₦airaland Forum

You are the light of the world, a city that is set on a hill cannot be hidden.Mt 5v 14

I pray your light will shine beyond the lay man‘s comprehension to the glory of GOD.

Good morning brethren do have a wonderful new week.

ATMC: oh , i thought it was ur surname? buh come o , girl why you awake

Oops nothing oo

Thank you LORD for today

ATMC: obadiah777, i love you

Is that a complaint?

ATMC: sleepy heads

hehehe
Who told you our baptismal name?

ATMC: r u @ work?

No

Ukuts gp: Fp tins

*coughs*

ATMC: lol i meant like henceforth not necessarily now how r u?

Lol! Ok I get it.

Am fine, you?

Happy birthday to you Divepen, may God bless and keep you sir.

Hope we will receive the birthday cake?

ATMC: can we play some game? any good game pls...

Game time?

*coughs*

Lol

;DIs someone intentionally avoiding my posts?

FrancisTony: LOL. You're Ma. I didn't know oo 'cos yhu didn't indicate your gender but your moniker/name sounds like male. Sorry Ma'am

No probs

Boomark:
You are a sis? I no no o! And i was so harsh as if i was dealing with a sir. Don't be offended, all i do is laugh most time when type.

Do you know those that are called Vocational brethren? They are Catholics and they told me something which I rejected.

I don‘t know about them. If they told you something you rejected, good for you. Or you can go and iron it out with them.

Now op can you show me just one point you made and won the arguement?

If you can prove it, if you can‘t, admit your failures so far lets continue.

4) you said the book of tobit is evil because according to you tobias made concoction to chase away demons

I showed you from your own bible where Jesus Christ made concoction and used it to cure the blind
True or false?

5) you argued Jesus didn‘t make concoction but later admitted he did it to test the blind man‘s faith
So i concluded it is either both of them or none of them is evil
True or false?

Continuation

3) you argued God was not the one who assited the prophets tell lies
I gave you1kings 22v23 which clearly state GOD put a lying spirit in their mouth. You later admitted God did it but it‘s not his will.
We concluded that if the book of judith is evil and heretic then the book of 1kings is also evil and heretic
True or false?

But am sure you still have 1kings in your bible therefore you are also guilty of using an evil and heretic book. NO?

Ukuts gp: i have answered all ur questions unless u want to tell me dat u are scared this new set of questions. I hv drawn my conclusion. U dnt draw me back.
So let start afresh with this new questions. So that i will draw another conclusion taking keen note of every word u utter in reply to the question. So that i can draw good conclusion. Or what do u think. I just dey enjoy hw u dey fumble.

Am really laughing so loud here.
It is on nairaland you see people failing and boasting of their success at thesame time.

Let me outline the points you‘ve raised so far and their conclutions so far since you are ashamed.
1) you said the preface to the book of sirach was written by the writer and he said he is not inspired
I proved you wrong by showing you it was actually written by the translator who is merely asking pardon from the reader should he make mistake in the course of translation
True or False?

2) you said the book of judith is evil and heretic because it said God helped judith tell a lie
I showed you from your own bible where God helped 400 prophets tell lies
True or false?

To be continued

Nonso23: wishing you the same and more @Sal C and Richieboyn

I hope everyone is using this season to ponder and reflect upon one of the greatest events that changed the perilous course of humanity for good. Advent is not just a time for merriment and celebration. It's also a time for deep personal mediation on what would have befallen mankind had God in his infinite mercies not sent our lord and savior Jesus Christ down to earth to redeem our souls.
Wishing everyone a fruitful and beautiful advent!

NP: O, Holy Night.

Same to you bro

[quote author=Demain_man]Peace be unto everyone on this thread who share my Catholic faith in Jesus name, Amen[/quote]You are most welcome to this house Demain man. We are happy to have you here and trust you will come around often. May the almighty God richly bless you.

Once again you are welcome.

Ukuts gp: stop drawing me back. I have already drawn my conclusion. The apocrypha books is man made books.

Let's see hw it goes. I hope is nt that crap ur brother posted up there u will resort to? Because that has nothing to do with rendering help and giving to the needy when they ask for ur help even when d person is a ur enemy or a stranger or a sinner. Then u will hv to explain the scripture up there for me and others i would bring. Meanwhile, the other questions are staring at u.

When i am back from church we would do battles to unvail the truth.

Lol who cares afterall you were never moving forward in the first place. I don‘t want to jump around like you are doing on this thread. I don‘t care if you‘ve made u your mind or not, you have to answer all my unanswered question or accept the fact that you flopped again then we can continue.

Am waiting

Happy sunday brethren hope you all attended mass today.
@Rich4god i saw what you did there lol.
@Richieboyn amen and thanks for the prayers.
@Maria Gorreti thanks for keeping the flag flying.

@youngprofdguru you are highly welcome home.

@FrancisTony Lol Sal C ain‘t no sir oo.

Happy new month to my brethren in the house,

POPEII, FrancisTony, Rich4god, Italo,Woky,Syncan, Ubenedictus, babestell, Maria Gorreti, mykindofperfect, Jrbayano Nonso23, Okpurukata, Mr Aladin, Richieboyn, Chidima, Thersa, Adesua veronica,Unongu,damerry, cypher cypher, Chukwudi44, stricktlymi, Nomski0, engrtee, leon12

May God almighty bless,uphold, protect, preserve and grant you your utmost heart desire as we step into this new and blessed month in Jesus name Amen.

Please if I didn't mention your name, kindly pardon me, but bear in mind you are so so blessed.

GREETINGS FROM SAL C

JMAN05: am waiting for you in that thread. i want to see how we saw the errors and left it in our bible just like you left the erroneous judith in urs.

now you see how the discussion have shifted? a prove that you have nothing else to say about judith. u are now looking for a way to save face. allowed.

I have defended it so far so you have nothing to talk about sir.

Sal C: Ukuts pay attention to this You said Jesus did not prepare concoction in your first sentence,
On the second you said, he did "THAT" because he want to try the man's faith.

Please ukuts what was "THAT" thing you said he did?

Ukut am still waiting for your answer here.

Jade William: My dear,ask me o

Lol am already asking na

JMAN05: hahahahahaha. looking for escape route to save face. with your answer above, you ve proved that your canon of Judith is a lie and the jerusalem bible joined in this infallible lie. maybe your god has a lie lie bible, not mine.

Please I said that you should go to the appropriate thread to post the errors in the scriptures. When I dont prove you wrong, then you have a say, for now, you only agree that your inspired bible is inspired by a lie lie god.

Oga it is your awake that mention 5000 errors in the bible therefore If there is anything to prove, it is you who has to defend your church not me.

Again you failed!

Ukuts gp: 4. Money as offering 4 d dead. 2 maccabees 12:43.

A. Can the sins of the dead be atone for?

B. Where in the bible did the dead earn forgiveness after they have died in sin.

C. When was money used as an offering for the sins of the dead in the bible.

5. The book of judith incorrectly says that Nebuchadnezzar was the king of the Assyrians instead of babylon. Judith 1:5.

A. When did Nebuchadnezzar became the king of the Assyrians and reign in Nineveh?

B. When did he fought against Arphaxad in the bible?

6. Baruch 6:2. Says the jews would serve in babylon for seven generations where jeremiah 25:11 says it was for 70years.

7. Was praying for the dead encouraged in the bible?
2 maccabees 12:45-46.

This is enough for now. Tomorrow i would see ur answers. Anticipating ur usual twisting and digression and misinterpretation.

Let me correct you a little, Baruch ended in chapter 5 so go back to wherever you copied your sixth question and correct it but I will only answer you after we must have settled the previous points.

Ukuts gp: Pls just add this cos my list is still full.
8. Sirach 12:4-7
Teaches that we should hold back our help from sinner that we should nt give unto him. We should hold back our bread from him. That we should nt help the sinner at all.

Which is contrary to luke 6:27, 30. Romans 12:20. Proverbs 25:21.

I have to add this to reduce the numbers of heretic teaching in the apocryphal books that i have listed.

I am tired now and cannot type again. Give ur twisted answers and tomorrow i will look at it. Thanks.

Aww simple questions but am only going to answer you after we must have settled the former ones

JMAN05: hahahahaha, now you are shaking, but before you shouted, 'comfort to the afflicted.

Oga, we are not inspired persons, as such we do not claim inspiration from God. we are thus fallible.

If book of Judith is a scripture, it is then inspired of God, as such, if it tells a lie, God has told a lie. God forbid!

OK, if it is human instrumentation as you opine, then it lacks inspiration from God who cannot lie. this vindicates our position that this books are folktales. (I said this cos the error even affected the hebrew rendering)

go to the appropriate thread italo formed for JWs and bring up this 50000 errors make I see.

this your human instrumentation is also carried by your infallible Jerusalem Bible. So infallibles makes mistake in a holy writing which is inspired? why hasnt Jerusalem Bible corrected it then? hahahaha when I made my humble statement, you should have closed your mouth instead of calling me up to disgrace you.

Sorry sir you did not prove me wrong in anyway, I asked if you will consider the bible uninspired because it has error and you did answer so you are the one disgracing yourself here.

JMAN05: Answer this simple question: Can an inspired book make a historically inaccurate statement?

Yes and that is because of human instrumentation.

For instance, your jehovah's witness article stated 50000 errors in the bible, can we say the bible is not inspired because of that?

My answer is NO because it was mainly caused by human. Instrumentation.
I don't know about you.