₦airaland Forum

amicable09:

Your peace creation in the absence of war doesn't speak well for equity demands.

Check your intentions
You are covering up a guy who is trying to expose me. Upon my threat to expose him, you jumped in to beg me. How much is he paying you?

Are you working for him? Reveal your true identity bro.

Lol. I thought I saw a war but it turned out to be a massacre. I thought a child was been tortured but it turned out my vision was blurred.

You know when we beg that stronger kid not to shove sand into the mouth of his victim. That's what I'm doing here. We know who's stronger now.

I know who will 'phuck' the other up. I'm only preventing that from happening. I'm just sapiosexuality, an advocate of peace. Lol.

What experiment is Valverd trying tonight? Messi Benched.

amicable09:
Lol. I am beginning to suspect you now. Are you on my side or on the side of a troll who openly abused me and made a mockery of my humble contribution on a noble section of this forum?

You are one of the people who cheer my haters and like my enemies post thereby giving them momentum to ridicule me and force me to deactivate in shame abi?

I will expose you too!

Lolol. You are high. For now I'm at the corner simply trying to make peace. Once I see a bloody nose I may step in to demand equity.

amicable09:
Sure.

It's only familiar strangers that have the effrontery to be hard on me in this forum.

I'll choose gentility as always
But watch out, he'll fight me even harder.

Lol. Be careful with his ego. Don't shrink the little thing beyond recognition. I'm not taking sides@Hoz.

amicable09:
I know the boy na

Called the kid on my last birthday for a movie night out but he ran away. Dude got no liver at all.

I'll hunt him down this weekend and teach him a lesson for harassing me on a public forum.

Lolol. Okay. Be gentle with him, please.

Effects of the symbolisms around. When the physical and spiritual structures are in your favour you feel entitled to some special rights.

Time to dismantle structures that promote one tribe over the other. That's what we are talking about here:

http://www.mortalpoet.com/arabic-symbols-nigerian-army-naira/

amicable09:
See your life outside!

A leopard cannot change its spots, can it?

Oya, chat me up let me give you all the gist you've missed for weeks. A lot has happened

I am on my way to my house along Gb area, come and treat my phuck up let me see you. Small boy!

Don't take his threats lightly except you know he's not capable of that.

Gone.

Donald3d:
its very normal depending on which country your traffic is coming from

I don't think it is a question of country now. It is a PPC issue. CPI is almost nonexistent in all advertising companies now.

That's the new trend. Advertisers now are only concentrated on PPC payment. You give them impressions and publicity for free until ads are clicked. I hate to work for free for a person who is not into charity.

They need to destroy every symbol of tribal superiority in this country if they want it to work. No three tribes should be given preference over the others. Their faces in the 50 Naira notes should be discarded with too. The Ajami on the Army's logo should go too.

http://www.mortalpoet.com/arabic-symbols-nigerian-army-naira/

Our ladies have to change their orientation and learn conversation skills. This behaviour is more prominent among them. Why will a girl chat you up first and the next thing is K, Fyn, Nthn?

They annoy you on two fronts. One. She initiated a conversation but is now looking up to you to move it. Why start a dialogue when you have nothing to say?. Two. The few response she gives are in shorthand.

Bad advice. What I'm looking for is how to stop PPC ads displaying on my site www.mortalpoet.com. I can't be doing free adverts for anyone who's getting popular with the impression I dish out.

tete7000:
No other way for a man that has turned himself to a deity.

I'm thinking. If the people were fed up and ready to dismantle him why then do they have to wait for a coup to register their displeasure? If the structure and guardians of it were fed up, how did he win the last election? Is a deity anything without worshippers? What were they afraid of? The soldiers? If the soldiers, what happened to these soldiers this past week? If not, what then held them? I doubt the men who did this did it for the people.

SmartyPants:
Hey my guy, some things are just basic:

A.i The voice of the people is expressed both by (a) The actions and speech of the people, (b) By their silence (c) By the acts of their elected representatives. In this case, some people have come out and supported the coup. Almost as importantly, no one has come out to denounce it. Not the opposition, not Mugabe's party people. No one. (c) Furthermore, the elected representatives, that is the parliamentary body are in support of his removal. The voice of the people has been expressed in all its forms, in support of the coup.

ii. if you have done statistics you should know that 10, 000 is an excellent sample size from which to draw inferences. Obviously, not everyone is going to go out to the streets to register their opinion.

B. There is no one single form of democracy, and the only tenet of democracy is that the will of the people be obeyed. Democracy is not a form of government per se it is a concept of government which is subject to interpretation. That is why US democracy is vastly different from UK democracy in the form of government employed.

Their is a difference between wanting Mugabe to go and Mugabe going by military coup. They'd be naive to include the latter as a reason for their jubilation. The people wanted him out but there has not being any strong reason to accept they will welcome any means. But if they really do, they are setting themselves up for more problems. That was the feeling that got us 8 military heads of states.

tete7000:
Which institution are you talking about? If institution existed in the first instance, Mugabe would not rule for 37years. The man destroyed your institution and turned himself to an institution. Let him go. No one cares.

He's going is good but the process was not different from the way he led. This could become the only way to remove poor leadership.

Before they celebrate they should watch the people replacing him. The interim President, his former V.P, cannot be trusted. He is not that different from the man.

The men who did the coup, the Military General, was his right hand man all these years executing 'projects'. He is not different from Robert Mugabe either. I wish them well.

It will be difficult for these similar men to bring Zimbabwe change. What played out is a matured madness with an overdose of confusion. No blood was shed. That's one good thing.

tete7000:
Mugabe is a dictator, nothing democratic about his rule. It is why no one gives a hoot about his been ousted. Stop making it sound like a democratic rule has been toppled. Those who live by sword, die by sword.

Mugabe is just a man, he is not the institution. You rejoice because an institution was crippled while trying to destroy just one man. If the people did this why can't they do it at the polls?

SmartyPants:
A. You must understand that the military here have acted as an agency of the people. This is evidenced by the large crowds that have turned out to show their support for the coup. Major political revolution cannot succeed without the endorsement of the people.

B. Again, democracy is not the goal in and of itself. If democracy is not useful for achieving a goal then it must be dispensed with immediately. The end justifies the means.

C. You are mixing democracy up with constitutionalism. They are quite different. Democracy is the system of government that derives its authority from the people. Lets define democracy in simpler terms: "The system of government that represents the will of the people". So if the people decide to back the military to take over power or eliminate the current power holder, that is perfectly democratic.

Constitutionalism is the theory that establishes a constitution as the supreme source of law and of political power. However, even constitutionalism links this power of the constitution back to the people. Really, constitutionalism is merely a support mechanism to democracy, and can never assume superior importance. It is people who come together to forge societies and determine how they should be ruled; therefore, at any point in time they may choose to abolish or overrule the system that they themselves created.

People>Laws(constitution)>government.

Which people? Which people are they acting for? Which large crowd? A crowd of less than 10000 people should be used as yardstick for the position of 14 million Zimbabweans? Forget it!

I don't agree that the end justifies the means. For me, both the means and ends must be justified in democracy and any attempt at commonsense. The people have not said they are tired of Democracy. They are yet to make that stand.

As long what happens there, what the coup plotters are trying to portray, looks like a democracy, its tenets must be fully satisfied. They must discard their laws before they start trying 'whatever works'.

The people have no hands in this. In Egypt, when Mubarak was ousted, we saw that face you are trying to paint here. The people have nothing to do with this. Some men simply feel Uncle Roo is taking them for a ride. Do a little search on the head of that coup.

linearity:
He didn't win and stay in power democratically for 37 years. Each election was not won fair and square and he didn't not rule democratically.

Sacking his V.P. and selecting his wife to take over was not democratic.

You reap what you sow...what is good for the goose is also good for the gander. He who live by the sword died by same and it's all good by me.

But is it right to abuse the law because a person abused the law? Can we even lay claim to a law in such scenario? And who or what determines the limit of such lawlessness?

SmartyPants:
A. The people

B. The coup itself is not an act of governance, whether good or bad. It is merely the means through which the people attempt to rectify bad governance.

So was it the people that carried out the coup or some group of evil military and party chiefs trying a new spec of evil? The people have nothing to do with this. Men of power did this and not the people.

Secondly, assuming the people did, once the people sanction a coup in a democracy, it ceases to be a democracy. Democratic rights end once democracy ends.

Their are other means through which good governance can be achieved. It is very hard to believe that the majority will support his sack through undemocratic means but they can't through Democratic means.

UBGG:
I would take the Devil's deal (which almost all the time never ends well) if I foresaw some good coming from it.

They were all at that point...due process be damned.

That's why Africa is messed up. Everyone knows good can be arrived through many means. We all know many ways to arrive at good deeds. But agreeing to any system through which we want to arrive at it is the sovereignty of nations. Do we want a democracy or whatever works?

SmartyPants:
Democracy is not the goal in and of itself. Good governance is the goal and whatever means it takes to achieve that, so be it.

Who then determines the limit of this good governance you speak of? And how is a coup good governance or a good thing simply because one demon was removed?

aolawale025:
The West were glad to see his(Mugabe's) back

Of course. They shared with him the same level of hatred for each other that they can't even call a coup a coup. The silence is deafening and it is a stand itself.

Still undemocratic. No matter how they try make the thing appear democratic, it is not. Democracy doesn't work like that. You don't make change in a democracy like that. What happened is a coup. No afterthought can change that.

Power and life is transient. Mugabe who once boasted no military coup can remove him is now under house arrest by the military.

The condemnation by the war veterans in 2016 of abandoning the revolution didn’t help his case either. They had accused him of promoting corruption and said they will not support him in next year’s election.

His treatment of the white farmers in his country didn’t help him or his country either and the sanctions he got suffered the country.

Till now, none of the western counties, who love to promote democratic values, has condemned the military coup. Tacit support or endorsement?

His wife has received criticisms and Mugabe’s attempt to pass her the touch annoyed the military, politicians and revolutionaries more. It seems everyone is finally fed up with him that even when democratic values are shattered to remove him, no one seem to care.

In Egypt when a similar thing happened, it was regarded as a ‘military intervention’ by the US and other powers when obviously a coup happened. What happened in Zimbabwe is a coup but unfortunately, Mugabe has annoyed so many people, destroyed so many laws and his authoritarianism has made it difficult to speak about him in the democratic language.

http://www.mortalpoet.com/mugabe-going-going

Power and life is transient. Mugabe who once boasted no military coup can remove him is now under house arrest by the military.

The condemnation by the war veterans in 2016 of abandoning the revolution didn’t help his case either. They had accused him of promoting corruption and said they will not support him in next year’s election.

His treatment of the white farmers in his country didn’t help him or his country either and the sanctions he got suffered the country.

Till now, none of the western counties, who love to promote democratic values, has condemned the military coup. Tacit support or endorsement?

His wife has received criticisms and Mugabe’s attempt to pass her the touch annoyed the military, politicians and revolutionaries more. It seems everyone is finally fed up with him that even when democratic values are shattered to remove him, no one seem to care.

In Egypt when a similar thing happened, it was regarded as a ‘military intervention’ by the US and other powers when obviously a coup happened. What happened in Zimbabwe is a coup but unfortunately, Mugabe has annoyed so many people, destroyed so many laws and his authoritarianism has made it difficult to speak about him in the democratic language.

http://www.mortalpoet.com/mugabe-going-going/

Watched so many. From Horror(My Favorite) to Action, SciFi, RomCom, etc., but none has given me the satisfaction I got watching Phone Booth.

Who exactly is the Presidency? Because the dunce of a President discarded contents he didn't bother to examine everyone should join in celebrating his cerebral weakness! Trash.

How does the presence or absence of confidence stop a man with sense from examining that document, sieving and picking the pearls out of the swine. The mistake has been made.

How do you reject a document you don't understand? Can't one person in his cabinet tell him the files in that document could save this country. Cowards and dimwits in governance.

Iran? Saudi Arabia? Syria? NK? Somalia? Smh. Complete junk. And it was moved to the front page.

The time is up for the man. The ovation died that a long time ago. He lost the mission a long time ago. He lost the love and respect he had a long time ago. His situation today is a conspiracy of annoyed forces.

But where does Abati and most of our journalists really stand on democratic values? One week they are trying to rationalise a misnomer with sarcasm, the next week they are talking about human rights and democracy.

Read more on the man and his legacy below:

http://www.mortalpoet.com/mugabe-going-going/

monex:
humans are more diverse than you think. There are intelligent peeps who aren't sapiosexual. Sapiosexuality typically comes from intuition - people who obtain facts by intuition usually like interacting with knowledgeable peeps.

Not again!

In 1987, Robert Gabriel Mugabe, also known by the name, Uncle Roo, became the President of Zimbabwe, a country formerly known as Southern Rhodesia. Prior to the time, he had served as Prime Minister from 1980-87 and was among the freedom fighters who fought the colonial masters for independence. He was a strong exponent of negritude and tried to promote and restore the dignity of countrymen and the black race in general. He had the opportunity to transform his nation and the black race but failed. His initial policies as President, towards the white community, was mild. But at the beginning of the new millennium it snowballed into absolute tyranny. Lands were forcefully collected with the claim that the lands were forcefully collected in the first place. By that time, his place as another African despot has been guaranteed. He had joined the ranks of men like Paul Biya of Cameroon and Nguema of Guniea. In his country, you could substitute the name 'Mugabe' for President in a synonym exam and you won't be wrong.


http://www.mortalpoet.com/mugabe-going-going/