₦airaland Forum

borntowin1:
Sit in your house and be asking how much is the pay

Why do employer think they're gods? Have you forgotten it's a "I rub your back, you rub my back" thingy? Employment is a transaction/contract, if the pay ain't satisfactory to me, I don't apply, and if my work/experience/resume ain't satisfactory to you, you don't employ me. Why are you now going gung ho? It's a simple question, and if you don't want to disclose in public, you could have said it's negotiable.

Imagine if it's a one time job, won't I ask for the amount you'll pay me, before embarking on the job?
Bro change your OT, you were probably once an employee (if at all you're still not).

Jarus:
I get to the 3rd source through our mutual friend and unfortunately the mutual friend was hesitant to ask him/her this time around: “Oga Jarus, nobody can tell you with absolute certainty what is happening”, was his/her response.

I really don’t want to become a nuisance to these people.

Still expecting re-confirmation from the one that insisted “letters will go out soon”.

But why do "big" people always make everything formal? Even when they're eating, sleeping or shiting in their closet, they'll still be like "this food shouldn't stain my mouth" "this bed sheet shouldn't stain my body" "this shit that I'm shiting, shouldn't stain my yansh"

Imagine "normal" guys, and we want to ask for info :
Mr. A: " Ogbeni, wetin dey sup for NNPC matter now"
Mr. B: "I no know o"
Mr. A: "Guy, you dey well? Na every time you no dey know, this is my 11th time i don ask you sef, you sure say you dey work for NNPC"?
Mr. B: " I swear I no know "
Mr.A : "I swear your dey Mad"
Mr. B: "Your father!"
Mr. A: "Na wa for you o. GMD suppose sack you sef"
Mr. B: "for wetin nau, na him employ me or na govt"
Mr. A "for not knowing the info about this recruitment ni"
Mr. B: "Alaaye, free me jor"
Mr. A: "Chai! This my friend useless, I swear"
Mr. B: "You dey craze (laugh)"
Mr. A : "Sha holla me if you get anything"
Mr. B: "I'll sure do, you be my man nau"






3 weeks after

Mr. B: (on phone) Hello, my guy, e don sure say the list dey show next tomorrow which is Wednesday o, if them swear for you, disturb me again on this matter, na thunder go fire you.
Mr. A: Thanks padi mi. You get mouth like duck... My name dey?
Mr. B: I be GMD? I no even remember your name again sef.
Mr. A: Chai!
Mr. B: Oya, gimme 30mins or less.




2hrs after
Mr. B: Congratulations padi mi! You're in!
Mr. A: Alaaye, Joor Joor o! Na God win! (Jumps up, and shout "Their Father!)

budaatum:
That is my own opinion. You would note that it is number 5 on my list of 10, and those that preceed it are all fiction, with one set of books I described as porn.

Lol, in your opinion. Well, in Rapsody's voice "opinions ain't fact"

Perhaps see the other books on the list before jumping to baseless conclusions.

Bro, wetin concern me with other baseless book list of yours?

The entire book is not hearsay, but even if it is, that does not, in my opinion, detract from the book.

Again, opinions ain't fact, and every person got one. It's even cheaper, keep your opinions to yourself. They don't matter in the scheme of things.

Not "just" saxha. I gave you one definition. The first definition for 'scripture' in Google actually comes up with wikis "Religious Text", which I did not use because it did not specifically mention the word "Scripture" at the beginning. And Dictionary.com is too narrow since it only mentions "Old or New Testaments".

Bro, you can't even stop cherry picking from your " best book/library " but you're now furthering by rejecting definitions of Books/website that were written and reviewed by experts in language, that's not your mother tongue. (I'm assuming you're an African here)
Ludicrous!!! Bro.
Since, you've been running away from my questions, is this your best response after all?
You're deluded man. A "Jon snow" who knows nothing.
Well! You can keep contradicting yourself, if it makes you feel better, rather than learn.

Your contradictions so far:
You do not reject any part of the Bible, yet you do not accept God killed those children in the Bible?
You do not accept Jesus was born of Virgin Mary etc.
The joke is on you.
My question, who killed those Children? Or you mean the writers lied?
A book containing deliberate lies, is your "best book/library"?
No wonder, you've been lying all along, that you're contradicting yourself and you don't even know it.
2. I once put it to you if Bible is considered a scripture, you inferred yes, later you said, you did not accept it as scripture, again you came out rejecting the online definition of scripture to show you accept it as scripture.
My question, are you now the authority in language and diction of English to reject those definition?
3. You compared Bible to Things fall apart, yet you claimed Bible is not a fiction or fantasy.
My question, what genre classification is Bible?


Bro, you don't need to quote me if you don't have answers or you want to keep running in a circle. You're just "too intelligent" to argue constructively.
Nigga, you should unlearn all that nonsense you know, humble yourself, and learn real knowledge.

Shalom.

budaatum:
One of, saxha. You'd struggle to mention a comparable collection of books, and the hearsay elements do not in any way detract from it

And it is scripture by virtue of being a religious text, which is what scripture means.

Being struggle to mention a comparable collection of books, makes it "the best book/library"?

An hearsay can be considered " best book/library"?

Your definition of scripture is just a religious book, but not holy book?

budaatum:
I never said "Bible is just another Book, not a scripture, but a fantasy and fiction like "Things fall apart", saxha. I in fact called it "best book", which I upgraded to "best library", which I never said about Things Fall Apart.

The following might help you understand, though also read this link where I took up religion.

According to you, A Book that at least part of it was written through hearsay is considered " Best Book/Library"?
Did you consider Bible as a scripture?

BenFlash:
Uhm! Hello, this is @Benflash not @Balher. Ma bi mi ni Jamb Question

Wetin conshine me, Jamb question that I'll still ask you.

Are you not his Looyarl?

budaatum:
You are the one who refered to it as "scripture; a holy book, a sacred writing, authoritative writing", saxha, and not I. If you cared to note and follow this conversation you are having with me here, I've compared it to Things Fall Apart which no one calls "scripture; a holy book, a sacred writing, authoritative writing", and the initial impression I got was that you were accusing me of not seeing it as" scripture; a holy book, a sacred writing, authoritative writing" when you held me up on my "humans wrote it" statement.

As for it being one of the "best book", please upgrade that to "best library of books" by virtue of it being many books compiled and compacted in one bound book. For most, its the only library of books they know.

So, according to you, Bible is just another Book, not a scripture, but a fantasy and fiction like "Things fall apart"?

Moyeeen:
The only accurate info he has ever given us was the date of the wedding... Every other thing has been okoto meow meow skrrrrrr

Okoto meow meow skrrrrrrrr
Opata huuu huuu skrrrrrrrr

BenFlash:
He had always mentioned that his source was the PA to the GMD. However, you can agree with me that there is a very wide berth between being a "source" and being a "connect"

Which channel is PA to GMD exploring before now, that's not working, and which other channel can he now explore??

Again, if PA to GMD can't pull strings for him in NNPC, which other work outside NNPC is now sure for him to deliver?(yes, I know it's possible though, but if you can't win in your own turf, shey na away you go smell draw? )

BenFlash:
Whenever a big man wants to send you money, he can ask you to send your account number over and over again, that's how big men do. No time to check previous messages for those that were sent earlier. If you know, you know...

Asking for Balher's CV again connotes that his connection is actually pushing things for him whether in NNPC (thru a new channel) or somewhere else. From the foregoing, it is safe to infer that something is about to happen in NNPC.

You want to be diplomatic or you're not seeing the picture. Here is it:
1.His source was so close to the GMD, he knows about the GMD son's wedding, and his movement during sallah, to the extent he was getting pictures to share for us here. Which other new channel will his source now explore? His wife? Aboki, Kai mana, fvck danboroba
2. Initially, through his post, he was acting like he's the source himself, and not that he's connecting with a source.
3. If he's not the source himself, that probably means, those pictures are being sent to him, and not himself taking those pictures.
4. He said his source, said, "NNPC is still another 'Moon sighting in a cloudy sky' "
5. He's admitted that he's "CONFUSED" why his source will ask for his CV again.

My own deductions, if the CV is meant for anything concrete or even this NNPC, his source must have told him, or gave impression for him not to be "CONFUSED"

His source maybe a scammer who is using pictures to trick our guy here.

Note: I wonder how balher/some people around here didn't notice that those pictures are only gotten through functions (and not office/actual work related) that can be captured by ordinary "Mai Guard/Maid" that may not have influence with GMD.

BenFlash:
Whenever a big man wants to send you money, he can ask you to send your account number over and over again, that's how big men do. No time to check previous messages for those that were sent earlier. If you know, you know...

Asking for Balher's CV again connotes that his connection is actually pushing things for him whether in NNPC (thru a new channel) or somewhere else. From the foregoing, it is safe to infer that something is about to happen in NNPC.

You want to be diplomatic or you're seeing the picture. Here is it:
1.His source was so close to the GMD, he knows about the GMD son's wedding, and his movement during sallah, to the extent he was getting pictures to share for us here.
2. Initially, through his post, he was acting like he's the source himself, and not that he's connecting with a source.

budaatum:
You mean, you are confused that I do not "accept the bit where it is written that God killed children"?

My views regarding are extensive in this thread, and if you are a reader of buda you would know my antipathy to believing instead of bothering to gain understanding. To understand requires extensive work doing research, while believing is a lazy fuq thing satan is said to do and tremble, which I see no merit emulating.

Note how the reports of what God is alleged to have done are not in the first person a la "I, God, did so and so", but in the third person "God did" as reported by some third party. I guess I'm not naive enough to believe God did a thing just because I read it in a book, same as I wouldn't believe the tortoise borrowed feathers and flew to heaven.

No, you said, you do not reject any part in the Bible, yet you do not accept the part where God killed children, in that same Bible.
Bro, be true on this matter.

According to your own standard, for a book that you accepted was written/parts of it was written through hearsay, and which you chose to accept some parts and reject the other parts. Can that book be "the best book" as you once claimed here, or called a scripture; a holy book, a sacred writing, authoritative writing (as you once accepted it's a scripture here)?

MI6:
Or come to think of it, maybe they want to give Bahler a TA or SA role. Never rule it out. Forgive us sir!

Results of sighting "1000 jets"... Either TA/SA is an appetizer before NNPC APL, or they're the actual goal. You know hunting for Goat and you now find Cow.

Iyajelili:
Just one person? Nawa for source o

Obviously you don't know, "GMD son's connect/link/source".

tejiri4:
are you saying the person with the presidential connect name is not on the list? which kind connect person won get again na

Nooo! I'm only saying, you can't submit two CVs for one single job nau, not to talk of "presidential list" that only needs 2minutes call.

Well, maybe they're doing multi level, verification of CV from presidential list.
What do I know.

Rahl444:
Your link obviously doesn't know what's going on in NNPC for now...Better look for another link and ask for updates!

This is the link that saw "1000jets" o... Argh!!!

budaatum:
I do not reject any part. Rejecting parts would distort understanding.

As I've said, humans wrote it, and research shows some of the writings were not done by actual witnesses. C.f. Luke 1:2 - "just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word".

That however does not mean one can't learn from (understand) what is written in it as opposed to just reading and believing what is written in it.

We may not believe Things Fell Apart, but many have learnt a lot from reading Things Fall Apart.

You do not reject any part of the Bible, and
at the same time, you do not accept the part where God killed children in the Bible?
Isn't that a confusion on your part?

jonnepapayo:
Does the presidency actually need your CV??

Most especially, the ones in the circle of NNPC GMD? Well, let's ask one certain, "darado"

olaidefat:
It might be for another recruitment : ICPC, EFCC et al .

Because the link has seen the NNPC list, and he's not there?

budaatum:
buda does not believe, period!

Please read about it here.
https://www.nairaland.com/5178192/questions-budaatum-how-follow-jesus

Perhaps I should use another verb,
@budaatum, can you try and answer this?
why do you accept/acknowledge some parts of the Bible that you considered a scripture, but reject other parts?

budaatum:
Do you mean buda accepted the story about Jesus being born without his mother having sex with a man and that after being crucified he now sits at the side of God judging the living and the dead? If so, I'm glad we are not talking about Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart, or you might claim buda "accepts" that the tortoise borrowed feathers from the birds so it could join them in a banquet in heaven and its shell cracked because it was greedy!

Please go through the thread and read Shepherd00's responses to buda to disabuse yourself of your illusions about buda.

Are you saying, you don't believe the part where Jesus was born by a virgin Mary in the Bible?

If yes, my question still remains, why do you chose to believe some parts of a Bible which you accepted as a scripture, but reject some other parts?

budaatum:
Bravo!


I don't know of any other book that "tells us all the moral teachings of Jesus" though you'd find those teachings in other books too if you read widely enough. The fact its all compiled into one book does make it easily accessible however, which is a good thing considering how few books are easily available in Nigeria on the topics Jesus is written to have taught.

Does the Bible being written by men (human beings, if you may), reduce those morals one bit in your opinion, and who do you think wrote it?

@bolded, 1. No it doesn't reduce those morals at all. 2. Men wrote it (at least, that's my own thinking)

Now, my question is:
This same Bible that was written by men and it's still a scripture, tells you two different stories, you accepted the story of Jesus, but rejected the part where God killed children.

May I ask why?

budaatum:
Did I ever claim the Bible is less of Scripture or that I did not learn of Jesus from it?

I will assume, your answers are "Bible is not less of a scripture because it was written by men, and you get to know Jesus through Bible that was written by men".

Now, this same Bible that was written by men and it's still a scripture, tells you two different stories, you accepted the story of Jesus, but rejected the part where God killed children.
May I ask why?

budaatum:
We are talking about one of the best and most read books in the world and about Jesus Christ the Light of the World for those who
bother to read it, right?

Please go read some more about buda instead of crucifying me for some imaginary view you think I might have.

You haven't answer my questions.
For the fact that, the best and most read book (I'm assuming you're referring to Bible here) was written by men, does that made it less of a scripture?
And did you know so much about Jesus from this same Bible?

budaatum:
So, your Bible was not written by people?
Was it written in heaven by God?

For your information, I do not "claiming Christian". Those of you who are Christians on here do not seem to have enough of the Love of Jesus Christ in you to accept me as one of you.

Because it was written by men, does that made it less a " scripture "?
@from the bolded, you seem to know about Jesus. How did you get to know him, is it from the same Bible?

BenFlash:
Confusion is confused

I dey tell you. Some people ehen.

budaatum:
You lie sir! The Bible never said anything! What you have is what someone wrote in a book called the Bible and which you read and now claim was an action by God.

Lol, you seems to just want to be accepting the part of the bible that seems logical, and reject the ones that are not. Hence, your "Bible is written by someone"...
Nigga, you can't pick and choose the part of Bible that suits you. Otherwise, go form your own religion and stop claiming Christian. Even Jesus didn't pick and choose the part of Bible that suits him.

Nnpccourtcase:
I just confirmed all what these people (positive minds) have said is far from truth and never expect the to come out next week.

I pray it comes as you said, but never in anyway raise your hopes as there is no clear indication the list will come out as stated above.

Hahahahaha. It's well.

Danwani200:
Its confirmed APL dropping next week btw 20-24th jan. 2020..

Hahahahaha, Another one!

Rotemens:
Morning guys, Expect Notification ending of the month and Documentation is gonna be online...
May God help us All!!

Una don start.














Secretly hoping it's true and favourable.

what was his post about?