Roger3D's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Roger3D's Profile › Roger3D's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 137 pages)
KingEverest:Ogbeni then what are you waiting for na? You wont be missed |
Zetra7:We no gree go fight for any dirty Ukraine. We die here |
where is an Igbo man when you need him? ![]() |
gidgiddy:Well Apostle that's just what you think. some of us think otherwise |
Goodmarlian:This can never happen cos the two situations are simply jus different. Ukraine is a sovereign nation state recognized by the international community while IPOB/Biafra is a group of unwashed cannibals better suited for Onitsha motor park activities. But as they say there's no harm in dreaming ![]() |
PrinceOfLagos:They don't want the presidency, they want Biafra |
FERNANDEZISBACK:Can the Americans allow the Russians place nuclear warheads in Cuba or Mexico just like they did during the 1963 Cuban missile crisis? |
Horeshit revisionist history. What a waste of a read! |
When the south east was warned about the consequences of supporting an ill advised insurgency on their soil we were told to shut up and mind our own business. Insurgencies naturally bring about backlashes by the security forces with innocent civilians taking most of the brunt. It happened in the North East on a far larger scale until the people there got sense. Sorry oh but as long as you don't fish out the terrorists in your mist, it's not going to end anytime soon |
Soylife:Yes that's why all Nigerians need to support Yemi Osibanjo to succeed Buhari in that high office come next year |
Sammy07:You're very naive and have no knowledge of recent Nigerian history. |
gimakon:This is a fallacy. Only Nigerian soldiers fought Biafra with a few Egyptian air force pilots. What the western powers did was to sell weapons to the Nigerian side. That being said nobody wants another war so be guided with your careless utterances |
Sammy07:Regional government puts minority ethnic groups in a disadvantaged position. Only 3 regions out of 6 are ethnically homogeneous |
Kriss216:It's empty chestbeating like this that got your arse kicked in the past |
Okwyjesus:Yes some of us are actually sympathetic to your line of reasoning but there are 2 problems 1. The SE hasn't put forward a candidate that has the nationwide appeal to be able to win a presidential election. Orji Kalu or Ayim? Common man! That's a cruel joke 2. The agitation for Biafra has alienated major sections of the country who now find it difficult to entrust power to the hands of an Igbo man. Also matters are not helped by the daily rain of insults by mostly Igbos heaped on other ethnic groups. You've got your work cut out for you |
officialmario:You are a disgrace to manhood. Bury your head in shame |
Fejoku:Empty words ![]() |
Fejoku:But the terrorist nnamdi kanu is rotting away in our zoo cage so how can God bless Biafra? ![]() |
The problem with this group is that they don't have sold grassroots support or more importantly political class support either. I'm sure after the APC national convention next month, the picture will be a lot clearer though not total on who will clinch the APC ticket |
Fejoku:You talk too much |
Kingscee:I don't have to go anywhere. Our armed forces are already on ground there. I will want to see how your IPOB will enforce anything |
IPOB don't have the power to enforce any ban in the east. The group are cowards best known for carrying out raids on police formations and they've largely been contained |
Valkrie:Joe Biden won that election fair and square. Even republican appointed judges right up to the supreme court testified to it. Trump and the republicans are just sore losers |
Joe Biden had spent a year in the hope that America could go back to normal. But last Thursday, the first anniversary of the deadly insurrection at the US Capitol, the president finally recognised the full scale of the current threat to American democracy. “At this moment, we must decide,” Biden said in Statuary Hall, where rioters had swarmed a year earlier. “What kind of nation are we going to be? Are we going to be a nation that accepts political violence as a norm?” Related: Trump has birthed a dangerous new ‘Lost Cause’ myth. We must fight it | David Blight It is a question that many inside America and beyond are now asking. In a deeply divided society, where even a national tragedy such as 6 January only pushed people further apart, there is fear that that day was the just the beginning of a wave of unrest, conflict and domestic terrorism. A slew of recent opinion polls show a significant minority of Americans at ease with the idea of violence against the government. Even talk of a second American civil war has gone from fringe fantasy to media mainstream. “Is a Civil War ahead?” was the blunt headline of a New Yorker magazine article this week. “Are We Really Facing a Second Civil War?” posed the headline of a column in Friday’s New York Times. Three retired US generals wrote a recent Washington Post column warning that another coup attempt “could lead to civil war”. The mere fact that such notions are entering the public domain shows the once unthinkable has become thinkable, even though some would argue it remains firmly improbable. The anxiety is fed by rancour in Washington, where Biden’s desire for bipartisanship has crashed into radicalized Republican opposition. The president’s remarks on Thursday – “I will allow no one to place a dagger at the throat of our democracy” – appeared to acknowledge that there can be no business as usual when one of America’s major parties has embraced authoritarianism. Illustrating the point, almost no Republicans attended the commemorations as the party seeks to rewrite history, recasting the mob who tried to overturn Trump’s election defeat as martyrs fighting for democracy. Tucker Carlson, the most watched host on the conservative Fox News network, refused to play any clips of Biden’s speech, arguing that 6 January 2021 “barely rates as a footnote” historically because “really not a lot happened that day”. With the cult of Trump more dominant in the Republican party than ever, and radical rightwing groups such as the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys on the march, some regard the threat to democracy as greater now than it was a year ago. Among those raising the alarm is Barbara Walter, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego, and author of a new book, How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them. Walter previously served on the political instability taskforce, an advisory panel to the CIA, which had a model to predict political violence in countries all over the world – except the US itself. Yet with the rise of Trump’s racist demagoguery, Walter, who has studied civil wars for 30 years, recognized telltale signs on her own doorstep. One was the emergence of a government that is neither fully democratic nor fully autocratic – an “anocracy”. The other is a landscape devolving into identity politics where parties no longer organise around ideology or specific policies but along racial, ethnic or religious lines. Walter told the Observer: “By the 2020 elections, 90% of the Republican party was now white. On the taskforce, if we were to see that in another multiethnic, multi-religious country which is based on a two-party system, this is what we would call a super faction, and a super faction is particularly dangerous.” Not even the gloomiest pessimist is predicting a rerun of the 1861-65 civil war with a blue army and red army fighting pitched battles. “It would look more like Northern Ireland and what Britain experienced, where it’s more of an insurgency,” Walter continued. “It would probably be more decentralized than Northern Ireland because we have such a large country and there are so many militias all around the country “They would turn to unconventional tactics, in particular terrorism, maybe even a little bit of guerrilla warfare, where they would target federal buildings, synagogues, places with large crowds. The strategy would be one of intimidation and to scare the American public into believing that the federal government isn’t capable of taking care of them.” A 2020 plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, the Democratic governor of Michigan, could be a sign of things to come. Walter suggests that opposition figures, moderate Republicans and judges deemed unsympathetic might all become potential assassination targets. “I could also imagine situations where militias, in conjunction with law enforcement in those areas, carve out little white ethnostates in areas where that’s possible because of the way power is divided here in the United States. It would certainly not look anything like the civil war that happened in the 1860s.” Walter notes that most people tend to assume civil wars are started by the poor or oppressed. Not so. In America’s case, it is a backlash from a white majority destined to become a minority by around 2045, an eclipse symbolized by Barack Obama’s election in 2008. The academic explained: “The groups that tend to start civil wars are the groups that were once dominant politically but are in decline. They’ve either lost political power or they’re losing political power and they truly believe that the country is theirs by right and they are justified in using force to regain control because the system no longer works for them.” A year after the 6 January insurrection, the atmosphere on Capitol Hill remains toxic amid a breakdown of civility, trust and shared norms. Several Republican members of Congress received menacing messages, including a death threat, after voting for an otherwise bipartisan infrastructure bill that Trump opposed. The two Republicans on the House of Representatives select committee investigating the 6 January attack, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, face calls to be banished from their party. Democrat Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, a Somali-born Muslim, has suffered Islamophobic abuse. Yet Trump’s supporters argue that they are the ones fighting to save democracy. Last year Congressman Madison Cawthorn of North Carolina said: “If our election systems continue to be rigged and continue to be stolen, then it’s going to lead to one place and that’s bloodshed.” Last month Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who has bemoaned the treatment of 6 January defendants jailed for their role in the attack, called for a “national divorce” between blue and red states. Democrat Ruben Gallego responded forcefully: “There is no ‘National Divorce’. Either you are for civil war or not. Just say it if you want a civil war and officially declare yourself a traitor.” There is also the prospect of Trump running for president again in 2024. Republican-led states are imposing voter restriction laws calculated to favour the party while Trump loyalists are seeking to take charge of running elections. A disputed White House race could make for an incendiary cocktail. James Hawdon, director of the Center for Peace Studies and Violence Prevention at Virginia Tech university, said: “I don’t like to be an alarmist, but the country has been moving more and more toward violence, not away from it. Another contested election may have grim consequences.” Although most Americans have grown up taking its stable democracy for granted, this is also a society where violence is the norm, not the exception, from the genocide of Native Americans to slavery, from the civil war to four presidential assassinations, from gun violence that takes 40,000 lives a year to a military-industrial complex that has killed millions overseas. Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, said: “America is not unaccustomed to violence. It is a very violent society and what we’re talking about is violence being given an explicit political agenda. That’s a kind of terrifying new direction in America.” While he does not currently foresee political violence becoming endemic, Jacobs agrees that any such unravelling would also be most likely to resemble Northern Ireland’s Troubles. “We would see these episodic, scattered terrorist attacks,” he added. “The Northern Ireland model is the one that frankly most fear because it doesn’t take a huge number of people to do this and right now there are highly motivated, well-armed groups. The question is, has the FBI infiltrated them sufficiently to be able to knock them out before they they’ve launch a campaign of terror?” “Of course, it doesn’t help in America that guns are prevalent. Anyone can get a gun and you have ready access to explosives. All of this is kindling for the precarious position we now find ourselves in.” Nothing, though, is inevitable. Biden also used his speech to praise the 2020 election as the greatest demonstration of democracy in US history with a record 150 million-plus people voting despite a pandemic. Trump’s bogus challenges to the result were thrown out by what remains a robust court system and scrutinised by what remains a vibrant civil society and media. In a reality check, Josh Kertzer, a political scientist at Harvard University, tweeted: “I know a lot of civil war scholars, and … very few of them think the United States is on the precipice of a civil war.” And yet the assumption that “it can’t happen here,” is as old as politics itself. Walter has interviewed many survivors about the lead-up to civil wars. “What everybody said, whether they were in Baghdad or Sarajevo or Kiev, was we didn’t see it coming,” she recalled. “In fact, we weren’t willing to accept that anything was wrong until we heard machine gun fire in the hillside. And by that time, it was too late.” https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-really-heading-second-civil-070014808.html |
Truthisunique3:From the way you type I can tell that you're an IPOB miscreant and I don't really care about your Islamophobia because I've never practiced Islam for a single minute of my life |
BafanaBafana:Now while it is not Israeli state policy to harm Christians but orthodox Jews hate Christians with a passion much more than they do Muslims |
Zandena:Sadly many Nigerian Christians fall for the Jewish propaganda that Christians and Jews are one. The persecution of Christians in that country is appalling but they turn a blind eye to it |
Truthisunique3:Continue with your Jewish arse licking |
Truthisunique3:Oga I myself am a Christian too but I don't support the state of Israel because I know Jews hate Christians. Just take a trip to the streets of Jerusalem and say you believe that Jesus Christ is God and see what those Orthodox |Jews will do to you Mr. Israeli supporter |
When we say IPOB is a terrorist organization some online IPOB miscreants will attack us. The government needs to step up and eradicate the group |
I recall telli9ng a friend about how much orthodox Jews hate Christians and he didn't believe me. It is very insulting for an orthodox Jew to hear a \Christian say that Jesus Christ is God. Actually they usually spit on Christians wherever they encounter them. Nigerian Christians better wake up and cease your support for the state of Israel because those Jews despise you |
By Stephen Farrell JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem has accused radical Israeli groups of threatening the presence of Christians in the holy city, in remarks that Israeli officials rejected as baseless. In a column in the Times of London on Saturday, His Beatitude, Theophilos III, said he believed the aim was to drive the Christian community from Jerusalem's Old City, which has sites sacred to Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Israel captured East Jerusalem, including the Old City, along with the West Bank and Gaza Strip in a 1967 war. It annexed East Jerusalem after the war in a move that has not won international recognition. "Our presence in Jerusalem is under threat," the patriarch wrote in the article, published a day after the Greek Orthodox celebration of Christmas. "Our churches are threatened by Israeli radical fringe groups. At the hands of these Zionist extremists the Christian community in Jerusalem is suffering greatly, he said. "Our brothers and sisters are the victims of hate crimes. Our churches are regularly desecrated and vandalised. Our clergy are subject to frequent intimidation." By singling out extremists as Israeli, Theophilos's criticism was more personal and trenchant than that of a collective statement issued by the heads of other churches in Jerusalem before Christmas. Their statement spoke of "frequent and sustained attacks by fringe radical groups" but stopped short of identifying them as Israeli. A U.S. State Department report published last year on religious freedom around the world said Christian clergy and pilgrims continued to report instances of ultra-Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem harassing or spitting on them. Church groups have for some time reported attacks of vandalism at religious sites in the city. Theophilos did not accuse any radical groups by name or cite specific incidents. He did not provide evidence that they were Israeli, or that their goal was to drive Christians from the city. On Sunday, an Israeli official said the reality on the ground for Christians was completely different from that described by the patriarch, citing a Foreign Ministry statement on Dec 22 that rebutted the earlier church leaders' claims. "Since the day it was established, the State of Israel has been committed to freedom of religion and worship for all religions, as well to ensuring the freedom of access to holy sites," the ministry statement said. "The statement by Church leaders in Jerusalem is particularly infuriating given their silence on the plight of many Christian communities in the Middle East suffering from discrimination and persecution." In his column, Theophilos said the radicals that he criticised "are not representative of the state of Israel or the Jewish people," and called on Jerusalem to remain a diverse "mosaic community" of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. https://www.yahoo.com/news/jerusalem-church-leader-says-israeli-165609247.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 137 pages)
? 