eph12:

Yes he will be. No defending that.

Do you think he's the only one responsible for that goal? Why were others avoiding the ball? About the first goal, we lost the first and second ball very close to our box before the shot. How do you excuse that?

Your excuse is watery. Players dont win every ball 100%, thats why their is a player that uses his hand to save the ball. . Man Games have been won by the odd 1 goal. Courtious was imperious in the UCL final last year and madrid score just 1 goal to win the match. If let let in easy goals like your man DDG Madrid would have lost like 4-1 and you will blame Benzema and co for not scoring 5 goals to win the match.

nihilistjnr:


Over to our local correspondent in the Autopsy Room.

Mr Lana1, we in the studio are waiting with bated breath for the confirmation of the cause of death...

If De Gea die na STD kill am. The dick-riding from his fans here is enough to kill a dead man

andrew444:


You equalized 1-1 and there was hope

Not like you where 3 goals down at the first half

I expected an easy win like 4-1 for city ,but it was an hard fought game by united ,man united fans won’t be happy for loosing ,but I think they did well

.

City has like 3 ways of winning the match at least. United has just one - transitions and quick counters. Who do you think will win?

Puhlease. Spare me the story. Had United played another strategy apart from the one they played today, the score line would be gargantuan.

If this man die, na Pep Guardiola kill am

We were scoring goals for fun with a front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood.

Get a competent striker up top with Rashford and you'll realise attack isn't really the problem this season.

eph12:

What kind of if is this na?

When do you see me defending DDG? Just because I say you can't put the woeful performance of some other players on DDG means I'm defending DDG?

You are defending him, Nothing like a woeful performance, the game was understandably cagey.

City is not an easy team to score against. Our outfield players score 1 goal. DDG failed in his duty just admit it and stop looking for an alibi for him. If DDG had not be criminal City outfield players would have not scored any goal today.

Expert17:


Man City were scoring for fun but changed Joe Hart (4X golden gloves winner) immediately Pep signed? Why?

So you don't know ball-playing GK makes you build play from the back and open up your opponent for easy penetration leading to more big chances for goals??

That's a good point Expert,

Pep changed keeper after they were scoring for fun
Sir Alex Ferguson changed keeper after having a team that can score for fun...

Has Man U started scoring for fun?

CapitalCee:


Your excuse is watery. Players dont win every ball 100%, thats why their is a player that uses his hand to save the ball. . Man Games have been won by the odd 1 goal. Courtious was imperious in the UCL final last year and madrid score just 1 goal to win the match. If let let in easy goals like your man DDG Madrid would have lost like 4-1 and you will blame Benzema and co for not scoring 5 goals to win the match.

So if we get this Courtious now, we will automatically play better?

Or maybe we will just manage to score a penalty and lock up shop. Nice one

CapitalCee:


You are defending him, Nothing like a woeful performance, the game was understandably cagey.

City is not an easy team to score against. Our outfield players score 1 goal. DDG failed in his duty just admit it and stop looking for an alibi for him. If DDG had not be criminal City outfield players would have not scored any goal today.

I'm having this argument right now with a friend on twitter. They want us to be scoring 4 goals for every 3 De Gea lets in. They think we were playing Chelsea

CapitalCee:


You are defending him, Nothing like a woeful performance, the game was understandably cagey.

City is not an easy team to score against. Our outfield players score 1 goal. DDG failed in his duty just admit it and stop looking for an alibi for him. If DDG had not be criminal City outfield players would have not scored any goal today.

Was the first goal DDG fault?

Lana1:
If De Gea die na STD kill am. The dick-riding from his fans here is enough to kill a dead man

I swear, DDG dic.k- riders are out in full force to talk nonsense as usual. Blaming the strikers for not scoring more goals in a final against a city team that is hard to score against. If their do-no-wrong i.diot DDG had performed his normal function the 1 goal the strikers scored would have been enough

I won’t blame De Gea for that first goal but I think he could’ve done more to save the second one. Apart from that, his poor passing skills also prevented us from playing out from the back.

We lose possession needlessly so many times. Imagine what chances we could’ve created if that didn’t happen.

But that’s just one of the major problems we have. Our attackers are also not clinical and lack proper decision making in the opponent’s box. Greenwood or any clinical striker will massively improve our goal haul. It’s a shame we might not see him in a United shirt again.

main24:



That's a good point Expert,

Pep changed keeper after they were scoring for fun
Sir Alex Ferguson changed keeper after having a team that can score for fun...

Has Man U started scoring for fun?

Changing to a ball-playing Gk and defenders will improve the team's attack.

eph12:

So if we get this Courtious now, we will automatically play better?

Or maybe we will just manage to score a penalty and lock up shop. Nice one

You don't understand things easily.

With Courtious, this game would have ended 1-0.

Lana1:
I'm having this argument right now with a friend on twitter. They want us to be scoring 4 goals for every 3 De Gea lets in. They think we were playing Chelsea

Lana1, Expert17 and those clamoring for a new goal keeper

If Man U gets a new goal keeper today, and we manage to loss any game.
Will you still find another player to blame?

eph12:

Was the first goal DDG fault?

It was his fault. Usual lack of concentration a competent GK will keep that out, City and Gundogan couldn't believe their luck. The ball did not go too side ways he just failed to react.

Ok lets say we forgive him for the first mistake, the game was at 1-1 and City are not particularly outplaying us. Booom your man killed the team morale by let in another against an almlst perfect team lime City

CapitalCee:


I swear, DDG dic.k- riders are out in full force to talk nonsense as usual. Blaming the strikers for not scoring more goals in a final against a city team that is hard to score against. If their do-no-wrong i.diot DDG had performed his normal function the 1 goal the strikers scored would have been enough

Agba shot stopper. We can see his shot stopping today and against West Ham.

At least he won golden gloves. They can come and spam the thread with pictures of that one. Na their trophy be that. We go use am hold body.

Lana1:
Agba shot stopper. We can see his shot stopping today and against West Ham.

At least he won golden boot. They can come and spam the thread with pictures of that one. Na their trophy be that. We go use am hold body.

DDG defenders are the worst fanbase ever. Once i see anyone defending DDG i stop engaging immediately

Leyqute:
I won’t blame De Gea for that first goal but I think he could’ve done more to save the second one. Apart from that, his poor passing skills also prevented us from playing out from the back.

We lose possession needlessly so many times. Imagine what chances we could’ve created if that didn’t happen.

But that’s just one of the major problems we have. Our attackers are also not clinical and lack proper decision making in the opponent’s box. Greenwood or any clinical striker will massively improve our goal haul. It’s a shame we might not see him in a United shirt again.

I believe we should work our way backwards. Once we start scoring goals, better midfield ball retention, we can get a better goal keeper.

For now, getting a better keeper with this same players won't change much.

Just my thought though. I could be wrong.

eph12:

So if we get this Courtious now, we will automatically play better?

Or maybe we will just manage to score a penalty and lock up shop. Nice one

Yes in a Final we can do that. Chelsea score City in the final UCL and locked up. Its not a crime to lock up in a final against a team like city. How many ti.es have you seen City concede more than 1 goal in a match. So because we have your darling DDG in pose, our strikers have to score buck loads of goals to win a match

TLona1:


Yen yen yen

You lose abi you no lose??

Like... Ehn...


Eph, the difference between your team and this City team is so much as day and night.

main24:


I believe we should work our way backwards. Once we start scoring goals, better midfield ball retention, we can get a better goal keeper.

For now, getting a better keeper with this same players won't change much.

Just my thought though. I could be wrong.

So we should keep conceding stupid goals from DDG till we start scoring plenty goals every match abi. This your thought is rubbish am sorry

main24:



That's a good point Expert,

Pep changed keeper after they were scoring for fun
Sir Alex Ferguson changed keeper after having a team that can score for fun...

Has Man U started scoring for fun?

Man Utd don’t need to start scoring for fun before having a contemporary goal keeper.

Imagine as a player, you equalize against City, a team that is tough to score against, and then your Gk made a howler to give them the lead again.

Won’t your legs feel heavier?

CapitalCee:


It was his fault. Usual lack of concentration a competent GK will keep that out, City and Gundogan couldn't believe their luck. The ball did not go too side ways he just failed to react.

Ok lets say we forgive him for the first mistake, the game was at 1-1 and City are not particularly outplaying us. Booom your man killed the team morale by let in another against an almlst perfect team lime City

THIS.

Lack of concentration and also flat-footed, there's nothing special about that shot.

Expert17:


You don't understand things easily.

With Courtious, this game would have ended 1-0.

Its not that simple. You can't just add and remove. The world does not work that way

Expert17:


You don't understand things easily.

With Courtious, this game would have ended 1-0.

With this current Man U team vs Man City...
Any goal keeper you like bring, Man city will still beat Man U.

You can even make Man U's goal keepers 2 😁🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️

main24:


I believe we should work our way backwards. Once we start scoring goals, better midfield ball retention, we can get a better goal keeper.

For now, getting a better keeper with this same players won't change much.

Just my thought though. I could be wrong.

You are right. You are wrong.

FirstbornWds:


Like... Ehn...


Eph, the difference between your team and this City team is so much as day and night.

We didn't see that today

main24:


Lana1, Expert17 and those clamoring for a new goal keeper

If Man U gets a new goal keeper today, and we manage to loss any game.
Will you still find another player to blame?

We will continue to blame every useless player that holds the team back till they are gone. Any more questions?

main24:


I believe we should work our way backwards. Once we start scoring goals, better midfield ball retention, we can get a better goal keeper.

For now, getting a better keeper with this same players won't change much.

Just my thought though. I could be wrong.

If we don’t have a ball-playing GK how will the ball get to attackers? Abi you think we’re still in 2005 where everyone hoofs goal kicks and fight for it in midfield?

We need to solve both problems as soon as possible. Else, next season won’t be any different.