Rubyjade's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rubyjade's Profile › Rubyjade's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 150 pages)
This called up isnlong over due. She should have been called up since but I think England tam could not accept her as she did meet the fitness requiremtn for the team after giving muitiple chances to meet up. |
I don't think being vocal on the touchline should be the yardstick for judging a coach. There are plenty of successful coaches who are relatively calm and quiet during matches but still have a very strong tactical influence on their teams. Carlo Ancelotti is a good example. He is famously composed on the touchline, yet he has won the Champions League multiple times. Pep Guardiola can also be very animated at times, but his success isn't because of how much he shouts during matches. José Mourinho, on the other hand, is very vocal and expressive — yet different coaching styles can achieve the same objective. Even Didier Deschamps is generally more measured than some of his assistants and has won the World Cup and Nations League with France. The important thing is whether the coach's instructions are reaching the players, whether the team is tactically organised, and whether he can make the right adjustments during the game. If his assistant is more vocal while he focuses on reading the game and making decisions, that's not necessarily a weakness. Football isn't a shouting competition. Results, tactical organisation, player management and in-game adjustments matter more than who is making the most noise on the touchline. Reference: |
I agree that consistency matters, and nobody is expecting a new team to become the 1994 Super Eagles overnight. But we also have to be careful with the Westerhof comparison. Tuchel and Southgate didn’t need five years to build competitive teams. Coaches can build a clear identity, structure and tactical system within a much shorter period when the right players and coaching are in place. Yes, the 1994 team also had players who improved with time. Amokachi, Finidi and others weren’t perfect from day one. But the difference is that you could actually see the foundation of something being built — a clear playing philosophy, tactical discipline and progression. So I’m not saying we should throw the coach or players away after every bad performance. Far from it. Give them time, but time should also come with measurable improvement. Consistency is important, but consistency without development is just repetition. The real question is: are we seeing enough tactical improvement and a clear identity to justify continuing with this project? Five years is a long time in modern football. We shouldn’t need to wait that long before knowing whether a team is heading in the right direction. Willie2015: |
![]() CorrectionFLuid: |
This is a game if Nigeria can outplay Russia for 90 minutes. It's a test of whether Chelle can build a disciplined Nigerian team that knows how to suffer without the ball and then punish the opponent in transition. If Nigeria concede first, I'm worried. If Nigeria get to half-time at 0–0, I become much more optimistic about their chances. My pick: 4–1, with Nigeria capable of been beated it 5–0 if they defend exceptionally well. |
I agree with some of these points, but I think a few of them are presented too absolutely. Life, relationships, business and family don't always work in black and white. 1. Don't allow anyone to exploit you financially, but don't confuse employment with profit-sharing. An employee doesn't necessarily have to share in a company's profits to deserve fair pay. At the same time, employers are allowed to struggle, make losses and control their costs. The real issue is whether the agreed salary is fair for the work being done. If it isn't, negotiate or leave. 2. There is absolutely no shame in honest work. If a legitimate hustle feeds you, pays your bills and keeps you independent, do it with your chest. But don't romanticise struggling either. The goal should be to earn honestly while continuously improving your financial position. 3. Having children with multiple women can create serious complications, but the problem isn't simply the number of women. The real issue is responsibility. A man who has children must be emotionally, financially and physically present in their lives. Whether he has one partner or more, irresponsible parenting can produce regret and broken relationships. 4. Being financially responsible isn't the same thing as being stingy. However, don't use "people are just calling me stingy" as an excuse to become selfish. Learn the difference between generosity, financial discipline and unnecessary spending. You can have a good heart and still have boundaries. 5. University should be taken seriously, but let's stop turning academic success into a gender competition. Some students, male and female, are focused; others aren't. Some are brilliant, some struggle, and some discover their strengths outside the classroom. Encourage young men to study, build skills, network and prepare for life—but don't teach them that women are the competition. 6. Living with someone you're not married to isn't automatically a mistake. People have different circumstances. What matters is whether both adults understand the arrangement, contribute fairly, respect each other and have clearly defined boundaries. Marriage isn't the only thing that makes two adults capable of living responsibly together. 7. Supporting someone else's education doesn't automatically mean you're sponsoring another man's wife. You can support a sibling, friend, relative, mentee or even someone you simply believe deserves an opportunity. The key is to give without creating an unhealthy sense of ownership or expecting romantic/sexual returns. 8. Respect your mother's advice, but don't outsource your marriage to your mother. She may have valuable experience and genuinely want the best for you. But ultimately, you're the one who will live with your spouse. Listen carefully, investigate concerns objectively, pray/reflect if that's important to you, and make your own informed decision. 9. This one deserves emphasis. Excessive alcohol, drug use and poor nutrition can have serious consequences. Take care of your body while you're young. You don't want to spend your later years trying to repair damage that could have been prevented. 10. Financial stability matters in marriage, but don't make the mistake of believing you must become rich before you can marry. Marriage requires maturity, responsibility, communication and a realistic financial plan. There are people who married young and built together successfully, just as there are financially comfortable people whose marriages collapsed. The bigger lesson for young men is this: Don't live your life based on pressure, ego, lust, comparison or the need to impress people. Build yourself. Protect your finances. Choose your friends and partners carefully. Take responsibility for your decisions. And most importantly, learn to think for yourself. Not every piece of advice needs to be accepted wholesale simply because it came from someone older or more experienced. Take the wisdom, question the assumptions, and apply what actually makes sense to your life. Rapmoney: |
This investment was worth it. essentialone1: |
Honestly, I don't think the first question should be whether the girl should remain in boarding school or be taken home. The first question should be: is this girl safe, emotionally stable, and protected from further harm? From the account, she has already shown signs that she is overwhelmed by the situation. She reportedly stopped eating, became extremely distressed when the young man was arrested, and was behaving in a way that made the family concerned about her immediate safety. Those are things that should not be ignored. I would suggest that the family take the following steps: 1. Put her safety and emotional wellbeing first. She should not be shouted at, beaten, humiliated, threatened, or repeatedly interrogated. This is a situation where the family needs to make her feel safe enough to tell them the truth. Her parents should calmly tell her something like: "You are not in trouble with us. We are worried about you and we want to understand what happened. Whatever happened, you can tell us the truth and we will help you." If she believes that telling the truth will automatically lead to punishment, she may hide important information. 2. Take her emotional reaction seriously. Because she has reportedly refused food and displayed behaviour that caused concern for her safety, I would not treat this simply as teenage stubbornness or "love drama." She should be assessed by a qualified mental-health professional, preferably someone experienced in working with adolescents. If there is any suggestion that she may hurt herself, she should not be left alone and the family should seek urgent professional help immediately. 3. Find out exactly what happened. The parents should try to establish, calmly and without leading questions: - How did she meet the university student? - How long have they known each other? - How old is he exactly? - How often have they communicated? - Who knew about the relationship? - Did she leave school voluntarily? - How did she get out of the school? - Where did she stay? - Was anyone else involved? - Was there any sexual contact? - Was she threatened, pressured, manipulated, or promised anything? - Has this happened before? - Does the young man have access to her through other people, social media, or messaging platforms? The family should avoid assuming that they already know the entire story. 4. Consider the possibility of grooming or exploitation. The fact that she calls him her "babe" and is emotionally attached to him does not automatically mean the relationship is safe. An older person can make a teenager feel genuinely loved while still exercising inappropriate influence or control over her. The age difference, the circumstances under which they met, how the relationship developed, and whether he encouraged her to leave school should all be properly investigated. This is particularly important because she is still a secondary-school student. 5. Don't make the police arrest the only solution. If there is evidence of sexual activity, coercion, exploitation, threats, abduction, trafficking, or other wrongdoing, the family should cooperate with the appropriate authorities and seek proper legal advice. But the family should also avoid turning the situation into a public spectacle or using the police simply as a way to frighten the girl into ending the relationship. The circumstances and the young man's exact age matter legally, particularly because she is a minor. 6. Get medical care if necessary. If there is any possibility that sexual activity occurred, she should receive confidential medical assessment from an appropriate healthcare professional. Depending on when the incident occurred, medical professionals can advise on appropriate testing, treatment and safeguarding. Importantly, this should be handled sensitively rather than as an opportunity to shame her. 7. Speak to the school about the security failure. This part should not be overlooked. If the girl was signed out of a boarding school because she allegedly said her father sent her to a supermarket, then the school needs to explain exactly what its sign-out procedure was. Who authorized her departure? Was the person who allegedly authorized it verified? Was the parent contacted? Was there a written record? Was the person who collected her identified? What prevented the school from confirming with her parents before allowing an SS2 student to leave? The parents should request a formal meeting with the school and ask for a clear explanation of what happened. 8. Whether she should remain in boarding school should depend on the investigation and her wellbeing. I wouldn't automatically say "take her home" or "leave her in boarding school." If the school cannot provide adequate supervision and the girl is emotionally unstable, temporarily bringing her home may be reasonable while the family gets professional support and establishes what happened. But simply taking her home without addressing the underlying relationship, emotional attachment and school-security issue may not solve anything. She could potentially continue communicating with the young man secretly. If she remains in school, the school should have a clear safeguarding plan, increased supervision and direct communication with her parents. 9. Don't destroy her trust in her parents. This may be the most important long-term issue. Her parents need to communicate that there will be consequences for leaving school without permission, but those consequences should not become so severe that she becomes afraid to seek help in the future. The goal should be: "You made a dangerous decision, but you are still our child and we are going to help you understand why it was dangerous and keep you safe." Not: "You have disgraced this family." There is a huge difference. 10. The university student should not be romanticized either. The fact that the girl is crying and begging the police not to arrest him does not establish that he is innocent or that the relationship is healthy. Likewise, his calling her "baby" and reassuring her that he won't leave her does not prove that he is protecting her. The adults need to look beyond the girl's current emotional attachment and establish what actually happened. Ultimately, this is a child who appears to have become deeply emotionally attached to an older young man and then made a potentially dangerous decision by leaving school without authorization. She needs protection, counselling, parental support, proper medical attention where necessary, and a careful safeguarding investigation. Her parents should absolutely address the seriousness of what she did, but they should do so without making her feel that she has lost her family. Right now, the objective shouldn't simply be to "separate her from the boy." It should be to understand why she became so attached, whether she was manipulated or exploited, what actually happened between them, why the school allowed her to leave, and how the family can prevent this from happening again. If there is one thing the parents should avoid, it is turning the entire situation into a battle between "the bad boyfriend" and "the disobedient daughter." The girl needs adults around her who are calm enough to find out the truth and strong enough to protect her. |
Don't hate the messenger.SafariHunter: |
For anyone reading this story and wondering whether the immigration situation described here was exaggerated, Malaysia has one of the more structured immigration enforcement systems in the region. The Malaysian Immigration Department openly states that it conducts raids, arrests, investigations and deportations involving foreigners who breach immigration laws. Malaysia's immigration laws are also quite strict. A foreigner staying without a valid pass or permit can face significant penalties, including fines, imprisonment and deportation. The department's own records show that large-scale raids involving hundreds of foreigners have taken place, so the writer's experience of suddenly losing friends to an immigration operation is not difficult to understand within the wider reality of living as a foreigner in Malaysia. But there is another side to the story. Malaysia itself is a beautiful and culturally diverse country. The writer's experiences at the Petronas Twin Towers and Batu Caves show that his journey was not simply about immigration problems. He experienced the beauty of Kuala Lumpur, explored Malaysian culture, made friends, played football and built relationships. That is what makes the story more interesting. Migration is not always a straight line. Sometimes you arrive in a country with one expectation, experience hardship you never imagined, lose people you care about, and eventually find yourself starting all over again in another city. His move from Selangor to Johor Bahru therefore feels less like simply changing locations and more like the beginning of another chapter in a complicated Malaysian journey. And perhaps that is what makes stories like this worth reading — behind every immigration statistic is a human being with friends, memories, dreams, disappointments and a life that continues even after everything changes. |
safeguide:What's is the current cost? |
Bahamas95:Have you been to Libya? You need to visit that country before you conclude. |
Repair works in Kara bridge Odewaleadesoye: |
If you don’t understand how Nigerian politics works, you may be quick to criticize Desmond for what he did. But there is a bigger political calculation behind his decision. Desmond knew that he was no longer in the good books of some of the powerful kingmakers in Surulere. At that point, continuing to fight openly or positioning himself directly against them could have come with serious political consequences. In Nigerian politics, it is not always about who is right or wrong; sometimes it is about survival, timing and knowing when to step back. By doing what he did, Desmond may have been trying to avoid becoming a political target and prevent the situation from escalating to the point where those with influence could frustrate his political future, undermine his interests or completely shut him out. So before condemning him, look at the bigger picture. What may appear to be weakness or betrayal from the outside could actually have been a calculated attempt to protect himself politically and live to fight another day. Politics is a game of alliances, interests and survival. When you fall out with the people who control the machinery around you, you have to be very careful about the battles you choose to fight. |
ENYIMBA FC & KANO PILLARS: THE BOARD, COACHES AND PLAYERS NEED TO WAKE UP! Let’s be brutally honest about what we are seeing from these two big names in Nigerian football. ENYIMBA FC Two games. Two defeats. Zero points. For a club of Enyimba’s stature, this is embarrassing. The problem is bigger than one bad match. There are serious questions for the board, technical crew and players. To the board: What is the recruitment strategy? What exactly was the plan for this season? Enyimba cannot continue operating like a club that is simply hoping things will somehow work out. To the coaching crew: Where is the tactical identity? Where is the response when things aren't going well? A team can lose, but when the performances lack confidence, creativity and control, the technical bench must answer questions. To the players: Wearing the Enyimba shirt is not a privilege without responsibility. You need to fight for that badge. Fans can forgive defeat; what they won't forgive is a lack of hunger and commitment. And losing 2–0 to Kano Pillars after already losing to Niger Tornadoes means this is no longer something supporters should simply brush aside. Enyimba are currently bottom of the table with two defeats from two games. KANO PILLARS Now, Kano Pillars deserve credit for beating Enyimba, but let's not get carried away. The team has started unbeaten — a 2–2 draw against Kwara United followed by a 3–2 victory over Niger Tornadoes — but conceding four goals in two games also tells us that there are defensive issues that the coaching crew needs to address. To the Pillars board: Don't wait until the team starts struggling before you strengthen the areas that need strengthening. To the coaches: The attack is producing goals, but the defence is giving opponents too many opportunities. You cannot seriously challenge for honours if every match becomes a shootout. To the players: Good start, but consistency is what separates a serious team from a team that simply starts well. The season is still young. Nobody should be talking about panic or relegation after two matches. But this is exactly the time to ask difficult questions. Enyimba need a serious wake-up call. Kano Pillars need to build on their promising start without becoming complacent. The board must provide the right structure. The coaches must provide the tactics. The players must provide the commitment. Because in football, big names don't win matches — good preparation, good coaching and hungry players do. |
I have personally experienced buying what I thought was an original product in Nigeria, only to discover later that it was fake. I bought it because the seller sounded convincing and the packaging looked original. Honestly, if you had shown me the product and asked me whether it was fake, I would have confidently said no. The problem started after I began using it. It didn't perform the way the original product normally does. At first, I thought maybe I had gotten a bad batch, but after checking the packaging and comparing it with another one I knew was genuine, I realised I had been sold a counterfeit. What annoyed me most was that I didn't even get it at a ridiculously cheap price. Sometimes you think fake products are easy to identify because they are cheaper, but that isn't always the case. Some sellers deliberately price them close to the original so you won't suspect anything. I tried going back to the seller, but as expected, getting my money back became another problem. That experience taught me one thing: in Nigeria, you really have to be careful about where you buy certain products. Looking at the packaging isn't always enough anymore. Since then, I check the seller, compare the product carefully, look for authenticity details and, where possible, buy directly from an authorised dealer. |
Who are you calling a kid? I work as an analyst for a local football call in Nigeria. You don't know anything about football. ilemona4you2: |
obi4eze:I think you’re being a bit too quick to write Carrick off based on five games. Nobody is saying Carrick is Zidane or that he has already achieved what Zidane achieved. The point is that coaching careers are not always determined by what a manager has won before getting a big job. If that were the case, plenty of successful managers would never have been given their first opportunity. Yes, Carrick’s time at Middlesbrough had its problems, and his coaching credentials are nowhere near Zidane’s. But his previous achievements—or lack of them—don’t automatically mean he is incapable of succeeding at United. Also, saying he finished third last season simply because he had one game a week and only played to the team’s counterattacking strengths oversimplifies things. Managing a team effectively means identifying its strengths and building a system around them. If counterattacking football was what suited that squad, why should he have ignored it just to prove he was tactically sophisticated? And as for Maresca being better tactically, that may well be the case based on what we’ve seen so far, but one match isn't enough evidence to make a definitive judgment about two managers’ overall abilities. Four points from five games is unquestionably a poor start. Carrick deserves criticism for that, especially if the performances are consistently poor. But calling for his sack already would be premature. Give him enough games to demonstrate whether he can adapt, solve the tactical problems and get the team playing consistently. If after a reasonable run the football remains stagnant and the results don't improve, then the argument for replacing him becomes much stronger. Criticise Carrick for what he is doing now, absolutely. But let's not rewrite his entire coaching career based on five games. |
Oga leave her and break up with her immediately she is singing to another man microphone funkmrflexx: |
0.04 xG on target. Let that sink in. That statistic tells you a lot about Manchester United’s performance today. United created very little of real quality. You can argue they had only about two genuine opportunities, and even those failed to seriously trouble Manchester City’s goalkeeper for most of the game. The one outstanding save towards the end was probably the only moment where City were genuinely tested. And there is another interesting point about the statistics: hitting the post or crossbar is officially recorded as a shot off target. City hit the woodwork once today, and United had their own efforts that could easily have changed the complexion of the game. But the numbers don't fully capture those moments. Still, the bigger issue is United's overall attacking output. Seventy minutes (70mins). Home ground. One extra man. If you're Manchester United, playing at Old Trafford, and you have a numerical advantage for 70 minutes, you simply have to create more than that. You have to put the opposition under serious pressure, move the ball quicker, get players into dangerous positions and manufacture clear chances. Instead, United struggled to turn the numerical advantage into meaningful attacking pressure. That's the worrying part. You can lose a derby. You can lose to Manchester City. But the manner of the defeat is what will concern United fans. One goal conceded, almost nothing created, and not enough urgency when the opportunity was there. For all the talk about tactics, individual players and missed opportunities, the brutal reality is simple: Manchester United were not good enough in front of goal today. |
ReacherSaidNoth:Watching that goal again, I think the VAR explanation is actually quite interesting. Yes, the attacking player was in an offside position, but he didn't touch the ball. So the question wasn't simply, “Was he offside?” The question was whether he became actively involved in the play or interfered with an opponent. VAR apparently determined that he didn't. Then comes the more important part: Patrick Dorgu's foot. From the normal camera angle, it looks like the goalscorer is clearly offside. But when you freeze the frame at the exact moment the ball is played, Dorgu's outstretched foot is keeping him onside. That's why the goal was allowed to stand. This is a good example of why offside decisions can be deceiving when we're watching from a normal TV angle. Your eyes immediately focus on the attacker's body, but VAR is looking at the precise position of the relevant body parts at the exact moment the ball is played. Personally, I think the decision is technically correct, even if it looks strange at first glance. |
VAR, Offside and the Dorgu Foot — What I Make of the Decision? Watching that goal again, I think the VAR explanation is actually quite interesting. Yes, the attacking player was in an offside position, but he didn't touch the ball. So the question wasn't simply, “Was he offside?” The question was whether he became actively involved in the play or interfered with an opponent. VAR apparently determined that he didn't. Then comes the more important part: Patrick Dorgu's foot. From the normal camera angle, it looks like the goalscorer is clearly offside. But when you freeze the frame at the exact moment the ball is played, Dorgu's outstretched foot is keeping him onside. That's why the goal was allowed to stand. This is a good example of why offside decisions can be deceiving when we're watching from a normal TV angle. Your eyes immediately focus on the attacker's body, but VAR is looking at the precise position of the relevant body parts at the exact moment the ball is played. Personally, I think the decision is technically correct, even if it looks strange at first glance. |
The striker scores. The goalkeeper prevents you from conceding. Everyone else is, in one way or another, helping those two jobs happen. That's why I find the argument about Chelsea and Arsenal quite interesting. You don't necessarily need the best goalkeeper and striker in the world. But if you have two players who are among the best available at those positions, you've already given yourself a very high floor. Of course, they still need help. Your defenders are helping the goalkeeper. Your midfielders are balancing the team and creating opportunities for the attackers. Your wingers and attacking midfielders are creating chances and space for the striker. And this is where I think Arsenal currently have a significant advantage over Chelsea. Arsenal have automatisms. They've been playing together for years, and certain movements have become almost automatic. Their midfielders know when to attack the half-spaces. Ødegaard is particularly good at this. Havertz understands how to occupy and interpret space rather than simply standing around as a traditional No. 9. Havertz reminds me a little of Thomas Müller in that sense. It's not necessarily about being the most explosive player or the most technically gifted player. It's about understanding where the game needs you to be. Look at the goal Chelsea conceded against Arsenal. The movement started creating problems before the final pass was even made. Havertz's movement occupied Lacroix and created the space for Ødegaard to exploit. Chelsea's defensive structure didn't react quickly enough. And that's the difficulty of defending with a back three. It's not simply: "You mark this guy, I'll mark that guy." There has to be constant communication and an understanding of what happens when one defender steps out. If one centre-back gets dragged out, somebody has to cover. If a defender is beaten, somebody has to slow the attacker down. If a midfielder moves to press, another player has to recognise the space that's being left behind. Arsenal understand these situations extremely well. If one player gets beaten, another player immediately knows, "Okay, I have to cover here." That's tactical intelligence. And this is also why dribblers are so valuable. If you beat one player, you've effectively removed him from the defensive equation for several seconds. In those few seconds, another attacker can exploit the space that has just been created. Chelsea haven't completely developed those defensive automatisms yet. And that's understandable. They're still developing as a team, and some players are still learning each other's movements and responsibilities. The interesting thing is that Alonso has already unlocked a lot of Chelsea's attacking potential. That's a very good starting point. If you're still figuring out your defensive organisation but you're capable of scoring goals, at least you have something to build on. But eventually, Chelsea have to reach the point where their players don't have to think about every defensive situation. They just know. That's what Arsenal have. And ultimately, football isn't just about having good players. It's about getting good players to function as one good team. |
mjblinks:Is theat the link on your signature? |
The Social Media Manager will manage social media platforms, create engaging content, and support brand growth. Job Location: Lagos Employment Type: Full-Time Salary: $250/month About the Company A growing hospitality team is seeking a skilled and passionate Social Media Manager to join its team. Limited information about the hiring company was provided at the time of listing. This opportunity was shared based on details made publicly available by the employer. Applicants are advised to review the official job page for full and updated company information. Key Responsibilities Specific responsibilities were not disclosed. For similar roles, tasks typically vary by employer and may be outlined during the application or interview process. Applicants should refer to the official source for accurate role expectations. Required Skills Skilled, passionate about social media, reliable, and ready to grow. How to Apply Interested candidates should send their CV to zipzapexpress1@gmail.com. |
The Social Media Manager / Content Creator will create engaging content, manage social media platforms, and support the growth of the company's online presence. Job Location: Ikotun, Lagos Employment Type: Full-Time Salary: ₦150,000 (Full-Time) or ₦100,000 (3 Days a Week) About the Company A client in the Food Product Industry in Ikotun, Lagos, is seeking a beginner-level Social Media Manager / Content Creator to manage its social media presence and create engaging content. Key Responsibilities Create engaging content for the company’s social media platforms. Plan, create, schedule and publish social media content. Design graphics and edit short-form videos for social media. Monitor trends and develop relevant content ideas to increase engagement. Manage audience interactions and support the growth of the company’s online presence. Required Skills Beginner-level candidate with a strong interest in social media management and content creation. Basic knowledge of Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and other social media platforms. Basic knowledge of Canva and CapCut is an advantage. Creative, proactive, with good communication and writing skills. Willingness to learn, take direction and meet deadlines in a fast-paced environment. How to Apply Interested candidates should send their CV to careers@crestructure.com with the subject line: "Social Media/Content Creator_Ikotun". |
The Social Media Manager will manage social media platforms, create engaging content, and support brand growth. Job Location: Lagos Employment Type: Full-Time Salary: $250/month About the Company A growing hospitality team is seeking a skilled and passionate Social Media Manager to join its team. Limited information about the hiring company was provided at the time of listing. This opportunity was shared based on details made publicly available by the employer. Applicants are advised to review the official job page for full and updated company information. Key Responsibilities Specific responsibilities were not disclosed. For similar roles, tasks typically vary by employer and may be outlined during the application or interview process. Applicants should refer to the official source for accurate role expectations. Required Skills Skilled, passionate about social media, reliable, and ready to grow. How to Apply Interested candidates should send their CV to zipzapexpress1@gmail.com. |
Englishisamust:I dey laugh you. Man I wey draw with Everton |
dominique:Fluke |
KarlTom:Why did they gtw their firm filled? |
You don't bench a 2025 champion league winning keeper for Trafford. buygala: |
Testing femi4:itd is called change. |

