₦airaland Forum

Jodera:
Lol.. Aside saka, I don't see any winger that truly impresses me in our squad. It's really sad. I was thinking willian might improve our wing problem a bit, but mehn!
Well, he didn't even play wing ystdy, but then, he's been underwhelming for us since (aside Fulham game)

BlueRayDick:
Arteta messed the match up with late sub

Jodera:
lol.. Yeah. Tbh, we're saying same thing. It's too early to say such. At least let's see 2-3 Intl break matches and if such trend continues, we can start the hypothesis. This is just the first Intl break, and making such hypothesis is so so early (esp using the racial card stuff). Mind you, most of those guys, saka would have played with them either for or against at youth level. So it's way early and wrong to start doing hypothesis that his teammates aren't passing to him

N.b.... On a side/light note sha.

Do you remember any season arsenal players refuses to pass to Ramsey??

Jodera:
Lol... But what timay said is true. How many matches did saka play for you(or them) to bring out that race card ish.

I guess if grealish was African, and he's been benched for Mount et al, the race card ish would have popped up how a talented grealish is African that's why he can't near the team.

Please, let's see a considerable trend before we'll conclude that saka is been alienated on the pitch and not just two matches

adubam:
Open the decoder and see the board. You would see the inferiority of the components first hand..

The same switch I have been plugging my Strong Decoder for years and other devices without issues was the same switch that I plugged the csat and I heard a loud explosion like a bomb from the decoder. That Decoder and lightning ⚡ are two enemies.

You there not upgrade it and try to downgrade it. It would never downgrade. It will take an expert to help you to restore it back.

Never try to charge your phone on it if you do constantly the decoder would not last long. Let me stop here.

adubam:
Csat 8 Pro+ has watering features but too fragile.

I would advice anyone here to buy a durable decoder even if it is Tiger or GT media that would cost you up to 28K or more. Please gather your money and buy it. GT media and Tiger Autoroll Biss Keys and Powervu, have inbuilt WIFI, Multi stream with durable components or any Strong Decoders with HEVC, DVB2 H.265.

Csat 8 Pro+ Multistream, Autoroll only Powervu and not Biss. The difference is like buying a Samsung Original Phone and Buying a Chinko phone that claims to have what the Samsung phone has and does.


I had advice here that people with low budget should go for Csat 8 Pro +, but due to high rate of complaints from those who have used it first hand including me; I hereby revert my previous advice.

Thank you.

mostob:
De Bruyne is out.

Gabriel Jesus is out.

Sterling is a doubt.

Agüero is a doubt.

Everywhere stew

timay:
You people just like to unnecessarily pull the race card.
This has nothing to do with his African heritage or being black, it's just the coach(Southgate) being clueless on his team selections and how to use the players.
What will you now say about Grealish. Shebi Grealish is black too ba. Pleased, let's learn to stop pulling the race card unnecessarily when things don't go our way, it's now loosing substance, and people won't take the real victims of racism serious anymore, cos they will tag them alarmists, because others have abused it

EMILO2STAY:
the suns nature is hot, antiseptic and drying. Its colour is bright golden and it colour does not change.

There is nothing in the stars that suggest similarities with the sun.
If viewed with a high powered zoom camera or telescope one can see that the stars have different colours and and their light fluctuate and sometimes change colour.

The stars you see in the sky all move in circular motion as if they are one giant body round about the face of the flat earth. This is what they won't tell you. The set of stars you see in January are not the same set you see in December. I have observed this myself. All the stars move except the north pole star Polaris which stays fixed and never move while all others revolve around it as if a giant body of stars.

If the earth is a ball moving around the sun and the sun moving with the planets through the galaxy and the stars we see are distant suns, then we should not be seeing the same stars night after night. The zodiacs which were made many years ago are patterned after the stars which can still be seen today. So the saying that stars are suns of other galaxies is mere speculation Infact it is not true at all. The purpose is to give an impression of other planets and possible life forms in those planets.

EMILO2STAY:
the sun is not a star and stars are not suns.

EMILO2STAY:
this is because the sun moves around the face of the earth in a clock wise manner from left to right, it is the sun that moves not the. If the earth was moving and the sun static 93 million miles while half of the earth is lit and the other half not, then all the lit part of the earth comprising of the north and south poles should have the same level of heat and light at the same time also their winter and summer seasons should come at the same time. But this is not the situation in out world today.


This people spend a lot of money to convince the world of a ball earth. Nasa budget is 90billion yearly. The hologram technology has come along way not research project blue beam and the Chinese floating cities. the iss is not a physical object. It is most likely a holographic projection because it wobbles and changes colour as you view it.

The iss is said to be in the thermosphere were heat level is above 2000°c temperature hot enough to melt steel. What technology or human can withstand that?

The human body reacts to speed and cannot withstand speed of about 17500mph which the iss is said to be moving in the thermosphere beside that how do they get to a moving iss moving at that rate.

The coriolis effect is said to be the displacement of a bullet as it leaves the barrel of a gun. That is to say that as the bullet leaves the gun it had left the surface of the earth while the earth is still rotating and therefore that bullet will be deflected by the rotation of the the earth. The earth is said to be moving at 1000mph while the iss at the geostationary orbit is moving in synchronism with the earths surface at 17500mph. If the a bullet can be displaced by the then the jet used in going to iss should even be more displaced than the bullet and the jet should never be able to catch up with the iss because of the speed.

Yet another problem is that the iss is said to be moving in synchronism with the earth surface and as such you can only see it if your directly under it or near side to it. Aside that you are not supposed to see it because it should be hidden behind the curve of the ball earth.

EMILO2STAY:
when it comes to education most of you are delusional. You think education today makes you knowledgeable but Infact it makes you indoctrinated and Brain washed. I was the best in my class in geography and biology but the teachers in my class then didn't give me my true score because of my puppy love girl friend then just to give you a little jara. But the whole class knew who the best was because they all depended on me during exams.

Now to answer you. The nature of a ball is that it slopes down 369° all around you and this makes the objects slope down below your eye level as they go far away into the horizon. If the earth is a ball curving 8inches/m^2 then one would have to look down into the horizon because the earth is curving down But if the earth is flat and level this makes the nature of the horizon straight and you will have to look straight into the horizon no matter the height you climb the horizon is straight and that is the reality we see in our world.

The human eye see in a triangular manner so objects moving away from you tend to get smaller and smaller as they go away from you until they get to the vanishing point or horizon where they appear to sink below the horizon. This is not because they are sinking but because of the nature of the human eye. If you were to take a telescope and view that object you will get a full view of that object proving they are not going down a curve. Eg check the image below.

The sun moves away from the human eye view and g. ets smaller as it does (depends on the atmospheric conditions) and when it reaches the vanishing point depending on your vantage point it Appears to sink down into The horizon and at this stage if you were to take a zoom camera or to climb unto a higher ground which would expose and allow the view of a farther horizon One can still see the sun again in full view until it is finally gone out of sight due to atmospheric blocking.

The sun is the moving object and not the earth. An evidence of this is the fact that we see it doing so and also the fact that shadows under the sun light move from left to right as the sun moves this is how the ancients were able to tell time using sun and moon dial.

Try the experiment and see if you will get the same result; get a stick and stand it upright, put on your phone light or any other and place it at angle 45°, now. move that light from Left to right and watch how the shadow of that stick also move with the movement of that light.
After that then get a ball place that stick side ways point your light from a distance to that stick on. The ball then rotate the ball to see if you will get the same result.

Like I told you before, education is nothing but a system of misinformation.

mostob:
Sure. .he ganered 75% of the votes. Laca came 2nd

tchijioke:
Firstly I must commend your selfless support on this forum@ Digitman2 and a host of others.



I did the bolded... But i didn't get the "green light" though i didn't blind scan cos its a strong decoder. It takes it ages to do a full blind scan so I simply reverted to my previous sat NigcomSat. Maybe I have to make out time and do the needful. Thanks

osayi90:
What? congratulate him for having his own facts . Omo this your diplomacy tie wrapper. Flat earth models are fun to tear apart. I love it .

EMILO2STAY:
pls highlight them to show transparency and honesty. I am not doing this for my image or ego, i am doing them with honesty and the need to enlighten. I have nothing to hide.

quote author=Spy360 post=94873604]Nevertheless, you are within your rights to accept the facts you put up there as they fall within rational thoughts. I congratulate you for this.

Personally I believe in a Creator. One who has created and fashioned out all the natural laws that brought about everything we witness in the universe - and His ways are passed finding out. Based on this, I believe that man will continue to wonder and wander about His creations.

I also believe in science as a body of knowledge which man uses to discover self. But science will always be limited to what we can observe.

I appreciate your response. I believe in relativity in science too. But most of what we are told are no science at all but pure lies, this is because there is an agenda behind it. Many scientist and professors who dare speak of this are dealt with either by withdrawing research grants and loosing there license to practice or outright death. We are been fed with lies. Yet another lie in the scientific community is the theory of evolution which still holds sway till this day even after some of the so called missing link have been discovered to be fraud yet this things are still in our science text book e.g the piltdown man of Sussex.

EMILO2STAY:
you are wrong here. Mine are not theories but facts which can be witnessed and confirmed and other proponents belief or theories are not even rational because it doesn't make sense neither can it be witnessed in the...

EMILO2STAY:
1. The earth is said to be curved 8inches/ m^2 but this has been proven false dozens of times because if this is true then the horizon we see which rises to the eye level should be below the eye level because as the earth moves away from you it should be sloping down as it goes father into the horizon.

The curvature maths also fails when put to test because buildings and bridges shouldn't have perfectly parallels columns for hundreds of miles such as the case of the longest bridge which is the danyang kushan grand bridge in China. no curvature was factored in during construction and they have perfect parallel columns for a whooping 108miles. Not even a drop in curvature was factored in.

Air crafts fly straight till they get to their destination. If the earth is curved then they would have to dip their nose down like every five minutes to account for the curvature.

It is impossible for an aircraft flying for an average 500 miles/ h due east to land on its destination moving 1000miles /h. This is simple maths.

Pilots when training using the target generation facility assumes a flat non rotating earth when simulating aircraft flight during training. This is because they can't compromise safety for their theories which have no realistic bases.


The sun and moon are the same size just like our eyes see them, and are about the same distance just as we see it. This is why during a solar eclipse the moon totally covers the sun.

The moon is not a solid object but likely a plasma because it has been observed that stars can be seen sometimes through the moon. Even the blue sky can be seen with the naked eye in the day time through the moon.

No human common sense or technology accounts for the rotation of the earth. If we are rotating at the rate of 1000miles per/h then the earth will fling off the ocean water just like when you pour water on a ball and spin it. There is absolutely no reason why things should seem stable just as we see them in real life if the earth rotates at 1000miles /h.

Water is an element that stays level on the surface. It doesn't take the shape of its container below it.
Water flows freely without a barrier to contain it on all sides. So this nullifies the ball earth theory that water curves around a ball. There Is no experiment any where in the world to show that water curves around a ball that spins for that matter.

These are just a few of them

Jodera:
Against small teams, we can use the 4man defence. We have "Ok" Ams for now in ceballos and Willian. We can try that out.

3 at the back limits us much, cos it seems as if teams are cracking the code(we played abysmally against west ham utd, and Sheffield with that formation). Against big teams I might understand, but against small teams where we need to hold more possession and expect to attack more, 3 at the back will limit our attacking options and movements

My 1kobo tho

EMILO2STAY:
the question should not be if gravity I appreciate natural science taught in schools, but I what we are taught in schools are true and can be observed, replicated and tested.

I don't have my own science. Rather what I present is the true science because they pass all the disciplines of science which is observable, testable and repeatable.

Next question...!!

EMILO2STAY:
there is no common sense in you that is why you cannot refute me with reason and presentable facts before calling me dumb. Fool don't quote me again.

mostob:
A 3 man defense? Nothing last forever bro,we will soon be found out. A 4 man defense is more beneficial.

mostob:
In a Midfield of 3, Xhaka will always start unless Saka starts in Midfield. Arteta will never play the same legged players together. That is why Mari and Gabriel were signed because all our defenders are right legged.

Digitizedman:
My bro I don see where many guys nearly panel beat an installer. During those days when Qsat was still very hot. See as men just seat down for living room dey Wait for the installation to be complete. Before then, the installer mouth dey wide reach back as they where asking him about the possibility of all the matches they intend watching that day. Long story short. My guy on decoder, put simcard, move to sport station. Channel nor open, time dey go, still channel nor open. The client provoke, na so other guys for the house buy the matter, when dey hear how much the client spend yet the reason behind the money spent was not visible. Fortunately for the installer, it was my neighborhood, so I had to quickly rush to my house to get my Dstv to enable them watch the match for that day. Just to pacify the situation. Meanwhile the installer don already collect some hot slap, from two die hard football fans in the house. Each time I remember such a day, I choose my words carefully when Making input on live sports.

kokaneprodigy:
I ask again how was Ozil’s reaction to the Chinese ish different from how celebs and players reacted to BLM and now “End SARS’ other than the BLM and End SARS trended and more popular than the China ish and everyone wanted to tag along. I repeat criticizing Ozil based on China ish no follow.