Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,154,850 members, 7,824,537 topics. Date: Saturday, 11 May 2024 at 12:01 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania (20791 Views)
At Least 3 Dead In Snowy Pileup Of Dozens Of Vehicles In Pennsylvania, Usa(Pics) / Pence Hits Breaking Point With Trump In Blessing Biden's Win / Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal, Affirms Biden's Win (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Goke7: 7:09am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence: Even Trump is not posting this on his page cos it's going no where. Some times you just let things be and fight another day rather than flogging a dead horse 5 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by DarkJeddi(m): 7:10am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Lol, Thursday is tomorrow and you will be back to spine another tales by moonlight after the supreme Court throws out the useless petition.. 6 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Rebelutionary: 7:10am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:If your senior colleague righteousness89 has left this matter as we say in Nigeria "for God hand", usef go soon learn! Goodmorning o |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by bobochem: 7:12am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Ffk and his cohorts how market |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:14am On Dec 09, 2020 |
SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.
SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Rebelutionary: 7:14am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:There was a time when the silly line was stop watching CNN and watch fox cos they bought into the Trump B.S but now that they were the first to call some states for Biden, they have all of sudden become Lamestream like how do you folks reason abeg! 2 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by wirinet(m): 7:15am On Dec 09, 2020 |
bluefilm: Holy bluefilm. Why not list the names of dead people that voted for Biden and submit it along with your other evidence in court? Abi the dead people no get name? |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Bluntemperor: 7:15am On Dec 09, 2020 |
flemsy15: Yes,but you have a Mr Trump,who is a bitter looser! -Very boastful,television apprentice manager,who had no regard for the American Democracy but love Russians who earlier helped him in the first term but has now moved on. - A Trump that forgot a simple rule of Democracy: Majority carried the day' but wanted it in his own way! - Trump and his entourage- MicMicconey and other Senators are hidding under the Republican Party to commit atrocities against Institutions of Democracy! But Americans are saved this time by their forefathers STRONG INSTITUTIONAL RULES,like the Courts,the Voters Colleges, etc. - Mr Trump was stunned, he couldn't believe that Americans could reject him,he couldn't take it because of being arrogant,he couldn't even showed mercy or compassion to thousands of Americans dying of Covid-19 but would rather be playing golf at the expense of dying Americans.He should have been born in Africa,as a Head of State to do as he wishes- he is not a good product! The World would not miss him! 1 Like |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by DarkJeddi(m): 7:15am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Bla Bla Bla,Bla.. Another useless petition to be thrown into the Cesspool.. 3 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:15am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Rebelutionary:lol you are tired already. fuvk off from here. read this article and stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets created by leftists Democrats party. SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH by Kevin Ryan Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution. Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration day. The lawsuit contends that the defendants: • Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT through legislation. • Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing different election rules and procedures in different counties within the states. According to the lawsuit: “Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. “Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non- legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.” Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control all four state legislatures. The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the Texas lawsuit says. The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana have issued statements of support for Texas case today. The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but has yet to adjudicate. SOURCES: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/ 162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07 %20FINAL.pdf https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/ texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election- idUSKBN28I27I https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/ docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:16am On Dec 09, 2020 |
DarkJeddi:novice buharist, you read the article at all. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:18am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Rebelutionary:stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets created by leftists Democrats party to caused conflicts and confusion in the media. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by ceejayluv(m): 7:18am On Dec 09, 2020 |
nelsonoba:Lol, yeah... Throw out votes that were recounted and monitored by both parties. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by ceejayluv(m): 7:19am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:So you recommend alternative media that's full of crap with no reputation to sustain. 1 Like |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:19am On Dec 09, 2020 |
DarkJeddi:so you are part of justice of the USA supreme court. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. rubbish thinking. buharist and zombie are not difficult to identify. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by DarkJeddi(m): 7:20am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:I don't need to read YOUR POST,.. If I need news on the American elections,I know where to go to.. The lame Texas petition is another trash petition,.. Like many trash before,it is going to the shithole.. 2 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by AntiWailer: 7:21am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Waste of time. 1 Like |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:21am On Dec 09, 2020 |
ceejayluv:watch newsmax, theblazetv and newspaper, thegatewaypundit.com, theepoch times too |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by hermesprogidy(m): 7:22am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Dream on. So Texas challenges the validity of votes in other States, and you think any sensible Court will let that pass? How about California challenging the validity of votes on Texas and other States Trump won? Don't you see the anarchy that will infold? Trump is like a fish on land, flailing on its last breath. The whole thing is comical. 4 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:23am On Dec 09, 2020 |
DarkJeddi:and that's why you are not updated at all. an illiterate buharist thinking. Bleep off joor. read the article and understand. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by rolams(m): 7:23am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Oya Nigerian Trump families! Come and brag oooo |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by ceejayluv(m): 7:23am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:hehehe... So the GOP couldn't get "facts" from Alternative crap media to present, the motions were all thrown out like used condoms. 2 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:23am On Dec 09, 2020 |
hermesprogidy: SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH by Kevin Ryan Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution. Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration day. The lawsuit contends that the defendants: • Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT through legislation. • Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing different election rules and procedures in different counties within the states. According to the lawsuit: “Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. “Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non- legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.” Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control all four state legislatures. The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the Texas lawsuit says. The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana have issued statements of support for Texas case today. The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but has yet to adjudicate. SOURCES: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/ 162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07 %20FINAL.pdf https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/ texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election- idUSKBN28I27I https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/ docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by hermesprogidy(m): 7:23am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Newsmax! Jesus!!! No wonder you are hopeful Trump will get anything out of this. Sorry. 3 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Bluntemperor: 7:24am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence: Yinmu! It's better for you to relocate to Trump Mara-lego! What is bad is bad- condemn it so that we have Peace! 1 Like |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by DarkJeddi(m): 7:25am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla! Anybody that doesn't agree your trash conspiracy theories is a BUHARIST and a Zombie. After they throw out this trash,you will still be here to tell us on how they are all working for dimentia Biden.. 1 Like |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by wirinet(m): 7:25am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence: Imagine the rubbish from a supposedly sane mind. Texas is suing on behalf of the legislature and citizens of other states. Texas wants to determine how other states choose their electors, and they must chose electors that must vote it's prefered presidential candidate. After the election of Barack Obama in 2012, Texas threatened to secede from the union. I think it's makes more sense for Texas to secede that to force it's presidential candidate on the union.
Texas always displaying the same stupid shenanigans after each election it's prefered presidential candidate loses. 3 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:25am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Bluntemperor:kikiki, read this post for better understanding. you are not inform yet. get updated. stop living in your deluded state of mind. SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH by Kevin Ryan Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution. Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration day. The lawsuit contends that the defendants: • Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT through legislation. • Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing different election rules and procedures in different counties within the states. According to the lawsuit: “Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. “Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non- legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.” Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control all four state legislatures. The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the Texas lawsuit says. The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana have issued statements of support for Texas case today. The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but has yet to adjudicate. SOURCES: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/ 162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07 %20FINAL.pdf https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/ texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election- idUSKBN28I27I https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/ docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Bluntemperor: 7:26am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Bigchristo: |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by hermesprogidy(m): 7:27am On Dec 09, 2020 |
Johnnyessence:Sorry. You go dey alright. 2 Likes |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:27am On Dec 09, 2020 |
hermesprogidy:newsmax is beaten down foxnews in the media rating. newsmax is doing the needful by broadcasting facts and truths to the general public. check Google on that. stop been deluded here. be well inform. |
Re: Supreme Court Rejects GOP's Bid To Nullify Biden's Win In Pennsylvania by Johnnyessence(m): 7:28am On Dec 09, 2020 |
hermesprogidy:you dey well before niii. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)
Robert Mugabe Sleeping During AU Summit / Idriss Deby: Boko Haram's Resilience Is Unprecedented / U.S. Intelligence Reports Says Mohammed bin Salman Approved Khashoggi's Murder
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 80 |