₦airaland Forum

Maynman:
And so is hebrew different in “many places”?

Maynman:
Your screenshot said this “ כִּי-ילד ילד-לָנוּ כֵּן נִתַּן-לָנוּ”
This is what you first posted.
כִּי־זֶרַע יְשַׁלַּח יְהוָה לָכֶם נְאֻם־יְהוָה וְרֹעֶה יִקָּח עַל־שְׁכֶם

Maynman:
This is what you first posted.
כִּי־זֶרַע יְשַׁלַּח יְהוָה לָכֶם נְאֻם־יְהוָה וְרֹעֶה יִקָּח עַל־שְׁכֶם

Doesn’t correlate.

Maynman:
Screenshot it.

The link i sent was for the Hebrew verses. Who is an almah?

Maynman:
Okay then screenshot it and show me this… “Again, I don't speak Hebrew so I researched. כִּי־הִנֵּה הַנַּעַר הָרָה וְנִקְרָא עֶלְיוֹ שֵׁם עִמָּנוּאֵל כִּי־אֶעֱנֶה יְהוָה עַל־אַדְמַת הַזֹּאֲתָ לֹא־בַחֲמַת־עַם וְלֹא־בַכַּף חָרָב”

Maynman:
Send me the link to this site where you got this “ Again, I don't speak Hebrew so I researched. כִּי־הִנֵּה הַנַּעַר הָרָה וְנִקְרָא עֶלְיוֹ שֵׁם עִמָּנוּאֵל כִּי־אֶעֱנֶה יְהוָה עַל־אַדְמַת הַזֹּאֲתָ לֹא־בַחֲמַת־עַם וְלֹא־בַכַּף חָרָב”

Maynman:
Did your site create hebrew language?

Maynman:
Yes screenshot it and show me this… “Again, I don't speak Hebrew so I researched. כִּי־הִנֵּה הַנַּעַר הָרָה וְנִקְרָא עֶלְיוֹ שֵׁם עִמָּנוּאֵל כִּי־אֶעֱנֶה יְהוָה עַל־אַדְמַת הַזֹּאֲתָ לֹא־בַחֲמַת־עַם וְלֹא־בַכַּף חָרָב”

Maynman:
What’s yulad in hebrew?

Maynman:
No hebrew writings mentioned there.

Maynman:
the operative word here in Hebrew is Yulad, “was born” from the Hebrew grammatical construct of Binyan Pu’al. The English translations that dubiously say “is born” are therefore incorrect. Being that this refers to someone who “was born” and already living during Isaiah’s time, that is 700 years before Jesus! So in no way, can this verse refer to Jesus. But rather, it refers to King Chizkiyahu (Hezekiah), a contemporary of Isaiah’s.

Maynman:
Yulad means “was born.”
It was not the only place the hebrew word was mentioned in the tanakh.

Maynman:
What did you think i was asking before? Bwahahahah

Maynman:
What did you think i was asking before? Bwahahahah

Maynman:
Point it out

Maynman:
Okay.
I’ve been been able to open the site and can’t see any hebrew writings that you posted.

Maynman:
Open the site and screenshot it.

Maynman:
You and i know you are lying. Didn’t know christians can be this desperate.

https://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/yeshayahu714.html

Maynman:
Who told you what you posted was Hebrew we are referring to? Did you check before you copied it bwahahahah

I’m not a brainwashed sheep like you.

Maynman:
You and i know you are lying. Didn’t know christians can be this desperate.

https://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/yeshayahu714.html

Maynman:
So desperate you’ll forged language exactly like how your New Testament was forged.
You have no link to post of your hebrew translation because there’s none.

You think I’m a sheep like you that you can bobo

Maynman:
What particular link should i post?

So you can’t post your expert link?

I believe you are lying, so shame me by posting the link you got your translation from now now.

Maynman:
So christians dey do taqqiya too? Bwahahahah

Maynman:
Kindly post the link where you got your hebrew translation that you posted earlier.

Maynman:
Not a single one said it, they are not dull.

Please post your link

Maynman:
Send me the link to this website

What’s virgin called in hebrew?

Maynman:
First of all, this is a mistranslation. The words in the original Hebrew are, ‘sar shalom.’ The word ‘sar’ does not mean ‘prince,’

Prince’ in Hebrew is ‘nasee’ and not ‘sar.’ The Christian translators intentionally chose the English word ‘prince’ to lead the reader into thinking about Jesus.

Maynman:
I’m saying in the original text a “virgin” was not mentioned, it may have been edited to that in your versions.

This refers to King Chizkiyahu/Hezekiah, as Rashi and Ibn Ezra, the great rabbinic commentaries explain. You’ll note the operative word here in Hebrew is Yulad, “was born” from the Hebrew grammatical construct of Binyan Pu’al. The English translations that dubiously say “is born” are therefore incorrect. Being that this refers to someone who “was born” and already living during Isaiah’s time, that is 700 years before Jesus! So in no way, can this verse refer to Jesus. But rather, it refers to King Chizkiyahu (Hezekiah), a contemporary of Isaiah’s.

Maynman:
Which language was the original written in?


In the Hebrew, the verse explicitly says, in the past tense: “A child was born to us. A son has been given to us. Government (or authority) is on his shoulder. And his name has been called, ‘God-plans-a wonder-God-is-wonderful-Mighty-Eternal-a-Peaceable Ruler” Isaiah 9:6.

Maynman:
I’m saying in the original text a “virgin” was not mentioned, it may have been edited to that in your versions.

This refers to King Chizkiyahu/Hezekiah, as Rashi and Ibn Ezra, the great rabbinic commentaries explain. You’ll note the operative word here in Hebrew is Yulad, “was born” from the Hebrew grammatical construct of Binyan Pu’al. The English translations that dubiously say “is born” are therefore incorrect. Being that this refers to someone who “was born” and already living during Isaiah’s time, that is 700 years before Jesus! So in no way, can this verse refer to Jesus. But rather, it refers to King Chizkiyahu (Hezekiah), a contemporary of Isaiah’s.

Maynman:
I’m saying:
Isaiah 7:14 says the woman “is giving birth.” Present participle (feminine singular). Yoledet. The woman is in the process of giving birth as he speaks (or writes).
in Isaiah 7:14. Here, Isaiah wrote, quite uncontroversially, that “the young woman is with child”, but this Hebrew text was mistranslated into the Greek Septuagint (LXX) as “a virgin will conceive”.

AntiChristian:
Yes, a virgin didn't give birth outside the Bible!

Why would the naming of the child be done by Christians outside the Bible?