In November Nineteen sixty eight, a satellite photo of the north pole was released, it showed a large polar opening in absence of cloud cover.

Premiumwriter:
we are not 'inside' the ball.

We are on it.


See, I respect that you believe that the earth is flat.

But a flat earth, a round sun and moon don't just make sense, that's me assuming that there are no other planets.

Secondly, all of our mathematics are based on the 'assumptions' that the earth is round. So far, those maths have held solid for milleniums without fail.

That's something you need to think about. It's one thing to make theories in maths and science and it's entirely another thing to put them into engineering.

If the earth is flat and we lie in our maths that it is round, then our engineering would have been in chaos because their will be a disconnection between our theories and our realities.

But for hundreds of years, we've not experienced any.

That should tell you how solid these principles are.

I'm not adding any scientific evidence of round earth because you may feel science is cooked up.

Instead, I'm only telling you that these things have been used for hundreds years and proven right from ancient Greeks

Down to the Roman empire.

That's like over 2,000 years before America or NASA ever existed.

Conspiracy theories just make it look like NASA discovered or theorized everything.

Please explain how we are on the spherical ball of the earth.




In my secondary school geography class i was taught proof of earth sphericity one of it says if you drive 3 woods into the ground they wont be at same height

I found it funny even till now.

When i say flat earth i mean like a spherical plate not flat box.

Since the previous photo, there have been other satellite photos showing serious anomalies that do raise serious questions, particularly from a Russian space station in Nineteen eighty seven showing light emanating in a very mysterious fashion from the north pole

logicalhumour:
@Premiumwriter
You reason very well, however, you do not sound like someone in tune with the modern scientific world. So much has changed since the times of "an atom is the smallest indivisible unit of an element."

I won't derail the thread, so I'll wait for OP to finish. But thereafter, I'll give you a little lecture about Antimatter (and antimatter laser tools used for boring), but just so you know, the sand from those tunnel are not dumped somewhere else. They disappear!

Fun Fact: Humans had created, and had been playing with Antimatter since the 1950s.

P.S
It WILL be a very interesting lecture for people like you, you might want to remind me if I do forget

you probably think I read my last scientific paper in 1940.

Lolz.

Baba update post make I see your theory.

There are other NASA images of other planets and moons showing these same anomalies - Holes in the north and south poles.

Where did you get your quote? As Above so it is below! Only freemason and satanist use this.

Incognito21:
Where did you get your quote? As Above so it is below! Only freemason and satanist use this.

The new age movement

I think its in the kybalion

Was Edgar Allan Poe correct when he said that sometimes the best hiding place is the one in plain sight?

We are being lied to folks.

Dangrace01:


Please explain how we are on the spherical ball of the earth.




In my secondary school geography class i was taught proof of earth sphericity one of it says if you drive 3 woods into the ground they wont be at same height

I found it funny even till now.

When i say flat earth i mean like a spherical plate not flat box.

when you put an iron nail on a magnet, even if you turn it upside down, you know the iron nail won't fall off because you understand there is an invisible force pulling the Nail to the magnet.

But where exactly is that force pulling the nail to?

Inside the magnet of course but it stops on the surface because the surface is hard and the force is not strong enough to break through the magnet.

Earth exert the same kind of force on everything. This invisible force is called gravity.

You can stand on a round earth because it keeps pulling you towards the center.

Where does the force come from? It comes from the mass of the earth.

If an object is massive enough, it's gravity can be felt.

Today if you as a person grows to the size of a planet, your gravitational force will be felt and you can attract people to yourself much the same way the earth attracts things to itself .

Gravity is simply a character of mass. The more massive the more gravity. That's why the sun can hold the planets and the earth the moon and yourself.

But if you recieve sufficient energy, you can be knocked off from the earth's gravity field. We can also knock the moon from earth's force field with sufficient force.

Dangrace01:


I believe that the earth is flat. Everything looks flat in my eyes. How can we be inside ball you sef check am now

When you see an aeroplane turning in the sky. Its curve looks like something turning on a flat surface

this has been taught in secondary School.with evidences

If you are following this thread and want me to continue, please like this comment. Let me know if I have an audience.

I have other things I could be doing but I'm taking time to post all this. If I know I have an active audience that's enough motivation for me.

OurTruth:
No energy to reply anybody on this thread. If you don't agree with the information, fuçk off or go create your own thread .

Okay I see some audience, I'll continue.

CAVES

Every continent on earth has extensive carvenous networks like Son Doong cave in Vietnam with it's jungles, rivers and space to fit a forty story sky scrapper

And there is the Mammoth Cave in Kentucky which is even longer than the four hundred miles of it which have so far been explored.

OurTruth:
If you are following this thread and want me to continue, please like this comment. Let me know if I have an audience.

I have other things I could be doing but I'm taking time to post all this. If I know I have an active audience that's enough motivation for me.

we here go on boss

Who is to say these naturally occuring spaces are not found at deeper depth?

According to laws of physics, empty spaces are unnatural in nature. So empty spaces have their own ecosystems, water bodies, plant life and animal life. If they extend deep into the earth, life will still fill it, even the most inhospitable depths of the ocean have lifeforms and creatures that have adapted to the darkness by creating their own luminousity.

As Aristotle said "Nature abhors a vacuum." Wherever there is a void, the universe seeks to fill it. So if enormous carvens like those we already know of, continue on to reach deep into the earth, what then could be residing in the space miles beneath our feet?

Since we are prohibited from flying over and seeing the poles and we are prohibited from exploring caves without permits or assigned guides, how might we know what exists within inner earth? Interestingly enough many of these accounts of strange unique lands have been told by many respected, credible people

But first, let's look at history.

Premiumwriter:
it's a wonderful quote but not in this context.


Did you ever stop to ask yourself where exactly is above and where is below?

The earth is spherical just like a ball.

Will you say a round object like the football has up and down?

No. Instead there is a center. A point where all of its mass is concentrated.

You might theorized that there are things living at the center earth apart from the hot molten magma but you can't say it is exactly 'as above, so is below' because evidently humans cannot live underneath the mass of the earth.

The pressure alone will be crushing. Same pressure that will crush some deep sea vessels if they are not specifically engineered for it.

Thirdly, the surface of a football is the greatest surface area. As you move inward, the surface area decreases.

So many wrong things with any theory of the earth being hollow but as usual once the op uses the line "NASA or CIA is hiding this or that information" you guys will just switch off your brains

Here's the gist: The earth is a spherical object. It does not have up or down. It has surface and then a center of gravity.

Every up or down is imaginary and not fixed. As it rotates and revolves, you face this or that side.

And if you are standing in space viewing the earth from a distance, you won't know up or down because space has no reference point.

No sky to say this is up or down. Everything is imaginary.

I always tell the op to pick up a book and read instead of wasting time on conspiracy theories that is always based on 'NASA or CIA is hiding this or that info'

More than 90% of what we know today were public knowledge before America existed talk more of NASA which is not even up to 100 years old.

So, how exactly is NASA controlling all the world information that people like the op will be so obsessed with that singular organizations?

I tire

Premiumwriter:
Add reference please.

Gravity is not what makes an apple fall from a tree.

It is the force that prevents the fallen apple from going 'up into the sky and then traveling to outer space'.

Gravity is a product of mass. Every object with mass has a force of attraction.

You have a force of attraction to your phone and your phone has a force of attraction to you.

Gravity is not merely peculiar to the earth. Everything with a Mass has gravity which is equal to Gmm/r2.

The sun has gravity pull on the earth, the reason why the earth cannot 'run' away from the sun. The earth has gravity pull on the moon, the reason why the moon is trapped forever with the earth.

The earth pulls you down when you try to jump from it.

Let me ask you, if there is no gravity, why does the rocket need sufficient energy for escape velocity but once it is in space, it needs little to no energy to get to the moon.

Secondly, why is weightlessness not happening on earth? Why can't you just float on earth as you would in space?

Baba those same Scienctists that told you about gravity are the ones saying what op is saying, NO GRAVITY. He is right, check recent studies.

LocalStandard1:


Baba those same Scienctists that told you about gravity are the ones saying what op is saying, NO GRAVITY. He is right, check recent studies.

sir

Show the recent documents that says there's no gravity, let's study them.

Almost every ancient culture shares legends about interaction with subterranean races.

Clearly some of these were considered to be purgatory for sinners - attempts to deter people from wrong doing. But other legends like those about Agartha with its cities Shamballa and Putalla have striking resemblances, no matter which continent they originate from. In all legends these civilizations tell of two beings. Very tall Giants or very advanced reptilian races.

OurTruth:
I'll be completing my other threads tonight as well

U done complete the one when u dey say oyinbo use history dey scam us? Abi na picture history scam wtv? Be like na half half ur own craze be

Premiumwriter:
sir

Show the recent documents that says there's no gravity, let's study them.

Go on YouTube or Google it. Understand that science is an ever evolving field, no theory or law is set in stone.

author=OurTruth post=113678485]I suffered some setbacks few days ago and due to this I've not been able to post, but I managed to sort it out and I'm back sharing important information to you all.

As above so is below. The Earth isn't exactly what you think it is. There is a major cover up by NASA to hide an important truth about our planet from the public. But the truth cannot hide forever.

Join me as we uncover one of the biggest secrets about our planet. [/quote]
Our planet is hanging in space, slightly rotating on its axis, deflecting the sun and moon, if you leave our atmosphere, you go into the lithosphere, space ship navigate through this lithosphere to out of space. In the real sense there is no ground, our earth only has a shell covering it, this shell is divided into fragments as it encircles our planet and forms it's shell. Birds don't disappear anywhere, they go where we can't see, but still within our planet.

To my fellow scientists in here, I once read a journal about moulins and how they can naturally occur. The only thing that puzzled was how glacier motion seemingly evaporated soil.

Here's a picture of a moulin. Some of them go deeper than 400 meters below.


[somewhere in Alaska]

These structures, if truly are caused by glacier motion, in theory, would be more pronounced in the poles of spherical bodies such as the earth where ice can be found in the poles.

I once got co-ordinates from an Internet friend in the US pointing to a very large glacier, too bad, I was too late. Google map error: sorry we have no images of this location. The area was pixelated.

My conclusion (based on it being theoretically natural, and the government cover ups) :

It's possible that we haven't really understood why they go that deep (and the probably keep going deeper). Hence, governments cover it up as they work to understand it. If these things (especially the one suspected to be in the North Pole) keep eating into the earth, they can destabilise earth's balance, and we exit our solar system (just as pluto did —which I suspect a similar scenario in its poles)

It becomes understandable why governments restrict this area even though there's a constant stream of scientists working in these areas.

LocalStandard1:


Go on YouTube or Google it. Understand that science is an ever evolving field, no theory or law is set in stone.

sir,

You have to understand that Newton gravity and Einstein gravity are not different things.

Rather they are two theories that explain gravity in different situations.

It does not negate gravity or proof that gravity does not exist.

If applied on earth or on two massive bodies, Newton theory of gravity perfectly describes the magnitude of the force of attraction between these bodies.

Because of this accuracy, Newtons theory is still being used today for launching rockets and just about any projectile on earth.

But if the body involves a larger one and a smaller one especially like the sun and mercury, the theory breaks down.

In this case Einstein theory of space and time curvature will perfectly the force of gravity in that gravity is not really a curve but a deep hole that a massive object creates around itself like it is sinking.

It is that curvature that draws objects close to it.

This theory will fail on earth and close to black holes.

So you see, both theories do not do away with gravity. Instead, they tried to explain gravity in different ways and they are both right in different conditions.

Physics is based on conditions. Most of our physics are limited by the speed of light. Provided that objects travel at a speed lesser than the speed of light, almost all physic theories will be accurate.

But once they move closer to the speed of light, the accuracy decreases and beyond the speed of light, everything scatters.

Fortunately for us, no object as of yet can travel at light speed because E=mc2 means it'll need an infinite amount of energy which is impossible.

What I'm saying is that there are boundaries to every physic laws. It does not mean that the laws are wrong.

They will be perfect within the boundaries.

So, no one has said gravity does not exist. Einstein explained gravity between a super massive object and a lesser massive object and his theory there is right.

Newton explained gravity around two massive objects and his theories are also accurate.

But both theories of gravity are wrong when it comes to explaining the excessive gravity around black holes... That boundary again.

Premiumwriter:
sir,

You have to understand that Newton gravity and Einstein gravity are not different things.

Rather they are two theories that explain gravity in different situations.

It does not negate gravity or proof that gravity does not exist.

If applied on earth or on two massive bodies, Newton theory of gravity perfectly describes the magnitude of the force of attraction between these bodies.

Because of this accuracy, Newtons theory is still being used today for launching rockets and just about any projectile on earth.

But if the body involves a larger one and a smaller one especially like the sun and mercury, the theory breaks down.

In this case Einstein theory of space and time curvature will perfectly the force of gravity in that gravity is not really a curve but a deep hole that a massive object creates around itself like it is sinking.

It is that curvature that draws objects close to it.

This theory will fail on earth and close to black holes.

So you see, both theories do not do away with gravity. Instead, they tried to explain gravity in different ways and they are both right in different conditions.

Physics is based on conditions. Most of our physics are limited by the speed of light. Provided that objects travel at a speed lesser than the speed of light, almost all physic theories will be accurate.

But once they move closer to the speed of light, the accuracy decreases and beyond the speed of light, everything scatters.

Fortunately for us, no object as of yet can travel at light speed because E=mc2 means it'll need an infinite amount of energy which is impossible.

What I'm saying is that there are boundaries to every physic laws. It does not mean that the laws are wrong.

They will be perfect within the boundaries.

So, no one has said gravity does not exist. Einstein explained gravity between a super massive object and a lesser massive object and his theory there is right.

Newton explained gravity around two massive objects and his theories are also accurate.

But both theories of gravity are wrong when it comes to explaining the excessive gravity around black holes... That boundary again.

Einstein's where theories of relativity.

I don't know how to post links on Nairaland, but there are many videos on YouTube and the internet, check them out. The assertion that gravity is not a force also shocked me, being a science major too. I only found it out some months ago. Check Veritasium on YouTube, he talked extensively about it.

I repeat, even the most solid "law" of physics is not written in stone. Even the first law of thermodynamics has been disproved. Thank you.

I guess Newton was wrong, according to modern Scienctists.

LocalStandard1:


I don't think Newton ever formulated any law around gravity, his where theories mostly. As for Einstein they where theories of relativity.

I don't know how to post links on Nairaland, but there are many videos on YouTube and the internet, check them out. The assertion that gravity is not a force also shocked me, being a science major too. I only found it out some months ago. Check Veritasium on YouTube, he talked extensively about it.

I repeat, even the most solid "law" of physics is not written in stone. Even the first law of thermodynamics has been disproved. Thank you.

sure you are a science major?

Newtons law of universal gravitational force "state that the force of attraction between two masses is directly proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them"

Ss3 physics and 2nd semester 100l work.

Again gravity is a force or not a force according to Newton and Einstein.

In certain conditions gravity is a force and in some it behaves like curve in space-time.

Think of this like the wave-particle paradox of light.

In some instances, light behave like a wave with all the properties of a wave.

In other instances, the same light rays behave like tiny particles traveling along the same lines.

Now would you say light is not a particle? Or would you say light is actually a particle but not wave?

The same applies to gravity. In some instances, it behave like a force, in such instances, Newton law holds.

In other instances, it behaves like a curve in space-time, in such cases, Einstein theory holds.

And talking about laws failing, I think I already stated that in my previous post that all physic laws have boundaries beyond which they will not work.

Premiumwriter:
sure you are a science major?

Newtons law of universal gravitational force "state that the force of attraction between two masses is directly proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them"

Ss3 physics and 2nd semester 100l work.

Again gravity is a force or not a force according to Newton and Einstein.

In certain conditions gravity is a force and in some it behaves like curve in space-time.

Think of this like the wave-particle paradox of light.

In some instances, light behave like a wave with all the properties of a wave.

In other instances, the same light rays behave like tiny particles traveling along the same lines.

Now would you say light is not a particle? Or would you say light is actually a particle but not wave?

The same applies to gravity. In some instances, it behave like a force, in such instances, Newton law holds.

In other instances, it behaves like a curve in space-time, in such cases, Einstein theory holds.

And talking about laws failing, I think I already stated that in my previous post that all physic laws have boundaries beyond which they will not work.

I have modified the comment.

Baba forget what they teach you in SS2, I am telling you to go and update your knowledge. Go and read or watch first, haba! As we are talking more students in secondary schools are being taught old knowledge.

Take out 20 minutes of your time and research.

OurTruth:
Missing Birds and Insects.

Did you know that before winter, many birds and insects in the most extreme latitudes fly not towards the equator, but towards the poles?

And did you know that those animals when given tracking devices lose their tracking signals?

this is not a mystery,these animals and birds are migratory and move according to season and avaliblity of resources,the white cattle egret we see during beginning of dry season in nigeria comes all the way from east Europe,turkey,middle East and North Africa and go back to those arid or semi arid climate during rainy season here

OurTruth:
Giant Mosquitos

Did you know that mosquitos in the northern most landmass, greenland, are so large and aggressive, they could take down a Caribou calf?

this is also not a mystery,it the prove of the Darwinan law of natural selection,the mosquitoes in Greenland has no natural enemies like frogs,lizard or bats and with thousands of defenceless elk to supply blood to them they evolved to grow big

Premiumwriter:
look the world over sir.

Let's assume you can carve the whole of Nigeria under the earth, first off, you'll need to dig out a very deep hole into the ground as a passage before carving the country.

Now digging out sand for a whole country needs a place where you can dump the whole dirt that you'll dig out from the ground.

Where would you dump that?

Now imagine digging for all the continents and dumping it in the surface.

Practically, you can't sit on a chair and lift it at the same time because you cannot exert a force greater than your self.

At the same time, you cannot empty the mass of the earth on the surface and expect the structure to hold.

That's like removing all the air from a ball and then dumping it on the ball and you expect the ball to still remain solid when you touch it.

It'll cave in instantly.

Of course you can build bunkers and underground tunnels those are negligible compared to the whole earth.

But try building an entire country under the ground and experience the marvel of engineering collapse.

And to think people will dig out all those sand and absolutely no one in the world will notice or hear the sound of the engines.

Y'all give NASA too much credit and too little for your brains

why bothering to even dig deep enough in the Earth's mantle when you know hot molten lava and supercharged temperatures awaits you,the Earth's core is a bubbling vat of molten rock,lava and gases,the evidence is scattered all over the world through rents in the Teutonic plates called volcanos,lava flows,geysers,hot streams,etc