₦airaland Forum

Magnifico2000:
How did ghost survive the wightwalkers.

Because bad writing. With the way jon treated him, his death would have been better.

Seun:
Don't you think he could be lying to everyone about his motives? As a spymaster, he must be a very good liar. Good enough to fool us.

But how does lying to everyone benefit him?

It could be bad writing or sexism. Remember when varys disliked Robert baratheon because he didn't want to rule? Robert was there to show us why reluctant rulers made bad kings. For varys to go against this means it's either bad writing or sexism, and I never saw anything from varys to make me think he was sexist.

Seun:
Varys is always scheming 'for the good of the realm', yet the realm keeps getting bleeped under his watch. I name him 'Hypocrite' and 'Liar'.

Failure seems more like it.

This show can make you go mad.

So it appears bronn was never really tyrion and jaime's friend, he only wanted his castle. Jaime returns the sentiment by calling him a cutthroat.

Tormund suffered a lot. Brienne too seeing what Jaime did to her.

Gendry and arya not being able to be together parallels his father not being able to be with lyanna, and it is ironic considering gendry didn't want to be with arya because he was lowborn and she was a noble.

If there's one thing danaerys arc in westeros has thought me, it's that being merciful can be a scam. Her ancestor Aegon 'the conqueror' targaryen had less than she had (Three dragons being his main claim to fame) and he united westeros. She came with dothraki and unsullied, yet talked to her enemies like they were equals and see where that got her.

Even when she went to winter fell, the people she came to help were treating her like an annoyance. Look where her kindness and tolerance have gotten her. She's lost two dragons
Lost jorah who's been there since forever
Lost missandei
Lost the unsullied
Lost the dothraki
It look's like she might lose the iron throne because varys' sexism sees Jon as a much better king than she.

Frankyboy1:
It is very possible! But its no accheivement! Its like 5,000 demons resident in one body!

Every small thing, supernatural must be involved. Haba.

This is good for him

popsy2:
[s]This dude should go sit down already. Do you know the number of Gboys that pay #1.5M for table for 5 in many of your damn shows ?

Make everybody just respect im own hustle. Naija don cast and we go spoil am kpatakpata as politicians no wan hear. [/s]

You are an idiot.

OkaNaUbe:
So, any lady that appears online is a sley kwin?

Help me ask him please. Any woman that takes selfie now is slay queen.

samsard:
The west will eventually find an excuse to overthrow the man.

They don't need one. The man has been a terrible president.

Nigeria is or should be a secular nation. That means our laws shouldn't favor a religion but the people.

There is also no way of proving that these women where sex workers. Anyone that says it's by their dressing or asks what they were doing in club at that time is a big fool. Would you support police arresting boys and calling them fraudsters because they carry laptops or dreadlocks and tattoos? If so, you need help.

And this same police has misplaced priorities. The abuja-kaduna road is filled with kidnappers yet as always; the police can only face citizens that are doing nothing wrong.

Prostitution should also be legalized.
Why?
1. Rape would decrease.
2. You are more likely to get STD's from a "normal" girl.
3. The fight against human trafficking could be better fought against.
4. It could be taxed and make the country a lot of money.
5. Sex is good for your health.
6. More jobs.
7. People are doing it regardless of what the law says. Cigarettes and alcohol are more harmful yet they are legal.
9. There would be less sex-crimes.
10. The government would not only be able to make money of taxed prostitution, but save on various costs to the tax-payer. Police, prison, etc...

Lastly, police has to be restructured lest Nigeria has their own version of French revolution.

Nigerians like being busy body on someone else's matter

These scammers are lucky their sheep are so gullible

OkCornel:
Yawns...

People will think I'm full of trash because I called a pointless topic making front page trash?

And you think you're really sounding intelligent and logical?

So you made a no point in a pointless topic yet you want people to think you have sense? You are deceiving yourself.

Oya, when next a useful topic graces FP, please make a good point if you can at all.

OkCornel:
Silence on such matters is a tacit endorsement to the trash being moved often to the front page.

The mods can do better than this, and it's not a bad thing to point their attention to it.

This is the front page for crying out loud.

Whether or not it's trash is completely your opinion. If you think the mods can do better, mail them and tell them so, don't come into a thread and say it's trash, or else people will think you are full of trash.

Go on sites like reddit, you'll see they have topics like this that are not being called trash by some random guy who doesn't pay the owner a dime.

OkCornel:
I am annoying because I stated an obvious fact?

Or you love it when trash keeps making the front page more often?


You are only being annoying when you butt into my comments without being mentioned.

Since it's so obvious why state it then? There is no need to say so. If you feel that the topics being pushed to FP are useless then stop hanging out here and find better topics in their sections to discuss about.

OkCornel:
On what basis did this get to the front page?

I thought nairaland was meant to be an educative and value adding platform.

Of what use is this information?

I really hate this thing where someone thinks that only a certain kind of news can make FP and they criticize the mods.

If you think the news is stupid, then don't comment in the thread. You are only being annoying.

Another mad man on the loose

This guy is not alright.

9inches:
That's right. But the core of the whole morality question is why should a sociopath not have his own oponions and reserve the right to act out on them IF morality is subjective?

Just read up on sociopaths, you have no idea what you are talking about. And about the subjective morality, you can't act out on your opinions if everyone else disagrees with them and will react violently to it.

What sort of education or advancement do you mean? How educated and/or advanced were the people who proscribed slavery and how how uneducated and/or unadvanced were those who had slaves?

Oh my.... Education and advancement in the sense of seeing how slavery was not good for those involved. Not how much they've learned.

The people who proscribed slavery did not exist for most of history.

What's your point? And your god is included among those who supported slavery.

Because God allows us to exercise our freewill. By the way, the slavery in the bible is not chattel slavery.

This same God that killed Israelites by their thousands any time they disobeyed his instructions(a.k.a used free will) did not want to challenge their views on slavery. This is very stupid. God can make a law that says that gays and fornicators should be stoned to death(even though they used their free will) but he cannot condemn and make the Israelites stop slavery.

And Definition of chattel slavery: Chattel slavery. Chattel slavery, also called traditional slavery, is so named because people are treated as the chattel (personal property) of the owner and are bought and sold as commodities. Typically, under the chattel slave system, slave status was imposed on children of the enslaved at birth.

Bible slavery: Female Hebrews could be sold by their fathers and enslaved for life (Exodus 21:7-11)

Male Hebrews could sell themselves into slavery for a six-year period to eliminate their debts, after which they might go free. However, if the male slave had been given a wife and had children with her, they would remain his master's property. They could only stay with their family by becoming permanent slaves (Exodus 21:2-5).
Non-Hebrews, on the other hand, could (according to Leviticus 25:44) be subjected to slavery in exactly the way that it is usually understood. The slaves could be bought, sold and inherited when their owner died. This, by any standard, is race- or ethnicity-based, and Leviticus 25:44-46 explicitly allows slaves to be bought from foreign nations or foreigners living in Israel. It does say that simply kidnapping Hebrews to enslave them is a crime punishable by death (Deuteronomy 24:7), but no such prohibition exists regarding foreigners. War captives could be made slaves, assuming they had refused to make peace (this applied to women and children — men were simply killed), along with the seizure of all their property (Deuteronomy 20:10-15).

Hereditary slaves were born into slavery and there is no apparent way by which they could obtain their freedom.

So the Bible endorses chattel slavery.

These are your justification for killing another human? Wow

In the same post, this idiot said:

Physical death is merely a change of location

In response to me questioning why god kills children. Now he acts incredulous at my reasons why people abort. Hypocrite.

I'll also have you know that The Old Testament says abortion or killing of a child under 5 is less serious than murder. The father of the child or fetus should be compensated (not the mother). The compensation is higher if a boy is killed than if a girl is killed. http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/abortion.html

Also, in case you are too lazy to read your bible, it says that in Exodus 21:22, if a man hits a woman, causing a miscarriage or premature birth, but no serious injury, he should be subject to a court-mediated fine from the woman's husband. If this was the case, then the act of causing a miscarriage could not be construed as 'murder' since compensation was not biblically allowed for murder (Numbers 35:31)

So, what's your new excuse?

Not true. Our ideologies differ, our values differ also.

Oh lord. People tend to have the same ideologies and they form groups with those who share them.

Not only that God loves, he is love itself. I don't know about you but I want a God who is love and just to be able to use his wisdom to judge, kill or save. Isn't it funny you hate that God plays God and take life in his infinite wisdom but you want human beings to be able to take life in the womb? What you are doing is using your own subjective standard to make objective moral argument.

A load of rubbish.

God taking people out of this world is not harm. IF there really is life after death, then physical death is merely a change of location. IF heaven really exists, then taking people off the universe he created to heaven would rather be a glorious thing, not harm.

Bullshit. I don't want to continue debating with you because you lack sense.

Omnibus:
Shut the hell up

Fool with nothing contribute.

StupidInyamiri:
Sodomy is the ultimate act of degradation to another being These grey aliens stick stuff in peoples butts, up their noses and in their peeholes. It is a form of violent traumatization and is pure MK-Ultra programming. #truth

Rubbish. The bold part is just wrong. Rape, Murder, grievous injury etc

These and more are worse than sodomy. Sodomy is not bad in fact.

There is nothing wrong with this. It's to be expected in fact.

The female body is sexualized more than the male's. Also, the average person can see two girls kiss and feel no disgust but with guys, it's another thing entirely.

Girls are as such willing to experiment more than guys in homosexual activities, be they lesbian or not

Femiali:
I'm the useless human being

Okay.

phantom24:
except you're not above 10years, write this date down, one day you'll regret you ever made this gruesome blasphemy.

Yen yen yen. See painment. Let your god fight me and tell me this instead of you.

dafeoroyo:
[s]Thats one thing about Jehovah God when get hold of this guy he would turn him to his vessel, Saul did worst Thant this.may God have mercy on you brother@Ruthlessleader[/s]

Trash.

sanerugwei:
Did any parent ask their children permission before sending them to school or other activities they believe is for their own good and for the good of the larger society?

That's a false equivalence. There is a mighty difference between sending your children to school and impregnating someone without her consent.

And since god is so omnipotent and need not have sex to make Jesus, why not have him come from the sky, or make him from clay?

God own us...if you own a pet do you seek their permission to take them for a walk?
Now that's just an analogy...not saying humans are God's pets.

But god owns us, so that means there is no such thing as free will.

slim14:
But everything the Bible says poined to existence of the Almighty God, except if there are things you are privy to that we aren't. It is well.

Bring out 1 of these things.

slim14:
Bro, are you refuting the existing of the Almighty God?

He has never existed bro.

jaxxy:
I understand ur doubts. I’ve been there before. Read the Bible even if it’s just to verify historical knowledge. There are many things u’d learn about life.

How do you think I became an atheist? Iread the bible properly man!!!

Peters1234:
In other words make the thing no rise until you are married abi?

Of course.

Dinho20:
BLASPHEMY

Better find something better to do than shouting blasphemy like a mad man

jaxxy:
Ure just deceiving urself. Keep talking nonsense.

Keep deceiving yourself worshipping a fake God

kingsleybrave:
Are you a foreigner.....? Y Digress?

Aren't you the one that started with talks on generation?