₦airaland Forum

jackbizzle...nice thread bruh

felixomor1:
Not even a single point made! . Please have u run out of scriptural "contradictions"?
I am waiting.
#StillFeelingTheBlessing

so youve accepted god lies and is a liar... Good... Im glad everyone can see this...not a matter of personal opinion

There is no contradiction there Mr. man
Matthew is clearly deficient on the time of the day when the disciples noticed the dry tree while Mark clearly specifies that they saw it in the next morning when they were returning.
Even a kid can clearly read that.

this is a bloody lie...
And i will post the verses for all to see again

Matthew 21:19-21Amplified Bible (AMP) 19 Seeing a lone fig tree at the roadside, He went to it and found nothing but leaves on it; and He said to
it, “Never again will fruit come from you.” And at
once the fig tree withered. 20 When the disciples saw it, they were astonished and asked, “How is it that the fig tree has withered
away all at once?” 21 Jesus replied to them, “I

clearly the fig tree withered at once in the presence of the apostles and they even commented on it at that moment....all these happened in a single time frame..
The day he was coming back to jerusalem(on the road to jeru.) after he had left bethany(Where he spent the previous night)
as shown in
mathhew 21 17 and 18

17 Then He left them and went out of the city to
Bethany, and spent the night there.

:18 Now early in the morning, as Jesus was coming back to the city[JERUSALEM] he was hungry

while in mark...

[quote][quote]Mark 11:14-15
Amplified Bible (AMP)
14 He said to it, “No one will ever eat fruit from you again!”And His disciples were
listening [to what He said].
15 Then they came to Jerusalem.
19 When evening came, Jesus and His disciples would leave the city.

Mark 11:20-21Amplified Bible (AMP) 20 In the morning, as they were passing by, the disciples saw that the fig tree had withered away
from the roots up. 21 And remembering, Peter said to Him, “Rabbi (Master), look! The fig tree which
You cursed has withered!”

here we can see in verse 14 and 15 that he cursed the fig tree before he came to jerusalem...and when he cursed the fig tree...the disciples listened and heard and saw nothing..(verse 14 ending) and verse 19 shows us that evening came(the evening of the day he cursed the tree)
verse 20 shows us that it was the next day...when they were returning to jerusalem that they noticed the tree....verse 21 perfectly sums it up that the withering of the fig tree didnt happen the previous day

21 And remembering, Peter said to Him, “Rabbi (Master), look! The fig tree which
You cursed has withered!”

peter remembered

so mrfelixomor...pls tell us how this is not a contradiction....
I need neutral minds like ranchhoddas et all...to comment on this and say if it is a contradiction or not...
Neutral minds pls comment
cc felixomor ranchhoddas

branhampaul:
Ain't Got Time To Start Posting Links.. Google 'Science Discover That Humans Have Soul'.
Can You Explain To Me Why Native Doctors Possess Powers Which Is Of Satan?..

you say?
Science discovers an immaterial independent soul as facts? Or postulates?
Mind what you say o

omhor:
I believe in miracles. Jesus turned water into wine. He raised the dead. Heal the sick. Restore blindness. The greatest of them all is He died on the cross just for u and I to be saved. Don't ignore the power behind miracles.

wetin concern jesus with black man wey dey africa?

DoctorAlien:
Wrong. The Catholic church wanted to hide the Bible from me at all costs. But GOD graciously brought the Bible to me by the hands of heroes like Wycliffe and Luther and Tyndale.

the catholics created the bible..and gave it to you...abc

ovadozes:
Do you know the second law if thermodynamics??

do you?

honourhim:
How do you know the end of your days for you to believe and enter heaven? You just want to noise.

the thief on the cross....remember him?

grandlexuz:
So how did the pastor break the law? There is no denying you have a serious problem with comprehension. Cheers

you do have a problem with comprehending what i said..
He obstructed justice....he withheld info about a serious crime...in nigeria yes the law protects them...but i said i dont support it oga...
If providence hadnt let his ''atrocities'' catch up with him...he would be a free man dude..free of the punishment for his crime...
You grab?

Christians and their pastors disobey jesus's words... As seen here www.nairaland.com/3301555/why-christians-pastors-men-god

they clearly dont believe in him

plaetton:
Schizophrenia spotted.

And how did your big mind arrive at this if not through fertile imagination ?

I mean, look at the absurdity and hypocrisy that you guys are displaying here.

You imagine a somebody supposedly existing outside of space and time. How you that exists inside space and time arrived at this remains a mystery. But then, you have the audacity and temerity to mock another who questions this mental contraption of yours.

I don't get it.

" God exists outside of space and time" . Full stop. No questions.

What a load of cow dung.

Wasn't he the same God that walked in the garden, asked Cain where Abel was, took Moses on eagle's wings, wrestled with Jacob, had an appetite for barbecued lambs, and even got his own share of virgins from the spoils of war ?

Now, in the age of reason and scientific rationalism, he has conveniently taken up residence in the outskirts of space and time ?

Na wa.

you forgot he appears as a cloud or something...
Mount sinai days

Ranchhoddas:
Bigger mansions

and bigger private jets

ovadozes:
How did the earth come about, was it designed or it happened by chance?? I need answers

planets form by a pattern..
A natural pattern

Are you a religious fanatic?

branhampaul:
Devil Is Deceiving You Bera Get Wise And Know God..
If No God, Why Do;
1. Miracles Happen.

which ones?
Placebo's or amputees?

2. How Can There Be An Antagonist (satan) Without A Protagonist.

prove satan exists as a being

3. Why Did Science Even Confirmed That Humans Have Soul.

whats this lie?
Stop it

4. Why Doesn't The Bible Contradict Itself?

it does...like hell

5. Why Are All Bible Prophecies Coming To Pass?

like which?

6. Why When A Child Of God Get Shot They Don't Die.

i forgot to laff here..
.
.

Mr.Man Thinkkk Naaa..

he is...perfectly

Ranchhoddas:
The idea of an unending furnace of torture is nothing but an insult to the Creator.

do bad,,in the end of your days...believe and enter heaven...
Do good to all humanity...disbelieve and burn..
Cool...

branhampaul:
Why Do You Have To Tag Your Mumu People.. Get Something Doing..

he tagged christians dude
so yes they are mumu's according to you

DoctorAlien:
No. I'm a Bible-believing Christian.

this bible was given to you by catholics...

lol

femarse:
atoms are physical snap one with your phone and let see (u can not even see the physical ameoba by your wide open blind eyes)
the point is open your mind dont close it and say it is not possible otherwise u wont be flying airplane today because going by your close mind it is not possible

atoms are not physical...
Magnetic force not physical...
Gravity not physical...
They are all supernatural phenomenom...well done...

KingEbukasBlog:
How is the supernatural illogical ?

no proof..(testable)

KingEbukasBlog:
Atheists own many accounts

Take a look at this

https://www.nairaland.com/3299206/exposed-truthman83-lied-deceived-nairalanders

dont forget christians too...

KingEbukasBlog:
Its all folklore . This should help : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tooth_fairy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_myth
happy?

Have you perused through numerous threads concerned with the testimonies of Christians who were once atheists ? People are having their doubts cleared through personal experiences , some people (deists) don't actually need it .

you do know christianity also loses converts right?

felixomor1:
this is what were are working on...
The bots ban me...when ever i want to answer the first contradiction in detail...no idea why...
But youre wrong there..
The [b]both words used have different origins in relation to the dyes used in producing them..
Read exo 25:4, rev17:4...you'd find out the two colours were treated differently..
Cc felixomor.[/b]


Again, u show ur desire too keep talking to hide a defeat of ur argument.

What has color description got to do with the dye it is produced with?

Well, Here is a scripture where red is used to describe "crimson" and "crimson" is linked to "scarlet"

Isa. 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.


Here is the word for "scarlet" in the hebrew manuscipt of the bible.

שׁני
shânı̂y
shaw-nee'
Of uncertain derivation; crimson, properly the insect or its color, also stuff dyed with it: - crimson, scarlet (thread).

Now here is the original greek translation from the part of the bible u are arguing.

"scarlet" in Matthew 27:28

κόκκινος
kokkinos
kok'-kee-nos
From G2848 (from the kernel shape of the insect); crimson colored: - scarlet (colour, coloured).

Those are straight from the original manuscript of the bible.

I purposely copied them straight so as to show that u have never ventured in your life to study the hebrew and greek writings from which the bible were translated to English. That is really sad of u.

U just jump in cut and paste and come to argue.

But u can see above that the bible uses red, crimson and even scarlet to some time refer to the same colour.

U have fired blank there!

If u like argue against the original greek translation, the truth is obvious now.


Should i roll in More contradictions?

As i Said before, what r u waiting for?
Or u don tire to quote bible out of context?



okay good


Oh, so u see that there was no contradiction just that u were in a hurry and thought u had found suya meat for ur argument abi?


[b[i]]no! this is michief from you...
take note of all the bolded words...
Then tell me how there's no contradiction[/i][/b]

I say it again,
There is no contradiction there Mr. man

One of the verses is more detail than the other. Even a child can see that. But u r trying to capitalize on the information deficiency of Matthew in comparison to Mark. Thats all.

Matthew is clearly deficient on the time of the day when the disciples noticed the dry tree while Mark clearly specifies that they saw it in the next morning when they were returning.
Even a kid can clearly read that.



will you just stop making things up?
where did i substitute judah as God?
The passage says God was [b]with judah but he wasnt able to defeat the valley dudes because they had iron chariots...(more powerful than judah's resource)
Not because they didnt have faith..
In the whole of judges 1..i cant find a place which hints that their ''faith'' caused so or they fell into unbelief...
Can u provide something that hints so?[/b]



Again u show ur desperate style of bible study:

U read Judges 1 but why didnt u go to Judges 2?

because u r in a hurry to come and argue abi?

See God showing them the reason for their failure in battle of the valley?

Judges 2:1-4 -

And an angel of the LORD came up from Gilgal to Bochim, and said, I made you to go up out of Egypt, and have brought you unto the land which I sware unto your fathers; and I said, I will never break my covenant with you.
Jdg 2:2 And ye shall make no league with the inhabitants of this land; ye shall throw down their altars: but ye have not obeyed my voice: why have ye done this?
Jdg 2:3 Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be as thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare unto you.
Jdg 2:4 And it came to pass, when the angel of the LORD spake these words unto all the children of Israel, that the people lifted up their voice, and wept.


U can see that ur bible study is below par abi?

Well, i am not surprised. Ur heart is crooked, thats why. Repent now.

Meanwhile, have u got any other so called "contradictions"?

I expected bones, u r bringing milk.

Please do sharp sharp. Afterall its very easy to always quote out of context. Nevertheless, I am #FeelingBlessed

cc raphieMontella

will answer this in the evening....
Ma go field first

Kgdavid:
1. That is the fallacy of composition. That logic can prove some objective beliefs does not mean it can be applied to prove all. When it comes to atheism, logic tells us that life must have started somewhere and that all things must come from something or someone. Logic also makes us realize that for the preceding principle to be true then we need to ask where the source came from. For which we have no simple answer. Logic then leads us to conclude that the truth must be something beyond the realm of known logical non-spiritual realities. Thus belief in the supernatural is entirely logical.

logic and faith...incompactible...
Superrnatural is not logical...it can never be logical

khalhokage:
The distance between Egypt and Israel is about 613 Km but it took Moses and the Israelites 40yrs to complete their journey. Possibly, each day they only walked 43 meters. I wish Moses was alive to explain this kind of laziness.

them been de wait for manna

Kgdavid:
don't refuse to understand me.

I already told you, you would probably disagree about whether or not my evidence would be evidence to you, which is why i said that subjectively, what i consider to be evidence of God is absolutely veracious.

so repeating this worn out line of my car exists because i feel it , etc, is really not applicable nor relevant here. Besides, can you feel, see, touch or smell atoms with any of your five senses? In order to perceive microbes, we must apply a different set of senses i.e a microscope. This should at least tell you that you should open your mind to the possibility of there being other ways of perceiving things.

are you kidding me?
Microbes are physical...
Spiritual is not...no testable proof..

WORLDPEACE:
The point is, how is Atheism better?

how is christianity better?

hopefulLandlord:
I'm not even arguing that

Its his manipulation of words and statistic bull he spills as fact

He would say those guys are Christians but would be quick to define "Christians" in another way when it comes to the destruction those same "Christians" in that same era wrought

may the tooth fairy bless you for this comment.

Jdazzle:
Thanks, we need to address that which has been left unattended to for sometime now...

My name is Rapha-el
native name chukwu......
Both have ''God'' in them...
M an agnostic atheist...
Changes nothing

lol...impressive

lol

gaelllic:
Your link:

Artificial gravity is an acceleration resulting from the application of a force.
In the context of manned spaceflight, artificial gravity may alleviate the adverse health effects of prolonged weightlessness.[1] Astronauts
routinely experience intermittent accelerations caused by the force of a rocket engine. However, the term artificial gravity usually
refers to a sustained Normal force provided by a rigid structure in uniform circular motion.

Apparently it is you who lost interest in physics early on.

Remedial, semester 2. Briefly.

As per the highlighted, the article refers to a simulation of 'gravitational effect' by accelerating an object. This would be similar to

describing the force pinning a piece of paper to a moving car windshield as 'induced gravity'. Clearly false.

The 'effect' is being simulated. The force itself is not produced.

Your link :

Gravity can be simulated in various ways:


Rotation

A rotating spacecraft will produce the feeling of inertia on its inside hull. The rotation drives any object inside the spacecraft toward
the hull, thereby giving the appearance of a gravitational pull directed outward. .

Thus, the "gravity" felt by the objects is simply the reaction force of the object on the hull reacting to
the centripetal force of the hull on the object, in accordance with Newton's Third Law.

Please note that the quote marks above are not mine.

The effects of electricity are not 'simulated'. (e.g. lighting a tiny match in the light bulb).

Actual electricity is actually (i.e truly) produced by artificial means. Ditto for magnetism, or nuclear energy.

True artificial gravity would be draw people towards the centre of the craft, rather than pushing them outwards (centrifugal force).


Your link :

However, the term artificial gravity usually refers to a sustained Normal force provided by a rigid
structure in uniform circular motion

The rotation drives any object inside the spacecraft toward the hull, thereby giving the appearance of
a gravitational pull directed outward. Often referred to as a centrifugal force, the "pull" is actually a
manifestation of the inertia of the objects inside the spacecraft


No one has ever, or will ever, produce 'gravity'. QED.


Addendum :

Do not merely regurgitate textbooks in order to pass exams, or for a pat on the head.

Face physical facts. And challenge received knowledge if it is false.

Or are you among them who are only rebels when it is time to challenge God?

Do you find yourself docile when it is time to challenge (errant) man?

why are you creating an argumentum ad lapidem??
I clearly showed you where to go to and you're creating a strawman and inducing an argumentum ad nauseam.
Ask me to prove that the speed of light is 3(10^ by my own measurments space tools etc
also ask me to prove that stars are not light bulbs in the sky...



Crap.