SMC's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SMC's Profile › SMC's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 22 pages)
davidylan:So why the heck was my post demoted to the "Islam for Muslims" section? Though it relates to their beloved Mohammed and his fanatical devotees, it is about a book. Moreover, the last time I checked, I was still not a muslim. |
In the last fortnight or so, I have read - * The Reluctant Fundamentalist by Mohsin Hamid * The Sirens of Baghdad by Yasmina Khadra * The Outcast by Sadie Jones * Waiting for an Angel by Helon Habila * What is the What by Dave Eggers (Okay okay, I know it says which books are you currently reading) I am currently reading Mohammed Naseehu Ali's The Prophet of Zongo Stree[/b]t (which includes the Caine Prize shortlisted story [b]"Mallam Sile" which was published in The Newyorker magazine). |
davidylan:Is this a fact or just rumours? And if they have, why has he not just totally removed ALL religious threads instead of bowing to their specific wishes and looking like a puppet? |
@SEUN, Pray tell, why is this thread still sitting in the literature section when a parallel thread on Mohammed was promptly demoted twice to the "Islam for Muslims" thread? The least you can do is try to show some objectivity, uniformity and transparency in your dealings and rules. It seems to me that things on Nairaland seem weighted in favour of the Muslim users. |
Again, my thread has been demoted by Seun to the Islamic thread. I am just sick and tired of all these double standards. Why weren't all the Davinci Code threads on the literature section moved to the religion section? This section clearly states "Islam for Muslims". This is not a muslim thread. I did not write it exclusively for the muslims and I sure as friggin hell do not want it in the muslim section especially after the intolerance shown by the biased muslim moderators. I created this thread for an intellectual discourse among people broadminded enough to participate in the issues raised, so whoever is in charge should kindly move it back to the bloody literature section where it belongs (and was originally posted). ![]() |
davidylan:I know. Here I was thinking that moderators are supposed to be impartial. Obvious issues like these that Seun should deal with are left unattended. None of the responses I saw posted yesterday were inappropriate or rude, but because they did not advance the view of a small section, they were deleted and the topic locked. I would like to know the justification for locking the thread. This is a topic that has been keenly debated in the literary industry by intellectuals over the past month and some uninformed moderator sees it fit to just lock the thread. If the topic was a "My Cock is bigger than yours" topic, it would still be there. I did not see anyone lock any of the Davinci Code topics. It's about time the hypocrisy stopped. I am upset to say the least. ![]() |
@ Seun, This is a thread regarding a book and though it relates to Islam, it is the freedom of expression (especially in the print media) that is in contention and not the form of the Islamic religion, so please do not move it to the Islamic childboard. When you moved the last post I created to your Islamic section, your muslim moderators over there deleted comments of some non-muslim contributors and then locked the thread for reasons I cannot fathom (except to guess that the topic is probably uncomfortable to their religious beliefs). |
For the last three weeks or so, I have watched with incredulity, amusement and then sadness, the events that have unfolded over a book titled "The Jewel of Medina", which has been written by Sherry Jones. It has dragged on a bit, and reached a level that I just thought I should let out some of my hot air a bit. The book is a fictional piece based on the story of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed's child bride. Now, this is a book that Random House (the publisher) paid a $100,000 advance on, but they were forced to pull the plug on it when they were advised that there was likely to be reprisals by a section of Muslims who would be offended by the book. It was stated that the book was likely to incite some muslims to violence and the outrage that would likely follow its publication has been said to be more serious than when Salman Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" was published in the 1980s and the quite recent Danish cartoon of the Islamic prophet. Quite rightly, Random House has come under heavy criticism from various quarters for its decision, and just on Saturday 30/08/08, US literary prize the Langum Charitable Trust has said that it will refuse to consider titles from Random House US for its $1,000 awards until "The Jewel of Medina" is published. This may be a token gesture, but I think it is a step in the right direction. The Question is: For how long will we have to endure this one sided censorship and continue threading around muslims on egg shells? I agree with Andrew Franklin's summation when he said "I just think publishers should uphold the principle of free speech – editorial judgement is very important, but free speech is sacred, without it we should give up and go home." Thank goodness that the Danish publishers of the book are forging ahead with its publication. The author is very disappointed with Random House's decision and hopes to find another publisher in English for the book. She has already finished its sequel and has been quite blasé about terrorist threats, saying that she was "more afraid of global warming than of terrorist attacks". I say Atta girl. I look forward to reading the book if it oes make it to the shelves of Waterstones or WH Smith. With all this publicity, hopefully the book would sell by the bucket loads. I am sick and tired of being dictated to by a small violent group of ignorant people, who use the slightest irrational whim to spread death and terror. What say you all? |
@ Ssheryl, If you've had enough of men, try women. |
I do not recall saying that it was breaking news. |
For the last three weeks or so, I have watched with incredulity, amusement and then sadness, the events that have unfolded over a book titled "The Jewel of Medina", which has been written by Sherry Jones. It has dragged on a bit, and reached a level that I just thought I should let out some of my hot air a bit. The book is a fictional piece based on the story of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed's child bride. Now, this is a book that Random House (the publisher) paid a $100,000 advance on, but they were forced to pull the plug on it when they were advised that there was likely to be reprisals by a section of Muslims who would be offended by the book. It was stated that the book was likely to incite some muslims to violence and the outrage that would likely follow its publication has been said to be more serious than when Salman Rushdie's "Satanic Verses" was published in the 1980s and the quite recent Danish cartoon of the Islamic prophet. Quite rightly, Random House has come under heavy criticism from various quarters for its decision, and just today, US literary prize the Langum Charitable Trust has said that it will refuse to consider titles from Random House US for its $1,000 awards until "The Jewel of Medina" is published. This may be a token gesture, but I think it is a step in the right direction. The Question is: For how long will we have to endure this one sided censorship and thread around muslims on egg shells? I agree with Andrew Franklin's summation when he said "I just think publishers should uphold the principle of free speech – editorial judgement is very important, but free speech is sacred, without it we should give up and go home." Thank goodness that the Danish publishers of the book are forging ahead with its publication. The author is very disappointed with Random House's decision and hopes to find another publisher in English for the book. She has already finished its sequel and has been quite blasé about terrorist threats, saying that she was "more afraid of global warming than of terrorist attacks". I say Atta girl. I look forward to reading the book if it oes make it to the shelves of Waterstones or WH Smith. With all this publicity, hopefully the book would sell by the bucket loads. I am sick and tired of being dictated to by a small violent group of ignorant people, who use the slightest irrational whim to spread death and terror. What say you all? |
What's going on with this project, guys? |
Whatever happened to those people who wanted to get their works pooled together to create an anthology? |
Where is she? I mean which country. I know her book was shortlisted for the Commonwealth Writers prize. but she did not win though she was a regional winner. |
Hey Oriks, how is it going? Did you manage to get Karen King-Aribisala to edit your "Memories of a Refugee Child" story? And, have you put your book back on the market? If yes, do tell me before you send me a copy cos I have moved house and I won't get it if you send it to my old address. |
great LOL |
tianshie:LOL. Well, I'll advise that you soak up as much as you can. You know what they say - No pain, no gain. Remember that you can only be a better writer for the experience (not worse). I'm sure that you will appreciate the experience sometime in the not too distant future. Did you manage to hook up with Chukky76? Since Seun banned him, he has not posted on Nairaland (though I believe the ban has since been lifted - I may however be wrong, who knows?). Anyway, all the best to you guys. Ensure you make the most of the workshop. |
Usually, their decisions cannot be appealed. However, you can write a letter of complaint, stating your case, listing your evidence and telling them how the certificate is orignal and its authenticity can be verified from WAEC (that is if that was the sole basis of the decision taken). Sometimes they actually review decisions based on letters of complaints. An ex-school mate of mine and her hubby were unjustly refused visas (ordinary visas and not visa lottery o) and they had no right of appeal, but when she wrote to complain bitterly, they asked her to represent her documents and they gave both of them visas. I guess it is on a case by case basis. Goodluck |
Back on Track, Good. Orikinla:Nice one Orikinla. jideosik:Hear, Hear! |
Aloy.Emeka:LOL! Na wah for this kain love o. U don carry wine go meet im Papa yet? If not, gate still dey open for plenty suitors o. |
playah P: StephenP:The guy never wrote that he wrote movies for musicians. He said he had written [both songs and movies] for "top artist" (sic). The last time I checked, an artist included an actor and people who work in one of the performing/visual arts. |
Seun:She actually does live in the country. She lives in both Nigeria and the US. |
Don't get me wrong, I did not say refine the language. I am aware that the language gets even crasser than that. I am saying that in my opinion, there are bits which can be expunged without doing material damage to the overall effect of the work. While striving for literary effect, use the language to pack a punch a couple of times, but going on and on takes it to the level of bad taste. [Obviously, this is just my own opinion. It is your work, so if you do not agree with me, totally ignore what I say. There is no obligation to take this on board in anyway]. Like I said, it reads as an interesting piece. |
Orikinla:I concur. It does need good tweaking. Oriks, I believe that if you remove the gratuitous sexually explicit stuff in there and polish it up a bit, the guys at Wasafiri, Agni or the Virginia Review might be interested in publishing it. Alternately, Nam Le at the Harvard Review might also be interested (though this is more poetry than prose, so that means at HR it should be Major Jackson and not Nam), but like I said, you'd need to work on it further. Regards, SMC |
chukky76:I have no grouse whatsoever with Sisikill. He/she is not known to me personally and I do hope my posts on that thread are not interpreted to be a personal attack on him/her or even Seun or anyone else, because no matter how displeasing those posts may be to anyone or how it may have ruffled their feathers, all I did was politely raise a pertinent question, and frankly I do not see that being a ground for offering an olive branch. If anyone feels slighted by my queries, he/she should learn to address the issues and stop ego tripping. |
Interesting! Kinda straddles the fence between prose and poetry, doesn't it? |
@ Sisikill, Touche, LOL. . . glad to see you read around. Though you could have saved yourself the unnecessary agro by google searching the quotation.On people feeling they are too much for Seun's competition (whether or not you were referring to me) - I do not know about you, but most writers actually pick and choose the different contests and journals/anthologies they will enter and/or submit stories to. Like me, they unfortunately cannot make submissions to everything that comes their way. I appreciate the fact that some of you guys can churn out material enmasse, sadly though it's not the same for me, as I do not write stories that fast (e.g. one moment, I was supposed to submit a story for the HISSAC contest, the next , the deadline was upon me and I still had not polished my story to my satisfaction and thus ended up not sending in an entry). Like I said previously, Seun's competition is not my scene (the same way BBC 3's call for scripts was not my scene), so if you decide to twist that to arrive to the conclusion that I think he is "small potatoes", too bad. I have actually submitted stories to a number of Nigerian and Naija based magazines and anthologies, but like I said a few lines above, I pick and choose what I submit to (and carefully too). It is my prerogative to do so (as it is for everyone else) and if for you, Seun or anyone else, that has been interpreted to mean that I (or any other person who chooses not to enter Seun's Competition) feel that I am "too much" for the competition, again, that's just too bad. |
Seun:LOL! Believe me when I say that the "prize" you are offering can never be a motivating factor for me (I will be hard pressed to make the money stretch on a typical friday night out on the town). But let me make it clear that the remuneration has nothing at all to do with my lack of interest in the competition, as I do actually submit my work gratuitously in certain instances (It's not always about the money). This just isn't my scene, that's all. |
Seun:See me see wahala o. I do not disapprove of this competition or anyone who enters it. I actually think it is quite commendable that you are giving your Nairalanders the chance to showcase their work (that is of course if the film sees the light of day and is any good). I just thought there were some points that had not been covered. Apparently, people questioning you does not go down well with you. |
@ Chukky and Tianshie, Good for you guys. Hope you enjoy the workshop. Chimamanda is a good writer and she does have good tips to pass on. Usually, she has the 2002 Caine Prize winner and editor of Kwani?, Binyavanga Wainaina cover the workshop with her (and some others). I am not sure that is the case this year, though I hope it is. So hopefully, you guys will have a good experience with the workshop. I hope to see your works published somewhere in the not too distant future. Goodluck. |
Sisikill:Nah, you have not understood my question at all. All you have done is using your analogy to oversimplify a clear question. Sisikill:You obviously know nothing of copyright and intellectual property law. A person's work does not have to be taken or used in "it's entirety" before credit has to be given. If a writer can prove without a doubt that a film or book has ripped off his work, he or she can have a cause of action. It could be a distinct scene or sequence that has been nicked. It does not have to be the "entire" story. Like someone in the business rightly said "if they use anything you have developed yourself - e.g.: structure, dialogue, attitude, point of view, theme, invented characters and scenes or even your own private research - then that is rightly your copyright." I think you got carried away in trying to come to the defence of Seun and thus decided to latch on to the word "idea", interpreting it as narrowly as possible and conveniently ignoring the fact that I had said "ideas, scenarios, and maybe even huge pieces". Strictly speaking, it is undoubtedly the position under copyright laws that mere ideas cannot be protected nor form the basis of an action for infringement. And that is why I used the term loosely (in conjunction with other terms), stating clearly that the end of my piece that I was not "talking about general/common school anecdotes that might be common" to what he might receive (and just before you go there, anecdote is to be interpreted in the widest form possible). Sisikill:If you knew how a lot of those netwoks and film/production companies work, you will readily admit that they are constantly hit by lawsuits from writers who constantly complain that their works/ stories were ripped off. Admittedly, many such actions do not succeed, however, the networks do settle quite a number of them. That is why many of these companies option works from writers, and/or make the writers sign "releases" or "waivers". You will be surprised how many options production companies/networks acquire for one film/series etc (there are many times, that the works optioned end up not even being used by the production companies). Moreover, I can assure you that most of the actions filed do not complain that their work has been stolen in its entirety. An example of one such action was the one against NBC for 'Heroes' (though I believe this action failed). Another lawsuit was the case against Simon Cowell by Simon Fuller for the X-Factor series. Mr Fuller took legal action "after seeing what he believed were clear similarities between the X-Factor and Pop Idol". This was the crux of the action (although there were actions regarding breach of contract as well) and Simon Cowell settled the copyright out of court (the contract issue also got dealt with). There are many other examples I can state. So as in your example, it would have been easy to argue that though there were similarities, there were material differences in the two shows/scripts (because there really are differences between both shows), but that defence will not avail someone who has clearly stolen anothers intellectual property and come up with his own "original" idea. The problem with you is you always attempt to simplify concerns. Rarely are issues as cut and dried as you have attempted to state them. Let me state clearly, that following the American Screen Writers Guild rules, which many western countries adopt in different forms, credits can be given to more than one writer and for a writer of an original story to be credited all he needs to have contributed is at least a third of the story. Moreover writers can be credited for themes and characters (as I have said above). Seldom is a story or work from one writer used without it being re-written (several times usually)/ worked over/snipped/changed etc before it forms the basis of a film or series or documentary etc. So, your portrayal that it is when a story is used in its entirety that Seun is obliged to give credit is cockamamie. Sisikill:I believe I have addressed the Ideas issue. Yeah, Ideas are not protected by copyright, but works which have formed the basis of the plagiarist/thief/borrower's ideas are. Finally, if you think that writers addressing issues of their intellectual property is making a mountain out of a molehill, then I guess you are not much of a writer, because if you are, you will know that copyright infringement/protection is one of the biggest (if not the biggest) issues that writers/authors face in their writing careers. In your response to someone's post, you say that you know Seun is going places, yet it does not occur to you that some people may also feel the same and think their stories may end up going far (who knows how far?), thus making them want to protect their interest or at least clarify their position. Like I have stated, I have no interest whatsoever in the "competition" as a writer, but as an observer, I think some strong issues need to be addressed. |
LMAO, this thread has degenerated into some kind of jesters feedback. I should say, I have been amused by some of the posts. @ Seun, Quick valid question (it is not for self interest, as your competition does not interest me in the slighest as a writer) - Knowing a considerable deal about the writing industry generally, I can say that it is the usual practice that once a winner of a writing competition is chosen, the work is published (as well as a few others e.g 2nd and 3rd best story. . . and sometimes highly commended stories too). Now under those circumstances, after the usual contracts etc., the work gets published and credited to the appropriate writer, and that's the end of it. The losers are left to lick their wounds and console themselves that they may have better luck next time. Hell, they may even submit the same story to another publication or competition, and unless they are dealing with unethical contests, their works/ideas are not usually plagiarised by the judges. The problem with your "competition" is that while you may well like and indeed choose one story above all others, it will be unlikely that you will not "borrow" or "nick" ideas, scenarios, and maybe even huge pieces from the works of one or more of the losers. Don't get me wrong, I do not think you are a swindler (well, I don't know you personally, so I hope you aren't), but if you are going to personally read and review each entry and select the winner, it is inevitable that these myriad of ideas from all the stories you read would swirl in your mind and you will end up regurgitating them as your "original" film script (to be touted as based on the winning story you chose, which it solely won't be) to the detriment of those writers who may subsequently be unable to use their losing story or at the very least, they would be worse off, having contributed to your project without any remuneration nor credits. Like I said, it may happen (and does not have to be as a result of a sinister plot on your part) because we all are influenced by what we read/see etc. That is why in creative writing exercises, when students have been given a topic to write on, there is usually a rich diversity to be seen in the works, but when subsequently, those same students are given a couple of texts to read and told to repeat the writing exercise, there are usually to be found many themes and similarities running through almost all (if not all) of them, which have come from the prescribed texts. Question - Are you going to give all the writers who submit their stories to you the assurance that even if they do not get the prize money, they will at least get film credits should any part of their work form part of your script? (and no, I am not talking about general/common school anecdotes that might be common to most if not all stories you receive). Before anyone goes on about how the question was not quick, It was a short question (one sentence). Na all the foreword yabis dey long-winded. |

LOL