Stats: 3,014,124 members, 7,370,322 topics. Date: Thursday, 30 March 2023 at 06:58 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Spy360's Profile / Spy360's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 415 pages)
![]() |
crestedaguiyi:Total agree. |
![]() |
ScamHunter:They rigged the areas they felt they didn't have a clear advantage like Rivers, Benue, Delta, Edo, Akwa Ibom etc leaving the ones they felt were 'in the bag' like Lagos (they rigged but it was too late to finish), Osun, Kaduna, Plateau, Nasarawa, Kano etc. |
![]() |
vincenteger:If the president-elect is not physically present and cannot be found, his vice would be sworn in and would automatically become the president. |
![]() |
alanto:The biggest problem was INEC. Yakubu Mahmood had one duty to perform on 25th Feb. That was to turn on the server so that polling units results would be uploaded real time as he actually promised several times. He didn't just fail, he failed woefully, making this election even worse than previous given the amount of expectations and resources spent. Now to your question. 1. There was massive over-voting in the northern states. BVAS has proven this already. 2. There was massive adulteration and manipulation of results to favour APC especially. This happened accross the country- as if APC had planned this all along. Seems they knew the server won't upload. 3. INEC were complicit to APC rigging seeing how they totally disregarded the electoral act and election guidelines which they themselves prepared and presented to the public. 4. INEC failed to listen to and resolve the issues raised by concerned parties before and during the final collation of results, after promising to do so on live TV. They had no need to hurry as the law gave them up to 14days to resolve any issues. 5. There were clear records of voters suppression, violent disfranchisement etc. As clearly observed by independent foreign observers. They reported that the elections was a shambolic exercise in futility that lacks credibility, transparency and fairness. I hope you are convinced. 🙂 |
![]() |
Can Liverpool allow God to use them this Saturday? Man City Vs Liverpool Arsenal Vs Leeds 1. Arsenal P28 69pts 2. Man City P27 61pts We could go 11points gap if my prayers are answered |
![]() |
Ireportlive:Did the post mention Obi? |
![]() |
OasisX:Will the movie include the drug part and do a flashback to when he was still Amoda? 3 Likes |
![]() |
liveLongNprospa:Owo mi da don't know who is omoale 😂 |
![]() |
Theflint1:You are intelligent |
![]() |
DenreleDave:Our court system are always compromised. They would never allude to that. |
![]() |
a4cube:Dem don use your brain soak garri. 1 Like |
![]() |
chrisooblog:I see what ice is doing on the streets. Legalising drugs will only make it affordable, but will send souls to asylum. Could this discussion be the growing preliminary effect of having a drug baron as president-elect? We are f**ked ![]() |
![]() |
Minjim:It will be too bad for Tinubu if he is sacked by the court as a sitting president. He would be the first and his history will be too dirty. He better think very well and decide his next line of action. They say he is a master strategist, but his only strategy is that of rigging...
|
![]() |
izzou:When we say poverty is weaponised by politicians to win elections many did not understand. If 50% isn't OK now, it was not OK then. But Igbos are the problem of Lagos. |
![]() |
skj1377:This case does not involve an incumbent, the judges are not obliged to any of them. The case favours Peter Obi 1 Like |
![]() |
A001:This is Ok. 👍🏽 |
![]() |
Realmrsean:Who among the following if he was president would not approve such spending? A. Bola Tinubu B. Atiku Abubakar C. Peter Obi 1 Like |
![]() |
A001:I agree with all you have said except the bolded. I think the bolded may even contradict your first paragraph. Culture for me by its definition is neutral. That is because by its definition, it is evolving. Meaning that any aspect that no longer ensures the survival of the people, or that no longer adds meaningful value to the lives of the people are thrown away and better ones adopted. So that as at the time it is being practiced it was considered OK. Whatever idea we know about any bad aspects of any culture is restropective in thoughts. If any of us were born in those eras we would not have had the same ideas or thoughts. I have given an example of use of fossil fuels today. Which many think is OK. But future generations will consider it barbaric practice. One day unprotected sex would be seen as uncultured behaviour. Children would be born in the labs not through sex. |
![]() |
Donjazet2:You are right only because you are thinking in retrospect. That's why I said culture by its definition is neutral. I gave an example of the use of fossil fuels today (that we have discovered destroys the environment). That future generations will consider us barbaric for carrying such acts. This is something we considered OK and necessary for our survival. Do you imagine that if you were born in those eras, that you would have been part of such acts and still regard yourself as pious? 1 Like |
![]() |
mostob:That Super Eagles tasted like CBN naira redesign. 4 Likes |
![]() |
Should any culture or its aspects be termed or qualified as good or bad? We know that cultures are the ways of live of peoples. These ways were adopted based on their idea of what's good and necessary for their continued survival and even existence. Culture is dynamic and transient. So that, those aspects as time progresses that do not ensure the ultimate goal of survival are ditched or adjusted. So for example, animal sacrifices were required to appease gods for good agricultural productivity. Then with time, when manure was discovered, there was no longer the need for such sacrifices. So we cannot conclude that animal sacrifice was bad culture, because as at that time in reference it was good practice. It is similar to the use of greenhouse fuels today, some day it will phase off but the future generations should not then consider our generation as barbaric. Cc A001, Donjazet2, Bombblacks |
![]() |
See where £0 worth more than £100m 3 Likes
|
![]() |
Novarisammy2:Two bullion vans actually ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tinubu bu Onye osi 26 Likes 1 Share |
![]() |
nihilistjnr:Obidient in UK, Batist in Nigeria Ekele m gi ![]() ![]() ![]() 8 Likes 1 Share |
![]() |
ToyinDipo:Agreed. But it was based on request- those I tagged. Thanks. |
![]() |
Saying that the FCT has no special status is nonsensical. The administrative head of a state is the governor. But the administrative head of the FCT is the president. How can you win less that 25% of the area under your watch? The legislative arm of the state is the house of assembly but the legislative arm of the FCT is the national assembly. That means the FCT is the mixture of all the states in the federation. A microcosm of the nation. Also, Nigeria as a constituency is domicile in the FCT. This is reasonable, just and sensible. |
![]() |
THE CONCEPT AND EVIDENCE OF GOD The concept What is a god? An object of worship. Why do people worship? They do so because there is an innate sense of awe, wonder and reverence in every man. Every body worships something. Could be the heavenly bodies like sun and moon or stars, animals, stones and rocks, some other humans like their ancestors, some it's more abstract like their nation of birth, or a philosophical idea or creation. Fact is everybody has a sense of awe, wonder and reverence. The idea of god is personal and also universal. Personal in the sense that every man has his own convictions, and universal in the sense that there ought to be a general idea of what or who god is and should be. The general idea is that 1. He should be a person (one with agency- purpose and will). The person to worship. Note not a person but the person. 2. The god (God) is the one who created all things (or is the source), and therefore is considered the first (and the last after all things come to an end). The beginning and the end. He should be the one who gave the purpose of all creation and hence considered omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient. 3. He should have a sustained influence on creation according to purpose. That is should be involved with creation, and not docile. His creation power should be responsible for all physical laws that govern the universe and sustains it, this must be consistent, and reliable. 4. He should have personal relationship either directly or indirectly with His creation. People should be able to attribute their personal life's experiences to Him. They should be able to acknowledge His influence in their personal experiences. The evidence 1. There is purpose in the universe. There is purpose for the sun along with other stars (primary source of energy), there is purpose for the moon, animals show purpose is their daily existence, there is purpose for man. A man is born, gets an education, reproduces, looks after his kind etc. You just have to look at the early morning hustle and bustle to see life's purpose. We are here because there is purpose to everything. Life is a purpose, no one can create life except him. You cannot create life out of chemical engineering. Life comes from life. Purpose from purpose. 2. There is design in the universe. From galaxies to photons. Stars are stars, atoms are atoms. Man is man and monkey is monkey. Mangoes and oranges etc. The process of reproduction is same across all living organisms. Non of these things can happen by chance. There is the DNA. Not a chance molecule. 3. The laws of the universe are the same everywhere. There is gravity in your house, in the earth, in the solar system, in the Milky way, in Andromeda, and in all the galaxies in the universe. 4. People have experiences of God. Though this is personal, but there are stories which cannot be wished away. Over 10billion earth inhabitants cannot be fools. They pray, they sing, they tell others. Cc Donjazet2, Bombblacks, OkpaNsukkaisbae |
![]() |
Joezinho:He didn't say Yorubas are political rascals. He said those who attacked Igbos during the elections are political rascals. ![]() 3 Likes |
![]() |
OkpaNsukkaisBae:You need to have a meaning or know that character that defines what a certificate is to be able to accept or reject whatever evidence was presented to you. I can show you a tea cup as certificate if you don't have an idea of what certificate is. So tell me what's your idea of 'god' or what does it mean to you or what characters define 'god' to you. From there I can present any evidence. |
![]() |
Donjazet2:I have seen your other reply. Right now I am sleepy, I promise to engage tomorrow if you're willing. |
![]() |
Donjazet2:Excellent. We can describe a unicorn. Let's say a flying horse with a horn. How can you describe the characters that define 'god'? |
![]() |
Bombblacks:You didn't get me. The statement on the bolded assumes you have a definition for dog. What does 'dog' mean to you? What does 'God' mean to you? Answer this question and we proceed. |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 415 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2023 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 247 |