Stoplying's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Stoplying's Profile › Stoplying's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (of 107 pages)
I think Ukraine would have defeated the USA. If you want details, I can provide, but first take a look at countries which defeated the USA: 1. Vietnam 2. Afghanistan IyfeNamikaze: |
No, I would rather locate the nearest library and get some more education from it. Also I would always dish out education for free even to ungrateful people who would insult me as a reward like it often is the case with uneducated Nigerians like yourself to whom fact and logic based history is a threat to ethno-political propaganda which you were brought up with either through the internet or through people who got it through the internet and pretended it were some sacred knowledge. I've gone way too far and seen way too much to take a simpleton like you too seriously. You will never in your lifetime get to my intellectual level of when I was 21 which is far below my current level. Dream25: |
Dream25:history is never nonsense. The fact I got my education in a country which values historical research and you got yours in a country which forbade history and informally replaced it with fairytales is your problem, not mine. |
Historically there was no such thing as "yoruba race" back then. Actually yoruba is a renaming of "yarr.iba" which is synonymous with oyo kingdom. The current meaning of the word "yoruba" is the handy work of politicians and the British. Mille: |
Again, you are just pure emotion, no intelligence at all, so to you Russia should not ever buy weapons just to make a point ? while more than 30 countries provide their weapons to Ukraine for free. Make this make sense. I should be charging you a fee for trying to deprogram you from your brainwashing. You have to try and stop being an emotional fool. 🙄"Who would have thought..." Exjoker: |
You are way too emotional, your brain is not working. I find it hard to understand why you keep referring to the president of Russia instead of talking about Russia itself or the Russian military. Again it is your obsession which was fed to you by the propaganda which you consume daily. On this same thread, it has already been logically explained that: "Ukraine was being destroyed in the frontline, so it gathered troops in a region of Russia with no Russian military presence and then called it victory. Attacking civilians is not the same as attacking soldiers. Now that russian reserves have arrived to meet the Ukrainians in Kursk, the "victory" is evaporating. Meanwhile Ukraine is losing even faster in the other frontlines in which it tried to create a distraction with this Kursk PR invasion. The invasion of Kursk will only accelerate russian victory." But again, you are so emotional that your brain has stopped working. Exjoker: |
Basically, you have chosen to be a fool. Or you are just too dumb and too arrogant that you want to elevate smarter people than yourself into your brand of stupidity. Obaranje: Obaranje:have you ever ask yourself before the start of this war,do Ukraine has the capability to go offensive in Russia territory? Now that they are doing it, what does that tells you about the Ukrainians? Getting weak or getting stronger Russia can no longer carpet bomb Ukraine the way they use to when the war earlier started What does that tells you about the Ukrainians, getting weak or getting stronger? Use your brain reason wetin you dey type not your hand[/quote] |
I think the aim is to make those Ukrainian soldiers either prisoners of war, either dead people, I don't think the aim is to dislodge them. You guys have a hard time understanding that Russia is using the strategy of attrition warfare. MRMRMR: |
Try and think by yourself instead of repeating what you heard. I know these are not your words because I also heard them at least five times already. Exjoker: |
Gbadebo19:nice name mr Idiot, mine is John. Nope, I don't have time for stupid wild goose chases. |
I think what was really exposed is the fact that some people confuse James bond movies with reality. Strategy wins wars, not wonder weapons. |
It seems you are the one being stupid. 1. The iPhones are mostly manufactured in India and china, and most of the iPhones which are sold in the USA are manufactured in china. So if you can buy iPhones manufactured in china wherever you are then you would have the same thing as what most American users have. 2. The person you are insulting didn't make the claim "the same version of American weapons that it uses to defend its own territory is what is manufactured elsewhere", you practically put those words in his mouth then proceeded to insult him for "saying" (🙄) your own words (which he actually never said). 3. You could have very easily talked about export versions and local versions of American weapons instead of needlessly insulting someone for something going on in your own brain, again the person whom you were insulting didn't make the claim that American weapons existed in only one version. Gbadebo19: |
Toktee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-Ys6XHH4VA?feature=shared |
Toktee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nyVETNESi8?feature=shared |
Dream25:I'ld be all for letting them continue if they had anything intelligent to say or if they acted in good faith, but all they do is just spread propaganda. I'm not interested. They seem to be here for the sole reason of making noise. Imagine going into a debate with more than two sides and one of the sides just takes over 60% of the speaking time for the sole reason of playing drums with their pots... |
SaLongs1:China can not invade Taiwan for the same reason England can't invade Manchester. You need to rephrase. |
Nafo, there's a thread for you guys, stop polluting this thread. People come here to exchange information in good faith. We are not here to produce propaganda or to spread propaganda, you are not on the right thread. We are not hear to be lied to, nor to lie to people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN-p3dKxiVQ?feature=shared |
Kremlingrad:Mynd44 rule 1 |
Newton2024:The last war china fought was against the USA in Korea. The USA got destroyed so badly that the head of the USA military back then requested to be allowed to use nuclear bombs on China. This was a period in which China was underdeveloped and people in china could not afford 2 meals a day. |
These are a combination of propagandists and victims of propaganda. Just ignore them for your own peace of mind. Bulldozer90: |
Repeating propaganda because you don't have a mind of your own. You guys even had to use the same word 🤣 Your propaganda teacher was too lazy 🤔 God1000: Remman: |
Akuruoulo:Those same Wagner forces are defending the Kremlin, so I fail to get your point. And they are so ordinary that they defeated every Ukrainian elite unite in bachmut. Perhaps you are trying to tell us that Wagner is now part of Ukrainian military? Otherwise I don't see how this makes sense. Yeah, russian military is strong enough to capture Russia 👏🏿 |
BALLOSKI:so you think attacking civilians is ok ? Remind me whet the word "terrorism" stands for. |
You don't seem to actually understand what a war is. You talk without nuance. Let me make this even clearer. This Ukraine invasion of Kursk is a military stupidity, no military goal was archived and 10000 military personnel of Ukraine whom are urgently needed elsewhere are now bugged down in a zone in which they can't achieve nothing. All that awaits them is surrender or death. They are literally fighting for nothing. MRMRMR: |
Guys, stop stating the obvious. |
IyfeNamikaze:Apparently the USA disagrees with you since the USA went on to create a military alliance of more than 30 countries out of fear of Russia. |
MRMRMR:Ukraine was being destroyed in the frontline, so it gathered troops in a region of Russia with no Russian military presence and then called it victory. Attacking civilians is not the same as attacking soldiers. Now that russian reserves have arrived to meet the Ukrainians in Kursk, the "victory" is evaporating. Meanwhile Ukraine is losing even faster in the other frontlines in which it tried to create a distraction with this Kursk PR invasion. The invasion of Kursk will only accelerate russian victory. An overrated weakling doesn't generally require an alliance of more than 30 countries to fight against it. |
malvisguy212:Russia has been only after regions of Ukraine which are russian historically but which the USSR administratively linked to some non russian lands. Also even though Kiev is historically russian, Russia wasn't interested in taking Kiev back. So what he's saying is that as from now, Russia would be aiming to take back not only Kiev but also a lot of non historically russian territory. The way things are going, Ukraine might be reduced to a strip of land within Poland at the end of this war. |
motayoayinde:Don't waste your time reading what he writes. |
Fixed OkpaNsukkaisBae: |
