felixomor:


Smh.
You now want to twist urself into deism?
In other words maybe Chineke exists and Oluwa doesnt...
See confusion

U guys r one funny lot.
Honestly

you need to pray to your god for the ability to understand simple posts

my post is clear enough Mr medic

I can't say Vishnu doesn't exist, I'm straight up agnostic to him

I'm however atheistic to the Abrahamic god

say a group of people gather and start worshipping a god they call shfysheufhdhsbff; I. can't start saying shfysheufhdhsbff doesn't exist

that's a position of arrogance

I'm done debating schematics abeg

4everGod:


Wrong! I suggest you huddle up with your buddies and thrash that out and also tell yourselves how philosophy comes into play over a simple word like unbelief or rejection of belief. Are those words not the root of atheism?

Regarding Christianity, its a lack of maturity that brings varied opinions but not so with atheism

The cause is irrelevant. The point is the variation in definition. You don't get to make excuses.

hopefulLandlord:


you need to pray to your god for the ability to understand simple posts

my post is clear enough Mr medic

I can't say Vishnu doesn't exist, I'm straight up agnostic to him

I'm however atheistic to the Abrahamic god

say a group of people gather and start worshipping a god they call shfysheufhdhsbff; I. can't start saying shfysheufhdhsbff doesn't exist

that's a position of arrogance

I'm done debating schematics abeg

U have clearly seen your lacuna

By the way here is oxford definition of atheist
Verbatim
I didnt change it

"..........A person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods. Eg.
‘he is a committed atheist’"

Adios

felixomor:


U have clearly seen your lacuna

By the way here is oxford definition of atheist
Verbatim
I didnt change it

"..........A person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods. Eg.
‘he is a committed atheist’"

Adios

but this doesn't hold for Christianity Amirite?

and this doesn't hold for other definitions of atheism in other dictionaries Amirite?

what about other definitions in other dictionaries that support our stand? it isn't valid Amirite?

tell me more about your confirmation bias

oh! adiós

hopefulLandlord:


but this doesn't hold for Christianity Amirite?

and this doesn't hold for other definitions of atheism in other dictionaries Amirite?

and your dictionary definition says "God" or "Gods"

which means a specific god or all gods, I hope you know what that means? let me break it cuz its you

it means one can be regarded as atheist based on one's stand on one specific "god"

tell me more about your inability to comprehend a definition you yourself and you brought

oh! adiós

I thought u said before that the definition was not "God/gods"

dalaman:


Which of the Gods proof is all around us out of the many different Gods?

The christain God.only him is the true God all others are fake.

felixomor:


I thought u said before that the definition was not "God/gods"

I already showed you that atheism's definition have changed over the years

already showed you that the word "God" is referring to a specific god

already showed you that even by the definition in the Bible one can say that a Hindu is an atheist because we know that "There is no God" is definitely referring to Yahweh and would've been "There are no gods"
if it were referring to all gods

this is why one simply need to go for the latest definition which takes it all into consideration by using the word "Deities"

its simple really

we can argue this schematics forever bring a dictionary definition that supports each of us while ignoring those that supports our opponent

in this day and age one has to simply assume atheism is lack of belief in deities; this cuts across all atheists with no exception

attempt to force atheism into something other than that and attacking it from there is simply pulling strawman except your atheist opponent tells you his specific stand

blueAgent:



The christain God.only him is the true God all others are fake.

and what's your proof of all others being fake? or you just assert it?

hopefulLandlord:


I already showed you that atheism's definition have changed over the years

already showed you that the word "God" is referring to a specific god

already showed you that even by the definition in the Bible one can say that a Hindu is an atheist because we know that "There is no God" is definitely referring to Yahweh and would've been "There are no gods"

this is why one simply need to go for the latest definition which takes it all into consideration by using the word "Deities"

its simple really

we can argue this schematics forever bring a dictionary definition that supports each of us while ignoring those that supports our opponent

in this day and age one has to simply assume atheism is lack of belief in deities; this cuts across all atheists with no exception

attempt to force atheism into something other than that and attacking it from there is simply pulling strawman except your atheist opponent tells you his specific stand

Very wrong.
People come and see o
That a hindu is an atheist to a Christian....
What is all this?
You see the twist u have put urself in

By the way there is no God according to bible means "no theos"
Which is also "a-theos"

Even if u say "deities" u can not be atheist and be indifferent to any deity.
Its simple english.

Either way you twist it....
Its goofy

felixomor:


Very wrong.
People come and see o
That a hindu is an atheist to a Christian....
What is all this?
You see the twist u have put urself in

you should've mentioned their names so they can see your folly

a Hindu is atheistic or agnostic to the Christian god

By the way there is no God according to bible means "no theos"
Which is also "a-theos"

Even if u say "deities" u can not be atheist and be indifferent to any deity.
Its simple english.

Either way you twist it....
Its goofy

nope, you're still referring to the narrow definition of atheism, same thing we've been referring to

I do not believe in any deity, simple; I take an agnostic position to their existence except the Abrahamic god

same way you disagree with definition of Christianity as shown in the dictionary

oga medic don't wear me down with this thing

hopefulLandlord:

It is obvious you have seen that atheism holds no logic
Hence your bending its definitions to make your own brand.

felixomor:


It is obvious you have seen that atheism holds no logic
Hence your bending its definitions to make your own brand.

nope, I've seen Christianity has no logic

its you that's been running upandan trying to force atheism into one and only definition you have because it would be almost impossible for you to argue against otherwise

I know that feeling

I don't hold believe in any god, I'm agnostic when it comes to their existence except the Abrahamic god

what does that make me?

what does that make Christopher Hitchens?

what does that make Rich Dawkins?

what does that make Jonbellion?

hopefulLandlord:


its you that's been running upandan trying to force atheism into one and only definition you have because it would be almost impossible for you to argue against otherwise

I know that feeling

I don't hold believe in any god, I'm agnostic when it comes to their existence except the Abrahamic god

what does that make me?

You r no atheist.
Just a hater of Christianity.
Nothing more.
I shouldnt even be debating existence of God with you.

felixomor:


You r no atheist.
Just a hater of Christianity.
Nothing more.
I shouldnt even be debating existence of God with you.

Hahahahahahahahaha

easy on the tinfoil hat

saying Abrahamic god doesn't exist means I'm a hater of Christianity? I hope you know that Abrahamic god is not restricted to Christianity


NB: you're free not to debate anything with me; I've learnt nothing from our debates except the first week or two we debated together; not gonna miss you cuz there are other more intelligent people I am debating with

randomperson:

So if rejection of belief is a belief, why do dictionaries make that distinction?

Dictionaries do not form English Grammar for you do they? They only offer definition. Education should be applied before such a definition would make sense when you apply it in Language.

If you say you have a disbelief or a rejection of belief that means you have reasons why you hold such rejection of beliefs. THOSE REASONS HAVE BECOME YOUR BELIEF. Do you get it now?

frank317:


Lol... All this long talk for a supposed Creator of the whole world

[b]Your God idea is a joke... Just face it, your God does not exist

Yet you dwell on this nonexistent God all day every day. The Joke is actually on you.

hopefulLandlord:


you were never a Christian, you were just a church goer

Brouhahahahahahaha

blueAgent:




The christain God.only him is the true God all others are fake.

Wetin you talk?

4everGod:


Dictionaries do not form English Grammar for you do they? They only offer definition. Education should be applied before such a definition would make sense when you apply it in Language.

If you say you have a disbelief or a rejection of belief that means you have reasons why you hold such rejection of beliefs. THOSE REASONS HAVE BECOME YOUR BELIEF. Do you get it now?

You are just beating about the bush here.... Why does the dictionary make the distinction.

felixomor:

Great question. Or better still ask him: between chicken and egg, which one evolved first?

It has been resolved. It was the chicken.

SirWere:

It has been resolved. It was the chicken.

Male or female?

felixomor:

Male or female?

Really

SirWere:



Really

U r hooked
Maybe transgender....

.

felixomor:

U r hooked Maybe transgender....

Sometimes I wonder who made you like this.

SirWere:




Sometimes I wonder who made you like this.

Quiet abeg.
If u cant answer.
Stop deceiving urself

felixomor:


Quiet abeg.
If u cant answer.
Stop deceiving urself

What's up "Doctor"?

dalaman:


What's up "Doctor"?

Good morning
U slept well?

felixomor:


Good morning
U slept well?

. I did.

dalaman:


. I did.

Praise God

felixomor:


U r hooked
Maybe transgender....

hahahaha hydra headed answer. The chicken was a female like male chicken which did not really have both sex organs but evolved the female organs after the sperm cell evolved an egg and fertilized it by itself and then very quickly the chicken evolved female reproductive organs which trapped the egg and incubated it for the period needed and then the chick hatched and came out a rooster.

lmao

scientific stories can amaze one.

4everGod:



hahahaha hydra headed answer. The chicken was a female like male chicken which did not really have both sex organs but evolved the female organs after the sperm cell evolved an egg and fertilized it by itself and then very quickly the chicken evolved female reproductive organs which trapped the egg and incubated it for the period needed and then the chick hatched and came out a rooster.

lmao

scientific stories can amaze one.

LoLz
I am telling u.....
They dont even put into consideration that for any animal to even have any attribute, that attribute must be coded in either the male or female Chromosomes.....

So many lies...