₦airaland Forum

BackDatAssUp:
I am waiting for you to deliver the download link to the PDF file you are parading as evidence.

Go and sleep, you've been debunked. Next..

Babymama1:
Because they read nairaland and premium times

Then how did the minister 'toronto case' get debunked?
Do you think the whites are clueless or don't know what's happening, especially news that's likely to tarnish their image?

cococandy:
dont ask so they won't call you an illiterate. Only if you swallow the nonsense hook line and sinker will you be learned like their general

Really disappointed. Can't believe you allowed your bias to totally block your sense of reasoning.
Should I also tell you my statement of result and my original cert.'s has different passports on them? I was in my schl. uniform in my cert.'s passport as opposed to the mufti wears on my statement of result's passport. Reason being, I submitted a new passport to my principal when I was to collect my statement of result and this was before my school received my original certificate from waec. Both results has the little girl face but the dress I wore were different.
This should tell you a statement of result is issued by the school at anytime based on the master result list from the exam body whereas the original cert is issued strictly by the exam body.
Obviously, Buhari has lost his original certificate and issueing a new one will take longer than expected, especially from an exam body outside Nigeria. However, it is quite easy for the school to issue his statement of result based on the Cambridge masters lists with them. This is exactly what Buhari's school did for him yesterday. Hence, the date issued will be year 2015 and the formats in 'todays' school formats i.e, (Sscce/Waec/Neco).
If the british body doesn't deny it, then I see no reason why we should, especially if we're truly the higher being with high intellect and reasoning.

Babymama1:
Ikpu nne gi

Of course the print out is fake
Couldn't you see the lines where the names were written were not in sync?

If it was, the british body would've come out to deny it. Get some brain, will you?

Chigold101:
are you saying that just filled that form this year? what that means is that the form is forged because the school is supposed to produce their own copy of his result... how did the principle get the University of Cambridge form in 2015... many years after Nigeria moved on...

You're so stupid. Infact, I can't quantify your level of stupidity, all I know is that it's at its peak.
If waec body made it a duty to grant registered schools original result slips of their students, you think a british body will become clueless as your otueke presido?
Let it be made known to you that all sec. schools has the original slip of their students' results irrespective of the year.
The cambridge result slip was issued 1961, only the statement of result was issued yesterday. Get a pair of glasses, dunce.

Chigold101:
when was NECO introduced in Nigeria? http://www.neconigeria.org/corporate/about.html
how is the Buhari in the WAEC statement of result an old man?
When did Nigeria introduce Class six in our secondary schools?

I swear some nigerians are so stup!d.
Do you expect the recent format of statement of results to have similar format to the one used in 1961?
Now, let you and your fellow fo0ls know this, statement of results are paper issued by the school itself based on the original result from the exam body and in this Buhari's case, it was from the british exam body, not some silly bodies from an otueke village.
The statement of result in use today in every secondary schools is in ssce/waec/neco format, not cambridge/wasc format. That means, anyone who is to be granted one is given the same format irrespective of the year you graduated. It's only your certificate and result print out slip that has its format unchanged because it is issued directly by the exam body.
Illiterates like you don't know this yet you're calling another illiterate. You're such a dunce.

5minsmadness:
Shut up you stvpid smelly bltch. No one was talking to you.

Lol.
No doubt, I really do enjoy banters but it becomes boring when it comes down to lies to save face.
I wouldn't have even interfered if you hadn't lie. Tell me, who's attacking who? Before her last post, coco never made any spiteful words despite all your effort to irk her, I was beginning to think she was dulling. And you should know me already, no dulling moment, especially with a stüpid fellow like you.

zeb04:
he hasn't changed and you know that because you the one leaving with him.

Someone who is alredy threating divorce 2months into marriage.

Please fear God oh
Stop being biased.If you are a christian,give christianly advice.

Tv isn't a christian. He's a religious man, Pharisee of our time.
Don't get it twisted.

5minsmadness:
Lol@people liking your posts. Its the same 'you lot' that like your posts hence 'you lot' keep getting likes no matter what excrementory advice you post.

If you have problems understanding what I mean by 'you lot' then maybe you're the idiiot.


I have never crossed swords with you on any thread so I'm not the one with the baggage here. Its you attacking me from what sirshymex and crackhaus have done to you in the past.

Yeah you mentioned counseling on an off note but mentioned divorce twice in that post alone! Not to talk of other posts. Now you're harping on it like its your usual line of defence. Pfft.

This would have been a civil discussion but no, you lot don't do that do you?



What is it with you and divorce? Does it empower the woman so much?

Ewwwwww@you thinking you have a syndrome worth naming.

People call you out when you make irritating comments. The vast majority simply ignore them. Its a pity I couldn't stop myself from commenting concerning you today.

I repeat;
Ewwwwww@cococandy syndrome, you actually gave it a name? So it must occur a lot then? Wonder why.


Now i feel dirty. Ewwww. I'm going to take a bath and wash this 'syndrome shit' off me.

Guess i'll beat you to it and put you on my ignore list first.

Huh?
You're so stupid i can't even quantify the level of your stupidity.
What's wrong with her if she says the wife should grant him divorce, afterall the husband asked for it?
Instead of you to give coco some credits for advising the woman to grant it 'only on the ground of abuse' rather it was her attacking you.
Some men with ape brain. Smh.

cococandy:
Sounds like you're speaking from two sides of your mouth.

If you were OP you would kick him out.
Really?

But in your other posts(not just on this thread anyway) you're always advocating women swallowing sh1t in the name of making it work but you won't do the same?
You tell them it is ok to allow cheating and polygamy is cool because you're the perfect african woman but now you're confessing you can't take it?

In fact before she made her idea of a solution known, you had already started blaming her for wanting to deal with the situation even when you know you wouldn't sit down and take it if you were her.

Na wa for you madam mutter.

Mutter is a miserable woman who seeks company in her misery. That's a fact I know.

DieeDiee:
Really? But all I did was ask why she should use contraceptives if she's married in answer to what someone said I even gave you context and I even said I don't care what a person does it's their choice what kind of sex they want

I saw your other posts. Are you married and using contraceptives?

You made no sense whatsoever in this thread.

SirShymex:
Well, that is different cos in this case se.x must have given whoever the accused is, consent to shag her. And that can't be classified as rap.e technically. The only issue is that he sold her a dream.

Misrepresentation/fraud - yes. Ra.pe - no.

I don't even know how women can allow this useless bill, when they cry about objectification all the time. This bill is directly/ indirectly objectifying the pum as a commodity lol. Materialism is about to destroy humanity.

I see.
As usual, your eyes go red whenever you think an agenda favours women but calma, it's not just for the women. Based on that law, a man can also charge a woman if he thinks the woman made a fool out of him. It's for both genders. As you can see, it's good to engage that brain of yours at all time.
Whatever, I don't see why such law should be allowed. Are they telling us humans are brainless dolls lacking intelligence whatsoever? It's not anyone fault if someone chose to act like one.

Kimoni:
You have no AGREEMENT with him!!! And you consented to NOTHING!!! Job referrals are given everyday and it doesn't tie anybody down.
And I do not even believe he has the power to fire you where you are as long as you are doing your job well.

But enough of the silence, now is the time to reply his messages sternly and tell him you don't want any relationship from him. And pls, keep his messages and your responses to him. They might come in handy.

Exactly. @op, don't mind stupid things like @Crackhaus and Timbuktou, that's exactly what they would do in the man's place.

crackhaus:
Doofus....still making a f00l of yourself, are you?

Go read the book of Exodus 2 - but if the entire chapter is too much work for your imbecilic brain matter, restrict your reading to just Exodus 2:16-22.

When you done, I know your next line of argument will be in trying to explain to me how the contents of Chapter 3 now precede those of Chapter 2.

Mega doofus!



*******************

That aside, let me humour you as well - now let's assume they did in fact work to earn these wives, how does this refute the fact that these women were offered as reward for job well done?
Are these women not human beings?
Why will a human be given as reward to a man, whether as repayment for work or as a gift?

Does this not also defeat the argument that a woman is not chattel?

There's a reason I stopped responding to captain-save-a-hoe on this topic - I can't stand it when people can't think beyond the length of their own nose just because they feel like typing to earn brownie points.

Now doofus, bring on your next line of insipid mental reasoning

Empty head, you clearly forgot verse 21 or probably got blinded. The verse says 'Moses was content to dwell with the man.' Am I supposed to make you understand that part too. Oops! I forgot you are too dead brain to undestand that Moses dwelt with the father of the girls before he was granted a wife.
That should tell you Moses stayed and worked for some years before he got a wife. The bible doesn't have to narrate all Moses' life story before you get it.
If ch 2 & 3 of Exodus was read literaly, you would think Moses was still a young guy at the time he returned to Egypt but we were made to realize he was around 50 yrs. So tell me, why didn't the bible talk about all the years he spent at his FIL house?
You should try to make use of that remnant you called brain at times.. It will save people the energy to spoonfeed you at all time. It's even funny when you think about it. A father would just give his daughter to a strange man because he helped her to fetch water? Are you thinking straight at all? You're a fool.
If you aint one, why would you also think a father would allow Moses/Jacob to marry his daughters when they had nothing? Or are you forgetting they were sojourners who ran away from their homes?
Let me tell you, the work they did was to earn their living and get their own livestocks which they did. Yes, the work can be referred as bride price and the gift of livestocks as dowries. Call it whatever but the fathers didn't give their daughters as gifts. Get it, baboon.

crackhaus:
Let me humour you a little bit - is your opinion based on the idea that a wife is a human being, while the car isn't?

Because if that's it, I'm pretty sure there are/were cultures where women have been offered as gifts to men as payment for work, debt settlement, creating alliances/treaties...etc.
It happened in the Bible more than once - with Moses for helping the daughters of Jethro, he was given Zipporah as a wife gift.... with Jacob for serving Laban, he was first given Leah and later Rachael as wife gifts[/b].
There are other examples like in England and France or England and Scotland forming alliances by gifting princesses with the intention of forming marriage unions which lead to alliances.
Even to this day, things like that still happen - so you really got no point.

Anyway enough of the examples, the analogy is not on the gift itself but on the unawareness/lack of prior knowledge which leaves one party in the dark, thereby making them feel inadequate, simple!
I already made this clear enough in that my post you quoted.


A gift is a gift, be it human or inanimate - as long as it is offered to another in the form of assistance, appreciation, or commendation.

Smh. Tell me more.
Empty heads forming know how.
If you read your bible well, you would know Jacob and Moses laboured for good amount of years before they were granted their wives. The work they did was their bride price, the girls wasn't given to them as gifts. Infact, they wanted a wife, worked and got them. The only gift Jacob/Moses got from their FIL was the flocks of sheeps/rams given to them as dowry.

coogar:
you are a verminous cretin!
how do you people sleep at night with this level of stupidity in your genes? you mean Jesus retained some curses and lifted some?



you are a consummate rëtard!
until adam & eve were cursed, no other human existed. no other woman gave birth & no other man tilled the soil. how could it be a norm when it was unprecedented? is this what you would tell your kids? women like you should be legally prohibited from having kids.



you have no hope!
you are just a mere gentile - you were never in God's grand plan. the refusal of the jews to grasp the gospel is the reason you suddenly see yourself as part of the grand plan.



even your pastor would get tutored by me - i finished the bible at the age of 15 - i have perused it more than a dozen times since then. at your age, you never knew adam had a mistress before eve & you called yourself a christian? may amadioha impregnate you with a dozen goblins.

you disgrace yourself & your church. get out of my sight before you embarrass yourself further.

Where did I say that?

I said none of the curse took its stand except death.
In that case, eventhough Christ lifted all curses, the only visible one was death because God in his merciful love had already cancelled most of it.
Like I said earlier, you're just so dumb to have any intelligent discourse with. If you aint, your brain would tell you it's a norm to expect a woman to have pains when birthing a child. If you could expect a woman to have pain when having sex for the first time, why argue birth pains?
Better still, visit a gaylord to rïm your anäl hole and tell me if that doesn't hurt. You would probably understand better that way.
What's so difficult to understand that Once Eve knows about sex, she's bound to have pains as a consequence which God told her?
Also, you can't provide everything for someone and expect not to have some form of control over them which God also told Eve. God's curse was 'as long as men work to feed the women, he would rule over them." Infact, God's true intent was made known when he made Deborah a judge/ruler, made Moses to give inheritance to the 2 daughters of Zelophehad and made Moses' sister, Mariam a prophet.
By the way, the tedious work assigned to the men were even made easier when God sent rain and now with the arrival technology, it's more easier. That's not to talk of the involvement of women in these same work cry babies like you are getting worked up over. So pls get a life.
When scientist made it known that men are the dumbest fools out there, it was an understatement because I'm seeing one right here. You should either get a brain or get lost. I don't want to be bothered spoon-feeding the likes of you.

dapsy4u2:
More of the reason why the question on who to choose should never arise, cos the man would always choose his wife and maybe/maybe not continue to see his 'slut'.

It's not by words but deeds. If he's not showing the effort, the marriage is already a facade.

khia:
Actually it also comes from the old eggs of the woman.

I know of down syndrome but not as a result of old eggs. Ova's quality doesn't depreciate as much as
sperm does.
Also, the down syndrome effect is compounded because women tends to marry older guys. Old women that have partners in their range of age or below don't birth retards.

dBard:
u really do lack comprehension.
Not everyone seeks attention on NL. I've got all the attention I need in reality

I do pray u attain some sense this year...fruitless prayer I know, but we can only hope.

You've got your daily attention dose..... Enjoy


@o.p..sorry for derailing

I don't condole stupidity. If I spot it, I spell it out. And your stupidity knows no bound here. If not, you won't disrespect other posters with your snide comment. Come out straight and stop being coward.

lastchild:
you should go back to primary school(that's if u ever attended any) and tell your biology teacher to guide you properly about reproduction

Trust me, you need it more than I do. Just tell your dad we don't need more rètards out there.

dBard:
The friend is in quote..dum dum.

Exposing ur ignorance so early in the year.

You expected a reaction, you got it dumbass.
What were you expecting when you said Nl went haywire because an husband is seeing an old friend? You really stink of stupidity.

dapsy4u2:
And what problem would divorcing him solve...? Instead of you to advise her to settle issues amicably, talk to the husband and make him see reason(s) why he shld love and be faithful to his family.

It will prevent stories that touches e.g std, Hiv e.t.c
Moreover, she didn't ask her to divorce. She said the op should ask her husband to choose either his marriage or his $lut. You should know men aint worth the stress.

dBard:
...he reconnects with an old 'friend' and d general assumption from the wise NL family is that he is cheating.
@first consideration, don't u think a cheating husband would have been smart enuff t cover his tracks especially knowing u have his password.

@o.p, wisdom doesn't act with sentiments nor assumptions..n making wahala now especially if it turns out to b false accusations will only work contrary.

You're the 'madam', call ur husband, tell him ur grievances, lay the rules down if needs be,esp concerning the lady in question.

keep in mind, Most ppl advising u here aren't married as well.
Be wise



'nuff said

You obviously didn't read the Op. Better still, you got eyes problem.

lastchild:
its a man's world ,period!

I always tell people that this issue of age being a number is only in a man's life not women,women use that to console their selves

A man can decide to marry at the age of 50,a woman dare not try it

My father is 64 and is about getting married 2015,he keep rejecting women we bring saying he doesn't like them,his taste is too high even at that age

Can a woman of that age get married? Even if she does its a miracle and bigger miracle to bear children

So a man should be cool being single not woman

Where do you think all those retärd genes are from? Obviously from old men who failed to have children at early age.
Just tell your father it's of no use because we don't need any more retärds in the country.

coogar:
forget higher mammals - you use epidurals because you carry the curse on yourself like a birthmark.



shut up & learn from me - i am your superior. go online & find out about lilith. she's the first woman in eden before she fell out with adam cos she wouldn't bow to him. she was made from dust like adam & eve was made from adam's ribs - this is why you are the weaker vessel.



what has free food gotta do with gluttony? look at your logic for heaven's sake. that something is free means it would be abused? this is why majority of earth's inhabitants believe your gender cannot reason logically without a dose of emotional outbursts. when you learn to separate emotions from logic, please holla @ me.

I only abide by the inspired scriptures written by Moses, not men. Gerrrit.
Like I said earlier, you're better left to your stupidity. And let me tell you, the only curse that took its stand was death. Apart from this death, nothing else was permutated because God is merciful. He said man will till the ground but in the end, he brought down rain..
It's a norm for women to have pain when birthing a child, so that's aint a curse.
He also said, men will rule the women which was the norm in the adamic era because only men were capable of tilling the deserted soil and without it, the women would have nothing to feed on, so they have to depend on the men. Even then, God made Deborah a leader to rule over the isralites...
As you can see, none of these curses ever materalized except death. And the death we're talking about is the death of the soul, and this has been nullified by the death of his son, Christ. Now, christians have the hope of living forever through the death of his son.
So, whether you puff and puff, It won't change anything. I repeat no curse existed or took its stand for so long, except death!
And next time, you shut up when the word christianity comes up 'cos you know nothing about it. It's not by force.

coogar:
animals don't need epidurals to give birth & they cope just fine. i had a female dog & all her deliveries were almost painless - why is yours different? the whole village must know if you are about to drop a child & yet you don't think you are cursed?



adam had sėx before even eve was made. you are a slowpoke! adam had a mistress before eve - how would adam be ignorant about sėx? as soon as adam realised all other animals were in pair, he became lonely and he was given a mistress!



the tilling is a figure of speech - it means men must work before they eat unlike when they ate freely in eden. so whenever you get an employment letter, the curse you carry is manifesting.



that's exactly the point.....
modern world & christianity don't mix. if you wanna embrace the modern world, drop christianity. the two cannot coexist!



without the curse you carry, that was the grand design. that plot changed after God cursed man & woman. in a nutshell, you still carry the curse & it's permanent - nothing can reverse it.

And the lie begins.
We uses epidurals because we're the higher mammals with cognitive reasoning and intelligence, you aint different from them thou.
Anyway, I'm not here to discuss whatever version of bible you use but according to mine, the first human were Adam and Eve, and they didn't know they were näked.
Lastly, God's design wasn't about gluttoness in the first place. If that's all you think about.. Let me leave you to your stupidity.

coogar:
physiology make-ups?
you are a big fool - go on google and see the number of pregnant women that die in nigeria annually? maybe all of them aren't christians.

why do you have to toil everyday to make ends meet? you have spent 30 years of your life on formal education & yet what you have to show for it is slightly above minimum wage - which cannot even feed you adequately. yet you don't think you carry a curse on your head?

you must be silly.....

You're the fool here.
How do you expect to birth a child without pains? Even goats has pains while birthing their kids or would you say goats were cursed too?
Let me tell you, it's a normal thing to expect as soon as Adam and Eve found out they were naked and expected to have sex. Before then, they knew nothing about such things.
As for the tilling of the ground, there was no rain during adamic era. That was why God said Adam will have to till.
Gen 2:5 says ''..and every herbs of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.'' So, you can imagine the tilling Adam have to do, to atleast reach the underground water to supply the root of their crops.
Now tell me, how many farmers till and till? Even leftover seeds can sprout by itself without any help.
Also, the world we have now is a modern world. So tell me, how we're still under the curse? Oh! You expect food to fall from the sky without any work...definition of a lazy man. Shior.

alutacontinua:
Huh?
Are you dreyl?

Remove that 'm' from your moniker. It's creeping me out. Or are you $hemale?

coogar:
it's too late in the year to be stupïd....you might carry it over to the new year.



christ didnt deliver any of you people from the curses placed on mankind. this is why you must go through excruciating pain during childbirth. you know nowt about the bible.

How do you expect physiology make-ups to change? I thought I was having an intelligent convo, now I know better.

coogar:
who is a christian?
are you high on pübic hair?

I didn't ask you if you're or not. You berra fix the nut in ya brain.

coogar:
how many times do we have to teach you about your bible?

genesis 3:16
To the woman he said, "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you."

is this what feminism preaches or God made a mistake when he said the above verse?



we have heard yours too - you sound like a broken record and perhaps jobless for making a thread about it. you coulda used the search button to push your agenda. there must be 400 threads like this existing somewhere on the forum.

That was a curse, not God's design.
And if Christ has delivered us from all curses, why am I still ruled by it? I cease to be, don't know about you.