₦airaland Forum

MzPreshie:
You aint being serious, are you?

I am

Princecalm:
So what do you do?

Kill Them

Exjoker:
When did you date your first girl

Last year

priincess:
pfffffffffffffff (pronounce as spelt)

Hehe

priincess:
anywaiz DAT will make a nu trend, Romeo n Juliet died for love, Jack died for love and then the latest, JILTED LOVER KILLED FOR LOVE. buhahaha

Trust me, it's coming soon.

Exjoker:
How many girls have yourself kill so far

They never cross my lane lau

hannesy:
owk

and if you can't wait till then we could hook up, date for 3years, break up, and see what happens afterwards..

priincess:
shuuu, am really get scared of nairalanders now ooo. unto which levels na bro

>>>> over the fence

Aybee92:
Haha Na d way kill dey sweet for ur mouth na

#Frustration.. na wetin cause ham be that bro

hannesy:
nt too late,u can still make it

When I fall victim sha

Princecalm:
Killing is not the problem but what comes up after it that matters.

Yh. We forget the issue and leggo




and that's not good

Aybee92:
as in ehn u be militant or BH no offence pls

None.. Abeg oo

hannesy:
Lead us@ OP

So no one has done this in history too bad

3DCYCLOPS:
Bro I'll be the one facing the other side of the gun

Well then. I suggest you watch these movies; Salt, Wanted and The One for a start... on how to handle a gun actually.



that's how we treat cowards.

Janeify:
Okay,but seriously how many corpse have you deposited in the mortuary?


Just curious

Not a victim yet...

Dopeyomi:
Yes.. Infact I have professional assassins I can link you with they wunt charge yOu much and they'd do a clean jOb fOr yOu.. Pm me..

I'll need their service later.

esof1:
What happens to conscience?

Do me do you

3DCYCLOPS:
And you were trying to say?

Why don't you just kill every player that breaks your heart badly it'd be better that way.

esof1:
Kill the player and go to jail and ruin your future. "Get over it" means the player isn't worth d trouble u re gonna put yourself through.

You won't be caught or go to jail if you do the job very well.

misreal:
she walked up to me and started explaining how that I don't know how to treat a woman nicely.she said things like.....even though we are not dating:
1.I don't even bother to open the door for her when boarding a cab.
2.I am practically insensitive to her needs...she said so many things that I can't even expantiate on now.
thank God she told me ,now I am ready to treat women nicely..guys should learn to treat ladies nicely oh,because DAT special woman should be treated like a queen.

After 7 years... stories that touch the heart.

You see...... when I read stories about break up and the friendzone thingy, the disappointment and and heart break encountered sometimes bringing up the idea of committing suicide I just ask myself "why not kill them"?

Hey hey I'm serious about this. It sounds funny to me when people come here, post stories about break up, some will say their relationship lasted 3 yrs, some 5 yrs, some even 7 YEARS! And the next advice they get is "move on" "get over it" etc and the victim would be "thanks man" WTF? Does it end there? You mean the player goes scot free, after breaking a relationship of 3, 5, 7yr? Smh Humans can be funny.

Why not just kill this player? S/he doesn't worth living. It just pains me the way folks react to this issue. Get over it? Just like that?? Can't still conjure it up.

I know my question will appear weird to some, just that... it bothers me

ebukav:
Guys hw do i drug some one to make d person sleep or wat kind of drug can i use to drug some one dat can me d person sleep within 20 seconds of taking d drug guys, mature ans pls, tanx. Am nt planing on molestin any one, jst want to kwn for kwnin sake,

Irony Make person dey fear you o

Prexxy1:
a girl that likes you will always find a way to make you feel bad. saying this from experience

Oh really?

emekakelvin:
1) Oau questions are mainly based in pencil and paper test. The paper comprises 4 sudtect with a minimium of 23questions. According to report, the questions are set based on Jamb standard with little or no variety in some sudject.

2) Candidates aggregate are calculated by merging the jamb and pume score then divided by 2. For example, if jamb equals 253 and the pume score was 267 then the aggregate would be 260

3) There is no fixed cutoff for any course. The cutoff is actually determine by the performance of the students. For safety sake, a candidate is expected to score a minimium of 200 and 210 in ume and pume respectively.

4) Yes she does, but in extreme case like --->> a)When an individual is short of the expected cutoff and a file a request for admission processing. In most cases, the individual end up not getting the first course s/he chooses at first.

b) If the individual does not has the required...

Thanks bro.

starlingleanets:
1. From past questions and newly set questions.

2. 4 mark per question. For subject less than 25 i had no idea.

3. 200
4. NO not in this life.
5. 5000 above.
6. Yes from Higher to lower.

Thanks. Buh that number 4 and 6 could you please explain better?

Toyolad:
I mean,If u believe that there 'was' an intelligent creator then it's logical to reason that He didnt create all these just for him to leave them to operate by their own laws,He probably had a reason for embarking on the d task of creation..then,do u think,he created d universe nd went to sleep without having any influence in its operations?

Reason why Deist holds this belief is because of the lie in religion. They acknowledge the existence of a Creator, but that this Creator doesn't have any religion. They believe religion to be the work of man and not divine because of its flaws. On a normal basis, you believe in God through religion. But if a freethinker examines these religions he would discover that they are just mere works of men. Atheism also rejects God because of the lack of reasonable proof from religion.He maintains that there can't be a God because religion fails. Deism, in the other hand believes in the necessity of a Creator tho religion has no credit

Random Questions

- How does OAU set her questions?

- How does OAU calculate candidates' score?

- What is the OAU'S cutoff mark; post UTME and JAMB?

- Does OAU give the chance of doing a change of course after their post UTME examination?

- What is the carrying capacity of OAU?

- Does OAU allow change of course after 100 level?

loading...

sinequanon:
Finish your point. That is the art of discussion.

Are you trying to say that religious assertions are based on feeling and scientific assertions are based on observation. (I'm guessing, I really don't know what your point is).

Exactly. And have evidence in mind through experimentation.

If it is the above, then there is no difference apart from the words you are using. You don't see god and you don't see electrons. You see an effect and you interpret it as "god" or "electron".

And the effect of God is?

Not at all. Only a tiny handful of people decide theories. The rest go along with it.

What you have is faith that you can observe an electron and that you will accept the theory. (I doubt that you would have come up with the same theory independently. Otherwise history would be flooded with "scientific breakthroughs" as every scientist has same thought processes as Bohr, Plank, Rutherford etc.)

When the experiment performed concurs with the theory then the theory is true. You'll then agree that electron are there.

Let's make it a bit simpler. A theory goes that when acid reacts with base it gives salt and water. A rational mind, again, would reason "is this true?" Science won't tell you to accept it on hearing or just reading (faith) No, for before the theory was even proposed experiment had been undergone to PROVE the theory right. So you just go to the lab and confirm, mix acid and base together, and you get salt and water. Science doesn't stop. It tells you how you get the salt and water eluciadating it in form of equations. Subsequent experiments will still prove the theory right and lead to the same thing. The case with God is different. No proof. He's taken just by faith, and that brings a line between science and belief.

Electrons would not have become a theory without test and experiment to support it.

Your claim is no better than a Christian saying that everyone can pray and reach god.

Why should the opposite be? Everyone can perform neutralization and get the same result. If experiment doesn't support it its theory doesn't hold.

I didn't mention "same source", and I don't share the faith of those who look at it that way.

May I ask what your belief is

You have stated your opinion.

I am just wondering why you are repeating it instead of explaining it.

If your argument is that it is so because you said so, that is fine. We can close the argument knowing where you are coming from.

This doesn't need explanation. It's a fact every normal human accepts, except you wanna say your abnormal... guess I've been wasting my time.

Toyolad:
I Disagree sir...if you dnt av faith that something exists,that doesnt make the thing non-existent,e.g If i dont av faith dat other planets exist,dat doesnt mean that they dnt,some things exist independent of the mind!...So,thru faith,i believe that God exists,if all in d world are atheists,dnt doesnt change anything!

BTW,Nice point u made up there,kudos

We are taught to accept God based on faith, and faith eliminates evidence. When were born we lacked faith in God not until when we started growing, beholding the mysteries of the world, and this teaching of faith in God. Now try to instil the state you were when your born to the now that you are, and everyone around you. We would have no idea of God. Now you get what I meant by when faith ceases to exist, God ceases to exist.

sinequanon:
They are both personal. How do you know the electron is there without personal observation? It's called faith.

What's personal observation doing here? Maybe you didn't get the personal feeling I was talking about. This's a kind of feeling that is unknown to the outsider and which can be explained by the person having this feeling. Every one can observe the electron by its energy. Everyone will come up with the same theory, agreement and observation, unlike feelings that result into different kind of conflicting beliefs.

I believe that people do feel and communicate on the spiritual level, i.e with spirit. That also comes from personal experience. Difference is, that I am not so overawed by the "spiritual" that I start worshiping it like people did when they were overawed by mountains or thunder and lightning.

And if this belief is coming from the same source and it's[the source] consistent why should the outcome be different

That is just your faith talking. What you are repeating is your faith in science, just as a religious person will tell you that once you pray with all your heart, you will find "god".

You don't get my clear statement? anything relying on faith is not scientific.

sinequanon:
All that means is that you personally reject the evidence, not that there is no evidence. A religious person will tell you that they have prayed and felt their god. That, for them is evidence. You are told that the light in your room comes on because electrons are flowing down a wire. That, for you is evidence, although you have never seen an "electron".

Well well electron is there for everyone to analyse, that's science. Feelings from God is personal, so do no hold more credit. The fact is your actually believing those who tell you they have felt God somehow and not God himself

What science have you questioned? How have you questioned it? Let us be honest, most of it you repeat without any first hand experience, so you are relying on faith.

As long as a thing is scientific it's a fact, whether you question it or not. When explained there'd be no room for question as you'd see it yourself. Lastly,anything relying on faith is not scientific

herald9:
I don't argue with this... You're right.

But you mean all these came to be by chance?

That's the only option left, tho seems too complex to be.