₦airaland Forum

Godhatesodomy:
Greetings


Part of what you say is correct except the truth in the Bible, Quran and Torah including the Zohar are what the Egyptians taught the invading tribe of Dan. We took the sons, heirs to the throne and reared them until their fathers death. This is how the cave man, wild man, who had no knowledge gained it by studying in Egypt. This is why Hebrew comes from the Coptic Egyptian and is similar yet missing the Niger Congo rhythm, deeper meaning and authenticity. Egypt only the capital of Africa at the time its inner core was the Niger Congo where the Abrahimc beast didnt arrive until 16th century colonialization. By that time the African people the world over had went to sleep.


Slide 1


This show art depicting what early Abrahamic people looked like.

Slide 2

This shows the Cave Of The Patriarch an actual holy site where Abraham and other Canaanite cave men are buried.


They are not the same species as us although the aim has been historically to graft them into the Original race.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz5LR7tB320





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYyD3T9qOGY

Wake up out your slumber

The Abrahamic religious narratives are false Eurocentric ideologies that are based on the plagiarisation of older characters and philosophies from around the globe, by means of malicious fabrications.

There isnt one character or storyline in all of Abrahamic religious text that can lay claim to being original.

Od31:
OP please answer these questions.

1. Why is the sun not shining on every country at the same, if the earth is flat.

the sun is not 93million miles away, it is small and the same size with the moon as evidenced by your own eyes not 400times bigger than the moon. The earth is a vast plane and so cannot be covered by the small and close sun light. The sun act as a spot light illuminating only the areas below it.

2. Why dont find the edge( the flat end of the earth).[/quote]the edge of every earth crust is covered by water and the end of this waters is bound by a massive ice wall. The end of these ice walls is yet to be explored and no one really knows what lies beyond them. But the current militarily enforced treaties barring independent explorers from going there shows the government knows what lies beyond and Don't want the public to find out.

3. Which countries are close to any edge of the flat earth.[/quote]the whole earth crust is covered by water no country is close to the edge all the earth crust is covered by water. There are only three countries/ continenets that are closer to the ice wall thats is south america, south africa and australia.

By now the "flat earthers" must have discovered the edges of the flat earth, so they can tell us what will happen to anyone that fall of the edge.[/quote]the only man in history who has explored the antarctic ice walls to a large extent is admiral Richard . E. Byrd
He reported of finding a vast area of land bigger than the whole of the united states and rich in mineral resources beyond the antarctic ice walls. The area was closed down after his explorations and declared a no fly and no sail zones. The antarctic treaty is a military enforced law which does not allow independent explorers to probe deep into the antarctic ice walls.

EMILO2STAY:
the only man in history who has explored the antarctic ice walls to a large extent is admiral Richard . E. Byrd
He reported of finding a vast area of land bigger than the whole of the united states and rich in mineral resources beyond the antarctic ice walls. The area was closed down after his explorations and declared a no fly and no sail zones. The antarctic treaty is a military enforced law which does not allow independent explorers to probe deep into the antarctic ice walls.

How does the explorer ship go beyond the ice wall?

I thought you flat earthers say, the ice wall is very high and the one that stops the ocean

Emusan:
How does the explorer ship go beyond the ice wall?

I thought you flat earthers say, the ice wall is very high and the one that stops the ocean

he used aircraft to fly over and into it to explore it nahh. The ice wall is 150 to 250 ft high. How come little things like this are difficult to understand for you guys

Amujale:
The Abrahamic religious narratives are false Eurocentric ideologies that are based on the plagiarisation of older characters and philosophies from around the globe, by means of malicious fabrications.

There isnt one character or storyline in all of Abrahamic religious text that can lay claim to being original.

Plagiarized? Yes. Totally false? No. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water because some of their writings as you say were plagiarized off of older philosophies and characters from around the Earth. I didn't say globe because we are not on a globe.


It appears Africans in primordial times were giants and they had elongated skulls. These ancestor possess 33 percent more brain capacity than we do today and had a different blood. The aliens they depict in movies with the strange heads are our ancestors. This is mind blowing. Our ancestors didn't come here from outer space yet they landed possibly from other worlds from inner Earth or outer rings of the infinite plane we live upon. Yet its clear we have been here for millions of years going through drastic changes. African DNA has never been completely researched the Cambridge Reference Sequence is based upon the European Cave Beast Troglodyte DNA what is currently being used.


Wake up out your slumber

joyandfaith:
That is correct both biblically and scientifically

I have taken my time to read all twenty something pages before I saw your post... Please explain what you mean

How does the bible prove or say anything about a spherical looking earth or world

Amujale:
The Christian bible is fake because its content aren't original.

False because its narratives are untrue.

And the Christian bible is counterintuitive due to the fact that the authors narratives goes against logic and common sense.

But who defines "a sensation that is common"

Truth is powerful and indisputable

Godhatesodomy:
Nonsense. The Sun is only so big it can't light the entire Earth 24/7 and then there would be no night. They are partying in Lagos now because it's night. Lagos needs the night we need the night too.

Wake up out your slumber

Hmm no be me dey slumber oh.
You are in real deep slumber. I pray u wake up one day.

Od31:
Hmm no be me dey slumber oh.
You are in real deep slumber. I pray u wake up one day.

Yorubas are one of the most advanced races on Earth, are you sure you are Yoruba?

You have the powerful Ogboni society I suggest you join so you won't be locked out of the secrets.


Wake up out your slumber

EMILO2STAY:
point of correction the sun does not appear to move, the sun is actually moving over the flat face of the earth.
it is you who do not understand what your saying. if from the perspective of the sun the earth moves and from the perspective of the earth the sun moves then there is no way to determine which is really moving since the movement is relative to the observer. Go and get proper knowledge before you come to debate me, you have not said anything new I haven't heard before.

Oh my goodness...
Can you just once, just for ONE time give me proof that the sun is moving and not the earth?
I gave you a popular experiment, and you "counter" it by stating for the millionth time your wacky belief that the sun moves.
Explanation: Nonexistent.
Abeg if you don't have evidence take your giant "L" like a man and close this thread.
Here's a question: If the sun does indeed orbit the flat earth, then surely, at some point it will go "under" the entire world. So how the hell does it go back up over the world? Does it activate nitro like in fast and furious and make its way back to the top of the earth? Is the world covered in absolute darkness at a point every day? How bout the moon? How come it appears in different phases? Also the sun moving in circles above the earth is ruled out as lunar and solar eclipses would be simply Nonexistent with that model.

abbeg:
Oh my goodness...
Can you just once, just for ONE time give me proof that the sun is moving and not the earth?
I gave you a popular experiment, and you "counter" it by stating for the millionth time your wacky belief that the sun moves.
Explanation: Nonexistent.
Abeg if you don't have evidence take your giant "L" like a man and close this thread.
Here's a question: If the sun does indeed orbit the flat earth, then surely, at some point it will go "under" the entire world. So how the hell does it go back up over the world? Does it activate nitro like in fast and furious and make its way back to the top of the earth? Is the world covered in absolute darkness at a point every day? How bout the moon? How come it appears in different phases? Also the sun moving in circles above the earth is ruled out as lunar and solar eclipses would be simply Nonexistent with that model.

pure rubbish.

abbeg:
Oh my goodness...
Can you just once, just for ONE time give me proof that the sun is moving and not the earth?
I gave you a popular experiment, and you "counter" it by stating for the millionth time your wacky belief that the sun moves.
Explanation: Nonexistent.
Abeg if you don't have evidence take your giant "L" like a man and close this thread.
Here's a question: If the sun does indeed orbit the flat earth, then surely, at some point it will go "under" the entire world. So how the hell does it go back up over the world? Does it activate nitro like in fast and furious and make its way back to the top of the earth? Is the world covered in absolute darkness at a point every day? How bout the moon? How come it appears in different phases? Also the sun moving in circles above the earth is ruled out as lunar and solar eclipses would be simply Nonexistent with that model.

what other proof are you looking for when the sun moves right before your eyes, you can clearly see the sun as it moves across the sky from east to west but you are confused with relativity. I should be the one asking you to give me proof that the sun is stationary and the earth moves.
You are not bringing anything new to the table but making me repeat myself instead of going through the thread. Stop running your mouth like your saying something I have not heard before.
Now to the simple proof that the heavenly luminaries revolve around the earth. The sun and the moon dial is a device used to tell time before the advent of the wall clock. It works by placing it under the sun light or moon light, as the sun or moon moves the shadow of the pointer moves clock wise thereby telling the time. If the earth was just rotating and the sun stationary the shadow of the sundial would not move to tell time.
You can try the simple experiment for yourself by just pinning a stick to the ground and then your phone light or any light at it at an angle 60° or so then move the light from left to right and you will see how the shadow of the stick moves clock wise. But try placing that same stick on a ball then beam your light and rotate the ball mimicking the rotation of the earth and see if you will get the same result. Come bk here and tell me what you found out.

I am still waiting for the experiment that confirms relativity

EMILO2STAY:
what other proof are you looking for when the sun moves right before your eyes, you can clearly see the sun as it moves across the sky from east to west but you are confused with relativity. I should be the one asking you to give me proof that the sun is stationary and the earth moves.
You are not bringing anything new to the table but making me repeat myself instead of going through the thread. Stop running your mouth like your saying something I have not heard before.
Now to the simple proof that the heavenly luminaries revolve around the earth. The sun and the moon dial is a device used to tell time before the advent of the wall clock. It works by placing it under the sun light or moon light, as the sun or moon moves the shadow of the of the pointer is moves clock wise their by telling the time. If the earth was just rotating and the sun stationary the shadow of the sundial would not move to tell time.
You can try the simple experiment for yourself by just pinning a stick to the ground and then your phone light or any light at it at an angle 60° or so then move the light from left to right and you will see how the shadow of the stick moves clock wise. But try placing that same stick on a ball then beam your and rotate the ball mimicking the rotation of the earth and see if you will get the same result. Come bk here and tell me what you found out.

Smoke9910


Do as Op suggests and read his whole thread. This also includes the rest. Read...

EMILO2STAY:
what other proof are you looking for when the sun moves right before your eyes, you can clearly see the sun as it moves across the sky from east to west but you are confused with relativity. I should be the one asking you to give me proof that the sun is stationary and the earth moves.
You are not bringing anything new to the table but making me repeat myself instead of going through the thread. Stop running your mouth like your saying something I have not heard before.
Now to the simple proof that the heavenly luminaries revolve around the earth. The sun and the moon dial is a device used to tell time before the advent of the wall clock. It works by placing it under the sun light or moon light, as the sun or moon moves the shadow of the pointer moves clock wise thereby telling the time. If the earth was just rotating and the sun stationary the shadow of the sundial would not move to tell time.
You can try the simple experiment for yourself by just pinning a stick to the ground and then your phone light or any light at it at an angle 60° or so then move the light from left to right and you will see how the shadow of the stick moves clock wise. But try placing that same stick on a ball then beam your light and rotate the ball mimicking the rotation of the earth and see if you will get the same result. Come bk here and tell me what you found out.

I am still waiting for the experiment that confirms relativity

Sir, look... I'm just tired.
To accurately carry out that garbage experiment of yours one would have to shrink the stick to microscopic size so you can more accurately depict the size a stick would be on earth. If you d
It seems no flat earther really knows how big our planet is compared to a person. If you do that you will notice the same results as with the stick on a level surface.
And apparently you think relativity is some law that governs why planes fly or something. I arrive late to a party, You could say I'm late but Based on relativity, I could say you're just early. Then this is where the other laws come in. Before the meeting, a particular time was agreed on. If I exceeded that time, then I am late. Simple.
You can't really "prove" relativity. What you can't also prove is that the earth is flat
How do eclipses occur on a flat earth?

Godhatesodomy:
pure rubbish.

Elaborate on how it's rubbish please. Or do you want to explain eclipses to me using the flat earth model?

Godhatesodomy:
pure rubbish.

Elaborate on how it's rubbish please. Or do you want to explain eclipses to me using the flat earth model?

abbeg:
Sir, look... I'm just tired.
To accurately carry out that garbage experiment of yours one would have to shrink the stick to microscopic size so you can more accurately depict the size a stick would be on earth. If you d
It seems no flat earther really knows how big our planet is compared to a person. If you do that you will notice the same results as with the stick on a level surface.
And apparently you think relativity is some law that governs why planes fly or something. I arrive late to a party, You could say I'm late but Based on relativity, I could say you're just early. Then this is where the other laws come in. Before the meeting, a particular time was agreed on. If I exceeded that time, then I am late. Simple.
You can't really "prove" relativity. What you can't also prove is that the earth is flat
How do eclipses occur on a flat earth?

you have no excuse not to carry out the experiment. So it is either your are not knowledgeable or you are being ignorant on purpose. Whether it be microscopic or not the results would be the same.

I never wanted to engage you because you lack intelligence but not only that you have no idea of what you believe in. If you were just asking me to explain things I would have done that with out hassles. But you came here forming intelligent thinking your well armed to challenge me but I saw your Naivety and never wanted to engage you. So pls don't reply me again just go and rest.

abbeg:
Elaborate on how it's rubbish please.
Or do you want to explain eclipses to me using the flat earth model?

Sure. Eclipses are caused by the hidden x moons that are translucent. The Vedic calls them Rahu and Ketu, the Vodoun the Divine Twins, in Western Astrology they are called North and South node.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOBYbfEIJZU



Neptune Uranus and Pluto do not exist as you can't ever see them via telescope. Besides they didn't exist in any ancient astrology from which modern Astronomy derived. All science evolved out of the occult such as chemistry from Alchemy. Medicine from Herbal. All sciences come from the occult the very thing modern religion comes from. Even religion comes from cult practices.


Wake up out your slumber

EMILO2STAY:
you have no excuse not to carry out the experiment. So it is either your are not knowledgeable or you are being ignorant on purpose. Whether it be microscopic or not the results would be the same.

I never wanted to engage you because you lack intelligence but not only that you have no idea of what you believe in. If you were just asking me to explain things I would have done that with out hassles. But you came here forming intelligent thinking your well armed to challenge me but I saw your Naivety and never wanted to engage you. So pls don't reply me again just go and rest.

Please stop dodging my question.How do eclipses occur on a flat earth model?
And yes, I carried out your "experiment". I didn't even need to start before I knew how it would end up. If there was a fictional stick tall enough to very visibly protrude from the earths surface then it will have the same result as in your "experiment". Earth is too big for something as small as a man to know he was standing on a sphere.
Sundials work perfectly with a round earth.
As for the part where you regarded me as "not intelligent", well, "When one is on the losing side of an argument, he resorts to insults".
We've debunked all your "proofs" so far, same can't be said about you as all you do is tell us to 'go and sleep'. .
Oh wise one, please educate us on how eclipses occur on a flat earth.

abbeg:
Please stop dodging my question.How do eclipses occur on a flat earth model?
And yes, I carried out your "experiment". I didn't even need to start before I knew how it would end up. If there was a fictional stick tall enough to very visibly protrude from the earths surface then it will have the same result as in your "experiment". Earth is too big for something as small as a man to know he was standing on a sphere.
Sundials work perfectly with a round earth.
As for the part where you regarded me as "not intelligent", well, "When one is on the losing side of an argument, he resorts to insults".
We've debunked all your "proofs" so far, same can't be said about you as all you do is tell us to 'go and sleep'. .
Oh wise one, please educate us on how eclipses occur on a flat earth.

you are very dishonest as it is the character of all those who came before you and you have proven yourself to be a waste of my time. Your lack of intelligence makes you say nonsense like "fictional big stick". I can't have a healthy debate with you so stop quoting me.

EMILO2STAY:
you are very dishonest as it is the character of all those who came before you and you have proven yourself to be a waste of my time. Your lack of intelligence makes you say nonsense like "fictional big stick". I can't have a healthy debate with you so stop quoting me.

Some of them are trolls. Unfortunately there are cults they don't want the truth told. Alot of it has to do with Christianity because no other group is responsible for the globe than Christians.

Wake up out your slumber

Godhatesodomy:
Some of them are trolls. Unfortunately there are cults they don't want the truth told. Alot of it has to do with Christianity because no other group is responsible for the globe than Christians.

Wake up out your slumber

it is not Christians it is the catholic church the catholic church only pretend to be Christian when it is not.

EMILO2STAY:
it is not Christians it is the catholic church the catholic church only pretend to be Christian when it is not.

The Jesuits pretend to be priests of other denominations of Christian churches. This is not known outside of occult circles that Jesuit priests infiltrate other Christian churches with support of the Vatican and Freemasonry. All that I have revealed the true shape of the Earth is connected to ancient Babylionian genetic engineering with animals who produced the unlike man. Always everywhere the unlike man has attacked there was a group of Moors behind him. The evil cults of the West has spread to Africa and puppets are in place. There is not as many in Africa as America yet you do have Africans helping the Western European with recolonizing Africa. They are most certainly alarmed if you are destroying Church lies about the true shape of the Earth. Remember they have set up Jesus Christ a Neanderthal Cro Magnum as God. Anyone professional educated African doing so is blasphemying Allah. There are no graven images of the Almighty and this is the same law with Ifa which forbid graven images of Olodumare. This is rebellious man making himself God and creating his own shape of the Earth. It's all connected.

Wake up out your slumber

Godhatesodomy:
The Jesuits pretend to be priests of other denominations of Christian churches. This is not known outside of occult circles that Jesuit priests infiltrate other Christian churches with support of the Vatican and Freemasonry. All that I have revealed the true shape of the Earth is connected to ancient Babylionian genetic engineering with animals who produced the unlike man. Always everywhere the unlike man has attacked there was a group of Moors behind him. The evil cults of the West has spread to Africa and puppets are in place. There is not as many in Africa as America yet you do have Africans helping the Western European with recolonizing Africa. They are most certainly alarmed if you are destroying Church lies about the true shape of the Earth. Remember they have set up Jesus Christ a Neanderthal Cro Magnum as God. Anyone professional educated African doing so is blasphemying Allah. There are no graven images of the Almighty and this is the same law with Ifa which forbid graven images of Olodumare. This is rebellious man making himself God and creating his own shape of the Earth. It's all connected.

Wake up out your slumber

the jesuits have infiltrated many protestant Christian churches, yes that is true. But to blame the heliocentric lie on Christians would be unfair. The jesuits of the catholic church are the originators of the globe earth lie. I only pity for those ignorant atheists on this forum who do not know that it was men who believe in God and Satan that created the big bang and the heliocentric lie.

Godhatesodomy:
Plagiarized? Yes. Totally false? No. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water because some of their writings as you say were plagiarized off of older philosophies and characters from around the Earth. I didn't say globe because we are not on a globe.


It appears Africans in primordial times were giants and they had elongated skulls. These ancestor possess 33 percent more brain capacity than we do today and had a different blood. The aliens they depict in movies with the strange heads are our ancestors. This is mind blowing. Our ancestors didn't come here from outer space yet they landed possibly from other worlds from inner Earth or outer rings of the infinite plane we live upon. Yet its clear we have been here for millions of years going through drastic changes. African DNA has never been completely researched the Cambridge Reference Sequence is based upon the European Cave Beast Troglodyte DNA what is currently being used.


Wake up out your slumber

All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

Abrahamic religions exist as a result of a combination of falsehoods.

Given that the authors of Abrahamic religious text have been found to have partaken in plagiarism of their content, then that makes all of such content fake. As in, Abrahamic religious text content arent original.

The authors of Abrahamic religious text have been found to have made use of fake content aswell as false concepts, such that it makes all of their content false. As in, Abrahamic religious text contents arent true.

The Abrahamic religious text are counterintuitive due to the fact the narratives they peddle goes against logic and common sense.

The Abrahamic religious text arent genuine history textbooks, rather they are made up of fakery and falsehood.

"They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America" authored by Dr Ivan Sertima is a history textbook.

Amujale:
All the Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

Abrahamic religions exist as a result of a combination of falsehoods.

Given that the authors of Abrahamic religious text have been found to have partaken in plagiarism of their content, then that makes all of such content fake. As in, Abrahamic religious text content arent original.

The authors of Abrahamic religious text have been found to have made use of fake content aswell as false concepts, such that it makes all of their content false. As in, Abrahamic religious text contents arent true.

The Abrahamic religious text are counterintuitive due to the fact the narratives they peddlle goes against logic and common sense.

Well said. I have no argument.


Wake up out your slumber

I hope you are all aware of the psychologies at play here, as in the way of thinking (or none) that makes some ignore the obvious that is before the eye and believe the crap they make up in their own heads, and how in these modern times with so many past giants on who's shoulders we stand on to see the very obvious can anyone in their right mind believe instead of actually doing research to know whether the earth is 'flat'? Goes to show a lack of basic education I'd say, with gratitude that this thread shows is rather delightfully uncommon situ since it is Physics as taught in primary school which everyone must have benefited from since Nigeria gives it free.

Would you hire such ill-informed people to do more than jobs above their level if understanding is required? Would you be able to constructively collaborate with such people on anything technical or even real? Think to yourself if you would hire people who ignore all evidence presented to contradict their belief and wonder how they might work if basic reasoning were a job requirement and you might understand why so many are jobless in a world where skilled workers are scarce. Yet I can assure you they apply to be the ceo and want to be the boss and be paid the most.

Pigs fly on a spherical/globe earth I guess, amusingly worried but delighted that lazy fuqs are so very few.

Astronauts use the so-called exact circumference of Earth as 40,030km.

Yet, the people of KM.T used a similar approximation using a stick and their brains.

A greek mathematics enthusiast named Eratosthenes had heard that in Alexandria, Nubian scientist made use of a unique method to determine their calendars.

Eratosthenes also knew that a sort of optical illusion used to occur near Alexandria whereby vertical shadows had no reflection at noon on the summer solstice. The sun was directly overhead at Syene a city south of Alexandria. All the devotees, academics, Hellio scientist, well-wishers and enthusiasts would go to see the spectacular phenomenon and he wondered was it true.

During and leading to the phenomenon, Eratosthenes observed the KM.Tic scientist partaking in strange scientific activities. He became fascinated with their scientific experiment that infact was a make shift clock.

During their determination of their timepiece, KM.Tic scientist planted sticks directly in the soil of their land i.e Alexandria and waited to see if a shadow would appear at noon. It turns out that during the summer solstice, there was always one, and it measured about 7 degrees.

The idea of a spherical Earth begins in KM.T, Africa. Prior to that, much of Asia and Europe assumed the Earth is flat.

Pythagoras floated the idea around 500 BCE after spending many years in KM.T and a couple of centuries later Aristotle validates Pythagoras claim after spending many years in KM.T aswell.

Now, back to Eratosthenes as he went on to claim the timepiece as his own and peddled the KM.Tic scientist calculations of the Earth's circumference -

He claims to have used his observation to estimate the circumference of the entire planet.

Since, the sun's rays are coming in at the same angle at the same time of day, and a stick in Alexandria is reflecting a shadow while a stick in Syene isnt.

Since the difference in shadow length is 7 degrees in Alexandria and Syene, that means the two cities are 7 degrees apart on Earth's 360-degrees surface.

Eratosthenes learned the distance between the two cities was 5,000 stadia apart, that is about 800km.

Then, using simple proportion,

Since 7.2degrees is 1/50 of 360 degrees,

800 ✖ 50 = 40,000 km

Therefore, the KM.Tic scientist made use of a stick and their brains to invent a clock whilst using it to prove that the Earth is spherical.

EMILO2STAY:
you are very dishonest as it is the character of all those who came before you and you have proven yourself to be a waste of my time. Your lack of intelligence makes you say nonsense like "fictional big stick". I can't have a healthy debate with you so stop quoting me.

Where did you see "fictional big stick"?
You fully understood what I meant so why are you pretending? You said I should use a ball, I told you a ball is too small to represent the earth. Simple.
But here you are, trying to play it off as a comment from an "unintelligent " person.
If you used an accurate sphere to represent the earth( in fact, earth itself is the only substitute) you'd notice a shadow, just like a sundial.
As joyandfaith and I said earlier, you're resorting to insults because it's all you can do at this point B)

And the biggest question of all: WHY ARE YOU DODGING MY QUESTION?