Rilwayne001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rilwayne001's Profile › Rilwayne001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 (of 614 pages)
Achile1515:Show us what you have invented |
nasslick:Wow, that's great. |
Empiree:Well, it is likely to change this year, you know we are in the era of 'CHANGE' ![]() |
Empiree:Hahahahaha how can you suggest that they employ the same tactics they used in Atlanta '96? That's absolutely not going to work in this age. Football has evolved far beyond those 90s game. A lot of things has changed.. Besides, they can't possibly put us in the midst of those beast, else it would be a case of a sheep in the lions cage, and you know, that's suicidal. Any which way, Nigeria will not go beyond the group stage ![]() |
Buhari and Jon snow have one thing in common, they are both the KING IN THE NORTH. ![]() |
madridguy:A very big AMEEEEEEN to that. |
Another propaganda for the Zombies to salivate on. |
diadem10:Ermm, please don't call my brother what he's not. He's not a bastard. And truly, he's not from ilorin, although a Kwaran; igbomina precisely, nevertheless he's just as Yoruba as I am and not an aboki-ass licker. |
kennystones:You said ilorin is turning to another thing, what does that mean? |
Hahaha blood of spaghetti ni |
kennystones:Can you please shed more light on the bold? |
Buhari is worse than Jonathan. |
Friday
|
Demmzy15: ![]() |
haffaze777:To be candid, I don't like what the Muric did. I'm my opinion, he's trying to bring religious division to Yoruba land. |
EponOjuku:Ajimobi is a Muslim though, although not a practicing one from all indications, but he do somehow go to mosque, maybe purposely for political reason sha. But who cares whatever religion he is? |
ChucE:Lol, I didn't create the thread, I just tried to solve it to the best of my knowledge, and I think my supposition is somehow right, or do you have an objection to it? Empiree:He edited his post already ![]() |
Empiree:Lol, he arrived at 25 too. And this thing is not tough at all, how come guys keep getting it wrong? Lol. |
Empiree:You need it. ![]() |
Empiree:Egbon, you have removed the parrots from your equation. If you actually add them, the total will be 25 ![]() Another format is 18; where six (6) elephants and twelve (12) monkeys are going to the river.Again where are the parrots? |
Empiree:Take note that the question says, 'how many animals ARE GOING TOWARDS THE RIVER'. And also, take note that nowhere in the story was it said the the elephants were on there way to the river the way it was said for the rabbit and the monkey. Also, one has to note that, that every elephant saw two monkeys doesn't necessarily mean each of the elephants saw 2 different monkeys, and so the assumption that the total number of the monkeys are 12 is not possible. In my own view, I suppose the 6 elephants saw 2 monkeys. So 1 rabbit + 2 monkeys + 2 parrots = 5 animals ![]() WWhat's your objection to this^? |
Empiree:True though, one has to be careful reading Jamb questions before answering them, else one will just get everything wrong while thinking one is right. Patience and smartness is the key. |
Empiree:I think the answer is 5. Ask me why I think so. ![]() |
Empiree:Haha ![]() |
Gosh! |
ChucE:We all anticipating for it. Hopefully they'll release it this week. The delay, I suppose is from Jamb. |
BLINGZ88:But you said earlier on that it is wrong from all angles? Haha ![]() |
tintingz:contingent adjective 1) subject to chance. 2) occurring or existing only if (certain circumstances) are the case; dependent on. 3) true by virtue of the way things in fact are and not by logical necessity. Now If something is contingent, that means that it could have failed to exist. So every individual thing in the collection of contingent things could have failed to exist. So, the whole collection of contingent things could have failed to exist, in which case there would have been no contingent things at all. Hence the existence of contingent things is itself contingent. Agreed? Now the fact that there are contingent things must be explained by something whose existence is not contingent. This argument is so simple to understand if you are going to be honest with yourself. My take here is, if something caused something, it is either the something did it with reasoning or by mistake.Of course, the more reason why any contingent fact must have an explanation. You're trying to use hypothesis as your fact.The infinite regression is utterly dealt with HERE, you can read and raise your objection(s) by telling us how it's just a mere hypothesis. And I suppose you implied earlier on that one can apply Occam's Razor on any hypothesis, didn't you? Lol, the universe is said to be infinitely dense at the big bang.Theory with nothing to show for it? All these are just still speculations, hypothesis, we don't certainly know the origin of the universe yet, even theist don't have the right and certain answers to this, the more reason I'm agnostic, I'm not ashame to say I don't know yet.Oga, you quantum vacuum argument has been destroyed. All I can certainly say is the proof for existence of a personal god is nowhere to be found, your argument here as not yet proven your personal god, the proof of an impersonal god is weak.This is what you want to believe, isn't it? |
ChucE:I see ![]() |
tintingz:You still don't get it, do you To avoid going on in circles, I will advise that you ponder on this Leibniz's cosmological argument: 1) Any contingent fact about the world must have an explanation. (Principle of sufficient reason) 2) It is a contingent fact that there are contingent things. 3) The fact that there are contingent things must have an explanation. (1,2) 4) The fact that there are contingent things can’t be explained by any contingent things. 5) The fact that there are contingent things must be explained by something whose existence is not contingent. (3,4) What's your take on this^? This is false,How? we don't certainly know yet if the universe has a beginningAre you now going to be denying the big bang theory? Don't come and tell me that the universe had been in existence before the big bang. or infinite,we don't know yet if there are multiple universe or not,Is there or you are just assuming this in your head? like I said the quantum vaccum contain zero energy which is nothingness.On this: Firstly, the view that some events just happen, also known as indeterminism, for no reason at all is impossible to prove conclusively. Our inability to identify a cause does not necessarily mean that there is no cause. Take note. Secondly, there are deterministic perspectives adopted by physicists to explain these so-called spontaneous sub-atomic events. For instance in the 1950s David Bohm showed there was an alternative formulation of quantum theory that is fully deterministic in its basic structure. Commenting on Bohm’s theory Polkinghorne explains, “In Bohm’s theory there are particles which are as unproblematically objective and deterministic in their behaviour as Sir Isaac Newton himself might have wished them to be. However, there is also a hidden wave, encoding information about the whole environment. It is not itself directly observable, but it influences in a subtle and highly sensitive manner the motions of the particles in just such a way as to induce the experimentally observed probabilistic effects.” What this means is that the apparent indeterminism present at the quantum level can be explained deterministically by this hidden wave that produces observed indeterministic or probabilistic effects. However, since these two interpretations of quantum theory are empirically equivalent the choice between them will not be based on a scientific decision but on a metaphysical one. This leads to the philosophical objection to this contention. Thirdly, from a philosophical perspective it is extremely difficult for these physicists (who adopt an indeterministic explanation of sub-atomic events) to justify their conclusions. This is because without the innate concept of causality we will not have the mental framework to understand our observations and experiences. In philosophical terms causality is a priori, which means knowledge we have independent of any experience. We know causality is true because we bring it to all our experience, rather than our experience bringing it to us. It is like wearing yellow-tinted glasses, everything looks yellow not because of anything out there in the world, but because of the glasses through which we are looking at everything. [i] The gravitation singularity(infinite density) is another theory there is an infinit regress before the big bang. I'm not a physicist nor a mathematician, but I know some of them hold to the theory that zero is equal to infinity since zero doesn't contain any properties. Is there any evidence time start from zero? |
ChucE:Lol |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 (of 614 pages)



.
