₦airaland Forum

hifaif:
Yes. If you insist that Buhari has no certificate, didn't he lead professors from 1983 - 85?

doctokwus:
So those mths he acted should be wiped off the calendar of Nigeria's history?

Ten-man Flying Eagles on Saturday in Abuja beat Enyimba International FC of Aba 2-0 at the 2014/2015 Glo Premier League Super 4 Invitational Tournament.

In the match played at the National Stadium mainbowl, the national under-20 male football team dominated the entire duration of the game.

The first half of the match ended in a stalemate but the Flying Eagles came back stronger in the second half to score their goals.

Musa Muhammed gave the national team the opening goal through a penalty kick in the 60th minute, after Taiwo Awoniyi was brought down in the box.

With less than a minute left to the end of the match, substitute Musa Yahaya doubled their lead.

Throughout the 90 minutes of play, the national team showed no respect to the 2014 Federation Cup winners, although both teams had scoring chances.

While Enyimba had a scoring opportunity as early as the 11th minute, they were stopped by the Flying Eagles’ goalkeeper Joshua Enahoro.

The Flying Eagles could have scored in the 18th minute, before Prince Aggrey was brought down inside the box, but referee Ferdinand Udoh booked him for simulation.

In the 26th minute, Awoniyi was denied a goal when he hit the woodwork.

Goalkeeper Chijioke Ejiogu also stopped him from getting his name on the score sheet in the 35th minute.

Upon resumption of the second half, the Flying Eagles continued the dominance but their spirit was dampened in the 49th minute when Aggrey was shown a second yellow card.

The Flying Eagles’ reduction to 10 men however did not affect their performance, as they held their nerves to continue to dominate the game.

They went on to crown their efforts through Yahaya’s brilliant effort in the 90th minute for the second goal.

Jarus:
Good to know you don't think Jarus can be a good Chairman. Only wondering why it took so long for you to say despite being on this thread for long.

Let some else take the role. I'm backing down, I don't expend my energy on something whose credibility will be questionable. It will be a waste of efforts, which I don't engage in.

freecitizn:
APC Supporters, like this post to confirm consent to Jarus as Debate Chairman....PDP Supporters, Share this post in support of Jarus as Debate Chairman

iliyande:
Because pregnancy is not a disease

Brahms:
Dude, why is this thread not on Front Page??

Pataki:
Since Seun has decided to quote Rule No 1 of his NL Rules; would you be man enough to deal with all those who are trying to derail this thread by injecting Buhari needlessly into the discourse.

Show us that you are indeed openminded.

Pataki:
I don't have regards either for some of your moderators. If I insulted them, that is a different case. Unless, you are now trying to tell us to keep our opinion to ourselves forthwith when coming on your forum..

Bruteforce1o1:
Of course, they ban E-guerilla cos he said he no longer have much regard for Seun. Imagine...... Is that an offense?

Pataki:
Who and who is slandering you? Someone says he has not much regard for you, you decided to ban him.

Little wonder your moderators know no better either.

The irony is when you state you are being slandered. The joke is in your face.

berem:
was it because the Op said he has no regards for you that's why you banned him? That was very unfair of you. Eguerilla have not been posting for a long time. You have now shut him up by giving him a ban?

That's wicked!

PS: Incase I don't comment further,let it be known I was banned by Seun.

Bruteforce1o1:
Of course, they ban E-guerilla cos he said he no longer have much regard for Seun. Imagine...... Is that an offense?

patrickmuf:
In other words, Seun has thrown his support behind the idea... Jar us please get busy...I can't wait.

PointB:
If Nigeria's problem cannot be solved by someone who possesses PHD, what can someone with a 'dodgy' WASC do? You can't give what you don't have!

Jarus:
hiding non-relevant posts, banning trouble makers, which are necessary ingredients for a successful debate.

PointB:
I beg to disagree! The certificate issue bothers seriously on the integrity of the candidate! It has to be dealt with in the most transparent way possible. As it stands, there still matters arising. The one concerned should quickly, and transparently deal with any and all inconsistencies observed. Only then can it be put to rest!

Tstone1:
Earlier today an argument ensued between my woman and myself about how workaholic I have become in recent times. She later joked about me being serious with my job cos am working cos of her. I told her NO! And to her greatest surprised I let her know am working for the sakes of my children unborn not necessarily her. She became very angry and said she was highly disappointed by my statement.

I felt this shouldn't be an issue as have only spoken my mind. Your take on this please..