mass murders of Jews in Europe, and because some people in Europe fear that if they don't have somewhere else to keep the Jews away from them then Jews will flood Europe and affect their societies in ways that they wouldn't want (in areas of economic, political, and media influence).

Ok, ill admit that what you said here is pretty much the truth. But despite this you cannot deny the fact Jews have such a disproportionate amount of control in the country. These are ppl with a blatant dual-loyalties who are allowed to function in the United States government primarily for the benefit of a foreign power... When you look at the sheer volume of Jews that play a role in U.S policy you will see that the influence of 'christian zionists' is actually very low. Here is a list of Jews who have taken part in U.S politics throughout history. http://www.subvertednation.net/jew-lists/jews-in-government/

This number is insanely high for a group less than two percent of the population... and the list doesn't even mention Jews in finance like Ben Bernanke or Allen Greenspan. What about Rahm Emmanual.. Axelrod ... Larry Summers.. aka Obamas whole damn cabinet

What about jews in the media?

"Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner

Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company

Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd

Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios

Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc

Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric

Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited"


Thats ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MTV, BET, Universal Studios etc. etc.

I wish i could go deeper into this but i am very very drunk right now...

PhysicsQED: lol, but you're posting a video by David Duke?

haha yup, the former leader of the KKK

But still, the video does have merit, did u watch it?

(btw i dont dislike the Jews, this thread is for informational purposes and is not intended to spread hate)

What modern nation is the most racist state on earth?

Where black women are sterilized...

Where you cannot marry an outsider...

Where your citizenship is your blood...

Isreal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvhIYNzBtLs

Why is that female soldier so attractive?

companionship, happiness and prestige thats it.

Ive been on here for a while. The Nigerian woman bashing comes in cycles....After this one batch gets tired of it a new group of men will crop up and start it again.... and so it will continue until Nigerian women change

But you are right the men are just as bad, if not worse. The difference is men financially Bleep over other men.. while ladies bleep over us.

[quote author=~vicky~]no one likes to admit they are wrong—-no matter hw serious it may be/ or simple the problem……[/quote]I admitt when im wrong all the time, if you cant admit your mistakes your credibility is 0

Alot of yall get into the habit of forcing ppl to agree with you... Then you pretend that is a character trait shared by everyone... its not. There are many ppl out there who will say they are wrong even when they are actually right just to make ppl like this shut up.

They teach broken English in school?

[quote author=tpia@]what to do?

i thought the standard practice was to wash your privates and cook him some stew with the effluent.[/quote]MON DEIU!

@ OP dont do anything... would u like it if someone cheated on you? many guys cant say no if a girl is throwing herself at them...

[quote author=12 inches!]@freecocoa I have met no creature as greedy as a woman in my lifetime. I now believe it's their genes.[/quote]You just now realized that?

The number 1 reason women deal with men is for resources/security, and that is according to Phychology Today. To actually give a male resources contradicts most females instincts. All these bs stories are just excuses

OTwist: First: This letter has been posted several times. . . so it's gettin boring.

Second: Ths man is talking about successfull black women who like to provide for their existance by working and with a responsible way of life . . .

Unfortunately in africa it is one out of 1'000'000 women u can find of this type. The rest? well. . . enjoy the interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0CHDuPtnJA

And they sleep with all of them

.

Yall think your doing something special by finding the most horrible black brutality, packaging it with some sad music and putting it out there for the world to see..... Just so some white supremacists can get off to it.

CAMEROONPRIDE: what should we do then?

have you noticed that the most graphic videos allowed on youtube are always of black men? Stuff like aluu4, people getting burned alive etc. and they don't even bother to blur out the nudity anymore.

That shows how little respect they have for you... they cant even show videos of hunting squirrels with a pellet gun without it getting flagged down but its perfectly acceptable to see a n.aked black boy getting beaten to death on a public website

The saddest part is... its blacks who are uploading this stuff.

when white people were savages it was not caught on video.. we will never live this stuff down.

btw... the youtube censor does not even show white ppl getting brutalized like that.. only black. The Aluu4, people getting burned alive, etc etc. they have enough respect for their people to not spread that stuff for the world to see