5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? - Health (17) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Health › 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? (74157 Views)
1 2 3 ... 14 15 16 17 18 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by AndSunGorilla: 8:38pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
kkins25:The conspiracy theory started from the developed countries sir. A lot of videos making the round quoting figures of birds that died in the Hague. There was destruction is 5G masts in the UK as well. Right now I don't believe the conspiracy theories as we have many examples thoughout history of society claiming common sense was evil and nonsense, e.g Galileo, belief that the earth was flat etc. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by successemma: 9:07pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
Mr physics good write up but let me inform you that theories fail and new theories are formed. In due time you will realize that what you believe on was a lie. I pray it will not be too late for you then |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by lenghtinny(m): 9:16pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
mrphysics:These network providers are nothing but legalized robbers. The same airtel that’s over feeding Indians with data will be acting like King Kong here. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by thinkmoney(m): 10:53pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
Skyfornia:weep for urself. that's proof there. u too show proof. if u don't get any but only rely on ur types that u are seeing causing arson in UK out of unfounded fear, then I am not very sorry to tell u the money spent on u to go to school may have been wasted. u now imagine people there in Europe have some knowledge we don't have because they are in Europe? in this present age!? in fact I feel sorry for u |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by kkins25(m): 11:07pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
GamalNasser:Mrphysics him write up is commendable but he still baggam. Wireless networks transmit at most 2.6ghz. While the research article he is quoting is testing 50kghz. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by dreyFoxx(m): 11:32pm On Apr 05, 2020 |
mrphysics:Totally a great piece and an eye opener at that....I really love the piece of knowledge you passed across.... But whatsoever we are taught today is what was handed down by the so called whites....down to us so we believe what ever they say.....no matter how true it might look like....none of it have we been able to do ourselves....those guys are thousands of steps ahead of us...no matter how good they might portray they always have hidden agenda.... |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by sonnie10: 12:08am On Apr 06, 2020 |
kkins25:Point of correction. When we talk about the harmful effect of radiation, we are mostly interested in the wavelength and not the frequency of the wave that you pointed out. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Denko2721987(m): 12:41am On Apr 06, 2020 |
mrphysics:If u like quote all the theorems, there will always be something u can never know even openly known to science at a particular point in time.. And what you dont know, will always be bigger than you and ur imagination.. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by yom2(m): 1:04am On Apr 06, 2020 |
mrphysics:do u mind those lazy lots spreading fake news up and down. Half education over religion and superstition is a big issue in this country. They won claim say them reason more than those who built the tech. I can remember some zombie reasoning of those days that AIDS was invented to wipe out the black race. And some one will be there spreading the fake news up and down and having orgasm on top of that |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by DedeNkem: 1:08am On Apr 06, 2020 |
Some idiots will still believe the opposite! |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by patosky3310(m): 1:17am On Apr 06, 2020 |
Mr physics didn't tell us if 5G will cause COVID-19? |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by mrphysics(op): 5:21am On Apr 06, 2020 |
patosky3310:Lol, it's not possible for it to cause Covid-19. Neither will it aid the propagation of Covid-19. Also, 5G is harmless and poses no health danger to anyone |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by mrphysics(op): 5:25am On Apr 06, 2020 |
Denko2721987:It's because of people like you that this article was written. Unfortunately, you guys has been sent to Nigeria to ensure we remain timid, stagnant, and hundreds of years behind development. You have so conditioned your mind that you lost taste and sense of objectivity. Now, since you know what is bigger than me, can you show me with proofs beyond your conspiracy theory. Ever imagined that the things you said is bigger than me is just the delusional thoughts of people that anyone can also think about? It's so baseless. Yet, you are excusing theories that won noble prize in Physics, which is also the basis of the phone you are using to type this trash. If you guys are not interested, why not leave us to move forward. What have we done? ![]() |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by mrphysics(op): 5:29am On Apr 06, 2020 |
sonnie10:Do you mind them. I converted everything to wavelength for easy comparison because we are talking about 5G network, so I had to convert to frequency for easy overview. I never even mentioned 50kGHz anywhere. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by mrphysics(op): 5:36am On Apr 06, 2020 |
successemma: ![]() Which theory has failed? You know what a scientific theory is? And these are even theories of modern physics. My brother, it has never failed. And you want me to believe which theory? The imaginations of your heart with no proof? Something someone in his room developed and sold. It didn't pass through any proof of concept? We are bigger than this, you guys are drawing us backwards |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by kkins25(m): 7:43am On Apr 06, 2020 |
sonnie10:so is it me you should be correcting or the person claiming the 5g models in Wuhan are transmitting at 50ghz huh? smh. and go and cross check the relationship between wavelength and frequencies before you forming cleaner- correcting mistakes ![]() |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 8:44am On Apr 06, 2020 |
oghenetega100: |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 9:34am On Apr 06, 2020 |
Has 5G been tested? |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 9:54am On Apr 06, 2020 |
Fariq: |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 9:55am On Apr 06, 2020 |
HellVictorinho:Tested and worked well |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by patosky3310(m): 9:57am On Apr 06, 2020 |
mrphysics:Thanks. In case if you are a Christian, what is your take on 5G being used as a vaccine for COVID-19, given that it has been claimed that 5G comes with metaphysical powers? |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 10:13am On Apr 06, 2020*. Modified: 10:55am On Apr 06, 2020 |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by efficiencie(m): 12:53pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
Kolping:Did anyone respond to this? |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Denko2721987(m): 1:30pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
mrphysics:Mr. Unconditioned, unrelenting, 5G spectrum mind.. There is no need bantering words here with you unnecessarily.. And i don't know where in my writeup i stated that i disproved the laws of physics.. But that doesn't change the fact that many of such laws though formerly valid are constantly been disproven everyday tru renewed & advanced research and discoveries in science and technology and it would be a pholly on ur part to honestly expect everything to be public knowkedge.. Anyone can draw up or formulate theories including the known applicable ones in existence but it will also take a non-ignorant mind to know it can be applied to give different results.. You of all people ought to know this better.. If u aren't aware that they've been lots of dangerous research and projects even govnernment backed over the years to test, apply and weaponise common things against humans then the joke is on you.. Like i said, what u don't know, u may never know until u seek to know.. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by sonnie10: 1:47pm On Apr 06, 2020*. Modified: 4:31pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
Denko2721987:Unfortunately science theories don’t work that way. There are presented for all mankind to disprove, if they can. Isn’t that why we have peer reviews? |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Kolping: 3:26pm On Apr 06, 2020*. Modified: 3:57pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks By Joel M. Moskowitz on October 17, 2019 Scientific American https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/ The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation. The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure. Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating. Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions: “Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals. The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior. The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats. Based upon the research published since 2011, including human and animal studies and mechanistic data, the IARC has recently prioritized RFR to be reviewed again in the next five years. Since many EMF scientists believe we now have sufficient evidence to consider RFR as either a probable or known human carcinogen, the IARC will likely upgrade the carcinogenic potential of RFR in the near future. Nonetheless, without conducting a formal risk assessment or a systematic review of the research on RFR health effects, the FDA recently reaffirmed the FCC’s 1996 exposure limits in a letter to the FCC, stating that the agency had “concluded that no changes to the current standards are warranted at this time,” and that “NTP’s experimental findings should not be applied to human cell phone usage.” The letter stated that “the available scientific evidence to date does not support adverse health effects in humans due to exposures at or under the current limits.” The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures. Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility). Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. [/b]However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research. [b]Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with results from case-control studies of tumor risk in heavy cell phone users. 5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress. As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play? Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Scientific American. ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S) Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, is director of the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley. He has been translating and disseminating the research on wireless radiation health effects since 2009 after he and his colleagues published a review paper that found long-term cell phone users were at greater risk of brain tumors. His Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website has had more than two million page views since 2013. He is an unpaid advisor to the International EMF Scientist Appeal and Physicians for Safe Technology. Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website Scientific and policy developments regarding the health effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure from cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, Smart Meters, and other wireless technology https://www.saferemr.com/ |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by MetaPhysical: 4:05pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
mrphysics:The solution for data demand and bandwidth throughput is fiber. Let me break the 'G' down for you. You can have 5G and still have slow data than someone on 3G. Due to environmental factors waves through air suffer loss and its properties is severely impacted. This is called loss. Engineers therefore look for ways to shape the loss and impairments by improving form factor and chip performance in electronic devices. This results in better sensitivity and fault tolerance and ability to receive a higher rate of wave signal. This improvement is what they term 'G' which stands for Generation. If you recal we used to have phones with antennas. They have gone away. We used to have phones with rubber keypads. They have dissapeared. We had phones with flip covers. They are gone. These changes in device is synched to the emergence of a new G so the devices and the technology function at par. For marketing purpose manufacturers develop firmware that restrict certain devices from connecting on a new G and thus compel consumers to upgrade. To get bandwidth and optimum data performance you should ask for broadband, not 5G. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Tboy1419: 6:30pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
Skyfornia:. They will still come and call you lazy backward northerner not knowing you are telling them the truth and reality, God bless you,my guy, you are the only reasonable person here. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Justdare: 6:47pm On Apr 06, 2020 |
hnmm |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 5:07am On Apr 07, 2020 |
GodWrites:Atheists don't operate based on proofs, Don't mistake agnostics for atheists. Atheists and theists are much alike. |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by Nobody: 7:22am On Apr 07, 2020 |
iomoge2:U are dangerously ignorant and u have listened to that idiatic voice note done by a megalomania lunatic |
| Re: 5G Network: Can It Cause Cancer or COVID-19? by GodWrites: 7:36am On Apr 07, 2020 |
Isinweke:.. Don't quote me again cause I hate to entertain foolishness. |
Sebastine Oiwoh: Bleaching Creams Can Cause Cancer, Kidney Disease, Cataracts • Telecom Mast: Can This Cause Cancer? (Photo) • What Causes Buruli Ulcer, Let Cancer Or Acha Ere? • 2 • 3 • 4
Best Dental Clinic In Lagos, Nigeria? • PHOTOS: Meet The 7-year-old Sierra Leonan Boy & Others Who Have Survived Ebola • Are There Any Side Effects Of Using Methylated Spirit To Aid Beard Growth??