Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,161,435 members, 7,846,792 topics. Date: Friday, 31 May 2024 at 11:58 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Sharetroll's Profile / Sharetroll's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 12 pages)
Sports / Re: Kobe Or Wade? by sharetroll(m): 8:15pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
kobesosimi: Everyone has had their great defensive moments, I can show youtube videos of Wade playing some great defense on Kobe as well. kobesosimi: . . .like Kobe does every other game? kobesosimi: Don't worry, you're doing a good job at it. kobesosimi: Remind me his FG% in the Olymipcs again? kobesosimi: Carmelo needs a catalyst (i.e a PG) to get his offense going. Wade does not. I may be exaggerating, but it seems like Melo gets his points mostly from alley-hoops & dunks. And the system Melo plays in is responsible for inflation of his offensive stats. If you didn't have Kobe's nuts rooted deep in your throat, you would understand this. kobesosimi: Thank God. kobesosimi: When you shoot a million times, what do you expect? And again, I'm not discrediting Kobe O-game in any way. kobesosimi: You respond b/c you know I'm right. . . .and, you're right. I'm a fruit for thinking he was evangelical when he scored the last 17 points against the Pistons to comeback from a 4th quarter deficit, or when he scored 18 consective points in the third quarter to close out a 4-0 series against the Wizards in a pivitol playoff game w/o Shaq. And this is just two of the many Jordanesque performances he has had in his 4-year career kobesosimi: Obviously, you didn't catch Wade last offensive outputs that resulted in wins. The guy dominated the 4th quarter through is mid-range game alone, shooting 6/7 against Portland and 7/10 against San Antonio w/ NO FREETHROWS. Oh, and BTW, Wade has shot less than 10 free-throws in his last 7 games kobesosimi: When did I ever say you have to possess a long wing-span to play effective on-ball defense. Putting words in my mouth doesn't get any more routine for you, does it "dunce"? I was implying that the wing span is one of the unwarranted benefits a for good perimeter defense, since the better defenders in the league are traditionally forwards/centers. kobesosimi: Retards get special treatment. In this case, I'll let go. kobesosimi: Yeah, I get the drift. . . .and gets lit up every other game. kobesosimi: Is Iverson the best shot-blocking guard in the NBA? Case closed. kobesosimi: It is good defense, nonetheless. . .Isn't it? Again, you refuse to acknowledge Wade and his great help-defense. A true hater. kobesosimi: Only difference is, Wade does that far more consistently. kobesosimi: Like Kobe when he got got lit up for 60 by Arenas, 45 by Redd? Arenas, who usually have poor shooting performances was like 20-23 that day, LOL kobesosimi: He doesn't have to. He has a shitload of great perimeter defenders on his team, unlike Kobe. kobesosimi: key word: Offensive threat. I want to see you "dwarf" my list, LOL kobesosimi: Read what the "bush doctrine" does, slowly this time. Hopefully, you will be able to comprehend better. kobesosimi: Honesty, Can these guys put teams into foul trouble like Wade. . . .I know, it's the refs, just like any Wade hater would say. . . kobesosimi: This is a Kobe vs. Wade debate, isn't it? Otherwise, I'm in the wrong thread kobesosimi: The facts are that Wade draws more of an influence on his team than Kobe, and both have the same # of opp. PER w/ Wade playing against more tougher guards. comprende? kobesosimi: Common sense doesn't require knocking one players game to praise your own player, either. . . .And I'm sure the facts & numbers are nonsense, right? Especially when evaluating two of the premire players in the league kobesosimi: KoMe Cryant is going to have to do alot of therapy this off season figuring out his race & cultural background. Uncle Tom think he's Asian, now. LOL |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 6:25pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Tornadoz: Since those are the types of people I dealing w/, I have no other choice, b/c of the blind, homeristic responses. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 6:22pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Christino: Your bashing is overplayed & worn out which you and only find audiences w/ like-minded, dogmatic neanderthals. Objectivity is a thing to be valued and you obviously have none. Carry on. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 6:15pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
mr me too: I'm the same troll, idiot. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 5:56pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
ThiefOfHearts: I'm expressing the idea of general Soccer homers/Football haters on this thread, and you just happen to be one of 'em. Fact of the matter is, most ignorant Soccer homers like you have the attention span of a 5-year old and can't sit still long enough to understand the game of Football. If you haven't seen it at a high level or even been to game then, you wouldn't appreciate the game. Who's more of a retard, dickheads like you who bash Football or well-rounded, objective individuals like myself who understand the game and how incredibly skilled the athletes are who play the game? |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 5:39pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Tornadoz: Of course I get it. Why do you think I decided not to make/demand a poll for which is the better sport. B/c, considering this is an international site, the outcome would be obvious. Instead, Seun made the poll to make me look ridiculous. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 5:28pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
ThiefOfHearts: Again, the tired, typical "ignorant Americans don't understand Soccer" idea is for people who are just too stupid to say anything else. I do know how big Soccer is in Europe and around the world. But what the hell is that supposed to have to do with my liking it or being able to "appreciate" the sport? I've seen Soccer. I've seen other sports. When it was all said and done, Soccer was not one of my favorite. But leave it to some slowpoke like you to try and reduce it to some "ignorant American thing". Typical. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 4:51pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
simmy: I understand there is a large soccer skill set, I was being slightly facetious. But when you've got countries that seems to preach falling (Portugal, C Ronaldo being some of the better examples) when games are decided by a single goal, its hard to really qualify that sport as the best in the world to me. simmy: . . .spiritual to the sense that a countries citizens will go out and kill the goalie for their team b/c a team scored on him. simmy: Soccer is boring because the game is flawed. There simply isn't enough correlation between execution and scoring. And don't tell me that I don't understand soccer vibe. . . .I've seen huge rivalry games in the world's biggest stadium (Rio de Janeiro). |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 3:17pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Eastcoast: CO-SIGN!! Thank you, baby. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 3:16pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
adconline: Soccer is boring. That's for sure. Most of the countries of the world are smaller than the USA. Take Europe. Most countries are like states here and they're all close. This sets up a bigger rivalry between nations. We don't have that here. . . .Who would be our rival? Canada? Mexico? And Soccer is the sport between nations. I don't think it would matter if they played tiddly winks. It's national pride. So it generates a lot of excitement. Because America is so large and isolated the rivalries are between cities and states within our country. We don't get too excited about a soccer game with Mexico or a basketball game with Lithuania. 1 Like |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 3:08pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
texazzpete: Another ignorant post. Why do you guys love to speak out of your ass? These NFL players are highly strutinized and tested rigourosly for any performance-enhancing drugs each year. The only guy that tested positive last year was Shawne Merriman, and that was 4-months before the start of the season!!! These guys are tested year-round. You would do the world a big favor if you could stop speaking out of your ass. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 3:03pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Vieira: Why are you speaking out of your ass? LeBron runs a 4.4, That is blazing speed. LeBron is also bigger and stronger than this pathetic "Theo Walcott" you're comparing him to, and I don't even like LeBron that much. . . |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 2:59pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
Donzman: Did you see the ignorant post that LoverBwoy made on #95? Can you even count the # of ignorant posts that these Soccer homers have been made throughout the thread? Maybe I exaggerated a little, claiming they're no world class sprinters, but that was out of the ignorant garbage these Soccer homers were spewing. Donzman: Should I bring out the #'s again? None of these Soccer player are even remotely as strong as LeBron. Lets not make pathetic statements, now. Donzman: I already stated in this thread that I love Rugby in post #88. OWNED Donzman: Don't bring up Steve Nash. He's not the most athletic & skilled player in the NBA, and he's certainly not the best player. Just look at how he plays defense, LOL. He just plays in a system that best fits his offensive style. If he played in the Princeton/Triangle offense like the Lakers, or the system that of a Jeff Van Gundy's, he would be an utter liability. Please, don't go the NBA route, b/c I will murder you. As for skill & athleticism, It comes down to this. . . . In America we have a lot of mainstream sports. . .Baseball, Football, Hockey, Basketball, Golf, Soccer, etc. . . And given all of these choices, soccer is ignored. It is a sport for the kids that can't make the elite sports team. I'm sorry if that bothers you. I did a little research on speed guys. Thierry Henry: 11.0 100-meter dash Michael Own 10.8 David Odonkor 10.7 Johann Smith 10.5 Wynalda 4.4 in the 40-yards. . . And from what I could find. . . .the NFL would easily sweep all the sprints in a track meet. Thierry Henry is fast, and I see that he's could be considered the fastest soccer player ever. But not fast enough to run with the NFL speed guys. And of course. . .the NFL guys are bigger with that speed. Which makes them even more athletic. I don't really have to talk about this anymore. It's clear that I'm right given the attention that Soccer gets here in America. |
Sports / Re: Kobe Or Wade? by sharetroll(m): 2:01pm On Mar 01, 2007 |
kobesosimi: It is arguable that Wade's defense may be better at this point, Kobe's defense @ 21 was better, but you have to admit it has fallen off big time. So many factors contributed to that, including the arthroscopic knee surgery. And did you pay attention to how many times Wade blew by slow footed Kobe on Christmas Day? kobesosimi: You get a pass, LOL kobesosimi: What can Kobe do that Wade cannot besides chuck FG%'s which is mediocre at best? Shoot the 3? That's about it. There are some players like Artest & Prince, or a Hinrich that have SHUT DOWN Kobe. I can barely think of 1 player that has contained Wade at best. Wade drives and finishes better than anyone else in the game. Like an above poster said: Wade is intelligent, and controls the mental aspect of games, something Kobe hasn't been able to master for years. Wade takes smarter shots. . .part of the reason why he blows every other SG away in FG%. I'll rather take a person who will take the smarter shots than someone who can chuck his own team into defeat like a Kobe or Arenas, though Kobe is developing more of a team concept now. But you still cannot refute the facts I posted on post #44. Wade's defense is pathetic? You are a HATER. And, just for good measure, a prime-Pippen would shut-down Kobe. kobesosimi: Wade does not guard the best defender b/c he doesn't possess the physical gifts that on-ball defenders like a Wright or Posey have (e.g long wingspan). Those players were brought or drafted by Miami b/c of DEFENSE Generally, great defenders like Pippen and Tayshaun Prince had it, Wade doesn't have it. And what is the big deal in guarding the best perimeter player when you get lit up for 60, 45 points. . .get the drift? Wade plays some of the best help/team defense I have ever seen. Obviously, you don't watch Wade. There is a reason why he is in the top 10 in steals, and the BEST SHOT-BLOCKING GUARD in the NBA. It's b/c his help defense is amazing. And, when I say opponents, I'm talking about the perimeter players that Wade guards. The East have far more guards that are offensive threats, than the West. . . .Paul Pierce (swingman), Gilbert Arenas, Joe Johnson, Michael Redd, Vince Carter (swingman), to name a few. Most of the West offensive juggernauts are F/C's. Why do I have to break things down the half-brain you are? OWNED kobesosimi: Your comprehension skills are lacking. Read what I said about the "Bush Doctrine". Wade wears his opponents production out by getting them in foul trouble, so they won't be able to perform effectively on the offensive end. It would help if you can read before you write. kobesosimi: The facts are utter trash? So the numbers are trash? My responses are based on speculation? LOL kobesosimi: Translation - I can't refute what he said. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 11:21pm On Feb 28, 2007 |
nferyn: But, who cares about rowing, cycling, etc. . .Religious threads are your real home. Endure it. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 11:12pm On Feb 28, 2007 |
seeni4ever: LOL @ this guy grinning hard & stroking his nutsack b/c some Soccer player decided to flop during his game-tying goal that merely worths a point. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 6:28pm On Feb 27, 2007 |
Gamine: So one person (your friend) is the determining factor here. WOW |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 6:03pm On Feb 27, 2007 |
ThiefOfHearts: HAHAHAHA, DLOL. . . . .You talk about violence. . . .What about the soccer player who got hammered in in the head b/c they were discussing KARAOKE LMAO, You know how many riots goes on during Soccer games for the littliest thing. . . .VLOL, Talk about violence. Only in Soccer do you get a SportsCenter Top 10 play where a guy misses a shot. What a sport. There goes the little girl flexing her internet muscles. Again, I will say soccer is pathetic. I also forgot to mention Ireland and the hooligans. How many folks do these guys beat up every game? People were getting mad about the allstar game in Vegas being violent? Virtually every soccer game ouside of the US is more violent than that. |
Sports / Re: American Football Is Better Than Soccer! by sharetroll(m): 5:40pm On Feb 27, 2007 |
adconline: Soccer is not popular in the US because it doesn't match up well with American culture. Americans are result-oriented, and so if something happens on the playing field that doesn't lead to something that constitute a "result" (either points or statistics that they consider significant in some way) then they think that "nothing happened". The most popular American sports are those that usually can be quantified easily making almost every action count for something. In baseball, they have a stat for just about everything except picking your nose, and they are looking to add MORE stats all the time (for example, Saves are not enough. Now they want to count "Holds" too.) In basketball every play results in at least 1 stat--shot, foul, turnover, steal, block, etc and virtually every good play is measurable in a quantifiable progress (points). In Football, again every single play generates measurable numbers and quantifiable progress (either points or territory). Two sports that are relatively popular world-wide but weak in the USA: Hockey and Soccer. Both those sports have a lot of up-and-down, back-and-forth, but relatively low scoring and limited statistical tracking to produce a "result" aside from scoring. For example, in baseball you do something measured and considered significant every time you get a base hit. In hockey or soccer you get nothing for a good play where you beat a defender or two but don't get a shot on goal. Think of basketball where goaltending and fouling was allowed, reducing the scores probably more to 20/25 points/game per team. Basketball popularity would likely plummet, because Americans are no-nonsense and appreciate RESULTS a lot more than process. You can also see the difference in the preferred kind of auto racing: Americans like NASCAR, the rest of the world likes Formula 1. |
Sports / Re: Kobe Or Wade? by sharetroll(m): 1:57pm On Feb 27, 2007 |
BlackMamba: You should learn to stop speaking out of your ass and watch the games for once. To say Wade is merely a hustle player reveals your knowledge of basketball. If you want to witness a pure "hustle player", try Ben Wallace. . .does all the dirty work (blocks, steals & boards) while his teammates looks to score. Wade is extremely talented. For you not to recognize that shows you're just a hater. P.S. If Kobe is that far & away the more talented player then why did he lead his team to the lottery & first round exit respectively when handed the leadership role? Why couldn't he beat the same Pistons team that Wade torched in last years Eastern Conference Finals? |
Sports / Re: Kobe Or Wade? by sharetroll(m): 1:48pm On Feb 27, 2007 |
RuuDie: LMAO, You are not to be taken seriously. The two most hated athletes in the NBA is arguably Kobe & Wade, respectively. I measure a players greatness by the # of his detractors. Ginobli isn't remotely close to the strutiny that these two receive. He is a good flopper, though. And what does your nationality have to do w/ your game? |
TV/Movies / Re: The Oscars 2007 by sharetroll(m): 3:52am On Feb 27, 2007 |
The media is so liberal and jewed up now its getting funny. So obvious how they screwed Mel Gibsons Apacolypto out of any nominations because of his Jew remarks. . .Then, for best documentery all nominations were anti-American or pro-liberal propaganda films. . . .and of course Al Gores film on Global Warming wins. . .Then we have all the gay agenda thrown in peoples faces with Ellen hosting and Mellissa Ethridge winning for best song. . .Then we have the obligitory black nominees and winners who don't deserve it. Does anybody take the Oscars seriously anymore? |
TV/Movies / Re: I Love New York by sharetroll(m): 3:21am On Feb 27, 2007 |
I don't know why you people watch this stuff. Most of the things MTV throws out there is utter garbage. |
Literature / Re: Titles Of Books by sharetroll(m): 3:10am On Feb 27, 2007 |
Uncle Tom's Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe (my favorite book) Second best-selling book in the 19th century in America. . . . .after the Bible Audacity of Hope by Barack Obama (my latest book) |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 12 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 111 |