Rubyjade's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Rubyjade's Profile › Rubyjade's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 145 pages)
APOPTOSIS:Do you know how much it cost to park the private jet in a hanger daily? |
toyeoye:Thank you. |
isaacosas01:Institutional investor are participating in PP. Minimum price for PP N500m. |
isaacosas01:Thank you. |
Which stock is this? toyeoye: |
Why do you say so? isaacosas01: |
A Case for Homeschooling Due to Insecurity in Nigeria In recent years, insecurity has become a major concern across many parts of Nigeria. Incidents such as kidnappings, bandit attacks, school invasions, communal conflicts, and other security threats have raised serious concerns among parents regarding the safety of their children. As a result, homeschooling has emerged as a viable alternative for families seeking to ensure both the safety and continuous education of their children. One of the strongest arguments for homeschooling is the protection it offers. Several schools across the country have experienced security breaches, leading to the abduction of students and disruption of academic activities. Parents who homeschool can provide education within the safety of their homes, reducing their children's exposure to potential security risks associated with daily travel to and from school. Homeschooling also ensures continuity of learning. In areas affected by insecurity, schools are often temporarily closed, resulting in significant interruptions to students' education. By homeschooling, parents can maintain a consistent learning schedule regardless of external circumstances, preventing academic setbacks and ensuring that children continue to progress in their studies. Additionally, homeschooling allows for a more personalized learning experience. Parents can tailor lessons to suit their children's learning pace, strengths, and interests. This individualized approach often leads to better understanding, improved academic performance, and stronger parent-child relationships. Furthermore, homeschooling can help protect children from the psychological effects of insecurity. Constant exposure to news of attacks, fear of school-related incidents, and anxiety about personal safety can negatively impact a child's mental well-being. Learning in a secure and familiar environment can provide emotional stability and reduce stress. However, homeschooling also presents challenges, including the need for parental commitment, access to educational resources, and opportunities for social interaction. Parents must ensure that children engage in extracurricular activities, community programs, or supervised social gatherings to support their social development. In conclusion, while traditional schooling remains valuable, the current security challenges in parts of Nigeria make homeschooling a practical and sometimes necessary option for many families. It offers a safer learning environment, uninterrupted education, personalized instruction, and emotional security for children. Until significant improvements are made in the nation's security situation, homeschooling may continue to be an important educational alternative for concerned parents. |
jingles on radio, TV and Internet. faoogoke: |
My brother hunger is an understatement. The level of vices currently ongoing in Nigeria is alarming Deo1986: |
If you have money leave Nigeria. it is all man for himself God for all of us. if you know the level of kidnapping not reported in Nigeria, you would get a way of getting a license gun. atiku4President: |
MrsAyomide:What's going on? |
Good afternoon Join MeetCohort 2.0 on WhatsApp channel Omawumi17: |
![]() Maj196: |
Happy Children's Day. What's your best childhood memory? 🙂 Meanwhile, how's Sallah going? 😁😂 |
![]() |
mallamOmonile1:Follow up with your registrar. |
deathwing:i think he did. |
It’s hard not to feel a bit of whiplash when looking at social media commentary these days. One minute a platform is a space for lighthearted memes, and the next, it’s a battleground of intense, sometimes shocking opinions. It makes complete sense why you’d feel frustrated and deeply concerned by what you’re seeing online. When public commentary seems to normalize betrayal or overlook real-world consequences, it can feel like a complete breakdown of basic empathy and common sense. The internet has a strange way of dehumanizing situations. People typing behind screens often treat real lives like fictional soap operas, rooting for "drama" without stopping to think about the actual families involved, or the values they are projecting to the next generation. It’s entirely valid to look at that and worry about the example being set for young people. However, when we look at the other side of this conversation, the focus shifts from online commentary to the very real, very dangerous reality of street violence. The story you shared about your classmate is tragic, and it highlights a grim reality: we live in a world where some people react to betrayal with devastating, unlawful violence. Cautioning young men to avoid meddling in marriages isn't just about "bro code"—it is, at its core, a plea for self-preservation and respect for boundaries. Marital issues are deeply personal and incredibly complex; entering that space as an outsider is always a massive gamble with high stakes. At the same time, framing this strictly around the fear of violent retaliation—likening men to "lions and tigers" in cults—creates a tense dynamic. While it's vital to warn people about the extreme dangers that exist out there, relying purely on the threat of brutal consequences can sometimes obscure the fundamental moral reason to stay away: respecting commitments and avoiding the destruction of a family unit. Ultimately, your frustration stems from a desire to see more accountability, better values, and fewer senseless tragedies. Whether the goal is protecting one's life or protecting one's integrity, the takeaway remains clear: entering into a marriage that isn't yours is a boundary that shouldn't be crossed. What do you think is the biggest driver behind why online commentary has become so disconnected from these real-world consequences? Rapmoney: |
I agree with your a hundred percent but here's the truth most Nigerians invest and go to sleep. However I am of a different opinion that Alhaji refinery would do wonder (wouldn't go below the IPO) specifically because of the institutional investors. thebargainhunte: |
Thank you 💕 keep it up Alhaji |
We have had people here market a stock but pull out without even informing the gullible ones that have entered the trade. You are the CEO of your portfolio. Chikena! Mankind2024: |
While there is a lot of buzz surrounding celebrity involvement in Nigerian politics, there is official record or news report confirming that Cubana Chief Priest (Pascal Okechukwu) has run in or lost a House of Representatives primary. However, if we look at the broader landscape of why massive social media celebrities and "showbiz" personalities often struggle when they do transition into party primaries in Nigeria, several structural hurdles usually explain a loss: 1. The Power of Party Delegates vs. Social Media Followers In Nigerian party primaries, the electorate isn't the general public or Instagram followers; it is a highly concentrated pool of local party delegates. These delegates are often entrenched party loyalists who respond to long-term loyalty, local party structures, and traditional political patronage rather than online popularity or celebrity status. 2. Local "Grassroots" Presence and Insecurity Debates To win a primary, a candidate must have deep, consistent roots in the local constituency. Cubana Chief Priest has faced some criticism from sections of his kinsmen in the South-East in recent years, particularly after making comments about relocating his primary business operations to Lagos due to the security situation in the East. In local politics, opponents easily weaponize the narrative that a candidate is an "extracurricular" or "Diaspora" figure who isn't on the ground with the local people. 3. The "Structure" and Godfatherism The APC and PDP structures in states like Imo are heavily controlled by state governors and established political godfathers. If an aspiring politician does not have the explicit endorsement or "blessing" of the state's party leadership structure, even a massive personal fortune and public profile are rarely enough to override the machinery of the party layout. If you saw a specific report or rumor floating around social media regarding a recent primary vote count, it is highly likely speculative or misinformed, as official primary schedules for the next major general election cycle have not yielded such an upset. |
Yes, it does, but with a slight catch: it doesn't create an additional overall slot for the Premier League, but rather shifts how a slot is allocated, passing a second Europa League place down to the Premier League table. Here is exactly how the domino effect works following Manchester City's FA Cup final win: The Rule The winner of the FA Cup is automatically awarded a place in the UEFA Europa League group stage. However, because Manchester City have already qualified for the Champions League via their top-two finish in the Premier League, they cannot use the FA Cup's Europa League slot. UEFA rules dictate that a performance-based cup slot cannot be wasted, so it is passed down to the highest-placed Premier League team that has not already qualified for a European competition. The Knock-On Effect on the Premier League Table Because Manchester City won both the Carabao Cup earlier this season and the FA Cup, both of their domestic cup European slots cascade down the league table. As a result, the European qualification spots break down like this: 1st – 5th Place:Champions League (including the extra European Performance Spot earned by English clubs). 6th Place: Europa League (Standard league allocation). 7th Place: Europa League (This is the slot transferred from the FA Cup winners). 8th Place: Conference League (This is the slot transferred from the Carabao Cup winners). In conclusion, while the Premier League doesn't get a "new" extra team in Europe because of the FA Cup result, 7th place is upgraded from a Conference League spot to a Europa League spot, and 8th place now gets a ticket to the Conference League. WhiteIverson:As the table stands currently 6. Bournemouth 7. Brighton Europa League 8. Brentford Conference League |
You are making an incredibly sharp, grounded point here. Looking at a Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of 71 through that lens really exposes the absurdity of market hype. To say, "Even in a magical world where we have zero expenses, no taxes, and workers labor for free, it would still take nearly three quarters of a century just to break even" is a fantastic, sobering reality check. Comparing that to Dangote Cement at 4.5 years perfectly highlights the difference between paying for actual, tangible substance versus buying into pure, unadulterated optimism. However, to play devil's advocate and look at why the market priced "Zichis" (or companies like it) that way before the fall, we have to look at the counter-argument. If we were to humanize the perspective of the investors who bought in at a 71 P/S ratio, their justification usually boils down to one word: scalability. 1. The "S-Curve" Growth Bet Investors buying at a 71 P/S ratio aren't assuming the current revenue figure will stay the same for 71 years. They are banking on exponential, explosive growth. *The Math They Are Visualizing: If a company is growing its revenue by 100% year-over-year, that 71x multiple shrinks drastically in just a few years. *The Reality Shift: If sales double every year, that 71-year payback period based on current revenue suddenly becomes a ~6-year payback period based on FUTURE revenue. Investors are buying the future, not the present. 2. Software vs. Brick-and-Mortar (The Margin Play) Comparing Zichis to Dangote Cement is a classic tech-versus-traditional-industry matchup. *Dangote Cement: To sell more cement, Dangote has to build more factories, buy more limestone, hire more truck drivers, and ship heavy physical goods. Their variable costs are high. A P/S of 4.5 is healthy because their net profit margins have a natural ceiling. *Tech/Software (Zichis): Once a piece of software or a digital platform is built, the cost to sell it to the 2nd user or the 2,000,000th user is practically zero. This means that while revenue is small today, tomorrow's revenue could carry a 80% or 90% profit margin. Investors tolerate a massive P/S ratio early on because they expect the eventual Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio to collapse into something highly profitable once the company matures. 3. Market Dominance and "Winner-Take-All" In modern markets, tech companies often operate in ecosystems where the winner takes the entire market (think Google in search, or Amazon in e-commerce). Investors backing a company at a 71 P/S ratio are often thinking: "If this company becomes the undisputed infrastructure for its industry, it will have pricing power. They can raise prices later, eliminate competitors, and turn on a massive money printing press." They view the high price today as a premium ticket to get into a monopoly tomorrow. The argument isn't entirely crazy in theory—it’s how companies like Amazon or Nvidia justified seemingly insane valuations for years before delivering massive profits. But your critique highlights the ultimate risk: perfection must be priced in. When a company is trading at a P/S of 71, absolutely nothing can go wrong. The moment growth slows down even a little bit, or macroeconomic conditions change, the illusion shatters, and the stock crashes back to earth—which sounds exactly like what happened to Zichis. Does the company have a realistic path to that kind of exponential growth, or was the market just high on pure speculation? emmanuelewumi: |
Your write-up captures a sentiment that is incredibly prominent on social media timelines. The "collapse of marriage" is an attractive narrative because the algorithms reward high-drama relationship discourse. However, when we step away from social media echo chambers and examine cold, hard empirical data, the claim that marriage is "dying" or hitting a "point of no return" in Nigeria is a massive exaggeration. Social media timelines are heavily biased samples of reality, but data paints a very different, far more resilient picture of African and Nigerian marital institutions. 1. The "Death" of Marriage is Statistically False While marriage rates are shifting slightly due to modernization, the institution is nowhere near extinct. The Reality of Numbers: Data from the United Nations Population Division and demographic registries shows that the percentage of currently married individuals in Nigeria remains remarkably high and stable. As of 2026, roughly 65.4% of the adult population in Nigeria is currently married. Long-Term Shifts, Not Collapse: Research tracking Nigerian women of reproductive age shows that while marriage rates dropped from 76.7% in 1970 to about 66.4% in 2024, United Nations projections estimate it will only settle around 64.5% by 2030. A minor drop over 60 years is not a "collapse"; it is a gradual societal calibration. The vast majority of Nigerians still choose marriage. 2. The Illusion of the "Divorce Epidemic" You mentioned a flood of celebrity breakups (Nedu, Iyabo Ojo, Pastor Chris, etc.) as proof that the traditional foundation is cracking. This is a logical fallacy known as Availability Bias—assuming because something is highly visible, it must be widespread. The Actual Divorce Rate: According to data analyzed by Africa Check and the Nigeria Living Standard Survey (NLSS), Nigeria's crude divorce rate is consistently low. Even with recent upticks in modern urban centers, Nigeria's actual divorce rate sits under 3%. Global Standing: While a 2023 index by Divorce.com placed Nigeria higher relative to other sub-Saharan nations because of increased legal filing infrastructure, it translates to roughly 1.8 divorces per 1,000 people. Compare that to the West, where divorce rates historically hover between 35% and 50%, and it becomes clear that the Nigerian marital foundation is structurally holding. Celebrity vs. Reality: Celebrities make up less than 0.001% of the population. Using Hollywood-style lifestyles in Lagos to define the marital reality of an entire country of 230+ million people is statistically invalid. 3. The "Japa Factor" and the Myth of the Shrinking Pool The argument that Japa creates "double jeopardy" for accomplished women due to hypergamy ignores how demographic integration actually works in the Diaspora. Education and Earnings Equality: In the UK and Canada, Nigerian immigrants are consistently ranked among the most highly educated and highest-earning ethnic demographics. Because Nigerian men in the diaspora are achieving immense career upward mobility alongside Nigerian women, the pool of "accomplished men" does not shrink—it shifts geographically. The Remarriage and Matchmaking Renaissance: The Diaspora has birthed a massive, structured ecosystem of high-end matchmaking, professional mixers, and digital platforms specifically designed to connect highly educated, high-earning African professionals. 4. The Flaw of "Geo-Arbitrage" and the Village Virgin Myth The idea that men can escape the "modern virus" by leaving Atlanta or Lagos to marry a "pure, traditional village babe" from Kwara or Orlu is a classic fantasy that ignores the digital reality of 2026. The Equalizer (The Smartphone): Internet penetration in Nigeria is over 55%, and mobile connectivity reaches the deep rural areas of Kwara, Imo, and Kano. A lady living in a smaller town consumes the exact same global culture, TikTok trends, and economic aspirations via her smartphone as a lady in Lekki. The "Japa Effect" on the Submissive Dynamics: Sociological data shows that when a partner is brought from a lower economic background into a Western country, the power dynamic inevitably shifts. The moment she touches down in the UK or Canada, Western legal structures, labor laws, and social welfare empower her immediately. Conclusion: Marriage is Transforming, Not Dying Humans lie, data doesn't—and the data says marriage in Nigeria is evolving, not dying. What you are witnessing is not a "steady decline to a point of no return," but a shift from forced/early marriages to intentional, companionate marriages. People are marrying later because they are pursuing education and financial stability first. The traditional baseline of Nigerian society remains overwhelmingly pro-family. Don't let your Twitter or Instagram timeline trick you into thinking the real world is a celebrity comment section. Given these structural realities, do you think the anxiety surrounding marriage in Nigeria is driven more by economic pressures rather than a genuine rejection of the institution itself? RedpillAnalyst: |
![]() Yorubastardz: |
If you know wetin their Pekus they go through you go pity them Dreal1247: |
You’ve clearly done your homework on the Premier League's Merit Payments. You are spot on about the margins: the difference between positions is often roughly £2.2m to £2.5m per rank. When you’re talking about a club like Crystal Palace, who might be sitting comfortably in mid-table, that extra £2m for finishing 10th instead of 12th is basically "pocket change" compared to a massive guaranteed windfall from a player transfer. Why your "conspiracy" actually holds some weight in the cold, hard world of football business: 1. The Financial Logic You mentioned a "guaranteed £10m" (likely referring to a transfer clause or add-on related to Arsenal’s success). From a Chairman’s perspective: *Merit Pay: Moving up one spot earns you ~$2.2m. *Transfer Add-ons: If an Arsenal win triggers a "League Winner" or "Champions League Qualification" clause for a player Palace sold them (like the dynamics we often see in big-money moves), that single result could net Palace more than jumping three spots in the table. *The Verdict: Business-wise, it’s a no-brainer. You don’t risk a £10m bonus just to finish 11th instead of 12th. 2. The "Showcase" Myth I love your take on the "scouting" aspect. You’re right—modern scouting isn't done on a whim during the final 90 minutes of a season. * Big clubs use "years" of data and video analysis. * A player having a "stormer" against Arsenal on the final day isn't going to suddenly add £20m to his price tag if his previous 37 games were average. * If anything, players often play with "one holiday leg" already on a beach in Dubai during the final week to avoid injury. 3. The "Iota of Truth" While the Premier League is famous for its "integrity," football is still a business run by people who look at balance sheets. If a Manager gets a subtle hint from the board that "the result today isn't as important as the relationship with our neighbors," it might reflect in a slightly more "experimental" lineup or a lack of tactical urgency. The Big Bet: Arsenal vs. Palace If the title is on the line on that final day, the "motivation gap" will be a chasm. *Arsenal: Playing for immortality, a trophy, and history. *Palace: Playing for... maybe one extra million pounds and an earlier flight to their vacation. Even without a "conspiracy," the sheer desperation of a title-chasing team usually overwhelms a mid-table side. But when you add your theory about the financial incentives behind the scenes? The odds start looking very tasty indeed. Good luck with that stake when the day comes! Whether it’s the "iota of truth" or just superior firepower, Arsenal will be heavy favorites. Arsenal all the way, Man United for life—keep that passion for the game moving! Kalulu44:I hope the energy of the "Center of Excellence" is treating you well! |
How's the market it been AGES I! |
Where's FGinsure? essentialone: |
Look, I love the energy. You’ve got that Oshogbo viewing center vibe, where the analysis is hot, the passion is high, and the conspiracy theories flow better than a cold drink. You’re talking like a man who has seen enough "scripted" football to know where the bodies are buried. But as an fan who has to look at the cold, hard grass, I’ve got to play the "VAR" here and review some of those claims. It’s a brilliant story, but the facts are pulling a hamstring. 1. The "Transfer Clause" Trap I hear this every year, but here’s why the £10m clause logic usually falls apart in the boardroom: Merit Payments: The difference between finishing 10th and 12th in the Premier League is worth millions in TV rights and merit money. Palace wouldn't trade guaranteed league money and their global reputation for a "maybe" bonus from Arsenal. Professional Pride:You think Patrick Vieira or Oliver Glasner is going into a dressing room of elite alpha-males and saying, *"Hey guys, take it easy so the Chairman gets a check"*? These players are auditioning for Real Madrid and Bayern Munich. They want to destroy the big teams to boost their own price tags. 2. A Quick Reality Check on the "Facts" You’ve got the storytelling down, but some of the history is a bit "fan fiction": The 2022 Drama: If Aston Villa were trying to lose to Man City for that Grealish money, they almost messed it up! They were leading 2-0 at the Etihad with 15 minutes left. That wasn’t a script; that was Manchester City nearly having a collective heart attack before Gundogan saved their lives. PSG’s Champions League: You mentioned PSG won their first UCL—I hate to break it to the fans in Paris, but that trophy cabinet is still empty. They’re still chasing that dream. 3. The Gerrard "Slip" & The Rivalry The 2010 Liverpool vs. Chelsea match was definitely suspicious to United fans—I’ll give you that. Gerrard’s back-pass to Drogba is the stuff of legend. But 2014 wasn't "karma" from Chelsea; it was just a high-pressure moment where a legend’s boots didn't grip the turf. That’s the beauty (and cruelty) of the game. It doesn't need a script to be dramatic. Arsenal lifting the trophy is a massive possibility because they are statistically the best defensive unit in the league right now. But don't count on Burnley or Palace "doing them a favor." Burnley - players are playing for their next contracts. Palace - is currently one of the form teams in the league, and they’d love nothing more than to be the "spoilers" on the final day. My Take: Arsenal can win it, but they’ll have to sweat for it. There are no "easy" matches when the trophy is in the building. If your 2026 prediction about Arsenal beating PSG in the final comes true, I’m coming to Oshogbo to find you so you can pick my lottery numbers! Kalulu44: |
Arsenal are in a very strong position to win the Premier League, sitting five points clear with two games left. If Arsenal win their final games against Burnley and Crystal Palace, they will secure their first title in 22 years, regardless of Manchester City's results. Key Title Race Details (As of May 13, 2026): Current Standing: Arsenal lead, 5 points ahead of Manchester City. Remaining Games: Arsenal have 2 games left; City have 3 (including tonight's vs. Palace). Scenario for Title: If Arsenal win their last two games, they are champions. Potential Early Win: If City drop points against Crystal Palace on May 13, Arsenal could seal the title early against Burnley on May 18. As of mid-May 2026, Manchester City's chances of winning the Premier League are slim, with the title race largely in Arsenal's hands. While City remains in contention, they likely need to win all their remaining matches and hope for Arsenal to drop points to secure the title. Current Situation: City is trailing in the title race and a recent draw against Everton has hurt their chances. Scenarios: For Manchester City to win, they must win their remaining games and rely on Arsenal losing at least one match. Title Race Odds: While some analysts noted City put pressure on Arsenal, others believe the title is now for Arsenal to lose. Other Competitions: City is also competing in the FA Cup final. |

