₦airaland Forum

.

Derekmiles:
God, you're dumb... I lied about the Latino and Black household median difference😂😂😂... Bro, i didn't lie, i literally stated their different household media difference, how the f*ck is that lying, or are you too stupid to comprehend?.

This is why i have concluded that you're dumb, i will give you an example... This is your own statement:

"Latino households in the U.S. generally fare better than Black households in terms of debt and bankruptcies due to differences in wealth, access to credit, and financial outcomes:
• Median Debt (2021): Black households: $10,000; Latino households: $12,000.
• Bankruptcy Rates: Black Americans file more bankruptcies and are more likely to use Chapter 13, which is costlier and less successful (39% success rate in Black-majority areas vs. 58% in White-majority areas).
• Key Reasons:
• Higher Latino homeownership rates lead to better wealth accumulation.
• Black households face more discriminatory lending practices and limited access to credit.
• Wealth gaps: Black households have lower median wealth than Latino households, limiting financial resilience".

Read that statement again, you are so stupid that you've been writing about the Systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans, but at the same time, choose to ignore it, this is not the 1st time you've done it either, that's why i said in an earlier comment when i first noticed it that "It seems like you're just copying and pasting articles", because you're contradicting your own comments about the systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans with other things that you've been texting... This is the same systemic issues i've been talking about how Black Americans have had it the toughest of all groups outside of the Natives, but you wholeheartedly continue denying it in so many of your comments, saying "Other groups had it just as tough"... I didn't watch your video because i didn't need to after that 2017 rubbish you sent a few weeks back, which yes, i did debunk you slowpoke; and i didn't say they were propagandas, stop putting words in people's mouth, i specifically said "I don't know the propaganda shows you've been watching, but reduce them for your own sanity".

I then showed you a blatantly double standards in the Reparations history mainly in North America, you also choose to ignore that one... It seems like you're actually dumb.

‘God, you're dumb... I lied about the Latino and Black household median difference😂😂😂... Bro, i didn't lie, i literally stated their different household media difference, how the f*ck is that lying, or are you too stupid to comprehend?’
You did lie by claiming that the difference is MARGINAL. just admit that you were wrong. I proved that the wealth gap be it on average or in totality is not marginal. Latin incomes are 15% higher and their GDP is like 2x the black one.

‘Read that statement again, you are so stupid that you've been writing about the Systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans, but at the same time, choose to ignore it, this is not the 1st time you've done it either, that's why i said in an earlier comment when i first noticed it that "It seems like you're just copying and pasting articles", because you're contradicting your own comments about the systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans with other things that you've been texting... This is the same systemic issues i've been talking about how Black Americans have had it the toughest of all groups outside of the Natives, but you wholeheartedly continue denying it in so many of your comments, saying "Other groups had it just as tough"... I didn't watch your video because i didn't need to after that 2017 rubbish you sent a few weeks back, which yes, i did debunk you slowpoke; and i didn't say they were propagandas, stop putting words in people's mouth, i specifically said "I don't know the propaganda shows you've been watching, but reduce them for your own sanity".

I then showed you a blatantly double standards in the Reparations history mainly in North America, you also choose to ignore that one... It seems like you're actually dumb’

I know blacks faced systemic discrimination. I’m not denying that. I’m just saying they can’t use that entirely as an excuse as to why they are such a trainwreck. They brought this upon themselves. Other groups did have it jsut as tough. I’ve shown that. And in fairness, it doesn’t actually matter as to who has had it tougher. At the end of the day, other ethnic groups are flourishing like Latins and Asians whilst blacks are failing.

Derekmiles:
"Latino GDPs are like $3 Trillion, whereas Blacks are like half of that", and then you go on to say 50% is not marginal... This is why i continue saying you're stupid.

Half of $3 Trillion is $1.5 Trillion, there are approx. about 65 Million Latin Americans, and 47 Million Black Americans... This is another good example of you using statistical information without the systemic reasoning; i want you to divide that again, this time using the population differences, Latinos will definitely still have a higher per ratio, but i actually think that maths is a problem to you, that's why you always go with absolute numbers all the time.

Just admit you were wrong about the wealth gap between Latinos and blacks. Asians are 20 million people in the US and their GDP is $1.5 trillion.!26/5 is your point?😂
You keep on going on about systemic reasoning where else Latinos and Asians also endured injustice. Blacks aren’t the only ones to have had or still have a sought time in America.

I gave you the raw numbers. Latino household incomes are 16% higher than blacks. Latino millennial wealth in average is 2x higher than blacks.

Derekmiles:
You know what, i'm not even going to bother too much with this rantfilled nonsense you just wrote... I will only say one thing here, you said India was doing well, let me use you your own empirical information for you:

Fact: India is classified as a relatively Low Income country.

Fact: India has a per-capita GDP of $2600+.

Fact: India is still very multidimensionally poor.

Fact: Same nonsense you're ranting about India having an Economic growth, which is obviously mainly pushed by Population growth, this same projections were made about Nigeria in the last decade; by the way, that is what i've been trying to tell your little brain, nobody is trying to compare.


"There is -1000% probability that any African/black community on this planet will achieve any meaningful prosperity. You think there will be a Nigeria by 2050? Where else with India and other Asian giants, there is far more reason to believe that India will achieve its target of not just raising its GDP per capita but the country as a whole. India has the potential to match the economic and geopolitical power of the U.S. and China in both the short and long term due to its vast demographic dividend, rapid technological adoption, and strategic position in global trade and politics. With a population projected to surpass China and a growing middle class, India has the consumer base and workforce to drive sustained economic growth."

This dude just gave all my points in one paragraph😂😂😂.
Firstly: you are definitely copying off an article, are you that dumb?; one of your last sentences says "With a Population projected to surpass China"... Dude that already happened like 3-4 years ago. Which article did you get that from?, a 2015 one?😂😂😂.

Secondly: You just literally confirmed what i've been saying since, that the Indian economy is majorly driven by population growth, not developmental nor Industrial growth... That is the same way Nigeria's economy majorly grows, it's a complete false sense of growth, but you're too dumb to even understand that.

Thirdly: You went on all those rant for a country who has more regions wanting to secede than the ones in Nigeria, have you done any digging into that country at all... Have you read about the Khalistan movement?, the North-Eastern Movement, the Kamtapur movement?, there are so many movements that i can't even list them all... You said Nigeria will most likely not be one by 2050; buddy, India is on the very same boat😂😂😂. Do some actual fucking reading for once instead of going on rants, or watching your propaganda channels.

Fourthly: As a kinda secessionist myself, i won't even be angry at a Nigeria separation😂😂😂, you just gave me the points i wanted😂😂😂.

So all these ranting that you're ranting about India not being a Shithole, it is by all ramifications one... Now shut the Bleep up and go eat something.

‘You know what, i'm not even going to bother too much with this rantfilled nonsense you just wrote... I will only say one thing here, you said India was doing well, let me use you your own empirical information for you:

Fact: India is classified as a relatively Low Income country.

Fact: India has a per-capita GDP of $2600+.

Fact: India is still very multidimensionally poor’

India is not doing well but it’s not doing terribly. It is doing infinitely better than Nigeria. What’s crazy is that you don’t realise as to how insane. How can you compare Zoogeria to any country on earth?

Let me give you my reasons

Reasons India is Performing Well:
1. Economic Growth: India has been one of the fastest-growing major economies, with growth rates averaging 6–7% annually over the last decade.
2. Technological Advancements: India is a global leader in IT services, software development, and space technology (e.g., Chandrayaan-3 moon mission).
3. Infrastructure Development: Rapid urbanization and investment in transportation, energy, and digital connectivity are transforming many regions.
4. Global Influence: India’s role in international politics and trade, such as through the G20 presidency, is expanding


Overall,
India is performing neither entirely “well” nor “terribly.” It shows remarkable progress in some areas while struggling with systemic issues like poverty, inequality, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Its trajectory indicates potential for improvement, but persistent challenges keep it from fully realizing its potential. But Nigeria is performing TERRIBLY.

‘This dude just gave all my points in one paragraph😂😂😂.
Firstly: you are definitely copying off an article, are you that dumb?; one of your last sentences says "With a Population projected to surpass China"... Dude that already happened like 3-4 years ago. Which article did you get that from?, a 2015 one?😂😂😂’

I forgot to cite the projection but it doesn’t change the fact India is still on track to reach an economy that large.

‘Fact: Same nonsense you're ranting about India having an Economic growth, which is obviously mainly pushed by Population growth, this same projections were made about Nigeria in the last decade; by the way, that is what i've been trying to tell your little brain, nobody is trying to compare.
Secondly: You just literally confirmed what i've been saying since, that the Indian economy is majorly driven by population growth, not developmental nor Industrial growth... That is the same way Nigeria's economy majorly grows, it's a complete false sense of growth, but you're too dumb to even understand that’

Why lie?
1. Services Sector: IT, financial services, and telecommunications are the largest contributors to GDP.
2. Industrial Growth: Expanding manufacturing and industrial sectors.
3. Exports: Software services, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods are key export drivers.
4. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Significant investments in technology, infrastructure, and retail sectors
India’s Gross Value Added (GVA) for the fiscal year 2023-24 is distributed across three primary sectors:
• Services: 54.7%
• Industry: 27.6%
• Agriculture and Allied Activities: 17.7%



Within the Industry sector, the contributions are as follows:
• Manufacturing: 14.27%
• Construction: 8.91%
• Electricity, Gas, Water Supply & Other Utility Services: 2.48%
• Mining & Quarrying: 1.97%

The problems India is having is not really any different from what China had before they became what they are today.


‘Thirdly: You went on all those rant for a country who has more regions wanting to secede than the ones in Nigeria, have you done any digging into that country at all... Have you read about the Khalistan movement?, the North-Eastern Movement, the Kamtapur movement?, there are so many movements that i can't even list them all... You said Nigeria will most likely not be one by 2050; buddy, India is on the very same boat😂😂😂. Do some actual fucking reading for once instead of going on rants, or watching your propaganda channels.

Fourthly: As a kinda secessionist myself, i won't even be angry at a Nigeria separation😂😂😂, you just gave me the points i wanted😂😂😂’

Get off the weed, Comparing the stability of India to Nigeria. You’re crazy man. You can never go wrong with Nigeria. That country will never disappoint you. If you asked someone which country is more likely to balkanise India or Nigeria. Nigeria will always be picked. India and general most asian nations don't have anywhere the kind of instability, insecurity that's found in Nigeria. Nigeria was never meant to work. Trying to have Nigeria as one country is like trying to have England and china as one country or Saudi Arabia or the Vatican City. No country where 50% of the population is one religion (Christanity) and the other 50% is another (Islam) will never work. It’s a recipe for disaster. You have no clue as to what you’re talking about. India has much better rule of law, governance etc compared to Nigeria. India will be like a brown China in the future and Nigeria will become the next Sudan.

Derekmiles:
You know what, i'm not even going to bother too much with this rantfilled nonsense you just wrote... I will only say one thing here, you said India was doing well, let me use you your own empirical information for you:

Fact: India is classified as a relatively Low Income country.

Fact: India has a per-capita GDP of $2600+.

Fact: India is still very multidimensionally poor.

Fact: Same nonsense you're ranting about India having an Economic growth, which is obviously mainly pushed by Population growth, this same projections were made about Nigeria in the last decade; by the way, that is what i've been trying to tell your little brain, nobody is trying to compare.


"There is -1000% probability that any African/black community on this planet will achieve any meaningful prosperity. You think there will be a Nigeria by 2050? Where else with India and other Asian giants, there is far more reason to believe that India will achieve its target of not just raising its GDP per capita but the country as a whole. India has the potential to match the economic and geopolitical power of the U.S. and China in both the short and long term due to its vast demographic dividend, rapid technological adoption, and strategic position in global trade and politics. With a population projected to surpass China and a growing middle class, India has the consumer base and workforce to drive sustained economic growth."

This dude just gave all my points in one paragraph😂😂😂.
Firstly: you are definitely copying off an article, are you that dumb?; one of your last sentences says "With a Population projected to surpass China"... Dude that already happened like 3-4 years ago. Which article did you get that from?, a 2015 one?😂😂😂.

Secondly: You just literally confirmed what i've been saying since, that the Indian economy is majorly driven by population growth, not developmental nor Industrial growth... That is the same way Nigeria's economy majorly grows, it's a complete false sense of growth, but you're too dumb to even understand that.

Thirdly: You went on all those rant for a country who has more regions wanting to secede than the ones in Nigeria, have you done any digging into that country at all... Have you read about the Khalistan movement?, the North-Eastern Movement, the Kamtapur movement?, there are so many movements that i can't even list them all... You said Nigeria will most likely not be one by 2050; buddy, India is on the very same boat😂😂😂. Do some actual fucking reading for once instead of going on rants, or watching your propaganda channels.

Fourthly: As a kinda secessionist myself, i won't even be angry at a Nigeria separation😂😂😂, you just gave me the points i wanted😂😂😂.

So all these ranting that you're ranting about India not being a Shithole, it is by all ramifications one... Now shut the Bleep up and go eat something.

Nigeria faces a much higher risk of balkanization than India due to its deep ethnic, religious, and regional divisions. The country is home to over 250 ethnic groups, with significant tensions among the three largest: the Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo. Historical events like the Biafran Civil War (1967–1970) underscore these fractures, and separatist movements, such as the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), remain active. Additionally, insurgencies like Boko Haram in the northeast and resource-driven conflicts in the Niger Delta exacerbate instability. Nigeria’s weaker institutions, corruption, and uneven distribution of oil wealth further erode national unity.

India, while facing separatist challenges in regions like Kashmir and the Northeast, benefits from stronger democratic institutions, a federal system accommodating regional autonomy, and economic integration that mitigates fragmentation risks. While ethnic and religious tensions exist, they are less likely to lead to full-scale secession due to India’s institutional resilience. Thus, Nigeria’s structural weaknesses and ongoing violent conflicts make it far more vulnerable to balkanization than India.

Derekmiles:
You know what, i'm not even going to bother too much with this rantfilled nonsense you just wrote... I will only say one thing here, you said India was doing well, let me use you your own empirical information for you:

Fact: India is classified as a relatively Low Income country.

Fact: India has a per-capita GDP of $2600+.

Fact: India is still very multidimensionally poor.

Fact: Same nonsense you're ranting about India having an Economic growth, which is obviously mainly pushed by Population growth, this same projections were made about Nigeria in the last decade; by the way, that is what i've been trying to tell your little brain, nobody is trying to compare.


"There is -1000% probability that any African/black community on this planet will achieve any meaningful prosperity. You think there will be a Nigeria by 2050? Where else with India and other Asian giants, there is far more reason to believe that India will achieve its target of not just raising its GDP per capita but the country as a whole. India has the potential to match the economic and geopolitical power of the U.S. and China in both the short and long term due to its vast demographic dividend, rapid technological adoption, and strategic position in global trade and politics. With a population projected to surpass China and a growing middle class, India has the consumer base and workforce to drive sustained economic growth."

This dude just gave all my points in one paragraph😂😂😂.
Firstly: you are definitely copying off an article, are you that dumb?; one of your last sentences says "With a Population projected to surpass China"... Dude that already happened like 3-4 years ago. Which article did you get that from?, a 2015 one?😂😂😂.

Secondly: You just literally confirmed what i've been saying since, that the Indian economy is majorly driven by population growth, not developmental nor Industrial growth... That is the same way Nigeria's economy majorly grows, it's a complete false sense of growth, but you're too dumb to even understand that.

Thirdly: You went on all those rant for a country who has more regions wanting to secede than the ones in Nigeria, have you done any digging into that country at all... Have you read about the Khalistan movement?, the North-Eastern Movement, the Kamtapur movement?, there are so many movements that i can't even list them all... You said Nigeria will most likely not be one by 2050; buddy, India is on the very same boat😂😂😂. Do some actual fucking reading for once instead of going on rants, or watching your propaganda channels.

Fourthly: As a kinda secessionist myself, i won't even be angry at a Nigeria separation😂😂😂, you just gave me the points i wanted😂😂😂.

So all these ranting that you're ranting about India not being a Shithole, it is by all ramifications one... Now shut the Bleep up and go eat something.

No, population growth is not the biggest factor behind India’s economy. While a large population provides India a vast labor force and consumer base, the primary drivers are its services sector (IT, finance, and telecommunications), which contributes over 50% to GDP, followed by manufacturing and exports like pharmaceuticals and software. Population growth also brings challenges, such as unemployment and resource strain, which can hinder their economic progress. Thus, India’s economic growth stems more from sectoral advancements and globalization than merely population size. By that logic, Nigeria should have a large GDP. Nigeria is not even the largest economy in Africa anymore. South Africa is now the Giant of Africa and that’s largely because their currency is nowhere as devalued. A pound and dollar is well over 1,500 NGN. But pound and dollar is much closer in value to rupee and rand.

HellVictorinho9:
Every society is successful and failed to some extent

In other words, every country has issues but every country also has people celebrating something.



But you prefer your white shit definition s of everything and ask me stupid questions based on it and expect me to answer in order to/with an intention to convince you


Your white definition of everything is useless to me

Getat!

No, black societies ALWAYS FAIL. They are violent, poor, barbaric. They don’t function. Look at what happened to South Africa when blacks took over. What a failed race.

Sladem05:
Just admit you were wrong about the wealth gap between Latinos and blacks. Asians are 20 million people in the US and their GDP is $1.5 trillion.!26/5 is your point?😂
You keep on going on about systemic reasoning where else Latinos and Asians also endured injustice. Blacks aren’t the only ones to have had or still have a sought time in America.

I gave you the raw numbers. Latino household incomes are 16% higher than blacks. Latino millennial wealth in average is 2x higher than blacks.

"Just admit you were wrong"... Are you a dumbass or something, where in any of my comments did i ever claim that it wasn't higher😂😂😂, i was even the first one that brought out their stats. on median income, or are you really that much of a dumbass.

Secondly: You literally write about the systemic issues, which obviously i think you copied from some article without actually reading them, but then revert back on the systemic issues you write about saying "They're not important"... You yourself talked about Redlining Black neighbourhoods faced, you yourself comfirmed how Asian migrants were given loans to open businesses in Black neighbourhoods for a long time, while the Black people in those same neighbourhoods will be heavily overlooked; but yet, you claim "Latinos and Asians also faced the same injustices"🤦🤦🤦.

Dude, a group are literally purposely overlooked in their own neighborhood in favour of a migrant group; but yet, to you, they faced the same injustices, do you understand what perspective is?... You confirmed in your former comments of how other groups will be favoured over the Black community after the Civil Rights Movement, and yet, you talk about them facing the same challenges; did you actually copy those things from an article without reading them, because your comments contradict themselves😂😂😂.

Sladem05:
‘God, you're dumb... I lied about the Latino and Black household median difference😂😂😂... Bro, i didn't lie, i literally stated their different household media difference, how the f*ck is that lying, or are you too stupid to comprehend?’
You did lie by claiming that the difference is MARGINAL. just admit that you were wrong. I proved that the wealth gap be it on average or in totality is not marginal. Latin incomes are 15% higher and their GDP is like 2x the black one.

‘Read that statement again, you are so stupid that you've been writing about the Systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans, but at the same time, choose to ignore it, this is not the 1st time you've done it either, that's why i said in an earlier comment when i first noticed it that "It seems like you're just copying and pasting articles", because you're contradicting your own comments about the systemic discrimination faced by Black Americans with other things that you've been texting... This is the same systemic issues i've been talking about how Black Americans have had it the toughest of all groups outside of the Natives, but you wholeheartedly continue denying it in so many of your comments, saying "Other groups had it just as tough"... I didn't watch your video because i didn't need to after that 2017 rubbish you sent a few weeks back, which yes, i did debunk you slowpoke; and i didn't say they were propagandas, stop putting words in people's mouth, i specifically said "I don't know the propaganda shows you've been watching, but reduce them for your own sanity".

I then showed you a blatantly double standards in the Reparations history mainly in North America, you also choose to ignore that one... It seems like you're actually dumb’

I know blacks faced systemic discrimination. I’m not denying that. I’m just saying they can’t use that entirely as an excuse as to why they are such a trainwreck. They brought this upon themselves. Other groups did have it jsut as tough. I’ve shown that. And in fairness, it doesn’t actually matter as to who has had it tougher. At the end of the day, other ethnic groups are flourishing like Latins and Asians whilst blacks are failing.

"It doesn't matter as to who had it tougher", what the hell are you saying, did you study psychology?... It totally matters who had it tougher, you saying it doesn't matter is like saying someone who had a decent accident and someone who faced a literal war will have the same level of psychological trauma... Even you can't deny the systemic issues Black people face in the U.S in favour of the same other groups you're mentioning, and yet, you want a situation were those systemic issues won't be brought out, but lets rely solely on raw figures.

F*cking Asian migrants were favoured aboved the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their own neighborhoods; but oh, just forget about that... OK, fine, i guess we can also forget about the better Wealth accumulation those Asian migrants accumulated in that time space, in the time space of Loan favouritism, in the time space of Redlining, do you want to also forget about that and its effects on the raw figures?.

Sladem05:
No, population growth is not the biggest factor behind India’s economy. While a large population provides India a vast labor force and consumer base, the primary drivers are its services sector (IT, finance, and telecommunications), which contributes over 50% to GDP, followed by manufacturing and exports like pharmaceuticals and software. Population growth also brings challenges, such as unemployment and resource strain, which can hinder their economic progress. Thus, India’s economic growth stems more from sectoral advancements and globalization than merely population size. By that logic, Nigeria should have a large GDP. Nigeria is not even the largest economy in Africa anymore. South Africa is now the Giant of Africa and that’s largely because their currency is nowhere as devalued. A pound and dollar is well over 1,500 NGN. But pound and dollar is much closer in value to rupee and rand.

Huh, Nigeria did have the highest GDP in Africa for a very long time, and yes, it was mainly based on population growth, our GDP did fall by $150 Billion in the last year... In the 1st half of the 2010s, we were literally almost always in the Top 5 highest growing economies.

Sladem05:
‘You know what, i'm not even going to bother too much with this rantfilled nonsense you just wrote... I will only say one thing here, you said India was doing well, let me use you your own empirical information for you:

Fact: India is classified as a relatively Low Income country.

Fact: India has a per-capita GDP of $2600+.

Fact: India is still very multidimensionally poor’

India is not doing well but it’s not doing terribly. It is doing infinitely better than Nigeria. What’s crazy is that you don’t realise as to how insane. How can you compare Zoogeria to any country on earth?

Let me give you my reasons

Reasons India is Performing Well:
1. Economic Growth: India has been one of the fastest-growing major economies, with growth rates averaging 6–7% annually over the last decade.
2. Technological Advancements: India is a global leader in IT services, software development, and space technology (e.g., Chandrayaan-3 moon mission).
3. Infrastructure Development: Rapid urbanization and investment in transportation, energy, and digital connectivity are transforming many regions.
4. Global Influence: India’s role in international politics and trade, such as through the G20 presidency, is expanding


Overall,
India is performing neither entirely “well” nor “terribly.” It shows remarkable progress in some areas while struggling with systemic issues like poverty, inequality, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Its trajectory indicates potential for improvement, but persistent challenges keep it from fully realizing its potential. But Nigeria is performing TERRIBLY.

‘This dude just gave all my points in one paragraph😂😂😂.
Firstly: you are definitely copying off an article, are you that dumb?; one of your last sentences says "With a Population projected to surpass China"... Dude that already happened like 3-4 years ago. Which article did you get that from?, a 2015 one?😂😂😂’

I forgot to cite the projection but it doesn’t change the fact India is still on track to reach an economy that large.

‘Fact: Same nonsense you're ranting about India having an Economic growth, which is obviously mainly pushed by Population growth, this same projections were made about Nigeria in the last decade; by the way, that is what i've been trying to tell your little brain, nobody is trying to compare.
Secondly: You just literally confirmed what i've been saying since, that the Indian economy is majorly driven by population growth, not developmental nor Industrial growth... That is the same way Nigeria's economy majorly grows, it's a complete false sense of growth, but you're too dumb to even understand that’

Why lie?
1. Services Sector: IT, financial services, and telecommunications are the largest contributors to GDP.
2. Industrial Growth: Expanding manufacturing and industrial sectors.
3. Exports: Software services, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods are key export drivers.
4. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Significant investments in technology, infrastructure, and retail sectors
India’s Gross Value Added (GVA) for the fiscal year 2023-24 is distributed across three primary sectors:
• Services: 54.7%
• Industry: 27.6%
• Agriculture and Allied Activities: 17.7%



Within the Industry sector, the contributions are as follows:
• Manufacturing: 14.27%
• Construction: 8.91%
• Electricity, Gas, Water Supply & Other Utility Services: 2.48%
• Mining & Quarrying: 1.97%

The problems India is having is not really any different from what China had before they became what they are today.


‘Thirdly: You went on all those rant for a country who has more regions wanting to secede than the ones in Nigeria, have you done any digging into that country at all... Have you read about the Khalistan movement?, the North-Eastern Movement, the Kamtapur movement?, there are so many movements that i can't even list them all... You said Nigeria will most likely not be one by 2050; buddy, India is on the very same boat😂😂😂. Do some actual fucking reading for once instead of going on rants, or watching your propaganda channels.

Fourthly: As a kinda secessionist myself, i won't even be angry at a Nigeria separation😂😂😂, you just gave me the points i wanted😂😂😂’

Get off the weed, Comparing the stability of India to Nigeria. You’re crazy man. You can never go wrong with Nigeria. That country will never disappoint you. If you asked someone which country is more likely to balkanise India or Nigeria. Nigeria will always be picked. India and general most asian nations don't have anywhere the kind of instability, insecurity that's found in Nigeria. Nigeria was never meant to work. Trying to have Nigeria as one country is like trying to have England and china as one country or Saudi Arabia or the Vatican City. No country where 50% of the population is one religion (Christanity) and the other 50% is another (Islam) will never work. It’s a recipe for disaster. You have no clue as to what you’re talking about. India has much better rule of law, governance etc compared to Nigeria. India will be like a brown China in the future and Nigeria will become the next Sudan.

"India has much better rule of law, governance etc compared to Nigeria".

In no way did i ever deny this, why do you somehow think i'm comparing India to Nigeria... I said that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, due to your comparison of the UK and India, which is outright delusion... In fact, my exact statement if i'm not mistaken was "India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, though they are doing way better than us, because we are a complete shithole"... So this comparison that you've always tought that i'm comparing Nigeria and India really baffles me, because my statement on Nigeria and India came from your delusional take on India and The UK, and that's when i told you that don't let absolute numbers fool you, especially for a country of 1.4+ Billion people.

"If you asked someone which country is more likely to balkanise India or Nigeria"

I don't need to ask anybody because India has already beaten Nigeria off the mark on that already, and with room for a lot more down the line... You think the Punjabis don't want their own country because they feel marginalized, you think the North-Easterners don't want their own country... India has a country literally has more seperatist movements than Nigeria as a country, that is a fact, are they more United even in their bid for secession, maybe; but it doesn't change the fact that like i said in my other comment, India is on the same both as Nigeria in terms of secession.

So you originally trying to make India out to be this rising utopia like you originally wanted to do, you're speaking to the wrong crowd dude, maybe speak to the people who has actually no done a deep research on the systemic issues of the country, maybe those will blindly believe you.

"India is performing neither entirely “well” nor “terribly.” It shows remarkable progress in some areas while struggling with systemic issues like poverty, inequality, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Its trajectory indicates potential for improvement, but persistent challenges keep it from fully realizing its potential".

Finally, you've said what i wanted to hear, this is literally the India that anyone who has done a deep dive on that country knows, not the rising utopia you've been trying to allude to since... And as for your last statement, so Nigeria of the 2000s and 2010s😂😂, because that is literally what was said about Nigeria in the 2000s/2010s, even the "persistent challenges keeps it from fully realising its potential" was said exactly the same😂😂😂; and that is why projections and trajectories without looking into the systemic issues will always make those projections delusional... If India starts tackling their Systemic issues, people may slowly start believing in them, but until they start doing that; all most will see is a country going up at face value, about to be shown the realitics of why systemic issues matters; and all i will see is a Nigeria projections of the 2000s/2010s that never referenced any of the systemic issues in Nigeria.

And having read about the Cultural and Ethnic systemic issues of India, you think it's not close to as bad as Nigeria's; maybe the Dalits and other issues will have to tell you to keep deceiving yourself... India's systemic issues doesn't just arise from Economical or everyday community issues, it's from the very mentality itself dating back cultural, ethnic, and religious norms. that are still normalized to a lot of degree; they need to start from the mentality itself... A similar issue is what's also affecting Nigeria systematically.

Sladem05:
No, black societies ALWAYS FAIL. They are violent, poor, barbaric. They don’t function. Look at what happened to South Africa when blacks took over. What a failed race.

Depends on your definitions

Of everything

















Dismissed

HellVictorinho9:
Depends on your definitions

Of everything

















Dismissed

Bull as shit.

Derekmiles:
"India has much better rule of law, governance etc compared to Nigeria".

In no way did i ever deny this, why do you somehow think i'm comparing India to Nigeria... I said that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, due to your comparison of the UK and India, which is outright delusion... In fact, my exact statement if i'm not mistaken was "India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, though they are doing way better than us, because we are a complete shithole"... So this comparison that you've always tought that i'm comparing Nigeria and India really baffles me, because my statement on Nigeria and India came from your delusional take on India and The UK, and that's when i told you that don't let absolute numbers fool you, especially for a country of 1.4+ Billion people.

"If you asked someone which country is more likely to balkanise India or Nigeria"

I don't need to ask anybody because India has already beaten Nigeria off the mark on that already, and with room for a lot more down the line... You think the Punjabis don't want their own country because they feel marginalized, you think the North-Easterners don't want their own country... India has a country literally has more seperatist movements than Nigeria as a country, that is a fact, are they more United even in their bid for secession, maybe; but it doesn't change the fact that like i said in my other comment, India is on the same both as Nigeria in terms of secession.

So you originally trying to make India out to be this rising utopia like you originally wanted to do, you're speaking to the wrong crowd dude, maybe speak to the people who has actually no done a deep research on the systemic issues of the country, maybe those will blindly believe you.

"India is performing neither entirely “well” nor “terribly.” It shows remarkable progress in some areas while struggling with systemic issues like poverty, inequality, and underdeveloped infrastructure. Its trajectory indicates potential for improvement, but persistent challenges keep it from fully realizing its potential".

Finally, you've said what i wanted to hear, this is literally the India that anyone who has done a deep dive on that country knows, not the rising utopia you've been trying to allude to since... And as for your last statement, so Nigeria of the 2000s and 2010s😂😂, because that is literally what was said about Nigeria in the 2000s/2010s, even the "persistent challenges keeps it from fully realising its potential" was said exactly the same😂😂😂; and that is why projections and trajectories without looking into the systemic issues will always make those projections delusional... If India starts tackling their Systemic issues, people may slowly start believing in them, but until they start doing that; all most will see is a country going up at face value, about to be shown the realitics of why systemic issues matters; and all i will see is a Nigeria projections of the 2000s/2010s that never referenced any of the systemic issues in Nigeria.

And having read about the Cultural and Ethnic systemic issues of India, you think it's not close to as bad as Nigeria's; maybe the Dalits and other issues will have to tell you to keep deceiving yourself... India's systemic issues doesn't just arise from Economical or everyday community issues, it's from the very mentality itself dating back cultural, ethnic, and religious norms. that are still normalized to a lot of degree; they need to start from the mentality itself... A similar issue is what's also affecting Nigeria systematically.

‘In no way did i ever deny this, why do you somehow think i'm comparing India to Nigeria... I said that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, due to your comparison of the UK and India, which is outright delusion... In fact, my exact statement if i'm not mistaken was "India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK, though they are doing way better than us, because we are a complete shithole"... So this comparison that you've always tought that i'm comparing Nigeria and India really baffles me, because my statement on Nigeria and India came from your delusional take on India and The UK, and that's when i told you that don't let absolute numbers fool you, especially for a country of 1.4+ Billion people’
At least the Indians actually produce goods, all Nigeria does is produce terrorism and banditry. Africans don’t produce anything. The Nigerian economy is just oil and gas.

You really do underestimate as to how bad Nigeria is. India doesn’t have anywhere the kind of instability or division that is seen in Nigeria. There’s no way in hell. I can bet anything that Nigeria won’t exist past like 2060. We will go the same way as the Sudanese. They are now two different countries. You can’t put a country that is that different and expect them to succeed. It’s a recipe for disaster. You forget that Nigeria had a civil war not quite 60 years ago.
1“India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK.”
• Not accurate: While India and Nigeria share colonial histories and diversity, India has a stable democracy, a diversified economy, and global industries like IT and pharmaceuticals. Nigeria’s reliance on oil and its political instability make it less comparable to India, and India’s shared institutional ties with the UK (e.g., parliamentary democracy and legal systems) make it more similar in governance structure. India is much closer to the UK than Nigeria.

India’s GDP of over $3 trillion far outstrips Nigeria’s $250billion, and India’s economy is diversified with robust IT, manufacturing, and pharmaceutical sectors, while Nigeria remains heavily dependent on oil exports. This diversification reflects India’s industrialization, a key difference from Nigeria’s economy.

Infrastructure and Global Influence: India has a global influence as a leader in technology and space exploration (e.g., the Chandrayaan lunar missions). Nigeria, though influential in Africa, has not reached comparable global status. These disparities make India closer to developed nations like the UK in economic structure, even if not in per-capita wealth. Africa is the only region on earth that still struggles with basic amenities like good roads, adequate power supply, San etc

“Don’t let absolute numbers fool you, especially for a country of 1.4+ billion people.”
Partially valid: Absolute numbers like GDP may. exaggerate India’s success, but per-capita metrics still highlight India’s edge. For example, higher literacy rates (74% vs. 62%) and longer life expectancy (70 vs. 54 years) reflect India’s better development outcomes compared to Nigeria. Nigeria is nowhere India. It’s only South Africa of the Sub Saharan African countries and SA makes Nigeria look like a jungle that’s comparable to India.

Economically, India is more comparable to emerging economies than the UK, but its industrial and technological base makes it more globally integrated than Nigeria. India is a far bigger deal. Comapring India to Nigeria is like comparing an ant to a giant😂

1. “India has already beaten Nigeria off the mark on [secession], and with room for a lot more down the line.”
Misleading: India has not experienced a successful secession since the 1947 partition. While separatist tensions exist, they are mostly contained through political and economic measures. Nigeria, on the other hand, faced the bloody Biafra Civil War and continues to deal with active separatist groups like IPOB, which have destabilized the country more than any movement in India.
2. “India has more separatist movements than Nigeria.”
Partially true, but context matters: India’s diversity leads to many regional movements for autonomy or independence, such as in Punjab or the Northeast. However, most are non-violent and politically managed. In Nigeria, fewer movements like IPOB and Boko Haram have resulted in more violence and greater instability, making Nigeria’s separatist issues more severe despite the lower number.
3. “You think the Punjabis don’t want their own country because they feel marginalized, you think the North-Easterners don’t want their own country?”
Overstated: The Khalistan movement in Punjab peaked in the 1980s and is now largely dormant. In the Northeast, most insurgencies have been resolved with peace accords and special autonomy. These regions are integrated into India’s federal system, unlike Nigeria, where separatist tensions remain active and unresolved.
4. “India is on the same boat as Nigeria in terms of secession.”
False equivalence: India’s strong democratic institutions and federalism allow it to handle diversity better than Nigeria. Nigeria’s violent history with Biafra, IPOB, and ethnic divisions makes it far more vulnerable to fragmentation compared to India, where separatist issues are largely political rather than existential

Nobody in their right mind will believe Nigeria will outlast almost any other country on earth. It’s highly likely it breaks up in another 10-20 years. The same can’t be said for India. Your crazy.

‘So you originally trying to make India out to be this rising utopia like you originally wanted to do, you're speaking to the wrong crowd dude, maybe speak to the people who has actually no done a deep research on the systemic issues of the country, maybe those will blindly believe you’

Never said India is a utopia but that it’s doing far better than the trainwreck known as Zoogeria. Zoogeria is not meant to exist. It’s one of the biggest mistakes in human history. All African nations are.
So you originally trying to make India out to be this rising utopia…”
Strawman argument: The idea that India is being portrayed as a “utopia” is an exaggeration. No one is claiming India is free of systemic issues; its challenges, such as poverty, corruption, caste inequality, and regional disparities, are well-documented. However, acknowledging its economic growth, global influence, and ability to manage diversity doesn’t equate to presenting it as a perfect nation.
2. “You’re speaking to the wrong crowd dude, maybe speak to the people who have actually no done a deep research on the systemic issues of the country.”
Dismissive and baseless: This comment assumes the speaker hasn’t researched India’s systemic issues, which is unfounded. Discussions about India’s progress (economic growth, democracy, and federal stability) don’t deny its problems. A nuanced view acknowledges both its successes and failures.
3. “Maybe those will blindly believe you.”
Ad hominem attack: Rather than engaging with the argument, this implies that anyone who sees India’s positive aspects must be uninformed. It disregards the complexity of discussing a country with 1.4 billion people, where systemic issues coexist with remarkable achievements

1. “This is literally the India that anyone who has done a deep dive on that country knows, not the rising utopia you’ve been trying to allude to since.”
Misrepresentation: At no point was India portrayed as a utopia. Its systemic issues, such as poverty, corruption, and caste inequality, were always acknowledged. The argument wasn’t about perfection but about India’s ability to grow economically and politically despite these challenges.
2. “Nigeria of the 2000s and 2010s, because that is literally what was said about Nigeria in the 2000s/2010s.”
False equivalence: Nigeria’s challenges in the 2000s/2010s (e.g., heavy dependence on oil, political instability, and insurgencies) are structurally different from India’s. India’s economy is far more diversified, its democratic institutions are more stable, and it has a stronger global presence, particularly in technology and pharmaceuticals. Comparing India’s trajectory to Nigeria’s overlooks these critical differences.
3. “Projections and trajectories without looking into systemic issues will always make those projections delusional.”
Partially true, but nuanced: Systemic issues do affect a country’s trajectory, but India’s projections are based on tangible economic trends (e.g., IT exports, manufacturing growth, space technology). Unlike Nigeria in the 2000s, India has a track record of addressing systemic challenges incrementally, even if progress is slow.
4. “Until they start tackling their systemic issues, all most will see is a country going up at face value, about to be shown why systemic issues matter.”
• Oversimplified: India is not ignoring its systemic issues; reforms in digital infrastructure, education, and healthcare show efforts to address them. While progress is uneven, dismissing India as “all surface growth” undermines its tangible achievements, such as poverty reduction and urbanization.
5. “All I will see is a Nigeria projection of the 2000s/2010s.”
Flawed comparison: Nigeria’s 2000s/2010s projections often failed because they ignored dependence on oil and corruption. India’s economy, however, is highly diversified, with thriving industries like IT, pharmaceuticals, and renewable energy. While systemic issues persist, India’s economic base is far broader and more resilient than Nigeria’s during that period.

1. “India’s systemic issues aren’t as bad as Nigeria’s; maybe the Dalits and other issues will have to tell you.”
Oversimplification: India’s caste system and discrimination against Dalits are indeed deeply entrenched issues, but comparing them directly to Nigeria’s challenges is flawed. Nigeria faces widespread ethnic conflicts, insurgencies (like Boko Haram), and governance failures, which are more violent and destabilizing. India’s caste issues, while severe, have seen progress through legal protections and social reforms, even if they remain far from resolved.
2. “India’s issues arise from its very mentality, dating back to cultural, ethnic, and religious norms.”
Partially true, but exaggerated: Cultural and religious norms in India, like caste hierarchies or patriarchal systems, contribute to systemic issues. However, India has made progress in challenging these norms through constitutional protections, education, and activism. While the mentality is slow to change, it’s inaccurate to suggest no effort is being made.
3. “They need to start from the mentality itself.”
Idealistic, but not unique to India: Systemic issues stemming from cultural and historical norms aren’t exclusive to India; they exist in many countries, including Nigeria. Both nations are working toward social change through laws, education, and awareness, but expecting a complete overhaul of “mentality” ignores the complexity of addressing deeply rooted issues in any society.
4. “A similar issue is what’s also affecting Nigeria.”
Partially correct: Nigeria’s challenges also stem from cultural and ethnic divisions, but the scale and impact differ. In Nigeria, issues like ethnic tensions, religious conflicts, and governance failures frequently lead to violence and instability, while India’s cultural issues, though significant, are less likely to result in widespread destabilization of the state

Derekmiles:
Huh, Nigeria did have the highest GDP in Africa for a very long time, and yes, it was mainly based on population growth, our GDP did fall by $150 Billion in the last year... In the 1st half of the 2010s, we were literally almost always in the Top 5 highest growing economies.

1. “Nigeria had the highest GDP in Africa for a very long time, mainly due to population growth.”
• Partially Correct: Nigeria was Africa’s largest economy for several years, but this status was due to a combination of factors, not just population growth. The country’s substantial oil reserves and production significantly contributed to its GDP. However, economic challenges like high inflation and currency devaluation have impacted its GDP ranking. 
2. “Our GDP fell by $150 billion in the last year.”
• Accurate: Nigeria’s GDP experienced a significant decline, dropping from $472.62 billion in 2022 to $362.81 billion in 2023, a decrease of approximately $110 billion. 
3. “In the first half of the 2010s, we were almost always in the top 5 highest-growing economies.”
• Not Entirely Accurate: Between 2010 and 2015, Nigeria’s GDP growth rates varied, with a peak of 6.88% in the first quarter of 2011. However, growth rates declined in subsequent years, and Nigeria was not consistently among the top 5 fastest-growing economies during this period.

As of 2024, Nigeria has fallen to the fourth position among Africa’s largest economies, behind South Africa, Egypt, and Algeria. Nigeria’s GDP is currently ranked fourth in Africa, with a nominal GDP of approximately $252.7 billion. While Nigeria once held the position of Africa’s largest economy, various economic challenges have led to a decline in its GDP and global ranking. The country’s economic performance in the early 2010s showed promise but was not consistently among the top 5 highest-growing economies. So stop hyping Nigeria’s progress. It was always doing badly 😂

Derekmiles:
"It doesn't matter as to who had it tougher", what the hell are you saying, did you study psychology?... It totally matters who had it tougher, you saying it doesn't matter is like saying someone who had a decent accident and someone who faced a literal war will have the same level of psychological trauma... Even you can't deny the systemic issues Black people face in the U.S in favour of the same other groups you're mentioning, and yet, you want a situation were those systemic issues won't be brought out, but lets rely solely on raw figures.

F*cking Asian migrants were favoured aboved the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their own neighborhoods; but oh, just forget about that... OK, fine, i guess we can also forget about the better Wealth accumulation those Asian migrants accumulated in that time space, in the time space of Loan favouritism, in the time space of Redlining, do you want to also forget about that and its effects on the raw figures?.

1. “It totally matters who had it tougher, you saying it doesn’t matter is like saying someone who had a decent accident and someone who faced a literal war will have the same level of psychological trauma.”
• This analogy oversimplifies the argument. No one is claiming all struggles are equal or interchangeable. The point is that systemic issues should be analyzed based on their unique contexts and impacts without trying to create a hierarchy of suffering. Comparing who “had it tougher” can lead to dismissing the progress or challenges of other groups, which isn’t constructive.
2. “You can’t deny the systemic issues Black people face in the U.S. in favor of the same other groups you’re mentioning.”
• No one is denying the systemic racism and historical oppression faced by Black Americans. Highlighting the experiences of other groups doesn’t diminish the significance of these issues—it simply adds perspective to the broader conversation about systemic inequality and how it manifests differently for various groups.
3. “F*cking Asian migrants were favored above the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their own neighborhoods.”
• While Asian migrants were sometimes positioned as a “model minority” to contrast with Black Americans, this was part of a racial hierarchy designed to divide marginalized groups. It didn’t erase systemic racism against Asian migrants, such as exclusion laws, internment, and workplace discrimination. The favoring of one group over another didn’t mean systemic issues disappeared for either group.
4. “Forget about the better wealth accumulation those Asian migrants accumulated in that time space, in the time space of loan favoritism, in the time space of redlining.”
• Asian Americans did accumulate wealth in some cases, but this was not universal. Many still faced poverty and systemic barriers, especially among Southeast Asian refugees. The impact of redlining and loan discrimination on Black Americans is undeniable and remains a significant driver of wealth inequality. However, focusing only on the advantages of one group overlooks the systemic barriers they also faced

Derekmiles:
"Just admit you were wrong"... Are you a dumbass or something, where in any of my comments did i ever claim that it wasn't higher😂😂😂, i was even the first one that brought out their stats. on median income, or are you really that much of a dumbass.

Secondly: You literally write about the systemic issues, which obviously i think you copied from some article without actually reading them, but then revert back on the systemic issues you write about saying "They're not important"... You yourself talked about Redlining Black neighbourhoods faced, you yourself comfirmed how Asian migrants were given loans to open businesses in Black neighbourhoods for a long time, while the Black people in those same neighbourhoods will be heavily overlooked; but yet, you claim "Latinos and Asians also faced the same injustices"🤦🤦🤦.

Dude, a group are literally purposely overlooked in their own neighborhood in favour of a migrant group; but yet, to you, they faced the same injustices, do you understand what perspective is?... You confirmed in your former comments of how other groups will be favoured over the Black community after the Civil Rights Movement, and yet, you talk about them facing the same challenges; did you actually copy those things from an article without reading them, because your comments contradict themselves😂😂😂.

You said that black financial status is improving. I debunked that as a lie and that the difference between black and Latin wealth is marginal when Latinos earn 16% more than they did and their GDP is 2x that of black America.

1. “Where did I claim it wasn’t higher? I brought up the stats’
The gap difference is clearly more than marginal is what im saying

2. “You write about systemic issues, then say ‘they’re not important.’”
• Misinterpretation. Systemic issues like redlining and loan discrimination against Black Americans were never dismissed. Acknowledging that other groups faced different challenges doesn’t erase Black-specific injustices.
3. “You talked about loans given to Asian migrants in Black neighborhoods but still say others faced the same injustices.”
• The favoritism shown toward Asian migrants in Black neighborhoods was an injustice against Black Americans. At the same time, Asian migrants faced broader systemic racism, like exclusion laws. These are distinct but not mutually exclusive realities.
4. “A group overlooked in favor of another group means they didn’t face the same injustices.”
• True, they didn’t face identical injustices. But systemic racism affected multiple groups in different ways. Black Americans faced redlining, while Asians dealt with exclusion acts and internment—both forms of systemic oppression. Cry me a river 🤣
5. “You confirmed others were favored over Black people but still say they faced the same challenges.”
• This isn’t contradictory. Black Americans faced unique injustices, like being overlooked in their neighborhoods, while other groups faced different systemic barriers. Recognizing this complexity doesn’t diminish anyone’s struggles

Sladem05:
1. “It totally matters who had it tougher, you saying it doesn’t matter is like saying someone who had a decent accident and someone who faced a literal war will have the same level of psychological trauma.”
• This analogy oversimplifies the argument. No one is claiming all struggles are equal or interchangeable. The point is that systemic issues should be analyzed based on their unique contexts and impacts without trying to create a hierarchy of suffering. Comparing who “had it tougher” can lead to dismissing the progress or challenges of other groups, which isn’t constructive.
2. “You can’t deny the systemic issues Black people face in the U.S. in favor of the same other groups you’re mentioning.”
• No one is denying the systemic racism and historical oppression faced by Black Americans. Highlighting the experiences of other groups doesn’t diminish the significance of these issues—it simply adds perspective to the broader conversation about systemic inequality and how it manifests differently for various groups.
3. “F*cking Asian migrants were favored above the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their own neighborhoods.”
• While Asian migrants were sometimes positioned as a “model minority” to contrast with Black Americans, this was part of a racial hierarchy designed to divide marginalized groups. It didn’t erase systemic racism against Asian migrants, such as exclusion laws, internment, and workplace discrimination. The favoring of one group over another didn’t mean systemic issues disappeared for either group.
4. “Forget about the better wealth accumulation those Asian migrants accumulated in that time space, in the time space of loan favoritism, in the time space of redlining.”
• Asian Americans did accumulate wealth in some cases, but this was not universal. Many still faced poverty and systemic barriers, especially among Southeast Asian refugees. The impact of redlining and loan discrimination on Black Americans is undeniable and remains a significant driver of wealth inequality. However, focusing only on the advantages of one group overlooks the systemic barriers they also faced

"However, focusing only on the advantages of one group overlooks the systemic barriers they also faced"

Given how this you comment has been carefully worded, one would think that you haven't completely overlooked the systemic issues Black American faced, because you have for the majority of our comments... I highlighted this section of your comment because i actively never focused solely on the the

Nobody is trying to create a hierarchy of suffering, but at the same time, it was hierarchical, and it was especially hierarchical in the United States; in a former comment, i stated that "I didn't want to compare, but your comments are forcing me to compare"; especially when you started talking about Latinos facing Systemic Segregation too before the Civil Rights Movement, and i gave you examples like the Mendez case... The fact is you throughout your comments overlooking and trying to merge the discrimination faced by Latino, and later Asians, and Blacks as the same thing was outright delusional, there are perspectives to discrimination, trying to clump all of them into the same boat is delusional, which is something you've been trying to do, especially when there been an outright bias of one group being favoured over the other in the country you speak about.

And i really do love the fact you brought in the Asians, because the Asians are a clear example of this perspective of discrimination, and discrimination in the United States... Trying to merge the discrimination faced by the Asians and Black Community since the Civil Rights Movement is the talk of a mad person, especially since one of those groups were literally purposefully being favoured for a long time over another group in the other group's neighbourhood... These are the 2 groups who's discrimination you're trying to clump together👇:... Also a link to the article if you want it: https://www.easternstandardtimes.com/article/asian-businesses-black-neighborhoods

How can you be so open to raw figures, but yet, so extremely narrowminded to how the world used to work and still works to a certain extent; do you think the world has always seen each other as equal?, do you think Humans have always seen each other as equals?... The modern world pushing for a mentality of Equality is actually a very valid push that nobody should joke with if there is to be a better future.

I once saw a Nigerian say that after the Civil Rights Movement, Black Americans automatically had equal rights, that is a very ignorant rubbish to spit out; Yes on paper, they did, but they also didn't for a very long time... That doesn't negate what other minorities faced, but trying to clump all of them together, when some have even outrightly been favoured to the detriment of the Black community is outright stupidity.

Where i gave up on this conversation and knew you were bias was when i brought out how Nigerians are not viewed in a very good light in some other countries outside of the United States, giving reasons and examples to why... You jumped to the defence of Nigerians in those countries like a Lion chasing its prey; if i'm not mistaken, that was the first time you used Systemic issues faced to actually defend a group in our conversation, and my question to you immediately after in no exact words was "You can easily defend Nigerians in these regions, bringing systemic issues into the mix, but you somehow don't have the mental fortitude to bring systemic issues into the mix when talking about Black Americans"... I've stopped trying to convince you since then, my comments since then has been just to let you know that your comments has been delusionally f*cked.

Sladem05:
You said that black financial status is improving. I debunked that as a lie and that the difference between black and Latin wealth is marginal when Latinos earn 16% more than they did and their GDP is 2x that of black America.

1. “Where did I claim it wasn’t higher? I brought up the stats’
The gap difference is clearly more than marginal is what im saying

2. “You write about systemic issues, then say ‘they’re not important.’”
• Misinterpretation. Systemic issues like redlining and loan discrimination against Black Americans were never dismissed. Acknowledging that other groups faced different challenges doesn’t erase Black-specific injustices.
3. “You talked about loans given to Asian migrants in Black neighborhoods but still say others faced the same injustices.”
• The favoritism shown toward Asian migrants in Black neighborhoods was an injustice against Black Americans. At the same time, Asian migrants faced broader systemic racism, like exclusion laws. These are distinct but not mutually exclusive realities.
4. “A group overlooked in favor of another group means they didn’t face the same injustices.”
• True, they didn’t face identical injustices. But systemic racism affected multiple groups in different ways. Black Americans faced redlining, while Asians dealt with exclusion acts and internment—both forms of systemic oppression. Cry me a river 🤣
5. “You confirmed others were favored over Black people but still say they faced the same challenges.”
• This isn’t contradictory. Black Americans faced unique injustices, like being overlooked in their neighborhoods, while other groups faced different systemic barriers. Recognizing this complexity doesn’t diminish anyone’s struggles

Huh, you never proved that Black weath isn't improving... I debunked that your nonsense 2017 article 0 wealth a long time ago... What the f*ck are you saying.

Wait, the Exclusion act?, are you talking about the Chinese Exclusion act of the 1800s, or the Anti-Asian immigration laws of the 1800s-Early 1900s?.

If that's what you're talking about; so wait, let me get this straight, to you, that is discrimination, or a comparable discrimination to what Black Americans faced?, so an older time migration policy is what you're comparing to what Black Americans faced in their own country?😂😂😂, that is like saying when Donald Trump banned the Citizens of some Muslim countries from coming to the U.S; and because of that, you then go "Yes, this is comparable to Slavery"😂😂😂... Bro, sh*t the f*ck up, you're actually delusional; Jesus Christ, are you this dumb on perspective. So a government telling people from another country to stay in their country, to you is the same or should even be put in the same sentence as people literally being lawfully Segregated, lynched, used as unknowning test subjects for syphilis, have communities they've grown burnt down, and so many other terrible occurrences in their own country; they are both proportionate discrimination to you?🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️WOW, just WOW.... I will tell you what you told me sometime ago, stop smoking that weed you're smoking.

I am done with this conversation, i hate to say this, but you are actually an ignorant fool, though i'm not even surprised because this is quite common among Nigerians... The fact you brought in the Anti-Asian Immigration acts as a proprotionate discrimination with Black Americans, and then go on and say "Cry me a River", not realising how ignorantly delusional your take just sounded, that is a very terrible take... I swear to God, KKK members are some of the most racist people you'd ever hear speak, but i'm not even going to be shocked if a few sees what you just said as the talk of a Mad person.

Derekmiles:
Huh, you never proved that Black weath isn't improving... I debunked that your nonsense 2017 article 0 wealth a long time ago... What the f*ck are you saying.

Wait, the Exclusion act?, are you talking about the Chinese Exclusion act of the 1800s, or the Anti-Asian immigration laws of the 1800s-Early 1900s?.

If that's what you're talking about; so wait, let me get this straight, to you, that is discrimination, or a comparable discrimination to what Black Americans faced?, so an older time migration policy is what you're comparing to what Black Americans faced in their own country?😂😂😂, that is like saying when Donald Trump banned the Citizens of some Muslim countries from coming to the U.S; and because of that, you then go "Yes, this is comparable to Slavery"😂😂😂... Bro, sh*t the f*ck up, you're actually delusional; Jesus Christ, are you this dumb on perspective. So a government telling people from another country to stay in their country, to you is the same or should even be put in the same sentence as people literally being lawfully Segregated, lynched, used as unknowning test subjects for syphilis, have communities they've grown burnt down, and so many other terrible occurrences in their own country; they are both proportionate discrimination to you?🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️WOW, just WOW.... I will tell you what you told me sometime ago, stop smoking that weed you're smoking.

I am done with this conversation, i hate to say this, but you are actually an ignorant fool, though i'm not even surprised because this is quite common among Nigerians... The fact you brought in the Anti-Asian Immigration acts as a proprotionate discrimination with Black Americans, and then go on and say "Cry me a River", not realising how ignorantly delusional your take just sounded, that is a very terrible take... I swear to God, KKK members are some of the most racist people you'd ever hear speak, but i'm not even going to be shocked if a few sees what you just said as the talk of a Mad person.

You didn’t. I debunked all your claims about black wealth. I proved to you that their wealth is diminishing.

Alright, let’s go through your text piece by piece and address each claim or argument step by step. I’ll clarify misunderstandings, correct inaccuracies, and point out logical inconsistencies.

1. “Huh, you never proved that Black wealth isn’t improving… I debunked that your nonsense 2017 article 0 wealth a long time ago…”
• Response:
• The claim about Black wealth stagnation comes from credible research, like the report by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which projects Black median wealth hitting $0 by 2053 if current trends continue. This isn’t a “nonsense” article but a widely cited analysis of systemic wealth inequality.
• If you believe this projection has been debunked, it’s your responsibility to provide evidence that Black wealth trends are improving significantly. Data from the Federal Reserve and Brookings Institution suggests otherwise. Blacks are getting poorer

2. “Wait, the Exclusion Act? Are you talking about the Chinese Exclusion Act of the 1800s, or the Anti-Asian immigration laws of the 1800s–early 1900s?”
Response:
• Yes, the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) and related policies barred Asian immigrants based on race. It was one of the earliest examples of explicitly racist federal immigration laws.
• While this primarily targeted immigrants rather than citizens, it reflects the same institutional racism that dehumanized people based on ethnicity. My argument was not that these laws are the same as what Black Americans faced, but that they’re part of a broader history of racial oppression in the U.S.

3. “So wait, let me get this straight, to you, that is discrimination, or a comparable discrimination to what Black Americans faced?”
Response:
• No, I did not claim they were “comparable” in severity or scope. Slavery and Jim Crow laws were uniquely devastating to Black Americans and involved atrocities like segregation, lynching, and generational disenfranchisement.
• My point is that systemic discrimination takes many forms. The Chinese Exclusion Act, though different, shows how a government can codify racism into law, impacting targeted groups for generations.

4. “That is like saying when Donald Trump banned the citizens of some Muslim countries from coming to the U.S., and because of that, you then go, ‘Yes, this is comparable to slavery.’”
• Response:
• This analogy oversimplifies my point. The Trump-era Muslim ban wasn’t comparable to slavery but was still discriminatory. Both the Muslim ban and the Chinese Exclusion Act reflect xenophobic policies that reinforced racial hierarchies. It’s not only blacks that receive/received racial hates
• Acknowledging one doesn’t minimize the other—it’s about understanding how governments enforce exclusion in different contexts.

5. “Bro, sht the fck up, you’re actually delusional. Jesus Christ, are you this dumb on perspective?”
• Response:
• Insults don’t strengthen your argument. Let’s keep the focus on facts rather than emotional attacks. If you believe my perspective is flawed, show why with reasoned arguments and evidence.

6. “So a government telling people from another country to stay in their country, to you, is the same or should even be put in the same sentence as people literally being lawfully segregated, lynched, used as test subjects for syphilis, and having communities burnt down?”
• Response:
• Again, no one equated these experiences. The Chinese Exclusion Act targeted immigrants, while Jim Crow targeted citizens. They are different in nature, but both are examples of institutional racism.
• My point is to illustrate how systems of exclusion have been used against various groups throughout U.S. history, not to say they’re equally severe or interchangeable.

7. “I will tell you what you told me some time ago: stop smoking that weed you’re smoking.”
• Response:
• Personal attacks don’t add value to this discussion. Let’s stick to the evidence and avoid unnecessary hostility.

8. “I hate to say this, but you are actually an ignorant fool. Though I’m not even surprised because this is quite common among Nigerians…”
• Response:
• This comment is offensive and uncalled for. Resorting to ethnic stereotyping undermines your credibility and derails the conversation. If your goal is to debunk arguments, focus on logic and evidence, not ad hominem attacks.

9. “The fact you brought in the Anti-Asian immigration acts as proportionate discrimination with Black Americans…”
• Response:
• I never argued the Chinese Exclusion Act was “proportionate” to slavery or Jim Crow laws. I brought it up to show how systemic racism has affected different groups in different ways. It’s not a competition oppression takes many forms.

10. “Cry me a river… KKK members are some of the most racist people you’d ever hear speak, but I’m not even going to be shocked if a few see what you just said as the talk of a mad person.”
• Response:
• The KKK’s actions were vile, but acknowledging other forms of racism doesn’t diminish that. This isn’t about one group’s suffering being “worse” but understanding the larger systems of oppression.

You’re a typical FBA fool.

Sladem05:
You didn’t. I debunked all your claims about black wealth. I proved to you that their wealth is diminishing.

Alright, let’s go through your text piece by piece and address each claim or argument step by step. I’ll clarify misunderstandings, correct inaccuracies, and point out logical inconsistencies.

1. “Huh, you never proved that Black wealth isn’t improving… I debunked that your nonsense 2017 article 0 wealth a long time ago…”
• Response:
• The claim about Black wealth stagnation comes from credible research, like the report by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which projects Black median wealth hitting $0 by 2053 if current trends continue. This isn’t a “nonsense” article but a widely cited analysis of systemic wealth inequality.
• If you believe this projection has been debunked, it’s your responsibility to provide evidence that Black wealth trends are improving significantly. Data from the Federal Reserve and Brookings Institution suggests otherwise. Blacks are getting poorer

2. “Wait, the Exclusion Act? Are you talking about the Chinese Exclusion Act of the 1800s, or the Anti-Asian immigration laws of the 1800s–early 1900s?”
Response:
• Yes, the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) and related policies barred Asian immigrants based on race. It was one of the earliest examples of explicitly racist federal immigration laws.
• While this primarily targeted immigrants rather than citizens, it reflects the same institutional racism that dehumanized people based on ethnicity. My argument was not that these laws are the same as what Black Americans faced, but that they’re part of a broader history of racial oppression in the U.S.

3. “So wait, let me get this straight, to you, that is discrimination, or a comparable discrimination to what Black Americans faced?”
Response:
• No, I did not claim they were “comparable” in severity or scope. Slavery and Jim Crow laws were uniquely devastating to Black Americans and involved atrocities like segregation, lynching, and generational disenfranchisement.
• My point is that systemic discrimination takes many forms. The Chinese Exclusion Act, though different, shows how a government can codify racism into law, impacting targeted groups for generations.

4. “That is like saying when Donald Trump banned the citizens of some Muslim countries from coming to the U.S., and because of that, you then go, ‘Yes, this is comparable to slavery.’”
• Response:
• This analogy oversimplifies my point. The Trump-era Muslim ban wasn’t comparable to slavery but was still discriminatory. Both the Muslim ban and the Chinese Exclusion Act reflect xenophobic policies that reinforced racial hierarchies. It’s not only blacks that receive/received racial hates
• Acknowledging one doesn’t minimize the other—it’s about understanding how governments enforce exclusion in different contexts.

5. “Bro, sht the fck up, you’re actually delusional. Jesus Christ, are you this dumb on perspective?”
• Response:
• Insults don’t strengthen your argument. Let’s keep the focus on facts rather than emotional attacks. If you believe my perspective is flawed, show why with reasoned arguments and evidence.

6. “So a government telling people from another country to stay in their country, to you, is the same or should even be put in the same sentence as people literally being lawfully segregated, lynched, used as test subjects for syphilis, and having communities burnt down?”
• Response:
• Again, no one equated these experiences. The Chinese Exclusion Act targeted immigrants, while Jim Crow targeted citizens. They are different in nature, but both are examples of institutional racism.
• My point is to illustrate how systems of exclusion have been used against various groups throughout U.S. history, not to say they’re equally severe or interchangeable.

7. “I will tell you what you told me some time ago: stop smoking that weed you’re smoking.”
• Response:
• Personal attacks don’t add value to this discussion. Let’s stick to the evidence and avoid unnecessary hostility.

8. “I hate to say this, but you are actually an ignorant fool. Though I’m not even surprised because this is quite common among Nigerians…”
• Response:
• This comment is offensive and uncalled for. Resorting to ethnic stereotyping undermines your credibility and derails the conversation. If your goal is to debunk arguments, focus on logic and evidence, not ad hominem attacks.

9. “The fact you brought in the Anti-Asian immigration acts as proportionate discrimination with Black Americans…”
• Response:
• I never argued the Chinese Exclusion Act was “proportionate” to slavery or Jim Crow laws. I brought it up to show how systemic racism has affected different groups in different ways. It’s not a competition oppression takes many forms.

10. “Cry me a river… KKK members are some of the most racist people you’d ever hear speak, but I’m not even going to be shocked if a few see what you just said as the talk of a mad person.”
• Response:
• The KKK’s actions were vile, but acknowledging other forms of racism doesn’t diminish that. This isn’t about one group’s suffering being “worse” but understanding the larger systems of oppression.

You’re a typical FBA fool.

😂😂😂... No you didn't you idiot... You never onced proved that Black Wealth was deminishing, if anything, like i said before, it's grown since that 2017.

Nobody said "don't acknowledge the other forms of discrimination", nobody said that, struggles are not meant to be diminished, but at the same time, all struggles are not equal... You've been using the systemic issues Asians and Latinos faced as a comparative quantification to vilify the Black American community from the onset, this is something you've constantly done in your comments, and now you want track back.

Bro, perspectives exists for a reason, you're an actual fool if you don't realise that, you want to compare their wealth difference, but don't want to compare the differences of their systemic issues, do you see were your biases lie, one can't work without the other... The same groups you're comparing to the Black community since the very onset were actively favoured more than the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their communities, and you still have the guts to talk about differences in Systemic discrimination... When a minority that is facing some discrimination, is still being favoured over you in your own community, you're literally at the bottom of the barrel, there is no other explanation for that; you are literally f*cked beyond explanation; so your take since the very onset of this conversation is still extremely bad, and very bias driven.

Please don't put the Anti-Asian immigration act when talking about the U.S racial history in the same sentence as the discrimination of the Black community... The Anti-Asian immigration act didn't give Asian communities no hope whatsoever because they still had their individual countries to rely on, they weren't even in the U.S, the act was a immigration policy to stop immigration of Asians, with the Asians already in their country; Black communities were being completely discriminated in their own country, their only option was to take it, and fight until it gets better, they are not even in the same league of discrimination.

Since we've been talking:
* You've disrespected the Black American history.
* Askewed the U.S racial history.
* Tried to claim that other minority groups did just as much as the Black community in the Civil Rights Movement, that was so degrading and disrespectful, i won't even bother with that.
* Use other minorities to vilify the Black American community, while setting the systemic issues by the wayside, you want to talk about wealth but don't want those factors to be talked about😂😂😂.
* What others; and Oh, try to make India more than what it is... Yea, that's why their population are the majorly finding ways to leave the country, be it legally or illegally.

All i can say is kudos, you really are delusional about the World we live in.

Derekmiles:
Huh, you never proved that Black weath isn't improving... I debunked that your nonsense 2017 article 0 wealth a long time ago... What the f*ck are you saying.

Wait, the Exclusion act?, are you talking about the Chinese Exclusion act of the 1800s, or the Anti-Asian immigration laws of the 1800s-Early 1900s?.

If that's what you're talking about; so wait, let me get this straight, to you, that is discrimination, or a comparable discrimination to what Black Americans faced?, so an older time migration policy is what you're comparing to what Black Americans faced in their own country?😂😂😂, that is like saying when Donald Trump banned the Citizens of some Muslim countries from coming to the U.S; and because of that, you then go "Yes, this is comparable to Slavery"😂😂😂... Bro, sh*t the f*ck up, you're actually delusional; Jesus Christ, are you this dumb on perspective. So a government telling people from another country to stay in their country, to you is the same or should even be put in the same sentence as people literally being lawfully Segregated, lynched, used as unknowning test subjects for syphilis, have communities they've grown burnt down, and so many other terrible occurrences in their own country; they are both proportionate discrimination to you?🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️WOW, just WOW.... I will tell you what you told me sometime ago, stop smoking that weed you're smoking.

I am done with this conversation, i hate to say this, but you are actually an ignorant fool, though i'm not even surprised because this is quite common among Nigerians... The fact you brought in the Anti-Asian Immigration acts as a proprotionate discrimination with Black Americans, and then go on and say "Cry me a River", not realising how ignorantly delusional your take just sounded, that is a very terrible take... I swear to God, KKK members are some of the most racist people you'd ever hear speak, but i'm not even going to be shocked if a few sees what you just said as the talk of a Mad person.

And for the last time concerning black wealth, I will debunk you again.
Based on the data and trends, Black wealth in the United States is getting worse relative to other racial groups, even if there have been some recent nominal gains.

Why It’s Getting Worse:
1. Wealth Gap Widening:
• Despite some increases in median Black household wealth (e.g., recent gains from $24,000 in 2019 to $45,000 in 2022), the wealth gap between Black and white households has grown in absolute terms. White household median wealth is now $242,000 higher than Black household wealth.
2. Structural Inequities:
• Historical systemic barriers, such as redlining, discriminatory lending, and labor market disparities, continue to hinder wealth accumulation for Black families.
• Black millennials and Gen Z are less likely to inherit wealth compared to their white counterparts.
3. Zero Wealth Projection:
• A 2017 report projected that if trends persist, the median Black household could reach $0 wealth by 2053. Even with recent gains, this alarming trajectory has not been fully reversed.
4. Fragility of Gains:
• Recent increases in Black wealth are primarily tied to short-term factors like homeownership during a favorable housing market, which remains fragile and volatile.
5. Intergenerational Barriers:
• White families are benefiting more significantly from intergenerational wealth transfers, perpetuating and even widening the wealth gap.



While there have been some recent gains in Black wealth, these are insufficient to counteract long-term systemic disparities. Without targeted interventions and structural reforms, the outlook suggests continued relative decline. In relative terms, Black wealth is getting worse, not better.

On the other hand

Latino Americans:

1. Income & Wealth Growth:
• Median Household Income: Latino median household income in the U.S. has been steadily rising. As of the most recent data, it’s around $65,000 which is about 70% of the national average of $78,000. This is a significant increase from previous decades, largely driven by the growing number of Latino professionals and entrepreneurs.
• Wealth Growth: Latino Americans’ wealth is on the rise, especially in communities with higher levels of education and homeownership. As of 2022, the Latino purchasing power was estimated at $2.6 trillion, and it’s expected to reach $2.9 trillion by 2025. This growth is mainly from increased labor force participation and entrepreneurship.
• Homeownership: While still behind white Americans, Latino homeownership has been growing, which is a major driver of wealth. In fact, Latino-owned households are buying homes at an increasing rate, contributing to long-term wealth growth.

2. Contribution to the U.S. Economy:
• Labor Force: Latinos represent nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce and are especially concentrated in industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality. Without their labor, certain sectors would collapse, highlighting their crucial role in the U.S. economy.
• Entrepreneurship: Latino entrepreneurship is booming. Over 4.7 million Latino-owned businesses exist today, and they’re growing faster than businesses owned by other racial or ethnic groups. These businesses are vital in driving local economies, creating jobs, and promoting innovation.

3. Future Outlook:
• The future looks promising for Latino wealth. With a younger population (a large proportion of Latinos are under 35), there’s potential for further wealth accumulation, particularly as educational attainment rises and intergenerational wealth transfers start to play a bigger role.

Asian Americans:

1. Income & Wealth Growth:
• Median Household Income: Asian Americans as a group have the highest median household income among racial groups in the U.S., at around $94,000, which is higher than the national average. However, there are disparities within the Asian American community—Indian Americans, for example, have much higher incomes, while certain Southeast Asian groups (e.g., Cambodian, Hmong) lag behind.
• Wealth Accumulation: Asian Americans have historically had higher levels of wealth compared to Black and Latino Americans, thanks in part to higher rates of homeownership and more established business ownership. In fact, Asian Americans have one of the highest rates of homeownership, particularly among Indian, Chinese, and Korean Americans.
• Education & Job Opportunities: Asian Americans generally have higher educational attainment, which translates into better-paying jobs. Many are concentrated in high-tech industries, engineering, healthcare, and finance, all of which have higher average salaries.

2. Contribution to the U.S. Economy:
• Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Asian Americans, especially Indian Americans, have made a major impact in sectors like technology and healthcare. For example, nearly 1 in 4 STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) professionals in the U.S. is Asian. Many Silicon Valley tech companies have been founded or led by Asian Americans, contributing immensely to the country’s economic growth.
• Labor Force: Like Latinos, Asian Americans represent a significant portion of the workforce. Beyond tech, Asian Americans are also highly visible in fields like healthcare, where they are crucial in roles such as doctors, nurses, and medical researchers.

3. Future Outlook:
• The Asian American population is expected to continue growing, especially among immigrant communities. This means their economic influence will likely increase as well, with expanding educational attainment and a rise in entrepreneurial activity.

Compared to Black Americans:

1. Wealth Disparities:
• Black Wealth: Black median wealth remains significantly lower than that of Latino and Asian Americans. As of 2022, Black median wealth was around $24,000, compared to $45,000 for Latino families and $187,000 for Asian families. The wealth gap between Black and white Americans is widening, and Black Americans still face systemic barriers that make it harder to accumulate wealth.

2. Historical Barriers to Wealth:
• Black Americans continue to face historical injustices like slavery, segregation, and discriminatory practices (e.g., redlining, unequal access to loans). These structural barriers have prevented Black communities from accumulating wealth at the same pace as Latinos or Asians.
• Additionally, Black Americans often face lower rates of homeownership and wage disparities, which severely limit wealth-building opportunities. The wealth gap is compounded by lower levels of intergenerational wealth transfers, which means Black families are starting at a disadvantage compared to Latino and Asian Americans.

3. Employment & Education:
• While Black Americans are making strides in educational attainment and career advancement, they are still disproportionately affected by unemployment and underemployment. Black professionals earn less than their white counterparts for the same work, and Black students face barriers in accessing higher education.
• The rise of the Black entrepreneurial sector is a positive sign, but the overall percentage of Black businesses remains much lower than that of Latinos and Asians. Black Americans are also less likely to have access to generational wealth, making it harder to invest in education, real estate, or businesses.

Conclusion:
bright, with steady increases in income, wealth, and economic contributions. Rising homeownership rates, educational attainment, and entrepreneurial activity are driving this growth. Their critical role in the U.S. labor force and growing purchasing power solidify their position as a cornerstone of the economy. If these trends continue, Latinos will likely see significant wealth gains over the next few decades.
• Asian Americans: Asian Americans are the highest earners among all racial groups in the U.S., with substantial wealth accumulation fueled by high educational attainment, tech industry dominance, and successful entrepreneurship. While disparities exist within Asian communities, overall, their financial trajectory is upward, and they are set to continue leading in wealth accumulation and innovation.
• Black Americans: Despite some progress, Black Americans are at a disadvantage compared to Latinos and Asians. The racial wealth gap persists, and projections of median Black household wealth potentially reaching zero by 2053 highlight the urgency of systemic reform. Historical barriers, lower homeownership rates, and employment disparities continue to impede wealth growth. Without significant policy interventions or structural changes, Black Americans may struggle to achieve financial parity

Sladem05:
And for the last time concerning black wealth, I will debunk you again.
Based on the data and trends, Black wealth in the United States is getting worse relative to other racial groups, even if there have been some recent nominal gains.

Why It’s Getting Worse:
1. Wealth Gap Widening:
• Despite some increases in median Black household wealth (e.g., recent gains from $24,000 in 2019 to $45,000 in 2022), the wealth gap between Black and white households has grown in absolute terms. White household median wealth is now $242,000 higher than Black household wealth.
2. Structural Inequities:
• Historical systemic barriers, such as redlining, discriminatory lending, and labor market disparities, continue to hinder wealth accumulation for Black families.
• Black millennials and Gen Z are less likely to inherit wealth compared to their white counterparts.
3. Zero Wealth Projection:
• A 2017 report projected that if trends persist, the median Black household could reach $0 wealth by 2053. Even with recent gains, this alarming trajectory has not been fully reversed.
4. Fragility of Gains:
• Recent increases in Black wealth are primarily tied to short-term factors like homeownership during a favorable housing market, which remains fragile and volatile.
5. Intergenerational Barriers:
• White families are benefiting more significantly from intergenerational wealth transfers, perpetuating and even widening the wealth gap.



While there have been some recent gains in Black wealth, these are insufficient to counteract long-term systemic disparities. Without targeted interventions and structural reforms, the outlook suggests continued relative decline. In relative terms, Black wealth is getting worse, not better.

On the other hand

Latino Americans:

1. Income & Wealth Growth:
• Median Household Income: Latino median household income in the U.S. has been steadily rising. As of the most recent data, it’s around $65,000 which is about 70% of the national average of $78,000. This is a significant increase from previous decades, largely driven by the growing number of Latino professionals and entrepreneurs.
• Wealth Growth: Latino Americans’ wealth is on the rise, especially in communities with higher levels of education and homeownership. As of 2022, the Latino purchasing power was estimated at $2.6 trillion, and it’s expected to reach $2.9 trillion by 2025. This growth is mainly from increased labor force participation and entrepreneurship.
• Homeownership: While still behind white Americans, Latino homeownership has been growing, which is a major driver of wealth. In fact, Latino-owned households are buying homes at an increasing rate, contributing to long-term wealth growth.

2. Contribution to the U.S. Economy:
• Labor Force: Latinos represent nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce and are especially concentrated in industries like agriculture, construction, and hospitality. Without their labor, certain sectors would collapse, highlighting their crucial role in the U.S. economy.
• Entrepreneurship: Latino entrepreneurship is booming. Over 4.7 million Latino-owned businesses exist today, and they’re growing faster than businesses owned by other racial or ethnic groups. These businesses are vital in driving local economies, creating jobs, and promoting innovation.

3. Future Outlook:
• The future looks promising for Latino wealth. With a younger population (a large proportion of Latinos are under 35), there’s potential for further wealth accumulation, particularly as educational attainment rises and intergenerational wealth transfers start to play a bigger role.

Asian Americans:

1. Income & Wealth Growth:
• Median Household Income: Asian Americans as a group have the highest median household income among racial groups in the U.S., at around $94,000, which is higher than the national average. However, there are disparities within the Asian American community—Indian Americans, for example, have much higher incomes, while certain Southeast Asian groups (e.g., Cambodian, Hmong) lag behind.
• Wealth Accumulation: Asian Americans have historically had higher levels of wealth compared to Black and Latino Americans, thanks in part to higher rates of homeownership and more established business ownership. In fact, Asian Americans have one of the highest rates of homeownership, particularly among Indian, Chinese, and Korean Americans.
• Education & Job Opportunities: Asian Americans generally have higher educational attainment, which translates into better-paying jobs. Many are concentrated in high-tech industries, engineering, healthcare, and finance, all of which have higher average salaries.

2. Contribution to the U.S. Economy:
• Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Asian Americans, especially Indian Americans, have made a major impact in sectors like technology and healthcare. For example, nearly 1 in 4 STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) professionals in the U.S. is Asian. Many Silicon Valley tech companies have been founded or led by Asian Americans, contributing immensely to the country’s economic growth.
• Labor Force: Like Latinos, Asian Americans represent a significant portion of the workforce. Beyond tech, Asian Americans are also highly visible in fields like healthcare, where they are crucial in roles such as doctors, nurses, and medical researchers.

3. Future Outlook:
• The Asian American population is expected to continue growing, especially among immigrant communities. This means their economic influence will likely increase as well, with expanding educational attainment and a rise in entrepreneurial activity.

Compared to Black Americans:

1. Wealth Disparities:
• Black Wealth: Black median wealth remains significantly lower than that of Latino and Asian Americans. As of 2022, Black median wealth was around $24,000, compared to $45,000 for Latino families and $187,000 for Asian families. The wealth gap between Black and white Americans is widening, and Black Americans still face systemic barriers that make it harder to accumulate wealth.

2. Historical Barriers to Wealth:
• Black Americans continue to face historical injustices like slavery, segregation, and discriminatory practices (e.g., redlining, unequal access to loans). These structural barriers have prevented Black communities from accumulating wealth at the same pace as Latinos or Asians.
• Additionally, Black Americans often face lower rates of homeownership and wage disparities, which severely limit wealth-building opportunities. The wealth gap is compounded by lower levels of intergenerational wealth transfers, which means Black families are starting at a disadvantage compared to Latino and Asian Americans.

3. Employment & Education:
• While Black Americans are making strides in educational attainment and career advancement, they are still disproportionately affected by unemployment and underemployment. Black professionals earn less than their white counterparts for the same work, and Black students face barriers in accessing higher education.
• The rise of the Black entrepreneurial sector is a positive sign, but the overall percentage of Black businesses remains much lower than that of Latinos and Asians. Black Americans are also less likely to have access to generational wealth, making it harder to invest in education, real estate, or businesses.

Conclusion:
bright, with steady increases in income, wealth, and economic contributions. Rising homeownership rates, educational attainment, and entrepreneurial activity are driving this growth. Their critical role in the U.S. labor force and growing purchasing power solidify their position as a cornerstone of the economy. If these trends continue, Latinos will likely see significant wealth gains over the next few decades.
• Asian Americans: Asian Americans are the highest earners among all racial groups in the U.S., with substantial wealth accumulation fueled by high educational attainment, tech industry dominance, and successful entrepreneurship. While disparities exist within Asian communities, overall, their financial trajectory is upward, and they are set to continue leading in wealth accumulation and innovation.
• Black Americans: Despite some progress, Black Americans are at a disadvantage compared to Latinos and Asians. The racial wealth gap persists, and projections of median Black household wealth potentially reaching zero by 2053 highlight the urgency of systemic reform. Historical barriers, lower homeownership rates, and employment disparities continue to impede wealth growth. Without significant policy interventions or structural changes, Black Americans may struggle to achieve financial parity

I see you've copied from an article again... Please, i will tell you again, read carefully what you just wrote, and read about the systemic issues you just wrote, and that you're clearly trying to put as a bypass option; becauss it seems you always contradict yourself without ever realising it.

And nowhere in the article you just copied did it same Black wealth was diminishing, it just says it's not increasing as much as the Latino nor Asian community🤦🤦🤦.

Derekmiles:
I see you've copied from an article again... Please, i will tell you again, read carefully what you just wrote, and read about the systemic issues you just wrote, and that you're clearly trying to put as a bypass option; becauss it seems you always contradict yourself without ever realising it.

And nowhere in the article you just copied did it same Black wealth was diminishing, it just says it's not increasing as much as the Latino nor Asian community🤦🤦🤦.

I won’t stop saying this
‘Based on the data and trends, Black wealth in the United States is getting worse relative to other racial groups, even if there have been some recent nominal gains’

Reasons for black wealth diminishing.

Racial Wealth Gap: Despite overall increases in median wealth, the disparity between Black and White households has widened, with the gap reaching $240,120 between the median White and Black households. 
• Projected Decline in Black Wealth: If current trends persist, median Black household wealth is on track to hit zero by 2053, exacerbating economic inequalities. 
• Lower Inheritance and Homeownership Rates: Historical discrimination in housing policies has led to lower homeownership rates and smaller inheritances for Black families, hindering wealth accumulation across generations.

It’s hilarious that to you the article I posted about blacks reaching zero wealth is propaganda. That projection that Black median household wealth could reach zero by 2053 originates from the 2017 report “The Road to Zero Wealth,” published by Prosperity Now and the Institute for Policy Studies. This analysis is grounded in data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, examining wealth trends from 1983 to 2013.’ The report highlights systemic issues such as discriminatory housing policies, wage disparities, and limited access to financial resources as contributing factors to the racial wealth gap. While some critics may view the projection as alarmist, it is based on historical data and current trends, underscoring the urgency for policy interventions to address economic disparities’
But please continue ignoring what analysts have said. You haven’t given a suitable argument that debunks it. You can’t just look at black wealth growing. It’s their growing debt that will make them broker by 2053 😂

Derekmiles:
😂😂😂... No you didn't you idiot... You never onced proved that Black Wealth was deminishing, if anything, like i said before, it's grown since that 2017.

Nobody said "don't acknowledge the other forms of discrimination", nobody said that, struggles are not meant to be diminished, but at the same time, all struggles are not equal... You've been using the systemic issues Asians and Latinos faced as a comparative quantification to vilify the Black American community from the onset, this is something you've constantly done in your comments, and now you want track back.

Bro, perspectives exists for a reason, you're an actual fool if you don't realise that, you want to compare their wealth difference, but don't want to compare the differences of their systemic issues, do you see were your biases lie, one can't work without the other... The same groups you're comparing to the Black community since the very onset were actively favoured more than the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement in their communities, and you still have the guts to talk about differences in Systemic discrimination... When a minority that is facing some discrimination, is still being favoured over you in your own community, you're literally at the bottom of the barrel, there is no other explanation for that; you are literally f*cked beyond explanation; so your take since the very onset of this conversation is still extremely bad, and very bias driven.

Please don't put the Anti-Asian immigration act when talking about the U.S racial history in the same sentence as the discrimination of the Black community... The Anti-Asian immigration act didn't give Asian communities no hope whatsoever because they still had their individual countries to rely on, they weren't even in the U.S, the act was a immigration policy to stop immigration of Asians, with the Asians already in their country; Black communities were being completely discriminated in their own country, their only option was to take it, and fight until it gets better, they are not even in the same league of discrimination.

Since we've been talking:
* You've disrespected the Black American history.
* Askewed the U.S racial history.
* Tried to claim that other minority groups did just as much as the Black community in the Civil Rights Movement, that was so degrading and disrespectful, i won't even bother with that.
* Use other minorities to vilify the Black American community, while setting the systemic issues by the wayside, you want to talk about wealth but don't want those factors to be talked about😂😂😂.
* What others; and Oh, try to make India more than what it is... Yea, that's why their population are the majorly finding ways to leave the country, be it legally or illegally.

All i can say is kudos, you really are delusional about the World we live in.

All you’ve done is
1. Hype up Nigeria and underrate india. I never said India was a utopia but it has far better prospects. I can’t wait for Nigeria to break up in a couple years time and India is still flourishing. Deep down, you know that Nigeria is nowhere near the level of India. A country that doesn’t even have basic amenities like good roads, stable power, rule of law etc is what you’re comparing to India? You’re a fool. You’re the one that is clueless about this world.

2. Not acknowledge the failure of black Americans especially relative to others.

3. Behaved like a typical FBA clown.
Here’s a more concise and humanized response:

1. “No you didn’t, you idiot… You never once proved that Black wealth was diminishing. If anything, like I said before, it’s grown since 2017.”

It’s true that Black wealth has grown in absolute terms, but the wealth gap between Black and White households has widened. Wealth inequality isn’t just about growth; it’s about how opportunities and resources are distributed. Ignoring that bigger picture oversimplifies the issue.

2. “Nobody said ‘don’t acknowledge the other forms of discrimination,’ nobody said that. Struggles are not meant to be diminished, but at the same time, all struggles are not equal…”

Struggles are different, not necessarily “unequal.” Black Americans faced a unique legacy of slavery and systemic exclusion, but other communities, like Asians and Latinos, also faced severe barriers. Their experiences differ, but comparing doesn’t mean diminishing.

3. “You’ve been using the systemic issues Asians and Latinos faced as a comparative quantification to vilify the Black American community from the onset…”

No one is vilifying the Black community. Bringing up other groups’ struggles is about understanding how racism and systemic barriers affect everyone differently, not about undermining Black history or achievements.

4. “You want to compare their wealth difference but don’t want to compare the differences of their systemic issues…”

Fair point—wealth disparities can’t be separated from systemic issues. For example, redlining hurt Black Americans’ ability to build wealth, just as immigration bans limited opportunities for Asian families. Both systems shaped today’s inequalities in different ways.

5. “The same groups you’re comparing to the Black community since the very onset were actively favored more than the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement.”

This oversimplifies things. Some groups benefited from post-1965 policies, like skilled visas for Asians, but they still faced racism and exclusion. Saying they were “favored” ignores the nuanced ways systemic barriers hit all minorities differently.

6. “Please don’t put the Anti-Asian Immigration Act when talking about U.S racial history in the same sentence as the discrimination of the Black community…”

These issues are different, but they’re part of the same system of racial injustice. Black Americans were citizens facing systemic exclusion, while Asians were barred from even entering. Both are vital pieces of U.S. racial history.

7. “Since we’ve been talking: You’ve disrespected Black American history…”

That’s not the intention. Discussing other groups’ struggles doesn’t mean disrespecting Black history—it means showing how deep and pervasive racism is across all communities. Everyone’s story matters.

This isn’t about ranking struggles; it’s about recognizing the different ways systemic racism impacts people and understanding those nuances to fight for real change.

Sladem05:
No, black societies ALWAYS FAIL. They are violent, poor, barbaric. They don’t function. Look at what happened to South Africa when blacks took over. What a failed race.

So i was not going to bother because i was getting bored, and then i saw this... Now it's starting to making sense, are you self-hating?, because there are telltale signs of that here; Example, your use of the term "They", it denotes dissociation of yourself as a Black man, which tells me you're either a Nigerian diaspora that has been away from Nigeria for a very long time, or a staunch secessionist Nigerian... But in any case, it tells a story of being blinded by delusioned Black rhetorics partly from your biases, maybe due to the movement you so wish to happen not happening how you want, which brings me back to the secessionism; so i will take it that you're most likely Igbo.

If the tribe is correct, it may also tell me how you were fast to defend Nigerians when i talked about countries where Nigerians are not really seen in a good light.

"Look at what happened to South Africa when Blacks Took Over"... Huh, well, South Africa under Apartheid was what?, Good?... The way you talk sometimes, or maybe it's the way you fix your comment; it just feels like you're a Black apologist or something, i don't want to use the "Uncle Tom" rhetoric, because i don't think you've gone that far yet, but you're getting there... Because look at the way you mentioned South Africa right, one who doesn't know about the White rule will think that it was this peaceful Nation with amazing equality for all, no disproportionate violent and barbaric discrimination, and were everyone lived happily with a big smile on their face.

I also noticed it when you talked about the KKK, the way you talked about them like this "Oh, they did this sh*t, but it's alright", and then, the way you talked about Black Nations now, it just went straight up damning... Also the way you've been portraying India way more than it actually is, while constantly putting the systemic issues by the wayside, but won't think twice to call that of Nigeria's, was also a sign.

And by the way, outside of Western Nations, which includes Western European countries, and the whole of Europe to some extent, the U.S, Australia, and New Zealand; some Asian Nations like Japan, South Korea, China, and some Middle Eastern Nations; i might be forgeting a few, but that's the general core group... Outside of those Nations anyway, no majority Non-Black Nation is doing particularly well. There are a lot of stable Nations, which you also have a lot in Africa by the way, but no one is doing particularly well, maybe except the few that like i said, i might be forgeting, oh, add Singapore to the list, i did forget that, though Singaporeans are always complaining about everything being too expensive, but that can be alluded to their heavy dependency of Importation.

And there are Black Nations doing very well, stop that self-hating cap, they are not many, but there are; The Bahamas is doing very well, quite a decent amount of Carribean Nations are doing decently actually, a few very well, some just alright.

Sladem05:
All you’ve done is
1. Hype up Nigeria and underrate india. I never said India was a utopia but it has far better prospects. I can’t wait for Nigeria to break up in a couple years time and India is still flourishing. Deep down, you know that Nigeria is nowhere near the level of India. A country that doesn’t even have basic amenities like good roads, stable power, rule of law etc is what you’re comparing to India? You’re a fool. You’re the one that is clueless about this world.

2. Not acknowledge the failure of black Americans especially relative to others.

3. Behaved like a typical FBA clown.
Here’s a more concise and humanized response:

1. “No you didn’t, you idiot… You never once proved that Black wealth was diminishing. If anything, like I said before, it’s grown since 2017.”

It’s true that Black wealth has grown in absolute terms, but the wealth gap between Black and White households has widened. Wealth inequality isn’t just about growth; it’s about how opportunities and resources are distributed. Ignoring that bigger picture oversimplifies the issue.

2. “Nobody said ‘don’t acknowledge the other forms of discrimination,’ nobody said that. Struggles are not meant to be diminished, but at the same time, all struggles are not equal…”

Struggles are different, not necessarily “unequal.” Black Americans faced a unique legacy of slavery and systemic exclusion, but other communities, like Asians and Latinos, also faced severe barriers. Their experiences differ, but comparing doesn’t mean diminishing.

3. “You’ve been using the systemic issues Asians and Latinos faced as a comparative quantification to vilify the Black American community from the onset…”

No one is vilifying the Black community. Bringing up other groups’ struggles is about understanding how racism and systemic barriers affect everyone differently, not about undermining Black history or achievements.

4. “You want to compare their wealth difference but don’t want to compare the differences of their systemic issues…”

Fair point—wealth disparities can’t be separated from systemic issues. For example, redlining hurt Black Americans’ ability to build wealth, just as immigration bans limited opportunities for Asian families. Both systems shaped today’s inequalities in different ways.

5. “The same groups you’re comparing to the Black community since the very onset were actively favored more than the Black community for a long time after the Civil Rights Movement.”

This oversimplifies things. Some groups benefited from post-1965 policies, like skilled visas for Asians, but they still faced racism and exclusion. Saying they were “favored” ignores the nuanced ways systemic barriers hit all minorities differently.

6. “Please don’t put the Anti-Asian Immigration Act when talking about U.S racial history in the same sentence as the discrimination of the Black community…”

These issues are different, but they’re part of the same system of racial injustice. Black Americans were citizens facing systemic exclusion, while Asians were barred from even entering. Both are vital pieces of U.S. racial history.

7. “Since we’ve been talking: You’ve disrespected Black American history…”

That’s not the intention. Discussing other groups’ struggles doesn’t mean disrespecting Black history—it means showing how deep and pervasive racism is across all communities. Everyone’s story matters.

This isn’t about ranking struggles; it’s about recognizing the different ways systemic racism impacts people and understanding those nuances to fight for real change.

"This oversimplifies things. Some groups benefited from post-1965 policies, like skilled visas for Asians, but they still faced racism and exclusion. Saying they were “favored” ignores the nuanced ways systemic barriers hit all minorities differently"

Bro, it doesn't oversimplifies things, stop using that word, it's just a word you keep using to dilute disparities... They were literally favoured, i literally sent an article talking about this favouritism, even screenshoted it, but yet, you try skimming it... Someone is being favoured more than you in your own neighborhood is not oversimplification, it's just facts.

Did the meaning of favouritism change in the dictionary?.

1)😂😂😂, i never even once hyped up Nigeria, in fact, i may actually hate this country more than you... I just know when to be mutually objectively about things, and bring in perspectives; i never once said Nigeria was better than India, in fact, i have constantly even with my talk about India keep on saying that "they're still doing way better than us though".... My perspective is that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to; they have secessionist issues just like Nigeria, it may not be as serious, but they're definitely there, i've watched Punjabis still talking about the issues to this day; they have deep cultural and ethnic issues that's a serious detriment to them, just like Nigeria... I never said Nigeria was better than India, i said India is systemically more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to... Even their GDP per capita is way closer to us than it is to the UK.

The way you've been hyping up India even comparing it to The UK originally, India is not that country dude, a lot of people fleeing from a country be it legally or illegally is nothing to be proud about, or twist to say "It's globalisation that is favouring them"... Nobody flees en masse from a good working country, who the f*ck does that; look at the newsline the other day of thousands of Indians illegally trying to migrate from Canada into the U.S through the border; they're ready to flee and restart their lives in the U.S, but aren't ready to do that in India, and you want me to start only looking at raw numbers like you?.... Bro, the world is way more complex than statistics.

This are the same Indians you talk about👇

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q767jgyJK3U?si=bdx3n-bEY_zEMYNL

This is the Study fraud Indians do in other countries just to get a Visa that i was telling you the other day, and yet, you want me to believe just raw numbers?🤦🤦👇
https://youtube.com/shorts/gvVsLdsd0SQ?si=jaJhyqJan36k2LRc

This is another News video talking about the Study fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssmXZHpI3Oo?si=ja94_I3zGc-wLyUO

This is the India you want to talk about, 5000 illegals in just a month, and that's just from the Canadian side👇... Like i continue asking you, who flees en masse from a stable working country?; and not even legally, illegally for crying out loud... Do you know how desperate thousands of people have to be to do that in the space of a month?. Yes, people migrate from stable working countries, but hardly anybody is that desperate to migrate from stable working countries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7vzY15WZqo?si=LLVnAJjaVFd7juVb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ry7cqdTZYM?si=etMuDZYPYBLLIAz8

These are Indians doing a Nigerian, and illegally entering the UK, the same UK you tried comparing them with🤦🤦... No UK citizen will do this rubbish to migrate to India, but you want to compare them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsEjc6Jpu0o?si=8Ys5hyk5IXRJYVWY

Millions of Indians are literally ready to give up their Citizenship, but oh, to you, the country is stable and doing well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov1iw61L1Dk?si=KTcEtmtd4euidNRq

The similarities are so uncanny that you have to be really biased to not see it👇... Still, i'm not comparing India to Nigeria, i'm saying that they're more similar to us than they are to the UK you tried comparing them to; these are just a few issues, and the similarities are already so uncanny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V7ek5nExSY?si=_EwbUkwPp-e37jsx

This is the India you want to hype up for me, someone who has done a deep dive on that country, someone who has friends from their neighbours, and get bombarded with news constantly about India this, or India that... When i said India is a shithole, i never said it wasn't doing better than Nigeria, i've always butress that they're doing way better than Nigeria, but doing better than Nigeria doesn't mean that it still isn't a SHITHOLE... Like i said, you're speaking to the wrong crowd on the India topic.

This is the reason why i said i'm tired of the conversation with you, you don't understand how to bring perspective into things, systemic issues are basically a non-issue to you, it's raw numbers this, raw numbers that, if only humans and human societies were that simple, we would all be living amazingly... You don't even realise that humans are more complex based off the systemic issues than the various statistics you keep bringing up.

Derekmiles:
"This oversimplifies things. Some groups benefited from post-1965 policies, like skilled visas for Asians, but they still faced racism and exclusion. Saying they were “favored” ignores the nuanced ways systemic barriers hit all minorities differently"

Bro, it doesn't oversimplifies things, stop using that word, it's just a word you keep using to dilute disparities... They were literally favoured, i literally sent an article talking about this favouritism, even screenshoted it, but yet, you try skimming it... Someone is being favoured more than you in your own neighborhood is not oversimplification, it's just facts.

Did the meaning of favouritism change in the dictionary?.

1)😂😂😂, i never even once hyped up Nigeria, in fact, i may actually hate this country more than you... I just know when to be mutually objectively about things, and bring in perspectives; i never once said Nigeria was better than India, in fact, i have constantly even with my talk about India keep on saying that "they're still doing way better than us though".... My perspective is that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to; they have secessionist issues just like Nigeria, it may not be as serious, but they're definitely there, i've watched Punjabis still talking about the issues to this day; they have deep cultural and ethnic issues that's a serious detriment to them, just like Nigeria... I never said Nigeria was better than India, i said India is systemically more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to... Even their GDP per capita is way closer to us than it is to the UK.

The way you've been hyping up India even comparing it to The UK originally, India is not that country dude, a lot of people fleeing from a country be it legally or illegally is nothing to be proud about, or twist to say "It's globalisation that is favouring them"... Nobody flees en masse from a good working country, who the f*ck does that; look at the newsline the other day of thousands of Indians illegally trying to migrate from Canada into the U.S through the border; they're ready to flee and restart their lives in the U.S, but aren't ready to do that in India, and you want me to start only looking at raw numbers like you?.... Bro, the world is way more complex than statistics.

This are the same Indians you talk about👇

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q767jgyJK3U?si=bdx3n-bEY_zEMYNL

This is the Study fraud Indians do in other countries just to get a Visa that i was telling you the other day, and yet, you want me to believe just raw numbers?🤦🤦👇
https://youtube.com/shorts/gvVsLdsd0SQ?si=jaJhyqJan36k2LRc

This is another News video talking about the Study fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssmXZHpI3Oo?si=ja94_I3zGc-wLyUO

This is the India you want to talk about, 5000 illegals in just a month, and that's just from the Canadian side👇... Like i continue asking you, who flees en masse from a stable working country?; and not even legally, illegally for crying out loud... Do you know how desperate thousands of people have to be to do that in the space of a month?. Yes, people migrate from stable working countries, but hardly anybody is that desperate to migrate from stable working countries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7vzY15WZqo?si=LLVnAJjaVFd7juVb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ry7cqdTZYM?si=etMuDZYPYBLLIAz8

These are Indians doing a Nigerian, and illegally entering the UK, the same UK you tried comparing them with🤦🤦... No UK citizen will do this rubbish to migrate to India, but you want to compare them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsEjc6Jpu0o?si=8Ys5hyk5IXRJYVWY

Millions of Indians are literally ready to give up their Citizenship, but oh, to you, the country is stable and doing well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov1iw61L1Dk?si=KTcEtmtd4euidNRq

The similarities are so uncanny that you have to be really biased to not see it👇... Still, i'm not comparing India to Nigeria, i'm saying that they're more similar to us than they are to the UK you tried comparing them to; these are just a few issues, and the similarities are already so uncanny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V7ek5nExSY?si=_EwbUkwPp-e37jsx

This is the India you want to hype up for me, someone who has done a deep dive on that country, someone who has friends from their neighbours, and get bombarded with news constantly about India this, or India that... When i said India is a shithole, i never said it wasn't doing better than Nigeria, i've always butress that they're doing way better than Nigeria, but doing better than Nigeria doesn't mean that it still isn't a SHITHOLE... Like i said, you're speaking to the wrong crowd on the India topic.

This is the reason why i said i'm tired of the conversation with you, you don't understand how to bring perspective into things, systemic issues are basically a non-issue to you, it's raw numbers this, raw numbers that, if only humans and human societies were that simple, we would all be living amazingly... You don't even realise that humans are more complex based off the systemic issues than the various statistics you keep bringing up.

Here is a list of the top 30 countries with the highest net migration rates (migrants per 1,000 population):
1. Ukraine: 36.5
2. South Sudan: 19.1
3. Venezuela: 13.2
4. British Virgin Islands: 12.9
5. Equatorial Guinea: 12.3
6. Cayman Islands: 11.4
7. Luxembourg: 10.9
8. Monaco: 10.5
9. Anguilla: 10.5
10. Turks and Caicos Islands: 8.4
11. Aruba: 8.1
12. Ireland: 6.8
13. Burundi: 6.8
14. Cyprus: 6.7
15. Australia: 6.4
16. Saudi Arabia: 6.1
17. Switzerland: 6.0
18. San Marino: 5.9
19. Sint Maarten: 5.8
20. Canada: 5.4
21. Malta: 5.0
22. New Zealand: 4.8
23. Liechtenstein: 4.8
24. Isle of Man: 4.5
25. Djibouti: 4.4
26. Spain: 4.2
27. Singapore: 4.2
28. Belgium: 4.2
29. Netherlands: 4.1
30. Norway: 3.8
You just want to exaggerate how bad India is. It doesn’t even have anywhere near the highest net migration rate.

Sladem05:
Here is a list of the top 30 countries with the highest net migration rates (migrants per 1,000 population):
1. Ukraine: 36.5
2. South Sudan: 19.1
3. Venezuela: 13.2
4. British Virgin Islands: 12.9
5. Equatorial Guinea: 12.3
6. Cayman Islands: 11.4
7. Luxembourg: 10.9
8. Monaco: 10.5
9. Anguilla: 10.5
10. Turks and Caicos Islands: 8.4
11. Aruba: 8.1
12. Ireland: 6.8
13. Burundi: 6.8
14. Cyprus: 6.7
15. Australia: 6.4
16. Saudi Arabia: 6.1
17. Switzerland: 6.0
18. San Marino: 5.9
19. Sint Maarten: 5.8
20. Canada: 5.4
21. Malta: 5.0
22. New Zealand: 4.8
23. Liechtenstein: 4.8
24. Isle of Man: 4.5
25. Djibouti: 4.4
26. Spain: 4.2
27. Singapore: 4.2
28. Belgium: 4.2
29. Netherlands: 4.1
30. Norway: 3.8
You just want to exaggerate how bad India is. It doesn’t even have anywhere near the highest net migration rate.

Well, you just shut yourself on the foot, this is the meaning of net migration👇... Now i've comfirmed that you're just a "follow the raw figures" guys, or follow the crowd as they say, and you don't even know what you talk about.

Now why a Nation like South Sudan will have a ratio of 19.1 this year, i don't f*cking know; but then again, it's kinda understandable, a lot of South Sudanese don't leave South Sudan, and there are a lot of Sudanese taking refuge due to the issue in Sudan, so that could be it... The way i just thought about that right now is something you will never think in your life, because to you, Raw figures are the supreme ultimate.

India has a Net migration of -0.3, Nigeria is at a -0.2... India has statistically (let me go with your statistics), a higher net rating of People leaving the country compared to people migrating into the country, there are more people ler ratio trying to migrate to Nigeria than there are trying to migrate to India.

Like i told you before, nobody is desperate enough to flee emasse from a Stable working Nation through any means possible, especially Illegally, to the point of even Millions of people saying they're ready to relinquish their Citizenship just to migrate to a Developed country.

Derekmiles:
Well, you just shut yourself on the foot, this is the meaning of net migration... Now i've comfirmed that you're just a "follow the raw figures" guys, or follow the crowd as they say, and you don't even know what you talk about.

Now why a Nation like South Sudan will have a ratio of 19.1 this year, i don't f*cking know; but then again, it's kinda understandable, a lot of South Sudanese don't leave South Sudan, and there are a lot of Sudanese taking refuge due to the issue in Sudan, so that could be it... The way i just thought about that right now is something you will never think in your life, because to you, Raw figures are the supreme ultimate.

India has a Net migration of -0.3, Nigeria is at a -0.2... India has statistically (let me go with your statistics), a higher net rating of People leaving the country compared to people migrating into the country, there are more people ler ratio trying to migrate to Nigeria
than there are trying to migrate to India.

Indians are more welcomed overseas than Nigerians and they will obviously have more people in raw numbers leaving than Nigeria. Per capita they would be slightly higher means nothing. I just had to debunk your argument that Indians are fleeing where else per capita wise they are actually not fleeing as much as you’re making it out to be.
I argue with empirical information, you argue with anecdotal BS.

And immigrating to another country is not inherently bad. I told you think like an FBA. You think everyone is a tether 😂

Sladem05:
Indians are more welcomed overseas than Nigerians and they will obviously have more people in raw numbers leaving than Nigeria. Per capita they would be slightly higher means nothing. I just had to debunk your argument that Indians are fleeing where else per capita wise they are actually not fleeing as much as you’re making it out to be.
I argue with empirical information, you argue with anecdotal BS.

And immigrating to another country is not inherently bad. I told you think like an FBA. You think everyone is a tether 😂

"I just had to debunk your argument that Indians are fleeing where else per capita wise they are actually not fleeing as much as you’re making it out to be".

Bro, you are an actual fool who can't accept when he's wrong... You brought in statistics that you didn't even know the meaning of... I know you actually thought that net migration of 19.5 means people are leaving the country a lot when it's the actual opposite😂😂😂.

India has a higher immigration rate to other countries at -0.3 compared to Nigeria. You don't even know the stats. you brought out😂😂😂.

Nigeria has a lower net migration rate than India at -0.2, that is really telling bro, and hardly anyone migrates to Nigeria... That means even Nigerians are not that desperate to leave Nigeria as much as Indians are to leave India😂😂😂, and even Nigerians are fleeing en masse😂😂😂, but still not up to the almighty Indians😂😂😂.

I swear to God, this dude brought out a stats. that he can't read, you literally brought out a stat. that you can't read, this is really shocking, the stats. dude can't read his own stats😂😂😂... And sh*t the f*ck up talking about empirical evidence, you've been saying bullshit ever since, this was just the icing on the cake. Ignorant idiot😂😂😂.

Derekmiles:
"This oversimplifies things. Some groups benefited from post-1965 policies, like skilled visas for Asians, but they still faced racism and exclusion. Saying they were “favored” ignores the nuanced ways systemic barriers hit all minorities differently"

Bro, it doesn't oversimplifies things, stop using that word, it's just a word you keep using to dilute disparities... They were literally favoured, i literally sent an article talking about this favouritism, even screenshoted it, but yet, you try skimming it... Someone is being favoured more than you in your own neighborhood is not oversimplification, it's just facts.

Did the meaning of favouritism change in the dictionary?.

1)😂😂😂, i never even once hyped up Nigeria, in fact, i may actually hate this country more than you... I just know when to be mutually objectively about things, and bring in perspectives; i never once said Nigeria was better than India, in fact, i have constantly even with my talk about India keep on saying that "they're still doing way better than us though".... My perspective is that India is more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to; they have secessionist issues just like Nigeria, it may not be as serious, but they're definitely there, i've watched Punjabis still talking about the issues to this day; they have deep cultural and ethnic issues that's a serious detriment to them, just like Nigeria... I never said Nigeria was better than India, i said India is systemically more similar to Nigeria than it is to the UK you tried comparing it to... Even their GDP per capita is way closer to us than it is to the UK.

The way you've been hyping up India even comparing it to The UK originally, India is not that country dude, a lot of people fleeing from a country be it legally or illegally is nothing to be proud about, or twist to say "It's globalisation that is favouring them"... Nobody flees en masse from a good working country, who the f*ck does that; look at the newsline the other day of thousands of Indians illegally trying to migrate from Canada into the U.S through the border; they're ready to flee and restart their lives in the U.S, but aren't ready to do that in India, and you want me to start only looking at raw numbers like you?.... Bro, the world is way more complex than statistics.

This are the same Indians you talk about👇

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q767jgyJK3U?si=bdx3n-bEY_zEMYNL

This is the Study fraud Indians do in other countries just to get a Visa that i was telling you the other day, and yet, you want me to believe just raw numbers?🤦🤦👇
https://youtube.com/shorts/gvVsLdsd0SQ?si=jaJhyqJan36k2LRc

This is another News video talking about the Study fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssmXZHpI3Oo?si=ja94_I3zGc-wLyUO

This is the India you want to talk about, 5000 illegals in just a month, and that's just from the Canadian side👇... Like i continue asking you, who flees en masse from a stable working country?; and not even legally, illegally for crying out loud... Do you know how desperate thousands of people have to be to do that in the space of a month?. Yes, people migrate from stable working countries, but hardly anybody is that desperate to migrate from stable working countries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7vzY15WZqo?si=LLVnAJjaVFd7juVb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ry7cqdTZYM?si=etMuDZYPYBLLIAz8

These are Indians doing a Nigerian, and illegally entering the UK, the same UK you tried comparing them with🤦🤦... No UK citizen will do this rubbish to migrate to India, but you want to compare them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsEjc6Jpu0o?si=8Ys5hyk5IXRJYVWY

Millions of Indians are literally ready to give up their Citizenship, but oh, to you, the country is stable and doing well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov1iw61L1Dk?si=KTcEtmtd4euidNRq

The similarities are so uncanny that you have to be really biased to not see it👇... Still, i'm not comparing India to Nigeria, i'm saying that they're more similar to us than they are to the UK you tried comparing them to; these are just a few issues, and the similarities are already so uncanny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V7ek5nExSY?si=_EwbUkwPp-e37jsx

This is the India you want to hype up for me, someone who has done a deep dive on that country, someone who has friends from their neighbours, and get bombarded with news constantly about India this, or India that... When i said India is a shithole, i never said it wasn't doing better than Nigeria, i've always butress that they're doing way better than Nigeria, but doing better than Nigeria doesn't mean that it still isn't a SHITHOLE... Like i said, you're speaking to the wrong crowd on the India topic.

This is the reason why i said i'm tired of the conversation with you, you don't understand how to bring perspective into things, systemic issues are basically a non-issue to you, it's raw numbers this, raw numbers that, if only humans and human societies were that simple, we would all be living amazingly... You don't even realise that humans are more complex based off the systemic issues than the various statistics you keep bringing up.

Statistics reveal to us as to how developed a country is. You can’t formulate an argument as to how developed. Country merely based on opinion. Development is objective you fool. You have to use statistics to find out how developed a country is.

Alright, here’s a more humanized and concise response to debunk the claims:

1. Favouritism in US Immigration
• Claim: Post-1965 US policies favored Asians, so it’s not “oversimplification” to call it favouritism.
• Debunk: Those policies were skills-based, not racially designed. Asians benefited because many came with the education and qualifications the system valued.
• It wasn’t “favoring Asians” so much as “favoring skills.” Other groups didn’t lose out because of race—it was about meeting criteria.
• Asians still faced racism and systemic barriers, so calling it outright favouritism ignores the struggles they dealt with after arriving.

2. India vs. Nigeria vs. the UK
• Claim: India is more like Nigeria than the UK due to secessionist issues, cultural divides, and GDP per capita.
• Debunk: On the surface, sure, India and Nigeria share some challenges. But the differences are huge:
• Economic Growth: India’s economy is booming and diverse (tech, manufacturing, pharma), while Nigeria is still heavily reliant on oil.
• Infrastructure: India’s railways, ports, and cities are far ahead of Nigeria. It’s messy, but it works.
• Global Role: India is a global power with growing influence, while Nigeria will never come close.

India has problems, but it’s on a completely different trajectory from Nigeria. Comparing it to the UK makes sense when you look at its economic potential and global influence. That’s why I compared the UK to India as both countries do have the same economic potential and India’s global influence is starting to rival the UK now. Obviously, it will take time for India to reach UK’s development levels but it will get there.

3. Migration Doesn’t Equal Dysfunction
• Claim: People don’t flee good countries. India’s migration shows dysfunction, not globalization.
• Debunk: Migration isn’t always about escaping bad situations. Indians often move for opportunity, like higher pay or education, not because they’re fleeing hardship.
• Legal Migration: India has the world’s largest diaspora, and most of it is legal. Skilled workers, students, and professionals dominate migration patterns.
• Illegal Migration: Yes, some migrate illegally, but it’s a small fraction. Nigerians, on the other hand, often migrate out of necessity, not opportunity.

The key difference: Indians migrate because they can, not because they must.

4. “The World is More Complex than Numbers”
• Claim: Stats oversimplify things; they don’t capture the full picture.
• Debunk: Sure, numbers don’t tell the whole story, but they’re reliable indicators. India’s rapid economic growth, thriving diaspora, and global influence aren’t just anecdotes—they’re backed by stats.

Ignoring data in favor of “perspective” often leads to cherry-picking. Both numbers and context matter.



India and Nigeria might share some struggles, but India’s growth, infrastructure, and global influence make it a completely different story. Migration from India is about opportunity, not dysfunction, and its trajectory puts it closer to countries like the UK than Nigeria. Stats may not tell the full story, but they don’t lie either.