₦airaland Forum

You mixing things up


This is another road not the calabar to Lagos road

I know where that one is in calabar and is under construction

SeeWahala:
Fellow Nigerians 🤗 Okay so let's do small calculation together . . .

Tilumbu has done 4 yrs to be able to complete just 1 section of this over 750 kilometres road. Let's be generous and give this total section a 30 kilometres stretch . . .

So, that is . . . To know how many regimes and total time (in years) keeping in mind it's being done with a whopping N15 TRILLION NAIRA of taxpayers money by a tilumbu . . . Let's press the answer out 🤳

Therefore,

750 ÷ 30 (750 ÷ 4) / 15,000,000,000 . . .

hey! HEY!! See my phone has grown legs and is running away! . . .



APC and their fraudulent propaganda activities 😏

Hire me as a monetization expert

Copyright ©️ Digital Bimpe

This outcry of suspend Gbaja or he should resign is just useless honestly.
The body language of the presidency shows they stand with their man.
Even if the presidency is force to suspend Gbajabiamila or he resign by himself.
Whose among the different agencies that has been cornered by the presidency is credible and independent enough to investigate this case and come out to indict Gbaja.
.
Indicting Gbajabiamila either while he's still there or suspended is a slap in the face of the presidency. So the investigation is heading nowhere provided it's the presidency that's sourcing the investigators.
So Atiku and co, make una leave this suspension matter abeg.
Wetin don happen don happen, na cover up remain now.

Buhari4dullard:
What's the difference between what he is accused of and David Umahi?

Poor man dey suffer for Nigeria.

BlueRayDick:
20 people in the day and 20 people in the night will guard 700km of road and it's not funny to you? 😂

So according to you it's the total 40 people that will prevent your car from getting stuck in man hole?

i know that you have an intense dislike for anything associated with APC , but you should not allow it to cloud your reasoning

this country has a serious vandalisation problem where infrastructure provided by the government is looted

it is the same reason trains are being derailed in the bush - because nigerians are stealing them

it should also be obvious to you that it takes TIME to dismantle a fence, or to wedge a manhole out from the road - and these are not items you can just run off with. all those patrolling need to do is sight the thieves and raise the alarm

it is also the reason why shanties are being cleared from the sides of the road because, these are also places your friendly neighbourhood iron condemn can temporarily store stolen materials [cue shouts of wickedness]

perhaps you are waiting until YOU have an accident due to a vandalised road, at which time you will come here to talk about how useless the APC government is - because complaining is easy

maybe you can come up with a solution to vandalisation of government funded infrastructure

the first step to securing anywhere is direct engagement of the community. members of the community already see when all this is going on, but they are not personally invested in stopping it. this is one measure that can be taken - as a first step

pappilo:
Disrespect/No regard

Whilst I can handle/take disrespect from the person I am seeing, one must properly deal with any disrespect from their family member immediately otherwise you go still meet am for front.

I am 12 years older than my ex. She is 2 years older than her sister. Whenever we are together with her sister na so she go dey send me message, dey take hand call me.

Let me give an example. We were all together on holiday and I was in a hotel lobby chatting with the said sisters husband. Na so the girl dey take hand beckon me, I pointed to her husband and shook her head and she motioned for both of us. Na so we waka go meet she and my ex. The girl then said to me and her husband "go and bring down our suitcases from the room". This wasnt her first time but this was the worst one. Me wey I get bad mouth but I have always held my tongue. I later complained to my ex yet again.

It happened again just over a month ago at a party and because I didnt want to cause no drama I waited till we go home and told my ex that she should tell her sister that the next time she talks to me like that I will slap her.

Omo see voltron. My ex defended her sister. She was not even having it dey shout ontop my head say if him sister dey disrespect their papa, who I be wey dem no fit disrespect. Na so I know say that relationship don finish. I will take some disrespect from the person I am seeing because that come a with the territory but you see from family members especially when you cosign it. That will never fly

Your weakness started from the onset. The fact that, her family member (not even her parents, for the sake of old age and tradition) like her sister is confident enough to send you on several errands, exposed you as a simp. You F up!!!

Odianose13:
You need mental reassessment.

You too. But never mind all that, state your refutal of the thesis point by point

Stephen0mozzy:
Put off my clothes to fight keh.
I no need to remove clothes to remove your teeth Sir 😁

That's is the highest level of madness 😄😄
They call it Fra😂😂

SonOfDSoil01:
you can tell that to the marines……just like I said, I hope the friendship continues after gringory have been rejected at the polls

But why does it make you jittery? Are one of the parties involved?

AntiisIam:
Sule koni what fun e

Kopa da lo ba e seh : Gbam
You personally .

What's the difference between what he is accused of and David Umahi?

doffman:
Lobatan ; wait o , am I sure I am not chatting with ward 7 patient ? 🥱

😅

Sule, koni what fun e

doffman:
Kolleeee daaa fun e seh

It is now evident that a select few have inculcated the habit of posting just about anything on this forum.

While we all have many interesting things to share, not every topic belongs here. If we're not careful, we risk losing focus, derailing discussions and driving members away.

Before clicking the Submit button, let's pause for a moment and ask ourselves: does this content align with the purpose and objectives of this forum?

We all have the liberty to comment and/or contribute. Let's use that freedom wisely, respectfully and in a way that benefits the entire community...

Hello house, please I need your candid help, which out of the 4 listed agencies under the ministry of health is suitable for a microbiology graduate with a good pay and career progression

A. National Health Insurance Authority
B. National Primary HealthCare Development Agency
C. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
D. National Agency for the Control of AIDS

Thanks in anticipation of all your contributions.

Rapmoney:
Source: https://dailypost.ng/2026/07/15/police-arrest-content-creator-for-alleged-rape-of-girl-who-committed-suicide-in-asaba/

Nawa o .

Prison straight ; asap

ddippset:
If only you knew how much goes into private pockets for every 1km of road constructed.

Any leader who does so much road and bridges while neglecting minimum wage,health, education job creation, promotion, pension,,is a big suspect.

Nit saying road is bad but at least let there be commensurate work in workers welfare, minimum wage, promotion, health.

you see that welfare is what leaders are paying less attention to......akwa ibom have the best road infrastructures but poor in welfare during udom era.you know politicians know Nigerians so they prefer to do what people can see.

Wike has done well in road construction but fcta workers welfare hasn't been attended to and they are complaining bitterly.

Sometimes it is good a leader does well in every aspect at least 80%.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3alHt08MxKs?si=TGGxMqHErv0vRr_E

mila1121:
Why kill her is it worth it all

The post says the girl killed herself!

Read black man read

Nice2023:
Seriously,uncontrolled penis has caused more problems for young people than the love of money.

Since the guy is popular getting ladies should not be difficult for him therefore I see no reason why he should rape a defenceless lady

equityjake:
If any pregnant woman from nowhere comes out and claims you impregnated her, you automatically becomes the father once the child is born right ?? It’s sad that we have so many people that reasons this way in government. You are so selfish that you so much want to take away the ability of a man to make choices for himself. Why should anyone be forced to raise a child he didn’t father I want a logical and clear explanation.

Why can't folks simply read what is actually written instead of what's in their heads?!

This is about SETTLED families! we don't even know wether there had been infidelity. What we do know is that a man accepted a child from infancy, bonded with the child, and has been happily raising the child.
"Uwarranted DNA fishing expedition" is years later suddenly going on DNA amidst all that.
The state's concern is to discourage such, and encourage that the man saves his money and simply and happily keep raising a child that knows only him as farher and is very likely his biological child!
That's what the govt concern is - Uwarranted DNA fishing expeditions that are actually of no benefit to the family or society!

mila1121:
Why kill her is it worth it all

Oga read the news properly.

She really went extreme. I guess it was too painful for her hmmm

Lock ' em up and Throw the damn keys away

Where's the proof and evidence that he grape her? We need to hear the man's side of the story and we need evidence first.

I am a balanced judge who gives a balanced judgment

IslamVIRGINS:
You stylishly run away for your WIFES!

IslamVIRGINS:
You want to replace your WIFES with WIVES right, should I give you opportunity to do that?

😄😄 you will repeat tire seh .

So Matthew 19:29 expose you being part of 100 wives ahaaa

NO COURT HAS DECLARED COLLEEN MERO YESUFU THE OWNER, YET EFCC SEEKS TO FORFEIT PLOT 4022 “FOR THE BENEFIT” OF HER AND OTHER PRIVATE COMPLAINANTS

Since Colleen’s adverse claim emerged in 2023, the dispute has escalated into EFCC investigations, prosecution, forfeiture proceedings and occupation of Rebecca’s residence. Now, despite a Federal High Court order directing the parties to maintain status quo ante bellum, Rebecca says she remains without water, electricity or cooking gas.

No court has finally determined who owns Plot 4022, Guzape, Abuja.
No final judgment has declared Colleen Mero Yesufu the lawful owner.
No final judgment has extinguished the interest asserted by Mrs Rebecca Omokamo Godwin-Isaac.
Yet the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, is asking the Federal High Court to forfeit the disputed property to the “for the benefit” of private complainants, including Colleen Mero Yesufu.
While ownership remains unresolved, Rebecca says she has been left inside the residence without water, electricity or cooking gas.
She cannot cook normally.
She cannot preserve food.
She cannot bathe properly.
Food in her refrigerator and freezer has spoiled.
Her home has become increasingly unhygienic and difficult to inhabit.
This is happening despite a Federal High Court order directing all parties to maintain status quo ante bellum, meaning the position that existed before the confrontation.

EFCC’s Own Filing Reveals the Intended Private Benefit

This is not speculation.
It is contained in EFCC’s Motion on Notice for Final Forfeiture in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/151/2026.
On page one, EFCC asks the Federal High Court for:
“A final order of this Honourable Court forfeiting for the benefit of the nominal complainants…”
The Commission names Mrs Colleen Mero Yesufu, May Estate Agency Enterprises, Fofam Nigeria Ltd and Adamu Ayeloda Nigeria Enterprises as the nominal complainants.
On page two, the first property listed for forfeiture is:
“Plot No. 4022 Guzape District Cadastral Zone A09, Abuja.”
EFCC further argues that final forfeiture should issue:
“With a direction for the victims’ benefit where the Federal Government is not itself the victim.”
Those are EFCC’s own words.
The Federal Government is not described as the victim.
Private complainants are named as the intended beneficiaries.
Colleen Mero Yesufu is one of them.
Yet no court has declared her the owner of Plot 4022.

A Complainant Is Not an Owner

Colleen asserts a claim to Plot 4022.
Rebecca also asserts an interest in the property.
The court must examine the original allocation, chain of title, payments, transfers, possession, development and authenticity of the documents relied upon by both sides.
Until that process is completed, Colleen remains a claimant, not a court-declared owner.
Calling someone a complainant does not confer title.
Describing someone as a victim does not transfer land.
A complaint is not a judgment.
An allegation is not ownership.
An EFCC investigation is not a conveyance.
The power of the Federal Government must not be used to create the practical result of a land judgment that no court has delivered.

A Troubling Pattern Since 2023

Since that claim emerged, the dispute has escalated beyond an ordinary contest over title.
It has developed into EFCC investigations, criminal allegations, forfeiture proceedings and, most recently, EFCC’s physical intervention at the residence.
Rebecca’s position is that EFCC has treated Colleen’s claim as superior even though her ownership has not been conclusively established by a court and her documents remain subject to judicial scrutiny.
Now EFCC’s own motion says the forfeiture is being pursued for the benefit of named private complainants, including Colleen.
That sequence creates an appearance too serious to ignore.
It creates the appearance that the coercive power of a federal agency is being deployed in a manner that advances one private claimant’s position in an unresolved land dispute.
It does not, by itself, prove a secret agreement or criminal collaboration.
But it demands an independent investigation into the entire relationship between the complaints made, the actions taken by EFCC and the private benefit expressly contemplated in the forfeiture motion.
EFCC must disclose why Colleen was treated as a victim before any court declared her the owner.

Forfeiture Must Not Become Private Conveyancing

EFCC relies on section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act.
That section permits forfeiture where a court is reasonably satisfied that property is unclaimed or represents proceeds of unlawful activity. It also requires notice and an opportunity for persons claiming an interest to show cause.
But section 17 repeatedly states that property is forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.
It does not determine the private ownership of disputed land.
It does not automatically convert a complainant into the owner.
It does not permit forfeiture to become a shortcut around a pending title dispute.
Forfeiture is one legal process.
Compensation is another.
Restitution is another.
Determination of land ownership is another.
These separate processes must not be collapsed into one procedure that manufactures a private winner before ownership has been judicially determined.
If EFCC says Plot 4022 is connected to fraud, it must identify the alleged unlawful activity and prove the connection between that activity and the property.
It cannot simply adopt one claimant’s account, describe that claimant as a victim and seek an outcome expressly intended to benefit her before the court determines title.

The Court Ordered Status Quo Ante Bellum

On 3 July 2026, the Federal High Court ordered the parties to maintain status quo ante bellum pending the hearing and determination of the motion.
Rebecca says the position before EFCC’s intervention on 29 June was clear.
She had water.
She had electricity.
She had cooking gas.
She could cook, preserve food and bathe.
She occupied the residence peacefully.
EFCC operatives were not stationed there.
Yet after the Court made its order, Rebecca says those conditions were not restored.
The operatives remained.
The water remained disconnected.
The electricity remained disconnected.
The cooking gas remained disconnected.
A formal request to Force Legal Services stated that EFCC operatives remained at the property after the order and that the occupants had not been restored to the position that existed before the occupation. It described the situation as an immediate threat to life, health and safety.
A court order is not obeyed merely because lawyers acknowledge it in legal papers.
It is obeyed when conduct on the ground reflects what the Court directed.

Rebecca Is a Human Being, Not Just a Respondent

Sixteen days without water is not property preservation.
Sixteen days without electricity is not investigation.
Sixteen days without cooking gas is not justice.
Leaving a woman unable to bathe does not prove fraud.
Allowing her food to spoil does not establish title.
Keeping her residence in darkness does not protect evidence.
Making her home unbearable cannot determine who owns Plot 4022.
Rebecca is not merely a name printed on the first page of an EFCC motion.
She is a woman living inside the disputed property.
She needs water for drinking, bathing and sanitation.
She needs electricity for lighting, refrigeration, communication and security.
She needs cooking gas to prepare food.
The Constitution protects human dignity and recognises the right of citizens to acquire and own immovable property, subject to lawful judicial processes. (placng.org)
Nothing in EFCC’s forfeiture motion authorises darkness.
Nothing authorises hunger.
Nothing authorises deprivation of water.
Nothing authorises the destruction of human dignity.

EFCC Must Answer

EFCC must explain which complainant is connected to Plot 4022.
It must explain what “for the benefit of the nominal complainants” means in practical terms.
Would the proceeds be paid to Colleen or another complainant?
Could the property itself eventually be handed to a private claimant?
Under what law?
After what determination of ownership?
It must also explain why Rebecca’s utilities and peaceful living conditions have not been restored after the Federal High Court ordered the parties to maintain the pre-dispute position.

Let the Court Determine Ownership

Rebecca is not asking to be placed above the law.
She is not asking that credible allegations be ignored.
She is asking that allegations be proved before they are treated as judgments.
She is asking that ownership be determined before federal power is used for the benefit of private complainants.
She is asking that the Federal High Court’s order be respected in practice.
She is asking for water.
She is asking for electricity.
She is asking for cooking gas.
She is asking to cook, bathe, eat and live safely while the courts determine the truth.
No private claimant should obtain through federal pressure what that claimant has not obtained through a final judgment.
No anti-corruption agency should appear to become an instrument for securing disputed private property.
No forfeiture proceeding should become private conveyancing.
And no woman should be left in darkness and deprivation while another claimant is named among those intended to benefit from the forfeiture of her residence.
The public is entitled to ask:

WHY IS EFCC SEEKING TO FORFEIT DISPUTED LAND FOR THE BENEFIT OF COLLEEN MERO YESUFU AND OTHER PRIVATE COMPLAINANTS BEFORE ANY COURT HAS DETERMINED WHO OWNS IT?

Restore Rebecca’s water.
Restore her electricity.
Restore her cooking gas.
Respect her dignity.
Respect the Federal High Court.
Investigate the pattern since 2023.
Let the evidence be tested.
Let the Court determine ownership.
Not darkness.
Not deprivation.
Not institutional pressure.
Ownership must be determined first.

doffman:
You will not be frustrated keh . You just started o , Jacobu

Depe kini e

doffman:
pangolo ni e 🤣

Top quality
40-46
70k

Where is the first section located? Ebonyi or Cross River?

Biodun556:
Wailers can cry but no noise