₦airaland Forum

EyeHateGod:
I need my freedom from religion!
Tell this to winner01/truthman2012!

felixomor:
Your analogy with a football match is wrong.
Why because a football match states the total and individual result.

A better analogy is a teacher and a student belonging to a class.

If I say "i taught a boy 2 years ago, his name was Bartimeus"

The statement doesnt mean the boy was the only person in his class.
The statement also doesnt mean that he was the only person i taught.

Thats it.

And u cant dictate for me that I must mention the number of people in his class because that is not the aim of my message, lest u get distracted.

Ranchhoddas:
How do they tag people on a comment. People have got to read this. Cc Hopefullandlord, Raphiemontella, Johnnydon22, EyehateGod, Donffdd, Kevoh, Sonoflucifer, KingEbukasblog ,SirWere, Deicide, Winner01 etc Make una help me tag the rest. My eyes have seen my ears

felixomor:
Ok na? Yet U r the one that challenged somebody to a debate.
Issorai

3 He left Judaea, and departed again into Galilee. 4 And he must needs go through Samaria........
6 Now Jacob's well was there. Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey sat thus on the
well: and it was about the sixth hour .....
8 (For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat(food).)

28 Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early.....

9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? ....

If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth
not, because he seeth the light of this world.

felixomor:Again, the answer to this rests on bible chronlogy which i will keep referring to .

I hope u can see the perfection of God's Word, we keep singing about?

You see that there is not a single atom of contradiction there?

felixomor:
U replying this comment not mentioning u already shows u know what the problem is.

Anyway, till they come. Or till u do the needful

felixomor:
I hope everybody is seeing what is happening on this debate thread o?

Cc Ranchhoddas, u have become silent.
I call u earlier.
U no respond.

Its like ur internet is not working?

Simple answer again: he healed 2 of them While
Mark and Luke focuses on the story of Bartimeus, the most out-spoken of the blind men.

I explain thus;

(Matthew 20:29-30) - "And as they were going out from Jericho, a great multitude followed Him. 30And behold, two blind men sitting by the road, hearing that Jesus was passing by, cried out, saying, "Lord, have mercy on us, Son of David!"

(Mark 10:46-47) - "And they *came to Jericho. And as He was going out from Jericho with His disciples and a great multitude, a blind beggar named Bartimaeus, the son of Timaeus, was sitting by the road. 47And when he heard that it was Jesus the Nazarene, he began to cry out and say, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!"

There is no contradiction. Matthew 20:29-30 makes it clear that as Jesus was leaving Jericho that there were two blind men sitting by the road. If there are two blind men, then there is certainly at least one there as well.

Again, Mark never said Bartimeus was the only blind man who sat on that spot.

The one focused on was Bartimeaus. Both called out for healing (Matthew 20:29-30). Perhaps Mark and Luke focus on Bartimeaus' account because he was the loudest and most determined of the both of them.

If there are two blind men, then there is certainly at least one there as well.

felixomor:
With reference to "galilee" u stated above?

Please o, I dont want to shout so that u wont say i insulted you

This is John 1:32 - And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.

And this is John 1:35 - Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;

I cant see any where "galilee" is stated.

Remember, this is a debate and specificity is crucial.

Please Is this another "typo"?

cc: Ranchhoddas

Ranchhoddas:
A Jewish Rabbi that once walked the face of the Earth. Deified and worshipped by many and also held in contempt by some others.

analice107:
Decide.

Shift.

Did Abraham killed his son?

Any voice which demands you do what the word of God is against is of the devil. God wont work against His words.

There are basically three voices speaking in our minds,
Your own voice.
The voice of the deceiver (Satan)

The voice of God. which takes spiritual sensitivity to hear.

4everGod1:
Science keeps hailing God while atheists delude themselves into thinking that it negates God.

Thats a very recent discovery which we Christians have been making use of long before now. We know and see what carnal men cannot know and see.

Thanks for sharing bro.

promise101:
You are still stupidly sounding so foolish!

1. the NON-PHYSICAL part of a person which is the
seat of emotions and character; the soul.

How come do you believe a NON-PHYSICAL part of a person?

You can never cease amazing me?

So amazing you didn't take selfies with a NON-PHYSICAL part of a person before you believe it exists.

Bro, for something to be non-physical, is it not spiritual??

felixomor:
Everyone knows u r superior when it comes to ad hominems.

felixomor:
Thats actually u u r describing. U dont even stylishly try to take corrections.

4everGod1:
The context of being in High spirit or High spirits is different from the context of DON'T MESS UP MY SPIRIT! Guy even you know this. Sometimes oversabi no good and always retorting is also not good especially when you are clearly wrong.

4everGod1:
Keep on looking for an escape route. Feel free to wriggle.

4everGod1:
I thought you did not believe in God hence also His holy spirit so how would you recognise a person who has or does not have the Holy spirit because your word began with CLEARLY I HAVE NO HOLY SPIRIT. ..

This means you know about the Holy spirit and can attest to the existence and right now you feel that I do not possess Him based on my comment...

Why are you contradictory?

DoctorAlien:
So you have a spirit? Wow. Tell me more.

my god what is this...? The boys were in high spirits before the match... Does it translate to your biblical spirit?

4everGod1:
Ouch! I never knew Atheists believed in spiritual existence. ..So you have a spirit? Interesting!

4everGod1:
And would the sun turn cold if you get annoyed? I suppose that when Ranchhoddas mentioned typo you also did not say typo right? Do you even know what a typo is?

Your respect for me matters not and weighs in ad a negative especially with the tone you just launched this comment.

Your error in ignorance it was and not a typo so gulp that down with a glass of chilled water or whatever tickles your fancy.

Already in your first response you already called me names despite that fact that in all I said I never called you a liar but simply said "you lied". I guess your imaginary respect for me was always just a mirage as always ...wink...

Learn to own up when you make faux pas and not all these rants you so enjoy doing all in a bid to cover up.

DoctorAlien:
There is nothing impossible for someone who said gravity is a code

4everGod1:
Wrong! you offered him an escape route when you called it a typo and he latched onto it and also claimed a typo.

Some of us are vehement over the truth and abhor lies. He lied by claiming it was a typo when it clearly wasnt...Even you know it was not a typo especially now that you read my post.

He lied plain and simple! it would have been more honorable if after you said it was a typo he would have said no it was not a typo but an error but he rather opted to lie along with your excuse.

He Lied!

4everGod1:
its neither a strawman nor is it trivial. Its a clear cut evidence that MrMontela is ignorant of scripture and just arguing while trying to look for something to hold against felixomor.

If you are being truthful you would
clearly see this.

4everGod1:
[b]Young man there was no cop out,

Your representation of Red for Scarlet was no typo. What is a typo is when you want to type red and you Type it as Read or Rid or Rin Or Ren Or Rev or anything else but not Purple. Red is a 3 letter word while Purple is a 6 letter word so when typing and you claim to have made a typo how could you not know your 3 letter word was now over 3 letters and now 6?

You obviously made a genuine ignorant error and not a typo so i suggest you apologize for your ignorant error and move on and stop using Typo to lie.

You obviously thought red and scarlet were different colours which in truth they are because Scarlet is a brighter shade of red which is a mixture of red and orange so due to its brilliance is called scarlet but here now as proof that you are ignorant of your argument you still rated red and scarlet as the same when they are not.

cc Ranchhoddas[/b]

promise101:
bro, i know dumb guys like you won't know that there is something wrong with that challenge.

i will be posting a topic on that anyway!

anyway, just swerve out of this thread please.

promise101:
you would only insult when you lack logical views of defending yourself!

felixomor:
"In context to something" Lord Jesus, which kind grammar be that?
U see, There goes the folly again.
Its like ur "contradictions" don finish.