Agboriotejoye:


It is because you're dull in head and heart that you don't get my point. What your caliph did can be compared to King James burning all other scrolls before his Bible on the premise that they contain dialectal differences. Who does that? Think now. Or Soyinka burning a pidgin version of the lion and the jewel because it was not written in proper English.
Your religion is a fraud. That's why every other opinion must be shut up and burned and why you guys are so violent.
Dialectal differences should not be a premise to burn a scroll. It's commonsense. But because of your herd mentality, you believe any nonsense you're fed with.
Your Quran is still a product of plagiarism. Learn to live with it.

Childish response

Is that an answer to the Questions?

No wonder you are afraid of a debate , because you know so well that you are an empty vessel that only relies on okd trashes fabricated by enemies of Islam who knows nothing but hatred!


"And if ye are in doubt as to what We have revealed from time to time to Our servant, then produce a Sura like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers (If there are any) besides Allah, if your (doubts) are true. But if ye cannot- and of a surety ye cannot- then fear the Fire whose fuel is men and stones,- which is prepared for those who reject Faith. (Qur'an 2:23-24)

Agboriotejoye:


It is because you're dull in head and heart that you don't get my point. What your caliph did can be compared to King James burning all other scrolls before his Bible on the premise that they contain dialectal differences. Who does that? Think now. Or Soyinka burning a pidgin version of the lion and the jewel because it was not written in proper English.
Your religion is a fraud. That's why every other opinion must be shut up and burned and why you guys are so violent.
Dialectal differences should not be a premise to burn a scroll. It's commonsense. But because of your herd mentality, you believe any nonsense you're fed with.
Your Quran is still a product of plagiarism. Learn to live with it.

Since you are not yet ready for a sincere response Let me expose the Textual Integrity Of your Bible...

People are enjoying the discussion because it is clearing their doubt and exposing the lies of missionaries that have published lies.....

Is your Bible that we have in our hands today unchanged?
Or has it undergone extensive revisions and alterations?

Truth is the first victim in the Christian apologetical literature. This is because if you guys tell the truth about the Church history and its role in formulating the Bible (or Bibles) as well as the manuscript tradition of the New Testament, belief in the Bible as the "Word" of God would take the beating and the Churches would go absolutely empty.

Hence it is not surprising to find you an average Christian's knowledge about your own scriptures is pretty close to zero.

Stop dodging stay calm, read well and understand the corrupt naturebof your bible

Truthissupreme:
shut up you are a Muslim

Someone was discovered to have been researching if Islam permits him to kill

Meaning he knew it was wrong but Islam convinced him to kill

So who do we blame?

The man who knew it was wrong to kill

Or Islam that pacified him that he can kill


You don't bring christianity into it when the Bible Christian's follow don't prescribe violence

We bring Islam into this because Islam and it's Quran has aided another Terrorist

"Since the days of John the Baptist, the kingdom of God suffereth violence and only the violent taketh it by force"

This is a bible verse. It's open to interpretation and misinterpretation. If I read this and it justified my violent thoughts - hence compelling me to violent actions, it begs the question: am I to blame or is Christianity to blame?

Chyjoey:


"Since the days of John the Baptist, the kingdom of God suffereth violence and only the violent taketh it by force"

This is a bible verse. It's open to interpretation and misinterpretation. If I read this and it justified my violent thoughts - hence compelling me to violent actions, it begs the question: am I to blame or is Christianity to blame?

When you look at that verse and the person saying it you should ask yourself was he ever violent physically?

Where was the passage he was violent in practice?

If you can't find such then you should know he really wasn't referring to physical violence but the spiritual battles with the kingdom of darkness

In practice same Jesus stopped Peter from violence even when he was the one affected

But I can show you passages where Muhammad commanded the physical beheading of non muslims

Quran (8:12) - "(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels... "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

The bolded no be spiritual head na

Who are the people, and did they say they are doing it for God or Jesus... you can't deny the fact all Muslims are terrorists sympathizers

Tomisin666:
I guess y’all know who the Christians imperialist state are bombing and enslaving people all because of their perceive ways of life they thought it could be best suit for the rest of the world through using mass destruction has a result to those who repudiate such forceful doctrine of theirs through cohesion and violent nonsense!

Ibkhaleel001:
Since you are not yet ready for a sincere response Let me expose the Textual Integrity Of your Bible...

People are enjoying the discussion because it is clearing their doubt and exposing the lies of missionaries that have published lies.....

Is your Bible that we have in our hands today unchanged?
Or has it undergone extensive revisions and alterations?

Truth is the first victim in the Christian apologetical literature. This is because if you guys tell the truth about the Church history and its role in formulating the Bible (or Bibles) as well as the manuscript tradition of the New Testament, belief in the Bible as the "Word" of God would take the beating and the Churches would go absolutely empty.

Hence it is not surprising to find you an average Christian's knowledge about your own scriptures is pretty close to zero.

Stop dodging stay calm, read well and understand the corrupt naturebof your bible

When will you accept that your Quran is plagiarism to start with?

That is too obvious.

When will you accept that there are many versions of your plagiarism

When will you accept there are many versions of hadith?

Jesus Christ admonished you to remove the log in your eyes before speaking of the speck in the eyes of others

Accept this and accept peace

Ibkhaleel001:
Childish response

Is that an answer to the Questions?

No wonder you are afraid of a debate , because you know so well that you are an empty vessel that only relies on okd trashes fabricated by enemies of Islam who knows nothing but hatred!


"And if ye are in doubt as to what We have revealed from time to time to Our servant, then produce a Sura like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers (If there are any) besides Allah, if your (doubts) are true. But if ye cannot- and of a surety ye cannot- then fear the Fire whose fuel is men and stones,- which is prepared for those who reject Faith. (Qur'an 2:23-24)

I already accept your debate as long as it is on this forum. Mention me when you're ready and I will prove the obvious fraud in your religion

Ibkhaleel001:
Sincere open minded scholars who studied the Quran from genuine sources have this to day...I am not talking about Poor hungry haters of Islam who hide online to lie and insult.....Let me take you to one of them

What Do The Orientalists Say About The Qur'an?

E H Palmer, as early as 1880, recognized the unique style of the Qur'an. But he seem to have been wavering between two thoughts. He writes in the Introduction to his translation of the Qur'an:

"That the best of Arab writers has never succeeded in producing anything equal in merit to the Qur'an itself is not surprising. In the first place, they have agreed before-hand that it is unapproachable, and they have adopted its style as the perfect standard; any deviation from it therefore must of necessity be a defect. Again, with them this style is not spontaneous as with Muhammad and his contemporaries, but is as artificial as though Englishmen should still continue to follow Chaucer as their model, in spite of the changes which their language has undergone. With the Prophet, the style was natural, and the words were those in every-day ordinary life, while with the later Arabic authors the style is imitative and the ancient words are introduced as a literary embellishment. The natural consequence is that their attempts look laboured and unreal by the side of his impromptu and forcible eloquence."

I know you are too Myopic to understand the statement!

There's no unique style in a disjointed work of plagiarism which keeps conflicting itself

Open the thread

That is how religious people see the world. They think that they can do everything and their Gods will forgive them and everyone will be happy.

Agboriotejoye:


I already accept your debate as long as it is on this forum. Mention me when you're ready and I will prove the obvious fraud in your religion

I am ready for a debate not a coverup of lies and insults online...show me your worth be bold enough to organize it...if you cant i will help you bankroll everything let the world see how i wil expose and disgrace a cheap liar

Agboriotejoye:


When will you accept that your Quran is plagiarism to start with?

That is too obvious.

When will you accept that there are many versions of your plagiarism

When will you accept there are many versions of hadith?

Jesus Christ admonished you to remove the log in your eyes before speaking of the speck in the eyes of others

Accept this and accept peace

The more you write the more i expose the blatant liar

It seems like you've exhausted your lies and weapons... howbeit That wil not stop me from showing the world How cheap you are in blackmail and lies.....

Keep twisting facts keep showing how shallow minded you are and i will help you do that excellently!!!!!

It has been a source of faith and pride for Muslims over the centuries in that the Holy Qur'an is the preeminent word of the Almighty, inimitable in style and absolute in nature. This conviction is as strong for believers of today as it has been for believers of the past. As the tradition of truth is distinguished from falsehood, the authenticity of the Qur'an has been challenged today as it has been in the past. Though the petty points of criticism have changed over the years, the archetype has remained quite the same since the very beginning. Time and again, these issue has been put to rest, only to be exhumed by depraved charlatans.

Agboriotejoye:


There's no unique style in a disjointed work of plagiarism which keeps conflicting itself

Open the thread

Lets who which book is really plagiarized!!!

Lets see the Sources of The Bible...

You have been saying that Muhammad(P) composed the Qur'an by borrowing the Judeo-Christian material. The 'logic' of showing the borrowing was to simply show similarity between the Qur'anic and Biblical narrative and then conclude that Muhammad(P) copied the verses in question from the Judeo-Christian sources.

So I figured that it was about time that I reciprocated the favour and pay you your due in full. I will use the missionaries own methodology to show how good the Bible stands the scrutiny.

You lied about the Quran and a Proof is Demanded

To plagiarise something is to commit literary theft by appropriating and passing off the ideas or words of another as one's own. You accused the Prophet Muhammad(P) of plagiarism and charges him with stealing and passing off the ideas.

This is a serious charge and one would expect the missionary to have provided sufficient evidence in order to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" that Muhammad(P) is indeed the plagiariser and liar that Christian missionaries consider him to be.

You keep ranting Yet you provide no evidence, no proof whatsoever to substantiate this claim of plagiarism.

You cite neither the original nor the Arabic of the Qur'an; nor does you provide a sufficiently And neither does you cite any hadith or eye-witnesses accounts to prove that the Prophet(P) plagiarised ancient Greek literature. Where then is the proof that Muhammad(P) plagiarised?

Go get the books and write the facts here and i will be glad to disgrace you even more

Agboriotejoye:


It is because you're dull in head and heart that you don't get my point. What your caliph did can be compared to King James burning all other scrolls before his Bible on the premise that they contain dialectal differences. Who does that? Think now. Or Soyinka burning a pidgin version of the lion and the jewel because it was not written in proper English.
Your religion is a fraud. That's why every other opinion must be shut up and burned and why you guys are so violent.
Dialectal differences should not be a premise to burn a scroll. It's commonsense. But because of your herd mentality, you believe any nonsense you're fed with.
Your Quran is still a product of plagiarism. Learn to live with it.

Over to your bible lets see the real plagiarized book...

You are now left with several difficulties. You missionary needs to explain to Me this:

Why the Bible uses the enormously influential teachings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle?
Why the Bible plagiarises ancient Greek Literature?

Why other non-Christian scriptures (e.g. the Qur'an) would be rejected as a divinely revealed or inspired scripture if they used (or were influenced by) the writings of ancient Greek scientists - but the Bible would not?

Why other non-Christian scriptures (e.g. the Qur'ân) would be charged with plagiarism if they used (or were influenced by) the writings of ancient Greek scientists - but the Bible would not?

Why the Prophet Muhammad(P) is charged with plagiarism but the authors of Job and the Wisdom of Solomon are not?

Why Christian missionaries continue to charge the Prophet Muhammad(P) with plagiarism of the Galenic stages of development even though they have failed to prove their case?

And more controversially,

Why do you reject the Wisdom of Solomon as a divinely inspired scripture when majority of the world's Christians accept it as the word of God?

Agboriotejoye:


There's no unique style in a disjointed work of plagiarism which keeps conflicting itself

Open the thread

What if I were to apply your method of reasoning to the Bible itself?

What if i were to apply the same standards against the Bible?

If i were to find the Bible plagiarising ancient Greek Literature, then it too should also be rejected as a divinely revealed or inspired scripture -- according to your own testimony, according to your own standards of reasoning and evidence.

Ibkhaleel001:
What if I were to apply your method of reasoning to the Bible itself?

What if i were to apply the same standards against the Bible?

If i were to find the Bible plagiarising ancient Greek Literature, then it too should also be rejected as a divinely revealed or inspired scripture -- according to your own testimony, according to your own standards of reasoning and evidence.

Lol. Humour me

Ibkhaleel001:
Over to your bible lets see the real plagiarized book...

You are now left with several difficulties. You missionary needs to explain to Me this:

Why the Bible uses the enormously influential teachings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle?
Why the Bible plagiarises ancient Greek Literature?

Why other non-Christian scriptures (e.g. the Qur'an) would be rejected as a divinely revealed or inspired scripture if they used (or were influenced by) the writings of ancient Greek scientists - but the Bible would not?

Why other non-Christian scriptures (e.g. the Qur'ân) would be charged with plagiarism if they used (or were influenced by) the writings of ancient Greek scientists - but the Bible would not?

Why the Prophet Muhammad(P) is charged with plagiarism but the authors of Job and the Wisdom of Solomon are not?

Why Christian missionaries continue to charge the Prophet Muhammad(P) with plagiarism of the Galenic stages of development even though they have failed to prove their case?

And more controversially,

Why do you reject the Wisdom of Solomon as a divinely inspired scripture when majority of the world's Christians accept it as the word of God?

Could you be coherent pls

Ibkhaleel001:
Lets who which book is really plagiarized!!!

Lets see the Sources of The Bible...

You have been saying that Muhammad(P) composed the Qur'an by borrowing the Judeo-Christian material. The 'logic' of showing the borrowing was to simply show similarity between the Qur'anic and Biblical narrative and then conclude that Muhammad(P) copied the verses in question from the Judeo-Christian sources.

So I figured that it was about time that I reciprocated the favour and pay you your due in full. I will use the missionaries own methodology to show how good the Bible stands the scrutiny.

You lied about the Quran and a Proof is Demanded

To plagiarise something is to commit literary theft by appropriating and passing off the ideas or words of another as one's own. You accused the Prophet Muhammad(P) of plagiarism and charges him with stealing and passing off the ideas.

This is a serious charge and one would expect the missionary to have provided sufficient evidence in order to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" that Muhammad(P) is indeed the plagiariser and liar that Christian missionaries consider him to be.

You keep ranting Yet you provide no evidence, no proof whatsoever to substantiate this claim of plagiarism.

You cite neither the original nor the Arabic of the Qur'an; nor does you provide a sufficiently And neither does you cite any hadith or eye-witnesses accounts to prove that the Prophet(P) plagiarised ancient Greek literature. Where then is the proof that Muhammad(P) plagiarised?

Go get the books and write the facts here and i will be glad to disgrace you even more

Who are these figures Ibrahim, Ishaq, Yakub, Yussuff, Zubair, Suleiman and most importantly Issa?
Where did Muhammad know them from and what is his relationship with them?
How come his narrations about them generally tally with Judaic writings which were in existence at that time?

Ibkhaleel001:
The more you write the more i expose the blatant liar

It seems like you've exhausted your lies and weapons... howbeit That wil not stop me from showing the world How cheap you are in blackmail and lies.....

Keep twisting facts keep showing how shallow minded you are and i will help you do that excellently!!!!!

It has been a source of faith and pride for Muslims over the centuries in that the Holy Qur'an is the preeminent word of the Almighty, inimitable in style and absolute in nature. This conviction is as strong for believers of today as it has been for believers of the past. As the tradition of truth is distinguished from falsehood, the authenticity of the Qur'an has been challenged today as it has been in the past. Though the petty points of criticism have changed over the years, the archetype has remained quite the same since the very beginning. Time and again, these issue has been put to rest, only to be exhumed by depraved charlatans.

Are you crying now

Ibkhaleel001:
I am ready for a debate not a coverup of lies and insults online...show me your worth be bold enough to organize it...if you cant i will help you bankroll everything let the world see how i wil expose and disgrace a cheap liar

Open a thread. Stop spitting everywhere

Agboriotejoye:


Open a thread. Stop spitting everywhere

You'll see Pepper tonight!

Scroll up and respond and stop beating around the bush yeye arne

Polytheist trinitarian pagan will suffer die today

Agboriotejoye:

I
Who are these figures Ibrahim, Ishaq, Yakub, Yussuff, Zubair, Suleiman and most importantly Issa?
Where did Muhammad know them from and what is his relationship with them?
How come his narrations about them generally tally with Judaic writings which were in existence at that time?

You ask a question like a motor park tot..

Is that the answer you have?

Anyway I will repeat the answer read with your brain this time around



You lied about the Quran and a Proof is Demanded

To plagiarise something is to commit literary theft by appropriating and passing off the ideas or words of another as one's own. You accused the Prophet Muhammad(P) of plagiarism and charges him with stealing and passing off the ideas.

This is a serious charge and one would expect the missionary to have provided sufficient evidence in order to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" that Muhammad(P) is indeed the plagiariser and liar that Christian missionaries consider him to be.

You keep ranting Yet you provide no evidence, no proof whatsoever to substantiate this claim of plagiarism.

Agboriotejoye:


Open a thread. Stop spitting everywhere

Christianity preaches lies! The whole baseless faith is built on lying and deception...Bible says that Jews and Christians from their essence were liars. From your "birth" they were liars writing lies the Old Testament declares them. The Bible is full of man-made corruption and fabrications especially in the Jews' ancient history and stories. Their writings were written with the "lying pens of the scribes".

Can we analyze
(a)- Deuteronomy 4:2 VS. the Bible!

- Few Examples from among literally 1000s of man-made lies in the Bible.

(b)- Jeremiah 8:8 confirms Deuteronomy 4:2!


Chaiii! Wahala for Christianity tonight

Agboriotejoye:


Are you crying now

I feel glad whenever i am dealing with a Christian... I flog them so bitterly that they get disgraced and shed tears.....by the time am done with you..you must have dig your own grave!


The Christian and Bible theologians clearly accept that "fictions exist in the Bible"!

The Christian and Bible theologians say "The original manuscripts had been lost"!

The Christian and Bible theologians call them "fairy tales and fables in the Bible"!


I can give you a conscience lecture on Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible for full proofs.

Allah Almighty Said: "Do they not ponder on the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy. (The Noble Quran, 4:82)"

Indeed, because the Bible is not the Word of GOD Almighty, it contains "much discrepancy" in it.

The bottom line is that the original and real Bible of today should've been a much smaller book than what it is now. But the fact that its laws and integrity are all mixed up together and compromised proves that the book or books are indeed corrupt. So for one to lump up the bibles and their many problems and say that Bible is the true living word of GOD Almighty" would be indeed a very ridiculous and absurd statement...

Do you still doubt me?

Or the truth is giving you headache?

Ibkhaleel001:
You'll see Pepper tonight!

Scroll up and respond and stop beating around the bush yeye arne

Polytheist trinitarian pagan will suffer die today

I thought you wanted to prove the Bible plagiarized Greek Literature to balance the obvious plagiarism in the Quran

Why are you now in tears?

`

Ibkhaleel001:
You ask a question like a motor park tot..

Is that the answer you have?

Anyway I will repeat the answer read with your brain this time around



You lied about the Quran and a Proof is Demanded

To plagiarise something is to commit literary theft by appropriating and passing off the ideas or words of another as one's own. You accused the Prophet Muhammad(P) of plagiarism and charges him with stealing and passing off the ideas.

This is a serious charge and one would expect the missionary to have provided sufficient evidence in order to "prove beyond reasonable doubt" that Muhammad(P) is indeed the plagiariser and liar that Christian missionaries consider him to be.

You keep ranting Yet you provide no evidence, no proof whatsoever to substantiate this claim of plagiarism.

The evidence is simple. Between the Bible and Quran, which is older?

The answer go choke you!

Ibkhaleel001:
Christianity preaches lies! The whole baseless faith is built on lying and deception...Bible says that Jews and Christians from their essence were liars. From your "birth" they were liars writing lies the Old Testament declares them. The Bible is full of man-made corruption and fabrications especially in the Jews' ancient history and stories. Their writings were written with the "lying pens of the scribes".

Can we analyze
(a)- Deuteronomy 4:2 VS. the Bible!

- Few Examples from among literally 1000s of man-made lies in the Bible.

(b)- Jeremiah 8:8 confirms Deuteronomy 4:2!


Chaiii! Wahala for Christianity tonight

How does this stop the Quran from being a product of plagiarism?

Focus on the topic headslammer

Don't go and blow yourself up out of frustration of the inability to handle the cold, hard truth

Ibkhaleel001:
I feel glad whenever i am dealing with a Christian... I flog them so bitterly that they get disgraced and shed tears.....by the time am done with you..you must have dig your own grave!


The Christian and Bible theologians clearly accept that "fictions exist in the Bible"!

The Christian and Bible theologians say "The original manuscripts had been lost"!

The Christian and Bible theologians call them "fairy tales and fables in the Bible"!


I can give you a conscience lecture on Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible for full proofs.

Allah Almighty Said: "Do they not ponder on the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy. (The Noble Quran, 4:82)"

Indeed, because the Bible is not the Word of GOD Almighty, it contains "much discrepancy" in it.

The bottom line is that the original and real Bible of today should've been a much smaller book than what it is now. But the fact that its laws and integrity are all mixed up together and compromised proves that the book or books are indeed corrupt. So for one to lump up the bibles and their many problems and say that Bible is the true living word of GOD Almighty" would be indeed a very ridiculous and absurd statement...

Do you still doubt me?

Or the truth is giving you headache?

So why did Muhammad copy stories and personalities from the Bible if the Bible is a friction? Does that not also mean the Quran is a friction too?

Don't blow yourself up o

Agboriotejoye:


So why did Muhammad copy stories and personalities from the Bible if the Bible is a friction? Does that not also mean the Quran is a friction too?

Don't blow yourself up o

You must finish what you started...

Am glad you agree with all the facts and challenges i mentioned regarding the bible...

The bible is plagiarized...a fake book a fabricated books fulk of lies and fairy tales

Agboriotejoye:


How does this stop the Quran from being a product of plagiarism?

Focus on the topic headslammer

Don't go and blow yourself up out of frustration of the inability to handle the cold, hard truth

You have shown your true colour!

A blatant online liar and a coward par excellence


Why are you afraid of the textual criticism?

missionaries like you are shameless you wil come online brag and make empty rantings but stil become scared of textual criticism of your bible.

Does this mean you agree with me 100% that your bible is a corrupted book


I'LL SHOW TO EVERYONE HERE HOW to investigate as well as highlight the myriad of dishonest statements made by the Christian missionaries concerning the textual criticism of the Qur'an and the Bible. And it will also be shown that who precisely is and should be scared of textual criticism....

i hope people here on NL are enjoying it

Agboriotejoye:


So why did Muhammad copy stories and personalities from the Bible if the Bible is a friction? Does that not also mean the Quran is a friction too?

Don't blow yourself up o

My advice to you Revise the Bible, Again!

How fsr with our physical debate?

Dont run or dodge pls!

I'll visit you in your church....gather audience including your dying father....

Truthissupreme:
When you look at that verse and the person saying it you should ask yourself was he ever violent physically?

Where was the passage he was violent in practice?

If you can't find such then you should know he really wasn't referring to physical violence but the spiritual battles with the kingdom of darkness

In practice same Jesus stopped Peter from violence even when he was the one affected

But I can show you passages where Muhammad commanded the physical beheading of non muslims

Quran (8:12) - "(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels... "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

The bolded no be spiritual head na

I have a lot of Muslim friends, very devout ones at that, and none of them have 'struck off my head and finger tips" because I do not believe in what they do.

It is ignorant to ascribe unto the majority, the behaviour of the misinformed few.

The church has committed a lot of atrocities in the past all in the name of Christ, yet all of that is ignored and forgotten.

There are extremists in every religion. Intolerance is not the answer to the problem.

But u no them yourself who the Christians country imperialist states are causing these havoc uproaring this presents world abi nah by force nah a most to dey leave your evil immorality lifestyle? They dilapidate almost your entire kinship, enslave them to their own country for hard labour while in the pacific oceans almost 10 millions of blacks lost their life on that plight mission the terorrist Christians country you’re having a sympathy about should be phantom you have lost your conscience and choose to be highly rancorous to other group they have no evil record about you Africa wake up from this brainwash evil sets of people and it’s the same them that brought you guys their own plagiarise religion to successfully detonate y’all to hell but majority of you won’t know this after hypocrisy and ignoramus has eaten deeply into you guys are in other to recognize who the evil set are but your hypocrisy won’t let your ego be. So my prayer is may Almighty bestow is infinite mercy on you to see the light of Islam before death comes to your diaspora Salam!

IzRayl:
Who are the people, and did they say they are doing it for God or Jesus... you can't deny the fact all Muslims are terrorists sympathizers