₦airaland Forum

JASONjnr:
Again, CR7 is way better than Messi and I won't even bother wasting my time with urchins quoting me...


FIFA president's reaction when France scored tell alot about the fixing of all Argentina's games......

JASONjnr:
Without FIFA's support, Messi with his team will never raise a world cup....

Badgers14:
I am not a Messi fan but I am happy for him.

One thing that is really crazy is, Messi had a good supporting cast that helped him achieve this feat but no one is even mentioning them..

Messi wasn't even the best Argentina player in the squad in this world cup. Their goalkeeper (which I am not his fan either), did make many crucial saves to get them the cup but all we hear is Messi Messi.

In my opinion, Messi was not even the best player of the tournament but they still gave him the award.. although FIfa and whomever their team sponsors are gotta sell some shirts and all but again, life's not fair..

JASONjnr:
Without FIFA's support, Messi with his team will never raise a world cup....

babajero:
Please tell me any one match that Argentina would have lost without penalty?

babajero:
This is where you people get it all wrong, goals only doesn't make someone a better player, if not ronaldo would have been the king of the world with all his goals. Both mbape and halland are making the same mistake ronaldo made focusing on only scoring goals forgetting about the playmaking, even at Messi's age he can't be benched for mbape or halland, because he is a complete footballer. At mbape and halland age Messi have already carried the champions league, la liga, copa de rey, and also won World best/balon d'or.

For over a decade now Messi has maintained goal scoring ability, assist ability, playmaking ability, dribbling ability, passing ability. He is just a complete player.

phemmyfour:
Don't mind them

The first three world cups, I don't think the winner played up to five matches to get to the final

headboyprince:
You're just as dumb as the poster...

Bro it's quite notable that as every competition progresses more teams are given space...

Back then it was 6 games
now it's 7 games just one game difference...
next world cup the winner will play 8 games

by then this world cup will become mini world cup to upcoming fans...

The same thing will happen to the UCL... number of matches will increase from 2024...

So watch your mouth

phemmyfour:
One game difference?

You must be foolish

Check 1930 World cup stat

Group stage>>Semi final>>final

Some groups had 3 teams, that's 2 games at group stage instead of 3

phemmyfour:
One game difference?

You must be foolish

Check 1930 World cup stat

Group stage>>Semi final>>final

Some groups had 3 teams, that's 2 games at group stage instead of 3

headboyprince:
same will happen in the champions league group matches will increase from 6 to 10... so that means this current one will become mini and 2024 ucl will become too difficult to win according to you...

phemmyfour:
Next time, don't just jumped into a conversation like a fool. We were talking about early World cup n few games with facts.

Your folly brain couldn't come up with a superior argument, that is, 6 matches for 1930 world cup finalists.

Kiddo, run along and swim in your folly

headboyprince:
shut your stinking mouth, i'm not your mate in any way...

i quoted you with world cup facts...
you choose to ignore it...


tell me why you're so pained about the first world cup 1930.... no footballer from 1930 is still alive, pele wasn't even born in 1930....

you dont want to address the point of 2026 playing more games than this present world cup,....

idont quote me again if you have nothing else to say, else you'll regret your life, i will deal with you...

because i'm laughing with you doesnt mean , we're on same level, rubbissh...

hisses. cow

phemmyfour:
Idiot! Don't change the line of argument. Give me a finalist in 1930 and 1934 with 6 game runs

Werey dey disguise....chop your big L and run along

headboyprince:
you're very stuppid big L from whom and where, am i a footballer and what's up with 1930 football, a time your grand parents werent born.. in 1930 they played 5 matches... and whats the fuss.. why being so pained...

next world cup will have more matches than this present one and teams will increase to 48 instead of 32....

i warned you to close your mouth you didnt listen. now i have destroyed you and you want to cry...stupid boy lol

phemmyfour:
Werey! Uruguay played four matches in 1950 to emerge as world cup winners.

Keep exposing your inadequacies

headboyprince:
which inadequacies uruguay played 4 matches because of the world war, a lot of teams backed out of the tournament... 2 teams dropped out in Uruguay group so they played only 4 games..

many teams had not recover from the war, and many stadiums were destroyed....

or you think it was fifa intention for uruguay to play 4 games, it was their luck...

spain played 6 matches, and sweeden played 5 in that same world cup...

you've ignored my point about next world cup having more matches, several times ode... you no reach

AImiron:
I guess na fifa tell Kolo mani to lose that last attemp on purpose, mumu

Cry more

headboyprince:
Bro you've changed the topic.. you said it's was easier to win world cup then than now.. because of no var

headboyprince:
so they didnt get penalties in almost every match... i thought var is meant supposed to prevent goals...and without var more magu-magu goals will be scored..

calmness0:
And the legend Diego Maradona will be put on cheaqe

babajero:
way way easier, how many countries participates and how many matches do they play then vs now?

If VAR was is in existence "the hand of god goal" would have been canceled after watching VAR, but it was used to win the world cup.

If VAR was not in existence now Argentina would have beaten Saudi Arabia on their first match comfortably.

If VAR was in existence then many of the aggressive pattern they played then would have earned straight Red card.

babajero:
Please which match would they have lost if not for the penalty awarded?

phemmyfour:
You're not communicating....I gave you a fact, you are giving me the reason why my fact is valid...Indeed, E ti ya were Sir

babajero:
If VAR was in existence then many of the aggressive pattern they played then would have earned straight Red card.

headboyprince:
As you can see back then diving wasnt allowed..defenders were more aggressive and ready to break attackers legs....

but now Just dive and var will award cheap penalty.. :

headboyprince:
Keep asking Stupid question... Why dive for penalties if it wasn't necessary... ode

babajero:
Please which of the Argentinian match was there any diving without contact that penalty was awarded? Please tell me let me verify.

babajero:
And you think if defenders can break someone leg and nothing will happen, and you still think any player could have scored against the Argentinian aggressive defenders? Football was rubbish then, VAR has made it more difficult to get away with stupid playing. If VAR was in existence then AC Milan will not be carrying any trophies because of Gattuso.

babajero:
And you think if defenders can break someone leg and nothing will happen, and you still think any player could have scored against the Argentinian aggressive defenders? Football was rubbish then, VAR has made it more difficult to get away with stupid playing. If VAR was in existence then AC Milan will not be carrying any trophies because of Gattuso.

headboyprince:
don't talk too much, just look at this.... And explain how VAR encouraged diving....

More penalties == more goals == easy to win trophies == more diving