₦airaland Forum

MissWrite:
Lol, and you are kind to say so.

WORDWORLD:
I was actually expecting someone to prove their good education by asking such an intelligent question. My dear, in the 60's U.S.A, the United States of America underwent change both in it's moral and political structure to fit certain articles of faith in the system called DEMOCRACY which governs that country. These articles of faith which are but illusions, FREEDOM and EQUALITY sprang up lots of movements fighting for rights, in the 60s because for the very first time America's system of governance was becoming functional by its defination after the 2nd World war. Blacks such as Martin Lurther King, MalcomX and even noble White folks who believe in JUSTICE and COMPASSION for fellow human being irrespective of skin color fought along side against oppression and racial prejudice by Whites. Other activism in the 60s was LESBIANISM which is the core of our discussion. "LESBIANISM" she wrote (Ruth Rosen) "is one road to freedom from oppression of men". Do you get the gist now why on an HOLISTIC PERSPECTIVE contrary to the popular representation of LESBIANISM as a sexuality, it is also a POLITICAL MOVEMENT to fight the oppression of men. IN ORDER WORDS ALL FEMINIST ARE LESBIANS. This is an holistic perspective and not the partial one that is indoctrinated today that lesbianism it is all about sexuality. If you want to know more read the book authored by Ruth Rosen titled: THE WORLD SPLIT OPEN. HOW THE MODERN WOMEN'S MOVEMENT CHANGED AMERICA. So on that bases as Lesbianism is defined the ideology called Feminism fits perfectly even though an inconsistent fantasy. My dear there is no argueing the fact that with every 'progress' this radical women movement makes, that partial defination of Lesbianism which is akin to sexuality gets a boost because it is meant to accomodate women loving women and for sexual gratification too. Kindly do a little research on a major homophile organisation known as THE DAUGHTERS OF BILITIS. I hope I am clear based on an holistic perspective. Thank you for your wonderful question.

greiboy:
lol

omg

You have no idea of what you are talking about

Let me educate you and relieve your mind of ignorance

feelings of trust or affection felt in many cases of kidnapping or hostage-taking by a victim towards a captor[/b]


Stockholm syndrome arises when strong emotional is develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other. ref Wikipedia

I am sure you saw harassment and beating etc in the illustrations of Stockholm syndrome
right

Violence

A behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

can you see how you don't know words you just throw around


2) You just type words at random, don't you ?

What the hell did I suggest empathy was love?

I said you have made your idea golden because you made reference to Stockholm syndrome with regards to ladies that don't support your views on feminism Do you even read what you type at tall or do you plagiarize it from somewhere

3) please educate me on measures of central tendencies or averages, how does it relate to your illustrations?

Do you know I studied economics like the back of my mind

You mean mean, media and mode, variance and standard deviation


How does that relate to op's assertion or intention. Or are anything you are talking about? Do you mean measurement of dispersion i.e. correlation?

or Probability that an event occurred?

Your measurement and illustrations makes no sense whatsoever

All tom like sports ?

I guess you are probably talking about probability




You are simply typing gibberish here, I am sorry to say

Olodo, this is how people fail. So you are told to research a subject matter and you go to Wikipedia, lmao.


"Academics discredit the website for several reasons: articles can be written by anyone, not necessarily a world expert;... Vandalism is also common. There are numerous examples of politicians and public figures amending articles about themselves to erase unfavourable material. Wikipedia's own incomplete list of hoaxes makes interesting and comical reading (I particularly appreciated the fictitious "Township of Asstree, Tennessee"."

That's what The Guardian newspaper had to say.

Now back to our discussion, here is what a clinical pysochologist, not some random writer had to say on the subject matter.

.. "[i]But the underlying principles of how it works can be related to different situations, say some psychologists.

"A classic example is domestic violence, when someone - typically a woman - has a sense of dependency on her partner and stays with him," says psychologist Jennifer Wild, a consultant clinical psychologist at the University of Oxford.

"She might feel empathy rather than anger. Child abuse is another one - when parents emotionally or physically abuse their children, but the child is protective towards them and either doesn't speak about it or lies about it."

donstan18:
Good piece, once again.

If I may ask ma'am, are successful women such as Ikeji and Adichie affected by these claimed injustices of yours?

shaybebaby:
They succeeded despite the injustices. What we want is for their success to be common place.

Linda is no less successful on a personal level because she is unmarried. Chimamanda is no more successful on the basis of her marital status. But should be judged on the value they bring and they do so brilliantly.

The stay at home(that decided to on her own) mum too brings value. All representing women on different roles, all equally laudable in their own ways. Most important though is choice. To be free choose and not shamed for it. To not encounter barriers because it goes against the grain of what society expects.

The same goes for the male folks.

donstan18:
Cool, good point.....Don't see it that I'm asking alot, I need to be cleared from a view of a woman.

These injustices you scribbled aren't gender biased, it's a 50-50 gender thing, no man or woman will be completely seen as a successful fellow if not married.

I need a profound highlights of women's rights that are being deprived in our society, if you don't mind

shaybebaby:
Nairaland is your playground, go to the crime section.

shaybebaby:
Olodo, this is how people fail. So you are told to research a subject matter and you go to Wikipedia, lmao.


"Academics discredit the website for several reasons: articles can be written by anyone, not necessarily a world expert;... Vandalism is also common. There are numerous examples of politicians and public figures amending articles about themselves to erase unfavourable material. Wikipedia's own incomplete list of hoaxes makes interesting and comical reading (I particularly appreciated the fictitious "Township of Asstree, Tennessee"."

That's what The Guardian newspaper had to say.

Now back to our discussion, here is what a clinical pysochologist, not some random writer had to say on the subject matter.

.. "But the underlying principles of how it works can be related to different situations, say some psychologists.

"A classic example is domestic violence, when someone - typically a woman - has a sense of dependency on her partner and stays with him," says psychologist Jennifer Wild, a consultant clinical psychologist at the University of Oxford.

"She might feel empathy rather than anger. Child abuse is another one - when parents emotionally or physically abuse their children, but the child is protective towards them and either doesn't speak about it or lies about it."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22447726

Note that emotional abuse is included which is NOT physical.


No, I am not talking about probability but even if I were, there would have to the the possibility of more than one outcome but you stated for a fact that you knew her motives. Pray tell, how did you make that inference statistically. Besides we talking quantitative analysis doofus!

Correlation is a measure of dispersion? You need to ask for a refund from where ever you studied.

As to the part you consider gibberish, that's hardly surprising now isn't it. It would be more astonishing if you understood.

greiboy:
So what is your point? what is the major difference between violence and emotional abuse? Isn't violence also known as physical abuse ? you mean abuse and violence are in two different universe ? isn't it meant to hurt the victims?

Even the most reputable scholars do go to Wikipedia to get a general knowledge of a subject of discussion, you aren't the first person to know Wikipedia could be edited by anyone, but I guess your tinny brain should have told you that no one will go to Wikipedia to edit that type information.


It is clear you have no idea of what you are talking about

I only needed the Wikipedia source as proof


Sorry I don't get your point again

You mean your illustrations are quantitative in nature and you didn't apply any real statistics besides imaginary measures of central tendencies ? Are you aware no research can infer based on measurement of central tendencies?

Okay dufus I made the inference statistically the same way you believe every women against feminism is Suffering Stockholm syndrome.

If you believed that the op out all possible intentions behind this thread, created the thread for any other reason than attention, I also believe those women don't suffer from any thing like a syndrome.

oh so you have just heard of correlation for the first time. I probably made a mistake by writing it in front of dispersion .

But only variance and SD measures dispersion

Correlation measure relationship btw two variables, which is what you needed to infer something not measurement of central tendencies.

I thought you too much already this night .

donstan18:


There she go again.

Why type such?

shaybebaby:
Omg, correlation tell you the relationship alright between two variables but only tell you if it's a positive relationship or a negative relationship.

Eg sugar consumption is positively correlated with obesity.

How does that work here, what are the variables, op and what else? It's obvious you are thick.

What we are sampling here is different opinions. We CAN sample which particular opinion has the most supporters, which would be the most occurring one out the different options. That would be the mode fart brain.

But unsurprisingly, the entire point flew past your brain. No one basis an analysis on a sample size of one. Ode omo.

shaybebaby:
@greiboy,

This is what you wrote.

Stockholm syndrome arises when strong emotional is develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other. ref Wikipedia

I am sure you saw harassment and beating etc in the illustrations of Stockholm syndrome
right

Violence

A behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.


With special emphasis on physical, which I debunked. Not only are you dull, you lie too.

greiboy:
Yes positive or negative
if it is positive or negative relationship we can make inference, if

Correlation tells us the relationship btw two variable

For example, if you wanted to determine a relationship between op intentions and possible outcomes to make a definite statement. I.e to infer something

We can test op character attributes against attention seeking attributes to determine if there is a positive relationship to infer something olodo

We can test the relationship btw women characters attributes and Stockholm syndrome attributes to infer something

So pray tell old fool how do you get the numbers to calculate the mode ? or you think statistics is magic ? olodo

In addition, your initial illustrations have nothing to do with mode

Tom has a hat or what ever you said ? Dies it mean every bit has a hat.

So tell me how you arrived at your statistics olodo

greiboy:
omg

I don't know what to say anymore

What is the big difference between violence and emotional abuse ? Isn't violence physical abuse ?

ok tell me the point of this great disagreements. Maybe I should said not all men are abusive in my previous post

shaybebaby:
@greiboy,

This is what you wrote.

Stockholm syndrome arises when strong emotional is develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other. ref Wikipedia

I am sure you saw harassment and beating etc in the illustrations of Stockholm syndrome
right

Violence

A behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.


With special emphasis on physical, which I debunked. Not only are you dull, you lie too.

shaybebaby:
We would be needing a different sort of analysis and we would also need to determine statistical significance and overall fit of the model.

I reiterate, you stated a fact based on a sample size of 1. I quantified my statement using some thereby acknowledging it is not representative of the entire anti-feminism population

Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall, utterly dense.

The Tom bit was trying to help you with your verbal reasoning. Are you really this stupid?

greiboy:
I see don't see how this statement relates to mode

Mode is a number with the highest occurrence in a set of numbers. So how does your quantifying op's intentions with other feminist intentions makes sense to you ?

Do you know op before?

How did you quantify your statement Aunty Based on what numeric analysis. ? Olodo?

on correlation

Ever heard of spss statistical package for social science. You merely set the level of significance to 95%, which is a general level of significance accepted by most researchers and test the correlation of both variables easily. if there is a positive or negative outcome then we can infer olodo

You simply have no basic knowledge of how statistics work, do you.?

shaybebaby:
Emotional abuse can yield Stockholm syndrome too. Some men stating submission is required from women means that they want control over another human being.

Controlling another is abuse, emotional abuse.

Since we have established that emotional abuse can cause Stockholm syndrome, we can conclude that it is reasonable to infer that some women will put up with it and even advocate that women should be submissive as a consequence of this.

shaybebaby:
Yes fart brain, I own a copy of the software by IBM.

But please do say how you can state with certainty the ops intention?

Make it quick because you are boring me senseless with your ineptitude and general stupidity.

shaybebaby:
Yes fart brain, I own a copy of the software by IBM.

But please do say how you can state with certainty the ops intention?

Make it quick because you are boring me senseless with your ineptitude and general stupidity.

greiboy:
Read what you write sometimes before posting them

Abuse is abuse? it either leaves emotional or physical scares. Emotional scares even take longer to heal than physical scares. So don't you think those suffering emotional abuse will be willing to come forward for redemption more quickly than those suffering physical abuse

In fact, people often suffering from physical abuse are more submissive than those suffering emotional.

shaybebaby:
I give up.

greiboy:
So you can no longer dispute my assertions with stupid logic that you resort to using a picture like a kindergarten pupil

Next time, try to understand that everyone on nairaland is not gullible to swallow your deluded rants as you dish them out

Some of us will actually counter your Stupidity with logic

TheUpsetGirl:
why were you arguing with her in the first place? have you forgotten the saying; my silence doesn't mean I agree with you, just that your level of stupidity is beyond comprehension "?...arguing with dumb people only portraits you as a dumb person.

Shugavee:
dont 4get cultural feminism and individualist feminism,

makydebbie:

Coming right up!

Im yet to see it

Lol,good morning, happy sunday,bye! Off to church

shaybebaby:
I give up.