₦airaland Forum

BraniacX: am starting a new buisness line thanks to you. It's the recycling of human waste and you're my recycling machine.

bon apetite SAGAPORK!

Sagamite: You are a cretinous person!

Sixix: All Men as in human beings are selfish and illogical. Selfishness and Illogic are common and natural human triats

Sixix: http://news.yahoo.com/white-ohio-woman-sues-over-sperm-black-donor-153715939.html

BraniacX: oh! U mean u'll like to drink urine too ?
Damn! Ur taste in cuisine crosses d border called gross. YUCK! But y should i let myself be grossed out by? Why should i puke? U're an animal afterall, not just an animal, a shyt-eating pig called SAGAPORK INFACT! But since you've asked, i wont let it be said i denied you your favourite drink, ok, open ur mouth, good boy, good boy, oya nairalanders, bring your di.cks out and quench SAGAPORKS thirst

ibrews: guy,how far omo mi?....seems like u just learnt dat CRETINOUS person...it is almost on every of ur comments....werey#troublemaker

BananaBender: You are an embarrassment to yourself.

Your entire existence exemplifies failure, I feel sad for you.

You jump into arbitrary conclusions that makes no sense and when you're questioned, you start displaying your agbero tendencies.

Now when I call you stup1d, know that I mean it.

I doubt any sane person that reads this thread would think I misinterpreted your post. Your dodging and "save-face" act is pathetic.

I almost feel sorry for you, seriously.

Keep jumping and shouting all over the place, like you're in the garage.

Good luck.

ibrews: Thanks Satan(Ghana)

BraniacX: hey shitbrain! U up 4 ur rehearsal yet? Oi sagapork! Up! Up! Munch some shit and start practicing.

BananaBender: What did you expose and where did you expose it?? You are clamoring for audience approval, that is not needed.

I am just here mocking your 'jumping' skills.

From "something" is missing to homosexual parenting is inferior

Nigga, how many chances am I going to give you to explain yourself??

BananaBender: Where did I mention 'parenting process'? Parenting is a process in itself, so I would not say that.
You are claiming I misinterpreted you, do tell me what your initial post intended to say.
Make this snappy, get on with it already.

BananaBender: Parenting nigga, parenting!

BananaBender: Are you always this pathetic? Or today is just a bad day?

Calm down, I'm not going to beat you.

BananaBender: I never accused you of saying Toyota cars can't be good. I'm accusing you of not having a logical proof that Toyota's (the maker) process of making vehicles is inferior to that of Land Rover.

Let me try to break this down to a lower level. Let's start from the beginning. *sigh* (This dude is ridiculous)

How did you determine that homosexual parenting is inferior to heterosexual parenting?

BananaBender: What are you going on about??

What is all this hog-wash?

Do you have a stone for a brain?

LMAO! You must be very verbose and redundant in arguments if you feel a need to talk about something(identity) that plays no part in your argument.

This roundabout is becoming a lil irritating, you could state your point you know.

BananaBender: You are just hiding your foolery. You jumped from "something" is missing to parenting skills being inferior. You are yet to tell us this mysterious "something".

*sigh*

You are mixing things up, thanks for quoting me. I am accusing you of jumping into a conclusion that doesn't make sense based on your premise.

My quote was mocking the fact that you are dismissing good parenting having a factor in a child's upbringing and totally determining inferior parenting by sexual orientation.

BananaBender: *sigh*

It's 4:35am, and I'm wasting my precious time hoping that you would act your age.

Tell me the sort of identity you mean that heterosexuals are capable of having that homosexuals can't.

You keep on thinking with the idea of the "norm" you have in your head. Children of homosexuals would not suffer any identity crises that adopted kids wouldn't.

People find their identity wherever they choose to find it. I am yet to understand your noise making.

Mondisweets: It takes a matured man to marry a single mother, unfortunately there aren't many of them out there.

databoy247: I have often been in hot conversations with other peeps, and most of them sound like it's a taboo to get married to a lady who has a child (maybe out of wedlock). It's usually cool when they as guys having one or two kids wants a lady to get married to them but when its the reverse, na war.

Wat's behind this mentality? And are single unmarried ladies who already have a child actually "bad" like the society paint the picture? Am not a traditionalist so i really dont discriminate but my peeps sometimes see me as someone who have "lost it" cos i dont see anything wrong with single ladies (with a kid). Your views pls....

BananaBender: LoL, what did I just say? Looking for random people online to affirm you. You need NL Sagamite, you really do.

I edited that part of your post for a reason. It's pointless!

Homosexuals do not fall from the sky, they have identities okay?

BananaBender: This is what happens when you lead a miserable life, and you need the internet to affirm your self-worth. This dude is hella trifling.

LMAO! Says the mor0n that goes around NL fighting any and every one that would engage him. You are a hood roach.

Stop being stup1d, you know I went to better schools than anyone in your family. No need for me to brag, but I would love for you to try to disprove that fact.

You get caught being fool1sh, then you start shouting like a rabid dog. Here, "As two homosexuals cannot procreate, a child will always feel something is missing. Hence homosexual parenting is inferior to natural parenting. "

You are comparing parenting between two different sexual orientations. One is inferior to the other because something about it is not sufficient or missing. I would love for you to tell me how this does not insinuate that their sexual orientation affects their parenting. Let's here it, c'mon.

This is not answer, this is me mocking your stup1dity just with much less insults.

Wow! I edited your post and this is all that was meaningful, LORD!

TV01: Well said Saga. It's been recently published that the biggest single indicator of a childs well-being is their understanding of their cutural, ancesteral - and dare I say it - biological lineage/heritage.


TV

BananaBender: See jumping! You be frog? What is this "something" that will be missing that made you jump to the conclusion that homosexual parenting is inferior to heterosexual parenting?

Let's follow your logic for a second, single parenting would also be considered child abuse, right? To say good parenting is swayed by the sexual orientation of parents is bullocks.

Aren't homosexuals from heterosexual homes? How can something so "normal" produce something so "abnormal"?

You excused abortion because the one woman/one man model is the "natural and societal norm". We create our societal norms, dude. We determine what is normal. If a child grows up in a society where both parents can be of the same sexx, he sees this as normal. That becomes his normal.



Really? You basically giving someone kudos for being scared of change. "It is the norm", it's time we start our new normal. Enough of the old norms.

cococandy: Good point.
I'll remember that next time.

cococandy: No.

I did have a debate with one of them some time ago and she won the debate by having more points.

It didn't change my POV but I only stopped arguing about it because I could not prove with facts that such kids are affected by having gay parents.

The most award winning point being that since straight parents raised gay kids,so who are we fooling by saying gay parents will only raise gay kids.(That one got her a million likes)

I still believe every kid needs a dad and mom.
I won't debate that with them again until such a time as when it is PROVEN that kids are affected by gay parents.

Then I'll have substance to back up my stance when next I go against them.

carefreewannabe: You want to set limits to my confidence by calling it cockiness?

Well, the man in my life has taught me NOT to have such limits. Notice the difference?
Now this was supposed to make you feel some bitter-sweet pain pain.




Playing the music loud and clean-dancing.

[img]http://3.bp..com/-5UlMGLLV-CY/Uu8KX88NdCI/AAAAAAAADeQ/pdDN-06ePCw/s1600/cleaning-gif.gif[/img]

carefreewannabe: He would have many arguments and you know them all. This way of thinking would not 100 % flawless but whose is?

carefreewannabe: I know you will say yours.

Ekiseme: jonkey

BraniacX: now that's an idea. A sagapork led porcine orchestra!
Chi, chi, chi, chi-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-ing! DOLLAR BILLS INCOMI-I-I-I-I-I-ING!!!!
Dat's ma laddie SAGAPORK!

EroticAngelina: like cultural dresses or tourism places!

HARTZIV: u forgot the ugly and and stupid people
they have a high risk of getting ugly and stupid children

its irresponsible to allow them to reproduce

ne child deservs to be ugly and stiupid

carefreewannabe: Good to know you have a million dollars.

carefreewannabe: @bold

You can't answer the question all by yourself?

cococandy: You're trying to make me argue for gay rights.
Sadly I'm indifferent to that ish.

I would be all up in arms against it,if I know of the negative effect it has on anyone apart from the couple.(To me that should be the basis of selectivity)

But I can't find any such reason all the while I've known about it, so I've kept my opinion about it to myself until such a time as when we will have the reason to backed with proof to argue against it.

carefreewannabe: So disgust is the yardstick, right?

I am not commenting, just asking, both hands up, don't shoot, please.