₦airaland Forum

KingEbukasBlog:
None

beejaay:
Am still waiting for the promise guy oooooo...am more than ready for him.....help me call him out ooooooo, am still in Ilorin

chybykee:
Shoot him, he'll know after death

JackBizzle:
You must not have heard of the Arab/islamic golden age.

If you were not religiously brainwashed and also a habitual lie mohammed, you would have realised by now that many societies/cultures/religions contributed to science in their own way.

To credit christianity with modern science is a gross overstatement and hence a lie.

frank317:
Pra! Pra!! Praise tha looorrrd!!!! Brothers and sisters the lord God saved me from the hands of kidnappers. They actually disguised like kind people but I didn't know they were demonic agents. God inspired me to preach and their real identity was revealed... Brethren I prayed and cast and bind and the lord forced then to drop me, I had to track 6kilometers to work... Brethren I would have been dead by now... PRAISE THA LOOOOOORD!!!!!!!!!!

winner01:
He is under no obligation to say the truth. Will you as a christian run from an atheist?
Would Jesus run from an atheist?
These people are desperate. This thread might be headed for front page.Stalin is one out of almost 70 atheists that imposed atheism on the world in the 20th century.
Ive given examples no one has been able to refute.
Till today in atheist north korea, christians are still hung on a cross fire, steamrolled and crushed to death.
Christianity is the reason you have a voice.
So when will you frame your story.
If you can be this desperate to spend your life on a religion section, then i dont think a very convincing story will be much of a big dealIf it was a miracle story, the idiots will be screaming evidence upandan.Keep crying....
We believe in Christ.
We will continue to.

felixomor:
Even the bible contains quotes from satan, quotes from men etc.
So u can see that u dont even understand the term "bible"?

If u like quote what the devil said from the bible (e.g when the devil tempted Jesus) and begin to argue that the bible is the word of God.
Even a kindergatten kid knows thats called "quoting out of context"

So no point there, sorry

And please read about prophets in the bible who lied. Its all there. Again, quoting out of context cant be used as an alarm raiser.
You simply cut and paste a part of Jeremiah's lamentations and use it to make a claim. Yeah right.

Its as good as cutting "God exists" from a sentence from Richard Dawkins book and using it to conclude that Richard Dawkins believe in God. Stupidity!

Nevertheless, I know why u keep quoting out of context, its because u just want to keep talking by all means.

But even kids can read and know better. You can really improve.

felixomor:
Hehehehehe, Wetin u dey wait for. I was even expecting bones, u brought milk

The last time I checked, u were the one in the devil's trap. he has tricked u into believing he doesnt exist. So that u never get to confess your sins and fornication and ask God for forgiveness and as a result go to hell, if u die prematurely.
Please come out. Jesus loves u

dharay99:

Its good tho, at least they will both be
having frequent vigils...#e good f0r am.

exhibit7432:
Mine is Friday oh

drizzytee:
I'll be resuming on monday guys. Feel free to hit me on my bbm or dm if you need assistance or have questions about admission you want answered, especially engineering student. I think I might be able to help.

shadeyinka:
For the first time raphieMontella I appreciate the way you presented facts and reasons in defence of your position. I hope this can continue and I tell you, you are on the way of becoming a friend.

You have some very strong point here to which I may not have adequate answer; but I will try my best.



I read the whole of Rom9:1-33 and I must confess, you have a point. How can Pharaoh know that he was following a script destined for him? Rom9 seems to say that God reserves the right to do with anyone whatever He chooses. Using the illustration of the Potter and the Clay, God is sovereign and thus justified. If this is the case, then the whole episode falls on Gods Responsibility to punish or not to punish a mans action. To this end, no one knows how God will decide/judge the case.

However, can anyone say that his misbehaviour on earth was caused by God? No!
For God could say "I didn't make you do evil..you chose to do evil by your own volition". In that case, the responsibility falls on man to do his utmost at being righteous. If indeed God designed him for evil and he did evil despite the fact that he strove to do good, then since God is righteous, he might have a case.

However, in the case of Judas, there is no evidence that he was destined to betray Jesus



The above is just a case of Foreknowledge and Devine Timing in action. If Jesus was born in Nigeria, one of his friends would have betrayed him. Foreknowledge is different from Predestination!

The scripture is:

Rom 8:29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

Step 1: Foreknowledge
Step2: Predestination for those who were Foreknown to conform to the image of Christ.

If you where NOT foreknown, you are not predestined!

DoctorAlien:
raphieMontella,

You can educate yourself here: www.exploregod.com/the-language-of-dna

After reading, come back and attempt the OP.

gaelllic:
The third dimension is height. Time is posited (wrongly) as the fourth.

Observation - light bulb comes on.

Inference - perhaps its magic... or perhaps its a tiny sun.. .or perhaps its electricity...

Evidence - the flow of electrons can be measured, it can be induced, it can be stored. So we have evidence of the physical
phenomenon (electric current), and its medium (copper wire).


Observation - plants die in darkness

Inference - perhaps they were lonely...perhaps plants need light...or perhaps its magic

Evidence - The activity of photosynthesis can be observed in the lab. Along with the medium in which it occurs (chlorophyll). Its
may be measured, and its dependence on chlorophyll proven.


Observation - metal attracts metal

Inference - perhaps metal is friendly...perhaps magic again...perhaps there is a force which exists in/around the metal

Evidence - this force can be detected, it can be induced in metal, it's direction can be measured (compass) as well as its
magnitude (magnetometer).

So let's take this from the top.

Observation - objects seek horizontal rest.

Inference - magic?...invisible companions holding us all down, or perhaps there is a force which exists in/around all objects (gravity).

Evidence - ??




You've taken the observation and called it evidence. You could have just chosen magic.

Now you go find me something that fits in that third row.

sinequanon:
Are you drunk?

If not, go back to school and learn to communicate in some intelligible language.

DoctorAlien:
Tryna deviate from the OP?

Anyway, the DNA copies the instructions coded(by pyrimidine bases) in it with extreme accuracy, such that a mistake occurs only once in about 10000000000000 times. This same mistake is responsible for variation in species. That is the reason why even siblings don't look exactly alike.

Address the OP, and don't bring in the ACTGGG-whatever.

code (kōd) n. 1. a. A system of signals used to represent letters or numbers in transmitting messages. b. A system of symbols, letters, or words given certain arbitrary meanings, used for transmitting
messages requiring secrecy or brevity. c. An access code. d. A special command, such as a sequence of keystrokes, that allows a user to activate a hidden
or accidental feature in a computer program or
video game. 2. A system of symbols and rules used to represent instructions to a computer; a computer program. 3. Genetics The genetic code.
4. a. A systematically arranged and comprehensive collection of laws. b. A systematic collection of regulations or rules of procedure or conduct: a building code. 5. Medicine Code blue. 6. Slang A patient whose heart has stopped beating, as in cardiac arrest.

DoctorAlien:
Brother, stop embarrassing yourself and google the meaning of "code." DNA is a code, a language. Moreover, codes and programs can be modified whereas laws can't bend. Please read. Don't come to arguments uninformed.

The law of gravity is isn't a code, just like the laws of thermodynamics. They are not languages.

Can a language be written by anything other than an Intelligent Being?

DoctorAlien:
So, according to you? Gravity is a code? (Chai!) Do you even know what a code is?

We are not talking about laws in this riddle.

A code is a program(software) written, on which a process can run. More like an information/instruction.
So, gravity is a program on which what runs?

This is very very embarrassing coming from you. Please educate yourself.

sinequanon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

sinequanon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

sinequanon:
Absolutely, just as music is independent of musical notation.

Nature doesn't care about the models scientists use to describe it. Models have become obsolete, even. The nature they described remains.

That depends on context. The context being debated in this thread is Darwin's ToE.

4everGod1:
Young man chai! I have to shake my head at this your comment. chai and chai again.

sinequanon:
1 + 1 = 2 isn't science. It is mathematics. To be precise, it is a mathematical definition.

As for your second rhetorical question, it also shows lack of understanding. There are many
examples in the scientific theory of evolution, itself, of co-option and exaptation.

Unfortunately, this is typical. People who follow science mainly through popular media have little idea of what they are supporting.

KingEbukasBlog:
What the heck man ?! I don't understand your response one bit . Am I talking about Stalin or Hong ? Apparently , you just mentioned The Taiping Rebellion without knowing the story . I thought you knew the story !!

Mtcheew , you atheists are just funny !

Just like the other day , CoolUsername mentioned Confucianism and Taoism and I thought he understood the tenets of those religions . Turned out he knew nothing and was just making senseless arguments .

You guys should just stick to your lame God does not exist arguments and stop mentioning topics you have little or no knowledge about !

DoctorAlien:
Seun,

You said scientists have a good record of saying the truth.(LOL) In 2007, fishermen caught a very rare creature known as a Coelacanth. Evolutionists originally told us that this “living fossil” had gone extinct 70 million years ago. It turns out that they were only off by 70 million years. See the link here: [url]news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6925784.stm[/url]

Perhaps, the most famous fossil in the history of the theory of evolution, "Piltdown Man", turned out to be a giant hoax. See the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man

Chai! LOL I laugh at the way "scientists" deceive these gullible atheists.

Cc: donffd

sinequanon:
Science, itself, isn't about truth. It is about a certain kind of "consistency" and "predictability".

Scientific findings are not "true", they are "currently accepted in the field". Science evolves.

And, in general, scientists are no more honest than anybody else. Because something is "scientifically accepted" does not mean it is true.

The worst recent case of deception in the scientific community is the supposed confirmation of the Higgs Boson.

You will recall that, during the theatrical debacle, designed to justify investment in enhancing the Large Hadron Collider, Stephen Hawking actually pretended that he had lost his bet that the the Higgs Boson did not exsist, and Peter Higgs was awarded the Nobel Prize!!

KingEbukasBlog:
Atheism is political - communism is proof .

Christianity is not political in anyway .

You need to understand the story . The warlord's subterfuge was simply creating his own version of Christianity to lure fanatics mostly from his ethnic group to overthrow the government .

I want you to think .

1. Hong's soldiers were up to 1 million and they were mostly from his clan , the few others were from minor ethnic groups .

2. Hong was interested in overthrowing the Qing's dynasty - the clan in power .

3. Hong claimed to be the brother of Christ . Seriously ? Don't get me started on how he "discovered" he was Jesus' brother

4. Hong added his own books to the bible as the war progressed .

5. Historians describe Hong as ostensibly Christian . Look up the word "ostensible"

So claiming the war was fought for a religious cause is ludicrous . Hong used Christianity as a tool to grow his army and overthrow the Manchu Dynasty , also called Qing Dynasty . You don't need to be a genius to figure that out .